Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-14 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
I see your point, so what do I 
do? Should I file a bug report 
against binutils?
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-10 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: trilinos-all-dev
Version: 12.6.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

The latest update of binutils to version 2.26.1-1 makes it imopssible to
compile against trilinos. The linker complains

/usr/bin/ld: warning: libbfd-2.26-system.so, needed by

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so,
not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so:
undefined reference to "bfd_openr"

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so:
riferimento non definito a "bfd_map_over_sections"

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so:
riferimento non definito a "bfd_close"  
  

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so:
riferimento non definito a "bfd_check_format"   
  

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so:
riferimento non definito a "bfd_check_format_matches"   
  

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so:
riferimento non definito a "bfd_init"   
  
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

The new target library is

$apt-file search libbfd-2.26
binutils: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.26.1-system.so

A similar problem was solved for PETSc package recently, see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828987




-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages trilinos-all-dev depends on:
ii  libtrilinos-amesos-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-amesos2-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-anasazi-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-aztecoo-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-belos-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-epetra-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-epetraext-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-galeri-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-globipack-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-ifpack-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-ifpack2-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-intrepid-dev   12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-isorropia-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-kokkos-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-komplex-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-ml-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-moertel-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-muelu-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-nox-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-optipack-dev   12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-pamgen-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-phalanx-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-pike-dev   12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-piro-dev   12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-pliris-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-rol-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-rtop-dev   12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-rythmos-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-sacado-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-shards-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-shylu-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-stokhos-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-stratimikos-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-teko-dev   12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-teuchos-dev12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-thyra-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-tpetra-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-trilinoscouplings-dev  12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-triutils-dev   12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-xpetra-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-zoltan-dev 12.6.3-1
ii  libtrilinos-zoltan2-dev12.6.3-1

trilinos-all-dev recommends no packages.

Versions of packages trilinos-all-dev suggests:
pn  trilinos-doc  

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#828987: libpetsc3.6-dev: Updating openmpi breaks usage of PETSc

2016-06-29 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: libpetsc3.6-dev
Version: 3.6.4.dfsg1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

Every time package openmpi is updated PETSc is rendered unusable by an
internal preprocessor directive, resulting in the error

/usr/lib/petscdir/3.6.4/x86_64-linux-gnu-real/include/petscsys.h:133:6:
error: #error "PETSc was configured with one OpenMPI mpi.h version but
now appears to be compiling using a different OpenMPI mpi.h version"
 #error "PETSc was configured with one OpenMPI mpi.h version but now
 #appears to be compiling using a different OpenMPI mpi.h version"

PETSc needs to be re-configured and re-built with the new openmpi
version.

Thanks for your help.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libpetsc3.6-dev depends on:
ii  libpetsc3.6.4-dev  3.6.4.dfsg1-2

libpetsc3.6-dev recommends no packages.

libpetsc3.6-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#787796: fenics fresh installation is broken

2015-06-05 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: fenics
Version: 1:1.5.0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

a fresh install of fenics yields a broken environment.

In fact, the command from dolfin import * in an ipython terminal
returns the backtrace you can find in the attachment.

The problem might be due to a version mismatch in one of the
dependencies [I remember there was little mess during the migration from
1.4.0 to 1.5.0].

Best regards,

Massimiliano Leoni


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), 
(500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages fenics depends on:
ii  dolfin-bin  1.5.0-2
ii  dolfin-doc  1.5.0-2
ii  libdolfin-dev   1.5.0-2
ii  python-dolfin   1.5.0-2
ii  python-ffc  1.5.0-3
ii  python-fiat 1.5.0-1
ii  python-instant  1.5.0-1
ii  python-ufl  1.5.0-1
ii  python-ufl-doc  1.5.0-1

Versions of packages fenics recommends:
ii  python-scitools  0.9.0-2

fenics suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
In [1]: from dolfin import *
---
ValueErrorTraceback (most recent call last)
ipython-input-1-f9fe29351801 in module()
 1 from dolfin import *

/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dolfin/__init__.pyc in module()
 14 
 15 # Import names from the compiled cpp modules
--- 16 from . import cpp
 17 from dolfin.cpp import *
 18 from dolfin.cpp import __version__, __swigversion__, __pythonversion__

/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dolfin/cpp/__init__.py in module()
 40 
 41 # Import the module
--- 42 exec(from . import %s % module_name)
 43 module = globals()[module_name]
 44 

string in module()

/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dolfin/cpp/common.py in module()
108 __swigversion__ = %d.%d.%d%(tuple(map(int, [tmp[-5], tmp[-3], 
tmp[-2:]])))
109 tmp = hex(dolfin_pythonversion())
-- 110 __pythonversion__ = %d.%d.%d%(tuple(map(int, [tmp[2], tmp[4], 
tmp[6]])))
111 del tmp, dolfin_pythonversion, dolfin_swigversion
112 

ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'a'
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2015-05-04 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Hi Ralf,

Thanks for your answer, but you are necroposting this bug.
The issue was solved long ago, it was related to a transition from 1.3 to 1.4.

The situation you described is an issue in testing at the moment, as some of 
fenics packages are version 1.5 and others 1.4, breaking the whole fenics 
package collection, but has nothing to do with this bug.

Massimiliano


In data lunedì 4 maggio 2015 22:03:42, Ralf Treinen ha scritto:
 Hello,
 
 this seems to be due to the fact that fenics depends on libdolfin-dev
 (= 1.5.0), which currently only exists in experimental. The long-term
 solution would then be to upload libdolfin-dev 1.5.0-x to sid. A quick
 fix for a user should be to install libdolfin-dev 1.5.0-1 from experimental.
 
 -Ralf.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2014-11-04 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Ok, somehow the problem seems to be solved.
I had to reinstall debian for external reasons, but then apt-get complained 
about some missing dependency and didn't let me install fenics.

For other's reference, I solved installing fenics with aptitude, which all of 
a sudden seems to be smarter than apt-get in managing dependencies.

Massimiliano


In data martedì 28 ottobre 2014 09:13:24, Johannes Ring ha scritto:
 Hi Massimiliano,
 
 Do you still have this problem? If so, can you please give us some
 more information? For instance, what do you get when you run the
 following command?
 
 # apt-get -s dist-upgrade
 
 Johannes
 
 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Massimiliano Leoni
 
 leoni.massimilia...@gmail.com wrote:
  Package: fenics
  Version: 1:1.4.0.1
  Severity: normal
  
  Dear Maintainer,
  
since about last week apt-get dist-upgrade proposes me a huge update
  
  involving 200+ packages, whose side effect is to have fenics - and all
  packages coming with it - removed from the system.
  
  I would guess it's a dependency issue, but of course I'm not sure.
  
  How can I recover this?
  
  Thanks for help,
  Massimiliano
  
  
  -- System Information:
  Debian Release: jessie/sid
  
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
  
  Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
  Foreign Architectures: i386
  
  Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
  Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
  Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
  
  Versions of packages fenics depends on:
  ii  dolfin-bin  1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  dolfin-doc  1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  libdolfin-dev   1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  python-dolfin   1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  python-ffc  1.4.0-1
  ii  python-fiat 1.4.0-1
  ii  python-instant  1.4.0-1
  ii  python-ufl  1.4.0-1
  ii  python-ufl-doc  1.4.0-1
  
  Versions of packages fenics recommends:
  ii  python-scitools  0.9.0-1
  
  fenics suggests no packages.
  
  -- no debconf information
  
  --
  debian-science-maintainers mailing list
  debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-mai
  ntainers

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2014-10-28 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Hi Johannes,
  yes, I still have the problem.

The output of apt-get -s dist-upgrade is long, so I attach it.
I also provided basic translation in english [my locale is in italian].

Thanks,
Massimiliano


In data martedì 28 ottobre 2014 09:13:24, Johannes Ring ha scritto:
 Hi Massimiliano,
 
 Do you still have this problem? If so, can you please give us some
 more information? For instance, what do you get when you run the
 following command?
 
 # apt-get -s dist-upgrade
 
 Johannes
 
 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Massimiliano Leoni
 
 leoni.massimilia...@gmail.com wrote:
  Package: fenics
  Version: 1:1.4.0.1
  Severity: normal
  
  Dear Maintainer,
  
since about last week apt-get dist-upgrade proposes me a huge update
  
  involving 200+ packages, whose side effect is to have fenics - and all
  packages coming with it - removed from the system.
  
  I would guess it's a dependency issue, but of course I'm not sure.
  
  How can I recover this?
  
  Thanks for help,
  Massimiliano
  
  
  -- System Information:
  Debian Release: jessie/sid
  
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
  
  Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
  Foreign Architectures: i386
  
  Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
  Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
  Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
  
  Versions of packages fenics depends on:
  ii  dolfin-bin  1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  dolfin-doc  1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  libdolfin-dev   1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  python-dolfin   1.4.0+dfsg-4
  ii  python-ffc  1.4.0-1
  ii  python-fiat 1.4.0-1
  ii  python-instant  1.4.0-1
  ii  python-ufl  1.4.0-1
  ii  python-ufl-doc  1.4.0-1
  
  Versions of packages fenics recommends:
  ii  python-scitools  0.9.0-1
  
  fenics suggests no packages.
  
  -- no debconf information
  
  --
  debian-science-maintainers mailing list
  debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-mai
  ntainers
Lettura elenco dei pacchetti... # reading package list
Generazione albero delle dipendenze...  # generating dependency tree
Lettura informazioni sullo stato... # reading status info
I seguenti pacchetti sono stati installati automaticamente e non sono più 
richiesti:
# The following packages were automatically installed and are not needed anymore
  gir1.2-gtk-2.0 libarpack2-dev libatk1.0-dev libavcodec-dev libavformat-dev
  libavresample-dev libavutil-dev libblacs-mpi-dev libblacs-openmpi1
  libbtf1.2.0 libcairo-script-interpreter2 libcairo2-dev libcf0 libcgal-dev
  libcgal10 libcsparse3.1.2 libdc1394-22-dev libdolfin1.4 libfontconfig1-dev
  libfreetype6-dev libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev libgl2ps-dev libglib2.0-dev libgmp-dev
  libgmpxx4ldbl libgtk2.0-dev libharfbuzz-dev libharfbuzz-gobject0
  libhdf5-openmpi-8 libhypre-2.8.0b libhypre-dev libilmbase-dev libjasper-dev
  libjbig-dev libjpeg62:i386 libjpeg8:i386 libjpeg8-dev libklu1.2.1
  libldl2.1.0 libllvm3.4 libllvm3.4:i386 liblzma-dev libmpfr-dev
  libmumps-4.10.0 libmumps-dev libnetcdf-dev libnetcdff5 libopencv-calib3d-dev
  libopencv-calib3d2.4 libopencv-contrib2.4 libopencv-features2d-dev
  libopencv-features2d2.4 libopencv-flann-dev libopencv-flann2.4
  libopencv-gpu-dev libopencv-gpu2.4 libopencv-imgproc-dev libopencv-legacy2.4
  libopencv-ml-dev libopencv-ml2.4 libopencv-objdetect2.4 libopencv-ocl2.4
  libopencv-photo-dev libopencv-photo2.4 libopencv-stitching-dev
  libopencv-stitching2.4 libopencv-superres2.4 libopencv-ts-dev
  libopencv-ts2.4 libopencv-video-dev libopencv-video2.4
  libopencv-videostab2.4 libopencv2.4-java libopencv2.4-jni libopenexr-dev
  libpango1.0-dev libparpack2 libpcre3-dev libpcrecpp0 libpetsc3.4.2
  libpixman-1-dev libpng12-dev libptscotch-5.1 libptscotch-dev libraw1394-dev
  libraw1394-tools libscalapack-mpi-dev libscalapack-openmpi1 libscotch-5.1
  libscotch-dev libslepc3.4.2 libspooles-dev libspooles2.2 libspqr1.3.1
  libsuitesparse-dev libsuperlu-dev libsuperlu4 libswscale-dev
  libsystemd-journal0 libsystemd-login0 libtiffxx5 libvtk5.8 libvtk5.8-qt4
  libwxbase2.8-0 libwxgtk2.8-0 libxcb-shm0-dev libxcomposite-dev
  libxcursor-dev libxft-dev libxi-dev libxinerama-dev libxrandr-dev
  libxrender-dev libxss-dev opencv-data python-ffc python-fiat python-instant
  python-ply python-pmw python-pyx python-scitools python-ufl python-ufl-doc
  swig swig2.0 tcl8.5-dev tk8.5-dev x11proto-composite-dev x11proto-randr-dev
  x11proto-render-dev x11proto-scrnsaver-dev x11proto-xinerama-dev
Usare apt-get autoremove per rimuoverli.  # use apt-get autoremove to remove 
them
I seguenti pacchetti saranno RIMOSSI:   # the following packages will be 
REMOVED
  dolfin-bin dolfin-doc fenics libcv-dev libcvaux-dev libdolfin-dev
  libhdf5-mpi-dev libhdf5-openmpi-dev libhighgui-dev libopencv-contrib-dev
  libopencv-dev libopencv-highgui-dev libopencv-legacy-dev
  libopencv-objdetect-dev libopencv-ocl-dev libopencv

Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2014-10-24 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: fenics
Version: 1:1.4.0.1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
  since about last week apt-get dist-upgrade proposes me a huge update
involving 200+ packages, whose side effect is to have fenics - and all
packages coming with it - removed from the system.

I would guess it's a dependency issue, but of course I'm not sure.

How can I recover this?

Thanks for help,
Massimiliano


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages fenics depends on:
ii  dolfin-bin  1.4.0+dfsg-4
ii  dolfin-doc  1.4.0+dfsg-4
ii  libdolfin-dev   1.4.0+dfsg-4
ii  python-dolfin   1.4.0+dfsg-4
ii  python-ffc  1.4.0-1
ii  python-fiat 1.4.0-1
ii  python-instant  1.4.0-1
ii  python-ufl  1.4.0-1
ii  python-ufl-doc  1.4.0-1

Versions of packages fenics recommends:
ii  python-scitools  0.9.0-1

fenics suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


[Paraview on Jessie] Rescale over time feature broken, patch released

2014-10-22 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Hi everyone,
  I am on Jessie and I installed package Paraview from the official repos, but 
I 
found out that a very useful feature, rescale data range over all timesteps 
is broken in this version.
However, a patch was created and is discussed on the official kitware forum, 
where it is claimed to solve the problem.

http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/14052/

Could you please apply it and update the debian package?
This is a very fundamental feature and I wouldn't like to manually install or 
compile another version to have it working.

Thanks in advance,
Massimiliano Leoni

P.s. Sorry if you received a blank email a moment ago, my bad.

P.p.s Sorry if this isn't the appropriate way to report a bug; in this case, 
can you point me to the right place?

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#766406: paraview: Rescale to all timesteps feature broken, but patch released

2014-10-22 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: paraview
Version: 4.1.0+dfsg-3+b2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,
I am using package paraview on debian testing, but the (very
handful) feaure rescale data over all timesteps is known to be
broken.
However, a patch was released on the official kitware forum, at
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/14052/
Could you please apply the patch and update the debian package?

You can confirm the bug by comparing the paraview package in the
debian
repos with the paraview binaries downloadable form paraview's
website.

Thanks
Massimiliano Leoni


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages paraview depends on:
ii  libavcodec-extra-56   6:11-1
ii  libavformat56 6:11-1
ii  libavutil54   6:11-1
ii  libc6 2.19-11
ii  libexpat1 2.1.0-6
ii  libfreetype6  2.5.2-2
ii  libgcc1   1:4.9.1-16
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  10.2.8-1
ii  libhdf5-8 1.8.13+docs-14
ii  libjpeg8  8d1-1
ii  libjsoncpp0   0.6.0~rc2-3
ii  libogg0   1.3.2-1
ii  libopenmpi1.6 1.6.5-8+b1
ii  libpng12-01.2.50-2
ii  libpython2.7  2.7.8-10
ii  libqt4-help   4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2
ii  libqt4-network4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2
ii  libqtcore44:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2
ii  libqtwebkit4  2.3.4.dfsg-2
ii  libstdc++64.9.1-16
ii  libswscale3   6:11-1
ii  libtheora01.1.1+dfsg.1-3.2
ii  libtiff5  4.0.3-10+b1
ii  libx11-6  2:1.6.2-3
ii  libxml2   2.9.1+dfsg1-4
ii  libxt61:1.1.4-1
ii  tcl8.58.5.16-1
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-2

Versions of packages paraview recommends:
ii  mpi-default-bin  1.0.2+nmu2
ii  paraview-doc 4.1.0+dfsg-3
ii  paraview-python  4.1.0+dfsg-3+b2

Versions of packages paraview suggests:
pn  h5utils none
pn  hdf5-tools  none

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers