Accepted optlang 1.4.0-1 (source) into unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 14:59:06 -0400 Source: optlang Binary: python-optlang python3-optlang Architecture: source Version: 1.4.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Afif Elghraoui <a...@debian.org> Description: python-optlang - sympy based mathematical programming language (Python 2) python3-optlang - sympy based mathematical programming language (Python 3) Changes: optlang (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version Checksums-Sha1: 3d24a23fb90a37951176e2724f83be9e4afd3332 2283 optlang_1.4.0-1.dsc 49eb09b67b67e4e736826cd5a734bf75bcc56e7e 8077266 optlang_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz 1509afd5108a7f7c9b5f0965d27a3a94fe4b949e 2000 optlang_1.4.0-1.debian.tar.xz 6277a03c8cd3f1e052bd6ed97d7e7598ed0b87f7 6327 optlang_1.4.0-1_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: bff519ba0fef22a425096e7cb9ce1be1c828808eee469e71bd45d121eaa6f708 2283 optlang_1.4.0-1.dsc 62e029c6227710aa8f84780feaf4355fe6ce2742aa582b68d747ceb00c52a868 8077266 optlang_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz 4a56fac6c44ff684e9e03773d1cb88856a69d5adb6fba5ec5b7688b1bdd56b45 2000 optlang_1.4.0-1.debian.tar.xz cff1e63c1491d08b647d9b39921cb5b67480f0efbdae7947b447e5105a487712 6327 optlang_1.4.0-1_source.buildinfo Files: 4689cb414ebd08411ef732a671e2bc1e 2283 python optional optlang_1.4.0-1.dsc 7252fd667b89385df5566355d5ff19fa 8077266 python optional optlang_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz daa76579f71ea6739931db955545971e 2000 python optional optlang_1.4.0-1.debian.tar.xz 2cfd94090d78cbb1f9343540e1ab9715 6327 python optional optlang_1.4.0-1_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEE6rcjomb2J+aAVWFfWbIwbzr53cEFAlq2oBAQHGFmaWZAZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBZsjBvOvndwbXmEACYx0d0AXPWqe62n4MCFFJsC50CLpGDrjXR aBVwp1xVO7jnkXeVWXdbqoeXuqGYjbZy2vNZPFuKM7imIF4VSYaSgfonCgJabkvO rfriKxNT/aCy6hU6mD08T5v8UIbgzEVFR/80+1QxL2qALUJd4mJH1d9BlVPyxJ+c y4aCGNxWgigv7ZLkvEqXjKpCqx/iwZFh3trH6ZdNp4zA5ggBXk7NmSf14Dwf2S4y +ovNqrrJwvSTcG2T04kklZIZfKkNgo5aGGk/J8Pplx3GxjDUzm41CiU85D5Q9ZXb 6Nb6P8lq7q/xdRbQcLra1BryzCbF5EURDNko7srsHatUVl0+qHGC3uVhYno/dJ+7 AA7uXpZRKZAn12VtEKgK9vhmClFegOCaR+a84CC5NfGUkY/5L5mrNx8jOdFwEGrR uAPtPDji4vX44UtRW4BP0VHJp+5bZQyBneh6s/LuaSq8SKAjVFTBHChWJg+GZiAZ w+FKB7T36rBvnYG3NOT6Cd32DmzLX/5HX/L+5vCynD3C6+ju527VpVO0FFDpuvJf yXkVSsK86Rw1Vd0gJ2gndUMuAEUSoc1ucf9Oe9AA+1HYVmR+dwv2j4cmTa3aq5qP u7hivNngj8yPX348uhJnUS6HeXDHN1EoMSXEBYbfVt5GcF9O1Tvlb4x3sUc1grt2 ljMPHxX7Tg== =DV/S -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Accepted swiglpk 1.4.4-2 (source) into unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 18:16:58 -0500 Source: swiglpk Binary: python-swiglpk python3-swiglpk Architecture: source Version: 1.4.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Afif Elghraoui <a...@debian.org> Description: python-swiglpk - Plain Python bindings for the GNU Linear Programming Kit (Python python3-swiglpk - Plain Python bindings for the GNU Linear Programming Kit (Python Changes: swiglpk (1.4.4-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Install examples * Add debian/watch Checksums-Sha1: 8fd95bd14d15e9704d9ef15c1fd51586ed245e78 2175 swiglpk_1.4.4-2.dsc da9224914831fd6561f857bd89b16a2b7a487c0f 1880 swiglpk_1.4.4-2.debian.tar.xz 86d884190383afccfe849ef1349092ea360593b7 6022 swiglpk_1.4.4-2_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 57af9692068017d2a7e7a18627038022d5da149bcb339306526df2d2b85ae773 2175 swiglpk_1.4.4-2.dsc 34ced07a7b28719127091793f4289fe5de1932352aa1747210bbb2fc0c40c52e 1880 swiglpk_1.4.4-2.debian.tar.xz f427e935c0d978019382686acd30e5d71b30362273e2278e0fffe65dd7b8ce4f 6022 swiglpk_1.4.4-2_source.buildinfo Files: ecabb5cece6c683c27b0f569ea328c70 2175 python optional swiglpk_1.4.4-2.dsc 5e20bd20b6e991808a3abcb749228b43 1880 python optional swiglpk_1.4.4-2.debian.tar.xz 709f130d8077e92385b9d9e592acf09b 6022 python optional swiglpk_1.4.4-2_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEE6rcjomb2J+aAVWFfWbIwbzr53cEFAlp6N5gQHGFmaWZAZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBZsjBvOvndwbjWD/9edlMBcBcmZXOjzqA+E5KuLmpcZa5faOww 1Va+m7a+7lOgYq6KjIiozsgcf0F5wGY9E4UhGPS8/FoezHYEJvDu8QTnB5XIgKS2 ABwbHVczkunPeaVwoXGWzsrYB35vC0srBRgePI1hRgSyHXtGGCENE7W8S+kOxV87 rxTwSPXMFnCBSlVakFRW9EpLwqD1ztTeVsa1YFnB/V2frgpu058PjLoSzDT25ncu KNT/f0GhK4xObsHchkTiH7r5ncp0IbOlby3Z4wv3VWPwrWTMgCC+XrErVuHvBSOn r13fpMz/AQc0W+XJdbGhEEVgU12AW60XI64I7PY0EPWufU0YwkAn8Z5F/TC9V+Gm 2E+iVekujhd7OiaqCxbr/vH1wMGmJvDDgrkc8CZKow/17yeny2tUvuutwm81AeS2 HbfMbuDOzebp+GA8OPYRWP3gkMU9jOss/nSRA2Dx9kcOlWQAsaNQ+TN+sRAjyNa5 k1Bj9djoGl2Li9NNyR6R+uhbt4DVSRMPmNTlp9ZIhR8r+E9lSikpG754La3+EuVe u9lof8UNeOgpCfu1D1EDj4qKLg7h1i0xbcjTZzwuW7+rsbobDU+udHV7/YEpZJNA SfUvuWXGzNZmKzCk9p1auKS0k/61h6AOTlsITs8TpwiswBD52M3U1mVilAb8xjis OXw4v2JobQ== =wnoh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#823379: Found Maintainer for Elmer
على الثلاثاء 8 آب 2017 16:24، كتب Tobias Frost: >> >> This happened over a year ago, let's go ahead with the removal? > > I thinks yes. There was plenty of time to follow up. > CC'ing Juhani for a last chance. > (IMHO Otherwise the pacakge can still be ITP at a later time) > The last I heard, he had joined the Debian Science alioth group, but I didn't follow-up either. Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#855600: src:nlopt: Please provide binary package for cxx library
Hi, Sergey, على السبت 8 تـمـوز 2017 07:11، كتب Sergey B Kirpichev: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:03:19 -0800 Afif Elghraoui <a...@debian.org> wrote: >> Anyway, I see the packaging is still in SVN. I'll switch it to Git and >> prepare a team upload. > Please ask first other co-maintainers! > > Personally, I'm +1 for packaging in Git. Unfortunally, Christophe > rejected this idea in the past. nlopt is maintained as part of the Debian Science time, and according to the Debian Science policy, the team has already agreed to use Git as its VCS [1]. In any case, I have zero time to continue working on this package in the forseeable future. regards Afif 1. http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html#idm45916847100528 -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Processed: downgrading as those never built on i386
Hi, Lucas, You missed downgrading the severities on the bugs you filed for the arch:all reverse-dependencies of these packages, which are not installable on i386 because their dependencies never built there. regards Afif على الأربعاء 19 نيسـان 2017 06:21، كتب Debian Bug Tracking System: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> severity 860616 wishlist > Bug #860616 [src:pbh5tools] pbh5tools: FTBFS on i386: build-dependency not > installable: python-pbcore > Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' >> severity 860631 wishlist > Bug #860631 [src:pbbarcode] pbbarcode: FTBFS on i386: unsatisfiable > build-dependencies: python-pbcore, pbh5tools [...] > Stopping processing here. > > Please contact me if you need assistance. > -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#855600: src:nlopt: Please provide binary package for cxx library
على الإثنين 20 شباط 2017 08:39، كتب Afif Elghraoui: > the compiled > library only works for C++. We need separate packages for the C++ library. correction: ^^^ C Anyway, I see the packaging is still in SVN. I'll switch it to Git and prepare a team upload. regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#855600: src:nlopt: Please provide binary package for cxx library
Package: src:nlopt Version: 2.4.2+dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Control: block 855597 by -1 Hello, I'm looking to package phyx, but it depends on the C++ version of the nlopt library. While libnlopt-dev provides both the C and the C++ headers, the compiled library only works for C++. We need separate packages for the C++ library. I wouldn't mind making this change for you. Just let me know. I will need it in order to continue packaging phyx (ITP set as a blocked by this). Many thanks and regards Afif -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#826042: Spyder crashes on start
Hi, Jitse, [Cc'ing Picca, who is listed as an uploader of the package and made the last update in Unstable] على الخميس 14 تـمـوز 2016 13:05، كتب Jitse Niesen: > I have recently become a developer with Spyder and I would dearly like > to have Spyder back into Debian. Is there anything I can do to help? > If it's the case as it appears to be that the usual caretakers of this package don't have time for it anymore, you may want to join Debian Science and take over maintaining the package here. I could help you get started with Debian packaging if you're interested. Thanks and regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Elmer version
Hi, Admar, I'm sorry about the delay in your getting a response. Please see inline below. على الجمعـة 24 حزيران 2016 13:25، كتب Admar Schoonen: > Dear Debian maintainers, > > The current version of Elmer in unstable is very old > (6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-4+b2; judging from http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sc > i/physics/elmer/bin/windows/2011/ this is from September or October > 2011). > > The homepage of Elmer (https://www.csc.fi/web/elmer/binaries) contains > a link to a PPA with more recent versions (currently 8.2- > 201606211331~0b361b5~ubuntu16.04.1). I am using that version now but > would love to see it in mainline Debian. > > Is there a specific reason why Debian has such an old version? > The specific reason is probably that nobody has spent time on it. The last commit to the packaging VCS was over two years ago. The last upload to the archive was a couple months before that, in late 2013. There seem to be license issues that haven't been sorted out and the QA team has even filed for removal of the package from the archive altogether [1]. The only way to keep it in Debian would be to find someone (or become someone) who is interested in taking care of the package here. Perhaps you might be able to convince the people involved in the Ubuntu packaging to get involved with it here. As far as I know, most of the benefit to Ubuntu was that the software was newer than in Debian Stable, but we have stable-backports which can sometimes provide newer packages than Ubuntu. Many thanks and regards Afif 1. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823379 -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#814680: RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Marko, On الأحد 6 آذار 2016 14:53, Marko Dimjašević wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 17:42 -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >> Something like the following: >> [...] > Thank you Afif for this! > No problem. > I am not sure what is the cause (maybe incorrect paths in > debian/rules), but when I try to build with gbp like this: > [...] > > Any clue what went wrong? > > I looked at the tests/query-files/lit.cfg config file/script in > question, but I don't see why it would fail. > > The second tarball gets extracted to outputcheck/ (directory name is based on the name of the subcomponent according to the 3.0 format). It looks like your code expects it in a subdirectory of utils, so I would put a symlink there as part of the build process or adjust the script to find it in outputcheck/ rather than utils/. I believe you can also get rid of the code to extract the outputcheck tarball in the first place. The conventions for the package format should take care of preparing the source tree. regards Afif - -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW4PyuAAoJEM6uatOv6Cb7szIP/2YoP/Kf8pd5jHl4H3ZGK0hU tBvV0kDPAhO0u1AoPJa9urzwTCLgJGmiVWCkqP12beeamG+rGdEzRl+ADzL9gY6J +KoqTShxNfi6rCJEAb4a744c2mNo73PBq2SCQNwc4mkeIYQFpNz05+wdEiO0pvwt jvgr/amOWjVRIvSjr5ZY0TBxQoF/mlPQ7NGFLqgDZsWCK0Ly6ZhDMnhwarA4KJId HJWz5dUCMUk5PS2FCyQUM0S6bnxcNImV+saYgRigVqhIQLPOoRagm/bWQ2lN7Jkr /Qc9N1pww8zY+95NfwsJquLHMn6AaPiNMtu7eg0Y93LKUVLmH0Wd4PenBUxXlZmP bd7328dB56cVq5SCkMxC7Qad+OXpzHkJczJ9bhapI8Y/dIj7f1HVADSSGUBhEjTT AQtqFDEQfqcdSOeHxua4NTjIIANSs2FlO/vJ5G3caaDzcsfHCtEaZMWrUU7G5r1m nO0oD9zpVJsvgEzMcwyjywwjMWthFANOn4k6zE34pjxNBhpZg2VApswMn5TRz/Tm kGcHtorrDqvxZSTatx9uTX3I6PLm8UTiJFc9pS7u/SToQyFF9TzSSQLCGNfZ2sur yIXzP+X6E4QT6QVUGEkCi3FXB4tgHA5kwkhdZqa/IetIp+XRND0yHnXUYV3gdCRa 004f04xmF3BVe2N47rRY =dbRs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#814680: RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover
Hi, Anton, على الجمعـة 26 شباط 2016 11:42، كتب Anton Gladky: > Hi Marko, > [...] > Feel free to ask me, if you have some questions regarding those > notes. You have done a great job, please fix those notices and > I will upload the package (Afif, if you want, feel free to do it). > That's alright, you can go ahead. I would just add that the source for the second tarball be documented somewhere or configured to be downloaded in debian/watch with a second uscan line. Something like the following: version=4 opts="dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg\d*$//" \ https://github.com/stp/stp/tags \ (?:.*/)?v?(\d[\d\.]*)\.tar\.gz \ debian opts="dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg\d*$//,component=outputcheck" \ https://github.com/stp/OutputCheck/tags \ (?:.*/)?v?(\d[\d\.]*)\.tar\.gz \ ignore uupdate regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#814680: RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover
على الأربعاء 24 شباط 2016 23:34، كتب Marko Dimjašević: > > Thank you for taking a look at the package! > No problem. > >> I took a look at it and found some issues. The first is the requirement >> of the additional file stp_2.1.2+dfsg.orig-outputcheck.tar.gz. You >> should not be directly using anything outside the packaging directory. > > The archive corresponds to OutputCheck, a build dependency that runs > STP's regression tests. OutputCheck doesn't have a Debian package, and > based on my discussion with upstream developers and a Debian developer > that sponsored the first upload of STP to New, this was the proposed > approach. OutputCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, used only by > STP, and the upstream developers have a plan of re-basing STP tests on a > different testing framework soon. Furthermore, OutputCheck is not > actively developed any more. > > I also found examples of other Debian packages being done in the same > way - having a small build dependency shipped as an archive. I don't > have a reference supporting that, but my memory tells me I saw an > example with a Debian Perl package. > Ah, yes, ok. Thanks for clarifying that. This is a multiple upstream tarball package [1]. The last time I checked this, it wasn't well-supported with git-buildpackage [2], which would explain why I don't have the necessary supplemental tarball (and why the build consequently fails for me). I don't have experience with multiple upstream tarballs myself, so I'll have to look up some things. I'd like to keep with the team policy of maintaining the package under VCS, so I want to see if there's a way to make this work. Is https://github.com/stp/OutputCheck the original source? I think the source address should be documented somewhere in the package as well-- either in d/copyright or as an additional line in debian/watch, or both. I'll look into this when I get a chance. > >> There's at least one other issue--in debian/control, the Vcs URLs should >> be pointing to the packaging repository rather than upstream. > > Ok, I didn't know this about the Vcs URL! Recently I added a Git repo > for STP on Alioth. Should I put the repo's URL to d/control? > > Yes, please see http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html#idp40308224 >> I didn't check further because the package currently doesn't build. > > Can you clarify this? It builds in pbuilder with defaults settings. > Yes, it's because I'm missing the supplemental tarball by having pulled from the git repository. > >> Most such problems can be found by running lintian, but we first need >> the package to build in a minimal environment. > > I haven't seen the Vcs problem in a report by Lintian. Usually I use the > "-i -I" options. Can you be specific, i.e. which other options should I > use that reveal issues you are talking about? > I use: $ cat ~/.lintianrc color=always display-experimental=no display-info=yes pedantic=no But it's possible that lintian could miss something like this-- sometimes Debian contributors really do have their packaging VCS hosted on github. regards Afif 1. https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.source-package-structure.html (see the box "Different source package formats") 2. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561071 -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Bug#814680: RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover
Hi, Marko, على الأحد 21 شباط 2016 18:27، كتب Marko Dimjašević: > > Let me know if I can do something to get you interested in sponsoring > this package for the Simple theorem prover. I am desperately looking for > a sponsor. The package has been in the New queue before. Its details are > given below. The package is also available on Alioth: > > git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/stp.git > > Thanks for working on this package. I took a look at it and found some issues. The first is the requirement of the additional file stp_2.1.2+dfsg.orig-outputcheck.tar.gz. You should not be directly using anything outside the packaging directory. There's at least one other issue--in debian/control, the Vcs URLs should be pointing to the packaging repository rather than upstream. I didn't check further because the package currently doesn't build. Most such problems can be found by running lintian, but we first need the package to build in a minimal environment. regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
RFP: python-cylp (initial packaging available)
Hi, all, I've done most of my work in Debian Med, not so much in Debian Science. This package (CyLP) is a Python interface to COIN-OR. I packaged python-cobra (aka cobrapy), which can use this as a solver interface and Debian packaging for CyLP was requested by the cobrapy developer. I'm not actually very concerned with it, so I filed an RFP on his behalf [1]. The RFP apparently didn't go anywhere where anyone would see it, so I thought I would get the packaging started myself. Again, I am not really interested in maintaining it myself, so I'm hoping to renew the RFP and provide the groundwork for the package if anyone here can take over it. The initial packaging is now in Debian Science git: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/python-cylp Some notes for anyone interested in taking up this package: * Some of the source files (see d/copyright for the exact file names) are copyright IBM with a header that only says "All Rights Reserved", so that will require some clarification from upstream. * The package currently does not build: upstream provides pre-cythonized files. Using these, the C/CXX codes compile, but one of the tests failed with a segmentation fault error. I overrode the d/rules clean target to get rid of the cythonized files so that they are freshly generated with each build, but there is then one file that fails to cythonize. * I have a branch set up where Python3 packaging can be attempted (named topic/python3-packaging), but obviously, Python2 packaging needs to be working first. Many thanks and regards Afif 1. http://bugs.debian.org/795619 -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
