Bug#893408: gazebo: Please use clang-format insteal of clang-format-4.0

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Source: gazebo
Severity: normal

Hello,

In order to limit the number of versions in llvm, it would be great
if you could move use clang-format instead of clang-format-4.0.

Thanks,
Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#892254: scilab: Cannot find jlatexmath libs

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Package: scilab
Version: 6.0.1-1
Severity: normal

Hello,

I had an old version of jlatexmath on my system (1.0.3). 

On scilab startup, the issue was:
Attention : Impossible de trouver le package Java 
'/usr/share/java/jlatexmath-fop-1.0.6.jar'.
Attention : Impossible de trouver le package Java 
'/usr/share/java/jlatexmath-1.0.6.jar'.
Des problèmes sont survenus pendant le chargement des bibliothèques Java.
Pouvant induire des erreurs de Scilab.
Veuillez vérifier le fichier SCI/etc/classpath.xml.

using latex in a graph makes Scilab crashes.

We need to force the same version of jlatexmath as built to make sure it works.

S

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages scilab depends on:
ii  scilab-cli   6.0.1-1
ii  scilab-full-bin  6.0.1-1

Versions of packages scilab recommends:
ii  scilab-doc  5.5.2-5

Versions of packages scilab suggests:
ii  scilab-doc-fr 5.5.2-5
ii  scilab-doc-ja 5.5.2-5
ii  scilab-doc-pt-br  5.5.2-5

-- no debconf information
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#891332: scilab: New upstream release

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Package: scilab
Version: 6.0.0-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

A new version of Scilab has been published:
https://www.scilab.org/fr/development/sources/stable
Contains a bunch of fixes.

Changelog:
https://help.scilab.org/docs/6.0.1/en_US/CHANGES.html

S


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages scilab depends on:
ii  scilab-cli   6.0.0-1
ii  scilab-full-bin  6.0.0-1

Versions of packages scilab recommends:
ii  scilab-doc  5.5.2-6

Versions of packages scilab suggests:
pn  scilab-doc-fr 
pn  scilab-doc-ja 
pn  scilab-doc-pt-br  

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#884033: scilab-celestlab

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Context:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884033

+ some upstream folks

Le 19/12/2017 à 19:06, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> again, a number of heterogeneous strings, then I get a prompt after
> warnings, and quitting (several times) leads to a success.
>
> I haven't reproduced the segfault in this bug report, but I have found
> problems which indicate that the three listed packages do not support
> the most recent scilab version.
>
> What can we do to push things forward?
>
> Snark on #debian-science
>

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#886837: scilab: impossible to plot anything

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 10/01/2018 14:13, cedric.flag...@ijs.si wrote:
> Debian is running inside a Virtual Machine (VirtualBox Version 5.2.2 r119230 
> (Qt5.6.2)) with no 2D / 3D graphic acceleration.
> 

This is probably the reason. jogl (the opengl lib that Scilab uses) needs good 
opengl driver support.

S

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#883820: scilab-cli: broken symlink: /usr/share/man/man1/scilab-cli.1.gz -> scilab.1.gz

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le 07/12/2017 à 22:29, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
> Package: scilab-cli
> Version: 6.0.0-1
> Severity: normal
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
> a broken symlink.
>
> From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
>
> 0m39.7s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
>   /usr/share/man/man1/scilab-cli.1.gz -> scilab.1.gz
>
> Is scilab-cli missing a Depends/Recommends/Suggests: scilab ?
>
Or scilab.1.gz could be in scilab-cli instead (as scilab depends on it)

Cheers

S

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#876733: jeuclid: Unclear licensing

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le 25/09/2017 à 13:23, Julian Andres Klode a écrit :
> Source: jeuclid
> Severity: serious
>
> The package mostly and debian/copyright state it is licensed under the Apache 
> 2.0
> license, but NOTICE contains different license terms, presumably Apache 1.0. 
> It's
> unclear how they interact.
>
> The Apache 2 also states that " The contents of the NOTICE file are for 
> informational
> purposes only and do not modify the License." - but the NOTICE file containing
> different license terms contradicts with that, so I'm not sure if that is even
> valid.

Do you have any recommendations on what we should do?

The last update from upstream is 2012 ... :/

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#873590: Update to Scilab 6

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le 29/08/2017 à 12:37, Amr Ibrahim a écrit :
> Package: scilab
> 
> Please update to Scilab 6.
> http://www.scilab.org/en/community/news/scilab6
> 
I would rather wait until 6.0.1, which should come ... At some point...
However, the work on Scilab 6 could be started in experimental.

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#873405: caffe-contrib: Please update to llvm-toolchain 4.0 or, better, 5.0

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Source: caffe-contrib
Severity: normal

Hello,

Currently, we have 6 versions of the llvm toolchain in the archive.
I would like to move to 3 versions (4.0, 5.0 and snapshot, aka 6.0)

Could you please update your package to use 4.0 (or, better, 5.0 which will be 
released very 
soon)?

I will update the severity of this bug at the end of September

Thanks
Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#865522: scilab: Segmentation fault at lauch

[Sylvestre Ledru]

I forwarded the bug to upstream. I think they will work on this very soon.

S


Le 23/06/2017 à 20:58, Marcio Bezerra a écrit :
> Looks like this bug was introduced in the latest kernel libraries
> update. Scilab was working just fine less than 24 hours ago.
> Scilab-cli is working but is very limited. Does anyone know of a
> workaround for this kind of problem? How long does it usually take for
> them to release a patch?
>
> I have downloaded Octave but it's not the same.
>
> Much appreciated.
>
> Marcio 
>
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:24 PM, trb  > wrote:
>
> I have the same bug on Debian 9 with KDE Plasma.
> I had the same problem on Arch, maybe this is related to the
> kernel ? (
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/1699892
>  )
>
> Best regards,
> Piotr
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Márcio B. D. Bezerra

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#852166: Contains a large number of auto-generated stub manpages

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Good investigation :) 
Indeed, there are some room for improvements here

Le 22 janvier 2017 09:56:23 GMT+01:00, Michael Stapelberg 
 a écrit :
>Package: liblapack-doc-man
>Version: 3.7.0-1
>Severity: normal
>
>liblapack-doc-man installs 10770 files into /usr/share/man/man3, all of
>which 
>seem to be generated by Doxygen if I understand correctly.
>
>Of these 10770 files, 5902 are symlinks and 4868 are regular files.
>Of the 4868 regular files:
>• 2057 files consist of 19 lines (documenting a function)
>• 2550 files consist of 25 lines (documenting a file)
>
>Notably, these files do not contain anything but the function
>prototype.
>
>261 files with actual content worth looking at remain.
>
>The large number of files without substantial content is unfortunate
>for a few 
>different reasons:
>
>• On manpages.debian.org, liblapack-doc-man consumes 1GB of disk space
>per 
>Debian version. The next biggest consumer is linux-manual-4.8 with 51
>MB.
>
>• liblapack-doc-man consumes about 1 inodes on user’s root file
>systems for 
>no good reason. Even when plenty of inodes are available, remember that
>many 
>backup programs do not scale well when presented with a large number of
>tiny 
>  files.
>  
>• I haven’t verified it, but I assume that the man database and similar
>tools 
>will degrade in performance when presented with such a large corpus of 
>  manpages.
>  
>Could you change the package so that it only contains the 261 files
>with actual
>content please? Thank you!
>
>
>-- System Information:
>Debian Release: 9.0
>  APT prefers testing
>APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
>'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable')
>Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>Foreign Architectures: i386, armel, mipsel
>
>Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
>Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
>Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#835005: Updating the arpack Uploaders list

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le 21/08/2016 à 14:59, Tobias Frost a écrit :


Christophe Prud'homme  has not been working on
the arpack package for quite some time.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.


Thanks, this is now fixed in the svn. Obviously, I don't do an upload for it :)

S

--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Upgrading OpenMPI libraries

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Hello,

Le 28/07/2016 à 08:13, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to draw your attention to an on-going discussion wrt. OpenMPI
> and upgrades:
>
> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/1906
>
> Basically, I'd like to know: did we ever successfully support upgrades
> of openmpi in Debian?
As the programs using openmpi had to be rebuilt, I don't think we ever
really worked on that :/

Sylvestre



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#811682: FTBFS with GCC 6: could not convert a from x to y

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le 26/06/2016 à 14:27, Gert Wollny a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 patch 
>
> Hello, 
>
> the attached patch fixes the reported compile error and also fixes the
> "narrowing conversion" errors that came up with g++-6.
>
> The package now builds with g++-6 (but it is not lintian-clean). 
>
> Best, 
> Gert 
Hello,

Are you sure?
It fails to build from source in unstable.

View.cc: In member function 'SmartPtr View::getCharAt(const
scaled&, const scaled&, CharIndex&, Point*, BoundingBox*) const':
View.cc:294:10: error: 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope
   return nullptr;

Thanks

S

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#749833: scilab: Scilab include non-free codes

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le 29/02/2016 à 09:54, Maximiliano Curia a écrit :
> Control: block 816260 by 749833
>
> Hi,
>
> As a request from the release team I have removed the dependency of scilab 
> from cantor, I'm adding this block to the corresponding bug in cantor as way 
> to remember to reenable the backend once the problem is fixed.
>
> Also, since there is a patch available upstream that's being stale for review 
> for sometime now, wouldn't it be feasible to upload a patched scilab to 
> experimental as a way to gather some testers/reviewers?
>
> Happy hacking,

Clément, François, could you help here?
Thanks

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#812311: Added information Bug#812311: scilab: Scilab Crash with Basic functions (det and inv matrix)

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le 22/01/2016 09:53, DAGOIS Mathieu a écrit :
> Dear maintainer,
> I tried to start scilab with debugging mode. I look at schlub web site
> :"https://wiki.scilab.org/Debugging%20and%20Profiling%20Scilab%205;
> I used the procedure with gdb. I put the shell return.
thanks but these information are useless.
We need an actual backtrace.

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#812311: scilab: Scilab Crash with Basic functions (det and inv matrix)

[Sylvestre Ledru]

severity 812311 normal
thanks

Le 22/01/2016 09:19, Mathieu DAGOIS a écrit :
> Package: scilab
> Version: 5.5.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: renders package unusable
I don't think it is making Scilab unusable.
Scilab contains thousand of functions. Here, it is crashing on your system with 
some functions
and data.
I cannot reproduce the bug. Could you check if the bug still occurs if you 
change the blas implementation used?


By the way, please don't dump a script in the content of the email, the syntax 
was broken.
As attachment, the correct file.

Sylvestre



foo.sci
Description: application/scilab-sci
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#800632: scilab: diff for NMU version 5.5.2-1.1

[Sylvestre Ledru]

No, go ahead, no need to wait :)

Calixte, Clément, you should probably bump the dep and apply this patch.

Thanks,
S


Le 03/10/2015 12:45, Gilles Filippini a écrit :
> Control: tags 800632 + patch
> Control: tags 800632 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for scilab (versioned as 5.5.2-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
>
> Regards,
>
> _g.
>
> diff -Nru scilab-5.5.2/debian/changelog scilab-5.5.2/debian/changelog
> --- scilab-5.5.2/debian/changelog 2015-04-27 18:30:06.0 +0200
> +++ scilab-5.5.2/debian/changelog 2015-10-03 10:06:56.0 +0200
> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
> +scilab (5.5.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +  * Three new patches to cope with java libs API changes:
> +- xmlgraphics-commons-2.0.diff
> +- fop-2.0.diff
> +- batik-1.8.diff
> +(closes: #800632).
> +
> + -- Gilles Filippini   Sat, 03 Oct 2015 10:06:53 +0200
> +
>  scilab (5.5.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  
>* New upstream release
> diff -Nru scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/batik-1.8.diff 
> scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/batik-1.8.diff
> --- scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/batik-1.8.diff1970-01-01 
> 01:00:00.0 +0100
> +++ scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/batik-1.8.diff2015-10-03 
> 09:45:21.0 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +Description: adapt to batik 1.8 API
> + New path for class SAXSVGDocumentFactory.
> +Author: Gilles Filippini 
> +Index: 
> scilab-5.5.2/modules/graph/src/java/org/scilab/modules/graph/utils/ScilabGraphUtils.java
> +===
> +--- 
> scilab-5.5.2.orig/modules/graph/src/java/org/scilab/modules/graph/utils/ScilabGraphUtils.java
>  
> scilab-5.5.2/modules/graph/src/java/org/scilab/modules/graph/utils/ScilabGraphUtils.java
> +@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ import org.apache.batik.bridge.DocumentL
> + import org.apache.batik.bridge.GVTBuilder;
> + import org.apache.batik.bridge.UserAgent;
> + import org.apache.batik.bridge.UserAgentAdapter;
> +-import org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SAXSVGDocumentFactory;
> ++import org.apache.batik.anim.dom.SAXSVGDocumentFactory;
> + import org.apache.batik.gvt.GraphicsNode;
> + import org.apache.batik.util.XMLResourceDescriptor;
> + import org.scilab.forge.jlatexmath.ParseException;
> diff -Nru scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/fop-2.0.diff 
> scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/fop-2.0.diff
> --- scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/fop-2.0.diff  1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
> +0100
> +++ scilab-5.5.2/debian/patches/fop-2.0.diff  2015-10-03 12:22:59.0 
> +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +Description: adapt to fop 2.0 API
> + New way to configure and create Fop. See rationals there:
> + 
> +Author: Gilles Filippini 
> +Index: 
> scilab-5.5.2/modules/scinotes/src/java/org/scilab/modules/scinotes/utils/CodeExporter.java
> +===
> +--- 
> scilab-5.5.2.orig/modules/scinotes/src/java/org/scilab/modules/scinotes/utils/CodeExporter.java
>  
> scilab-5.5.2/modules/scinotes/src/java/org/scilab/modules/scinotes/utils/CodeExporter.java
> +@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ import org.scilab.modules.helptools.scil
> + import org.scilab.modules.gui.messagebox.ScilabModalDialog;
> + 
> + import org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory;
> ++import org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactoryBuilder;
> ++import org.apache.fop.apps.FopConfParser;
> + import org.apache.fop.apps.Fop;
> + import org.apache.fop.apps.FOUserAgent;
> + import org.apache.fop.apps.MimeConstants;
> +@@ -114,11 +116,11 @@ public class CodeExporter extends FOCode
> +  * @param format the page format
> +  */
> + public void convert(String code, int[] lineNumberArray, String 
> fileName, String type, String title, PageFormat format) {
> +-FopFactory fopFactory = FopFactory.newInstance();
> + OutputStream out = null;
> + 
> + try {
> +-fopFactory.setUserConfig(new File(ScilabConstants.SCI + 
> "/modules/helptools/etc/fopconf.xml"));
> ++FopFactoryBuilder fopFactoryBuilder = new FopConfParser(new 
> File(ScilabConstants.SCI + 
> "/modules/helptools/etc/fopconf.xml")).getFopFactoryBuilder();
> ++FopFactory fopFactory = fopFactoryBuilder.build();
> + FOUserAgent userAgent = fopFactory.newFOUserAgent();
> + userAgent.setProducer(CREATOR);
> + userAgent.setTitle(title);
> +Index: 
> scilab-5.5.2/modules/helptools/src/java/org/scilab/modules/helptools/FopConverter.java
> +===
> +--- 
> scilab-5.5.2.orig/modules/helptools/src/java/org/scilab/modules/helptools/FopConverter.java
>  
> scilab-5.5.2/modules/helptools/src/java/org/scilab/modules/helptools/FopConverter.java
> +@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ import javax.xml.transform.stream.Stream
> + import 

Bug#798652: scilab: scilab doesn't work on ppc64el: could not find the Java configuration for the model <>

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Jogl has to be updated too. I think there is a familiar patch for another arch. 

Le 11 septembre 2015 15:45:19 GMT+02:00, Erwan Prioul 
 a écrit :
>Package: scilab
>Version: 5.5.2-1
>Severity: normal
>
>While scilab is available on ppc64el, it doesn't actually work:
>> $ /usr/bin/scilab
>> Could not find the Java configuration for the model . Please
>contact us on http://bugzilla.scilab.org
>> /usr/bin/scilab-bin: error while loading shared libraries:
>libjava.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
>I apply this patch to get rid of the error:
>> --- scilab-5.5.2.orig/bin/scilab
>> +++ scilab-5.5.2/bin/scilab
>> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@
>>  "ppc"|"powerpc")
>>  proc="ppc"
>>  ;;
>> -"ppc64"|"ppc64el")
>> +"ppc64"|"ppc64el"|"ppc64le")
>>  proc="ppc64"
>>  ;;
>>  "s390")
>
>Unfortunately, we then get another error:
>> $ /usr/bin/scilab
>> Could not create a Scilab main class. Error:
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
>>  at javax.media.opengl.GLProfile.(GLProfile.java:120)
>>  at org.scilab.modules.gui.SwingView.(Unknown Source)
>>  at org.scilab.modules.gui.SwingView.registerSwingView(Unknown
>Source)
>>  at org.scilab.modules.core.Scilab.(Unknown Source)
>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Please port CPU detection to
>your platform (linux/ppc64)
>>  at
>jogamp.common.os.PlatformPropsImpl.getCPUTypeImpl(PlatformPropsImpl.java:304)
>>  at
>jogamp.common.os.PlatformPropsImpl.(PlatformPropsImpl.java:134)
>>  ... 4 more
>> 
>> Scilab cannot create Scilab Java Main-Class (we have not been able to
>find the main Scilab class. Check if the Scilab and thirdparty packages
>are available).
>
>Thanks,
>Erwan.
>
>-- 
>debian-science-maintainers mailing list
>debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#783639: openblas: Please provide a -dbg package

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Source: openblas
Severity: wishlist

Salut!

Not asking for me but for a lazy friend.
It would be nice to have an openblas dbg package.

Thanks,
Sylvstre

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), 
(500, 'stable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#772410: scilab : uploading the proposed patch fixing bashism ?

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Salut Ralf!

On 25/01/2015 12:07, Ralf Treinen wrote:
 Hi Sylvestre,

 I can upload the proposed patch for #772410 (scilab: bashism in /bin/sh 
 script)
 if you don't have the time.
Sorry, I just forgot that. I uploaded it.
  However I do not know what to do about #749833.

About #749833, I don't know either. Maybe Vincent, as CC, knows more.
Anyway, we could just ignore it. It has been in Scilab from the first
version it has been shipped in Debian...

Cheers,
Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#773424: tcl-vtk6 is unusable

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 18/12/2014 10:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
 Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 773422 important
 Bug #773422 [libvtk6-java] Java binding is missing runtime libraries
 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
 severity 773424 important
 Bug #773424 [tcl-vtk6] tcl-vtk6 is unusable
 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

I don't think this is correct. Both packages are broken and should be
fixed (instead of changing
the priority).

Otherwise, they should be removed from jessie. Shipping broken packages
reflect badly on Debian.

Sylvestre


-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#773424: tcl-vtk6 is unusable

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 18/12/2014 10:45, Anton Gladky wrote:
 2014-12-18 10:38 GMT+01:00 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
 I don't think this is correct. Both packages are broken and should be
 fixed (instead of changing
 the priority).

 Otherwise, they should be removed from jessie. Shipping broken packages
 reflect badly on Debian.

 I tested them so far as I could. And they are worked. Yes, I agree to
 remove them if necessary.


Then, I am not sure to understand why the first thing that you do is to
decrease the severity and not help him (or fix the bug itself).
If the user is correct, these two packages should be removed from Debian
asap (and
therefor, grave is the correct severity).

Sylvestre



-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#749833: scilab: Scilab include non-free codes

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 15/12/2014 15:54, Vincent COUVERT wrote:
 Hello,
 On 12/14/2014 10:01 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
 On 13/12/2014 11:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
 On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:22:51 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
 wrote:
 On 30/05/14 at 11:29 +0900, mejiko wrote:
 1) scilab-version/modules/polynomials/src/fortran/rpoly.f
 There is work in progress upstream (status 13 Dec 2014: Review in
 Progress). The amount of code is not much, but I am not able to judge
 the workings. Review is needed if this should go into Debian for
 Jessie.
 Indeed. I don't have more news. Maybe Vincent knows more.
 We are still working on it and we have to check the results of this
 new implementation.
OK.

 2) scilab-version/modules/randlib/src/c/fsultra.c
 This file is currently not commented on in the upstream bug report.
 Yes, I have to remove this algorithm from the package. It is not really
 used and it should be easy to get ride of it.
 What do you think about adding a compilation option for it?
We would still be shipping non free code. Not sure it is the best solution.

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#773422: Bug#773424: tcl-vtk6 is unusable

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Well, fixing the bugs would probably be a better solution. .. 

Le 18 décembre 2014 11:01:52 GMT+01:00, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org a écrit 
:
2014-12-18 10:57 GMT+01:00 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
 If the user is correct, these two packages should be removed from
Debian
 asap (and therefor, grave is the correct severity).

OK, I will request their removal, even if binaries shipped in both of
them
(for example vtkWrapJava-6.1 and vtkWrapTcl-6.1) are working.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#749833: scilab: Scilab include non-free codes

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 13/12/2014 11:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
 On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:22:51 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
 On 30/05/14 at 11:29 +0900, mejiko wrote:
 1) scilab-version/modules/polynomials/src/fortran/rpoly.f
 There is work in progress upstream (status 13 Dec 2014: Review in
 Progress). The amount of code is not much, but I am not able to judge
 the workings. Review is needed if this should go into Debian for Jessie.
Indeed. I don't have more news. Maybe Vincent knows more.
 2) scilab-version/modules/randlib/src/c/fsultra.c
 This file is currently not commented on in the upstream bug report.
Yes, I have to remove this algorithm from the package. It is not really
used and it should be easy to get ride of it.

 The versions of scilab in squeeze and wheezy already included those
 files, with the same license. I wonder if this shouldn't simply be
 jessie-ignored, given that both codes are fairly old mathematical codes.
 I think if Sylvestre is right with his statement Old ACM algorithms
 were in a kind of public domain but they updated their license policies
 [1] than we can jessie-ignore this. @Sylvestre: do you have any data
 that would substantiate this? Should we just file a bug against
 release.debian.org (the RT) and ask to jessie-ignore this bug? If the
 rpoly implementation is good than only the second file would need
 jessie-ignore.

Sorry, I did that a while ago and I don't really remember where I find
it. :(
I don't think it is a bit issue here.

Sylvestre





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#772410: [PATCH] Fix bashisms in scripts

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Hello
Thanks but next time, you should check in the svn, most of them were
already fixed :/

S

On 10/12/2014 08:54, Boris Egorov wrote:
 Do not use bash-specific features in scripts with '#!/bin/sh'
 interpreter; it can be some other shell instead of bash.

 Exit codes converted to non-negative values identical to those before
 (to not break some scripts relying on old behavior).

 Implementation of $RANDOM taken from Debian package apt script
 (apt.cron.daily).

 Fixes: https://bugs.debian.org/772410
 Signed-off-by: Boris Egorov ego...@linux.com
 ---
  scilab/bin/scilab | 4 ++--
  scilab/config/install-sh  | 4 
  scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/install-sh| 4 
  scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/scicompile.sh | 6 +++---
  scilab/modules/helptools/src/script/dispatchHelp.sh   | 2 +-
  5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/scilab/bin/scilab b/scilab/bin/scilab
 index 0b77b6c..cbfe5a8 100755
 --- a/scilab/bin/scilab
 +++ b/scilab/bin/scilab
 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ if test -n $SCI; then
  if test ! -d $SCI/modules; then
  echo Cannot find directory $SCI/modules/ !
  echo SCI should point to the root data directory of Scilab
 -exit -1
 +exit 255
  fi
  fi
  
 @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ case $OS in
  # When started as an Application, the default path was /
  # It is not really useful. Changing to HOME.
  # See bugs 8339 and 10575 for rational
 -if test $(pwd) == /; then
 +if test $(pwd) = /; then
  cd $HOME
  fi
  
 diff --git a/scilab/config/install-sh b/scilab/config/install-sh
 index 377bb86..ba479c1 100755
 --- a/scilab/config/install-sh
 +++ b/scilab/config/install-sh
 @@ -345,6 +345,10 @@ do
   # is incompatible with FreeBSD 'install' when (umask  300) != 0.
   ;;
 *)
 + if [ -z $RANDOM ] ; then
 +   # A fix for shells that do not have this bash feature
 +   RANDOM=$(( $(dd if=/dev/urandom bs=2 count=1 2 /dev/null | cksum 
 | cut -d' ' -f1) % 32767 ))
 + fi
   tmpdir=${TMPDIR-/tmp}/ins$RANDOM-$$
   trap 'ret=$?; rmdir $tmpdir/d $tmpdir 2/dev/null; exit $ret' 0
  
 diff --git a/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/install-sh 
 b/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/install-sh
 index 377bb86..ba479c1 100755
 --- a/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/install-sh
 +++ b/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/install-sh
 @@ -345,6 +345,10 @@ do
   # is incompatible with FreeBSD 'install' when (umask  300) != 0.
   ;;
 *)
 + if [ -z $RANDOM ] ; then
 +   # A fix for shells that do not have this bash feature
 +   RANDOM=$(( $(dd if=/dev/urandom bs=2 count=1 2 /dev/null | cksum 
 | cut -d' ' -f1) % 32767 ))
 + fi
   tmpdir=${TMPDIR-/tmp}/ins$RANDOM-$$
   trap 'ret=$?; rmdir $tmpdir/d $tmpdir 2/dev/null; exit $ret' 0
  
 diff --git a/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/scicompile.sh 
 b/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/scicompile.sh
 index 9426218..694761f 100755
 --- a/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/scicompile.sh
 +++ b/scilab/modules/dynamic_link/src/scripts/scicompile.sh
 @@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ ORIGINALLIBNAME=libsciexternal
  
  if test ! -s Makefile.orig; then 
   echo The compiler detection has been performed. Please launch 
 compilerDetection.sh before.
 - exit -1
 + exit 255
  fi
  
  # Check number of parameters
  if test $# -lt 2; then
   echo Syntax : $0 libname sources
 - exit -2
 + exit 254
  fi
  
  # retrieve parameters
 @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ for file in $SOURCES_TEMP; do
   FFILE=`echo $file|sed -e 's|\.o$|\.f|g'`
   if [ ! -s $file -a -s $CFILE -a -s $FFILE ]; then 
   echo Error: Cannot find $file
 - exit -3
 + exit 253
   fi
   # It is an include file, do not build it!
   if [ ! `echo $file|grep -i -E (\.h$|\.hh$|\.hxx$|\.H$)` ]; then
 diff --git a/scilab/modules/helptools/src/script/dispatchHelp.sh 
 b/scilab/modules/helptools/src/script/dispatchHelp.sh
 index 987eb45..e8ee6e8 100644
 --- a/scilab/modules/helptools/src/script/dispatchHelp.sh
 +++ b/scilab/modules/helptools/src/script/dispatchHelp.sh
 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
  
  if test -z $SCI; then
  echo Please define the variable SCI
 -exit -2
 +exit 254
  fi
  
  REFERENCE_LANG=en_US

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#769002: scilab: FTBFS on arm64, ppc64el, s390x

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 10/11/2014 18:00, Hector Oron wrote:
 Source: scilab
 Version: 5.5.1-3
 Severity: serious
 Justification: FTBFS



 *** /home/zumbi/bin/ftbfs-armel
 Hello,

   Your package fails to build from source on Debian autobuilder network.

   Please check your package build logs at:
   https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=scilabsuite=sid

   Full log at:
   
 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scilabarch=arm64ver=5.5.1-3stamp=1415427340

This is caused by the fact that libjogl2-java has been be built on these
archs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl2-java

I should have added a stronger dependency on it in Scilab.

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#764783: scilab: plot3d function doesn't display graph

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 13/10/2014 21:04, Matteo Schiavon wrote:
 Here it is:
ok, thanks and what is your graphic card? Did you have up to date drivers?

S

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#741196: libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 14/09/2014 16:11, Francesco Poli wrote:
 On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:00:22 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:

 [...]
 I am more and more worried by the lack of answers from the
 FTP Masters.


 Bye.
 Hello again FTP Masters,
 just a friendly ping about this troublesome issue.

 Please please please express your opinion!

I am not part of the ftpmaster team but I think they have plenty of
works with the latest transitions for Jessie to worry
about license incompatibility.

Cheers,
Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#759275: feel++: FTBFS - /usr/bin/clang++ not found (should be clang++-3.4)

[Sylvestre Ledru]

That is likely to be caused by:
http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2014/08/11/clang-3-4-3-5

cheers,
S

On 25/08/2014 21:28, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
 That's weird, all my packages are built with pbuilder and I never has
 this issue.
 I will check and try out your fix.

 Best regards
 C.


 On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org
 mailto:m...@debian.org wrote:

 Package: feel++
 Version: 1:0.98.0-final-3
 Severity: serious
 Usertags: goto-cc

 During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot
 (using cowbuilder
 and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.

 [...]
 -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/clang++
 CMake Error: your CXX compiler: /usr/bin/clang++ was not found. 
  Please set CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to a valid compiler path or name.
 CMake Error: Internal CMake error, TryCompile configure of cmake
 failed
 -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/clang++ -- broken
 CMake Error at
 /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/CMakeTestCXXCompiler.cmake:54 (message):
   The C++ compiler /usr/bin/clang++ is not able to compile a
 simple test
   program.

   It fails with the following output:





   CMake will not be able to correctly generate this project.
 Call Stack (most recent call first):
   CMakeLists.txt:62 (project)


 CMake Error: your CXX compiler: /usr/bin/clang++ was not found. 
  Please set CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to a valid compiler path or name.
 -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!


 Indeed this should be clang++-3.4 it seems:

 # ls -l /usr/bin/clang++*
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Aug 19 06:58 /usr/bin/clang++-3.4 -
 ../lib/llvm-3.4/bin/clang++

 You may want to depend on the clang package instead of clang-3.4 |
 clang-3.5.

 The full build log is attached; please do let me know if the
 problem is
 unreproducible, in which case I shall try to investigate further.

 Best,
 Michael




 -- 
 Professor in Scientific Computing
 IRMA, CeMoSiS, AMIES
 IRMA: http://www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/~prudhomm
 http://www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/%7Eprudhomm
 CeMoSis: http://www.cemosis.fr 
 AMIES: http://www.agence-maths-entreprises.fr/
 Téléphone : 03 68 85 0089 - Bureau : P-210
 Mobile: 06 87 64 60 51



-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#757008: critterding: segfaults on amd64, NV98

[Sylvestre Ledru]

forcemerge 757008 756997
retitle 756997 Segfaults on start
thanks


On 04/08/2014 14:07, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
 Package: critterding
 Version: 1.0-beta14+dfsg-1
 Severity: grave
 
 It segfaults right away. Attaching backtrace, glxinfo and lshw outputs.
One bug is enough.

No need to report a bug per arch.

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#755227: Building eclib with clang

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 26/07/2014 10:09, Julien Puydt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 sorry it took so long to answer.
 
 Could you tell me the full name of the patch author? 
Alexander Ovchinnikov

 and whether the
 patch was already forwarded upstream?
Probably not :)

S

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#752795: timblserver: use dh-autoreconf in order to build on new architectures

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 26/06/2014 09:53, Breno Leitao wrote:
 Source: timblserver
   /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX   --mode=link g++  -g -O2 
 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security 
 -Wall  -I/usr/include/libxml2  -fopenmp  -fopenmp  -Wl,-z,relro -o 
 timblserver TimblServer.o libtimblserver.la -lpthread  -ltimbl  -lticcutils 
   libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 
 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -I/usr/include/libxml2 -fopenmp 
 -fopenmp -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -o timblserver TimblServer.o  
 ./.libs/libtimblserver.a -lpthread -ltimbl -lticcutils -fopenmp
   /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libtimblserver.a(ServerBase.o): undefined 
 reference to symbol 'xmlNewNode@@LIBXML2_2.4.30'
   //usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libxml2.so.2: error adding symbols: DSO 
 missing from command line
   collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

For curiosity, is that an as-needed issue?

Thanks,
Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#752786: mpich: Please add mpi.pc alternative

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 26/06/2014 10:45, Anton Gladky wrote:
 tags 752786 +pending
 thanks

 Thanks for the patch. Pushed to git.

Thanks Anton and thanks Alastair for the patch.

Don't hesitate to do a team upload. I will do it next week otherwise.

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#751111: Improper shared lib package (SONAME contains python/tcl/java version)

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 11/06/2014 08:10, Anton Gladky wrote:
 severity 75 important
 thanks

 2014-06-11 7:45 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org:
 severity 75 serious
 Again, stop doing it!

 I would like to hear also other's people opinions about this issue.
 Then I will agree to raise up the severity if the problem really serious.

Well, the policy is pretty clear on the topic.
And for users (and maintenance), it would be way better to have a
package per binding.

Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#746970: code-saturne: Lintian complains about source-is-missing javascript

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Source: code-saturne
Severity: minor

Hello

I am reporting this as a gift bug for potential contributors.

Lintian complains about:
E: code-saturne source: source-is-missing docs/doxygen/src/jquery.js
E: code-saturne source: source-is-missing docs/doxygen/src/search/all_75.js
E: code-saturne source: source-is-missing 
docs/doxygen/src/search/functions_62.js
E: code-saturne source: source-is-missing 
docs/doxygen/src/search/functions_6d.js
E: code-saturne source: source-is-missing 
docs/doxygen/src/search/functions_75.js
E: code-saturne source: source-is-missing 
docs/doxygen/src/search/functions_77.js

It should be quite easy to fix.

Cheers,
Sylvestre

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), 
(500, 'stable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#744073: scilab shared libraries are heavily underlinked

[Sylvestre Ledru]

severity 744073 normal
thanks

On 09/04/2014 20:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
 Package: scilab
 Version: 5.5.0~beta-1+git~20140406-1522-2
 Severity: important

 please forward this upstream. maybe as separate bug reports for each library
 with unresolvable references.

Thanks for sharing. However, I do not agree on the severity.
That does not prevent the package to build under Debian. I don't know
what is different in Ubuntu
and explains the FTBFS there.

Cheers,
Sylvestre

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers