Bug#883987: rheolef: FTBFS error: partial specialization ... after instantiation ...

2017-12-12 Thread Graham Inggs
On 12 December 2017 at 21:58, Pierre Saramito  wrote:
>> I think the thing to do here is reassign this bug to src:boost1.62 and
>> mark that it affects src:rheolef.
>
> Do you known how to do that with the Debian bug system ?

You can send mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org to manipulate bugs [1].
In one in email, you can have multiple commands; e.g. 'reassign' and
'affects', and manipulate multiple, even unrelated, bugs.
When merging, the newer bugs always get merged into the oldest bug.
Remember to end your list of commands with 'thanks' or one of the
other recognized commands to stop processing.

[1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Hi Dear,

2017-12-12 Thread Lisa Williams

Hi Dear,


how are you today I hope that everything is OK with you as it is my great 
pleasure to contact you in having communication with you starting from today, i 
was just going through the Internet search when i found your email address, I 
want to make a very new and special friend, so i decided to contact you to see 
how we can make it work if we can. Please i wish you will have the desire with 
me so that we can get to know each other better and see what happens in future.


My name is Lisa Williams, I am an American  presently I live in the UK, I will 
be very happy if you can write me through my private email 
address(lisa.williams...@yahoo.com) for easy communication so that we can know 
each other, I will give you my pictures and details about me.


bye
Lisa
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - Tienes una factura sin pagar!

2017-12-12 Thread Claro





	

	

		

		

			



	

		

			



	

		

			



			





	Tienes una factura sin pagar



Generado el: 12/12/2017



Factura #3389790



Descarga la factura con el enlace





		Attachment(s) :

		

Factura_3389790.zip

		



			



			

		

	



			

			



Todos los derechos reservados, Claro 2017.

	



-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#884256: pysph: please make the build reproducible

2017-12-12 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: pysph
Version: 0~20160514.git91867dc-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kernel
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that pysph could not be built reproducibly.

This is because it generates a Python .egg in a directory that is
named with the current kernel version. On the Debian i386 architecture
this can either be i686 or x86_64 when running the 64-bit kernel.

Patch attached that uses --single-version-externally-managed instead,
preventing the generation of the egg in the first place.

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-
--- a/debian/rules  2017-12-12 21:27:30.217492858 +
--- b/debian/rules  2017-12-12 22:39:47.621834301 +
@@ -13,8 +13,7 @@
 
 override_dh_auto_install:
dh_numpy
-   mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/
-   python setup.py install --prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr
+   python setup.py install --root=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp 
--single-version-externally-managed --install-layout=deb --no-compile
rm -rf 
$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools.pth
rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sit*
 
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#883987: rheolef: FTBFS error: partial specialization ... after instantiation ...

2017-12-12 Thread Pierre Saramito
Hi Graham,

> Would you please quote the bug number?  I failed to find your bug report.

Here is the bug report:

   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884185

Hummm... I just realize now that I have do a mistake and assign this bug
to libcgal-dev instead of libboost-dev package when using Debian "bugreport".


> I think the thing to do here is reassign this bug to src:boost1.62 and
> mark that it affects src:rheolef.

Do you known how to do that with the Debian bug system ?

Many thanks for your help solving this issue,

Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito


- Mail original -
De: "ginggs" 
À: "PIERRE SARAMITO" , "883987" 
<883...@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: "Andreas Beckmann" 
Envoyé: Mardi 12 Décembre 2017 20:26:18
Objet: Re: Bug#883987: rheolef: FTBFS error: partial specialization ... after 
instantiation ...

Hi Pierre

(cc-ing Andreas in case he is not subscribed)

On 12 December 2017 at 15:13, Pierre Saramito  wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> This problem do neither comes from Rheolef-6.7 nor from CGAL-4.11:
> it comes from Boost-1.62 combined with g++ 7.2 in Debian sid and testing.
>
> The bug has already be identified in the upstream version of Boost :
>   https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534
> and it is now fixed in the upstream version Boost-1.65:
>   
> https://github.com/boostorg/container/commit/5e4a107e82ab3281688311d22d2bfc2fddcf84a3
> but this version is not yet available in Debian.
>
> I've just send a bug report to the Boost package, together with a patch for 
> Boost-1.62
> and later, until we will get Boost-1.65 in Debian.
>
> See also in attachment for a small test "pair_tst.cc" and the corresponding 
> Boost patch "pair_tst.patch"
>
> I hope it will be fixed soon.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre
> --
> pierre.saram...@imag.fr
> Directeur de Recherche CNRS
> Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
> http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito

Would you please quote the bug number?  I failed to find your bug report.

I think the thing to do here is reassign this bug to src:boost1.62 and
mark that it affects src:rheolef.

Regards
Graham

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#883987: rheolef: FTBFS error: partial specialization ... after instantiation ...

2017-12-12 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-12-12 20:26, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Would you please quote the bug number?  I failed to find your bug report.
> 
> I think the thing to do here is reassign this bug to src:boost1.62 and
> mark that it affects src:rheolef.

just saw these (against cgal) in my buster RC udd query: #884184 #884185


Andreas

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#883987: rheolef: FTBFS error: partial specialization ... after instantiation ...

2017-12-12 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Pierre

(cc-ing Andreas in case he is not subscribed)

On 12 December 2017 at 15:13, Pierre Saramito  wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> This problem do neither comes from Rheolef-6.7 nor from CGAL-4.11:
> it comes from Boost-1.62 combined with g++ 7.2 in Debian sid and testing.
>
> The bug has already be identified in the upstream version of Boost :
>   https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534
> and it is now fixed in the upstream version Boost-1.65:
>   
> https://github.com/boostorg/container/commit/5e4a107e82ab3281688311d22d2bfc2fddcf84a3
> but this version is not yet available in Debian.
>
> I've just send a bug report to the Boost package, together with a patch for 
> Boost-1.62
> and later, until we will get Boost-1.65 in Debian.
>
> See also in attachment for a small test "pair_tst.cc" and the corresponding 
> Boost patch "pair_tst.patch"
>
> I hope it will be fixed soon.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre
> --
> pierre.saram...@imag.fr
> Directeur de Recherche CNRS
> Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
> http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito

Would you please quote the bug number?  I failed to find your bug report.

I think the thing to do here is reassign this bug to src:boost1.62 and
mark that it affects src:rheolef.

Regards
Graham

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-12-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:libignition-cmake-dev is NEW.
binary:libignition-cmake-dev is NEW.
source:ignition-cmake is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


arpack++_2.3-8_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-12-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:42:46 +0100
Source: arpack++
Binary: libarpack++2-dev libarpack++2c2a
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team 

Changed-By: Anton Gladky 
Description:
 libarpack++2-dev - Object-oriented version of the ARPACK package (development)
 libarpack++2c2a - Object-oriented version of the ARPACK package (runtime)
Changes:
 arpack++ (2.3-8) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * [5cdaf7c] Set Standards-Version: 4.1.1. No changes
   * [07647b0] Remove myself from uploaders
Checksums-Sha1:
 b07d92895af2157680d5d5429e732e9a807bdfcb 2146 arpack++_2.3-8.dsc
 bddafe3efe34887372a3d010f541a18c3bea1d12 15804 arpack++_2.3-8.debian.tar.xz
 64a47f7b5fc07320178e3edab5eadb28d104deec 6125 arpack++_2.3-8_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 54a0cbf945eaa3a6cf1795caa46854838a137798f746915b7366cdf236310241 2146 
arpack++_2.3-8.dsc
 7cc05e381592d64cf167adb486fc8369cd6688bb1bbe8d2e13f587f55e3480aa 15804 
arpack++_2.3-8.debian.tar.xz
 f97b27d2c4f4c3de5137680cac232063175fb82c1046d09841c8911c0f0068ef 6125 
arpack++_2.3-8_source.buildinfo
Files:
 2d9390b5e95501cf1e81df65b7c48d52 2146 devel optional arpack++_2.3-8.dsc
 7a39c8e61fcc38dd46b96250ae3119b8 15804 devel optional 
arpack++_2.3-8.debian.tar.xz
 5f9e92271291b34a19e8bfa4dc47d3bb 6125 devel optional 
arpack++_2.3-8_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=OzQF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Processing of arpack++_2.3-8_source.changes

2017-12-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
arpack++_2.3-8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  arpack++_2.3-8.dsc
  arpack++_2.3-8.debian.tar.xz
  arpack++_2.3-8_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Processing of ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes

2017-12-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1.dsc
  ignition-cmake_0.2.0.orig.tar.bz2
  ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
  ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
  libignition-cmake-dev_0.2.0-1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Re: ngspice: Remove build dependency on elyxer to allow for the elyxer removal from Debian

2017-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gudjon,

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:58:10AM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> I'm terribly sorry for having missed the bug.
> There is a new version in SVN (27) that is not fully prepared but will
> be in the next few days. If somebody is willing to sponsor it I will be
> very happy.
> 
> Andreas: Moving from SVN to git is fine by me, I will try to find out how to 
> do that.

I've done the conversion here:

   https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/ngspice.git

Usually I'm also commiting the upstream branch and pristine tar but I
have no idea how to do this with the multi-source package layout.  So I
took over only the debian/ dir.  (I've choosen the repository name
identically to the source package name in contrast to ng-spice-rework
in SVN which I always considered very confusing.)

I'll leave you the task to merge the recent NMU and your current
packaging.  For finalising the packaging I'd recommend to switch to
short debhelper (dh) in debian/rules.

Let me know if there is something to sponsor.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#883987: rheolef: FTBFS error: partial specialization ... after instantiation ...

2017-12-12 Thread Pierre Saramito
Hi Andreas,

This problem do neither comes from Rheolef-6.7 nor from CGAL-4.11:
it comes from Boost-1.62 combined with g++ 7.2 in Debian sid and testing.

The bug has already be identified in the upstream version of Boost :
  https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534
and it is now fixed in the upstream version Boost-1.65:
  
https://github.com/boostorg/container/commit/5e4a107e82ab3281688311d22d2bfc2fddcf84a3
but this version is not yet available in Debian.

I've just send a bug report to the Boost package, together with a patch for 
Boost-1.62
and later, until we will get Boost-1.65 in Debian.

See also in attachment for a small test "pair_tst.cc" and the corresponding 
Boost patch "pair_tst.patch"

I hope it will be fixed soon.

Best regards,

Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito
// bug description
// https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534
// and its fix in boost-dev 1.65:
// https://github.com/boostorg/container/commit/5e4a107e82ab3281688311d22d2bfc2fddcf84a3
// i.e. remove from line 431 to 460 in include/boost/container/detail/pair.hpp

#undef FIX_BUG
#ifdef  FIX_BUG
#include 
#endif // FIX_BUG

#include 

static const bool is_enum = boost::is_enum >::value;

#include 

boost::container::flat_map m;

int main() {}
*** /usr/include/boost/container/detail/pair.hpp.orig	Tue Dec 12 12:15:26 2017
--- /usr/include/boost/container/detail/pair.hpp	Tue Dec 12 12:41:22 2017
***
*** 416,451 
  }  //namespace container_detail {
  }  //namespace container {
  
- 
- //Without this specialization recursive flat_(multi)map instantiation fails
- //because is_enum needs to instantiate the recursive pair, leading to a compilation error).
- //This breaks the cycle clearly stating that pair is not an enum avoiding any instantiation.
- template
- struct is_enum;
- 
- template
- struct is_enum< ::boost::container::container_detail::pair >
- {
-static const bool value = false;
- };
- 
- template
- struct is_enum< ::std::pair >
- {
-static const bool value = false;
- };
- 
- template 
- struct is_class;
- 
- //This specialization is needed to avoid instantiation of pair in
- //is_class, and allow recursive maps.
- template 
- struct is_class< ::boost::container::container_detail::pair >
- {
-static const bool value = true;
- };
- 
  #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES
  
  template
--- 416,421 
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Business Discussion Request

2017-12-12 Thread Dr Angela Liu
Good day,

Thank you for taking the time.

I am Angela Liu, I got your contact via Linkedin. Would it be convenient
for you to be available for a proposition discussion?

I look forward to hearing from you at your convenience.


-- 

Best Regards,

Ms Angela Liu

Head of Operations

Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd.


Dr Angela Liu, Head of Operations, Standard Chartered Bank, Hong Kong.


Virus-free.
www.avast.com

<#m_-3135209614819068001_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

My dear greetings to you,

2017-12-12 Thread Lilian Noor
My dear greetings to you,
 
I crave your indulgence at this mail coming from somebody you have not known 
before. I decided to do this after praying over the situation. You should 
please consider the transaction on its content and not the fact that you have 
not known me before. I need not dwell on how I came by your contact information 
because there are many such possibilities these days.
 
My name is Mrs. Lilian Noor, from Benin Republic, widow to Late Mr. Hashim Noor 
(former Minister of Tourism and Culture Benin Republic). I have been recently 
been diagnosed of Cancer of the pelvis. I am writing you from my sick bed.
 
There is this USD$17.2M (Seventeen Million Two Hundred Thousand American 
Dollars) my husband has in an account with the Africa Development Bank Benin 
Republic of which I am the next of kin. With my health condition and because my 
husband and I have no children, I am looking for a credible person to whom I 
will pass the right of next of kin. This person will apply to the bank and 
request for the transfer of the fund to his/her bank account. This is on the 
condition that you will take 25% of the fund for yourself, 5% used for 
expenses, while you will use the remaining 70% for the less privilege people in 
the society. This is in fulfillment of the last request of my husband that a 
substantial part of the fund be used to carter for the less privileged.
 
I cannot do this my self any more. I once asked members of my family to close 
one of my late husband’s bank accounts and donate the money which I have there 
to the less privilege people in the society; they refused and kept the money to 
themselves. Hence, I do not trust them anymore, as they seem not to be 
contended with what I have left for them. If this condition is acceptable to 
you, you should contact me immediately with your full names and contact 
information so that I will ask our family lawyer to prepare the authorization 
that will give you the right of next of kin to the account in the bank. I will 
also give you a text of the application you are to send to the bank.
 
I cannot predict what will be my fate by the time the fund will be transferred 
into your account, but you should please ensure that the fund is used as I have 
described above.
 
Reply to this Email Address: lilianno...@inbox.lt

Best regards to you and your family,
 
Remain bless,
Yours sister,
Mrs. Lilian Noor.
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers