Re: flash plugin from ubuntu (was: flashplugin-nonfree and latest Flash security updates)

2016-08-04 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Mittwoch, 3. August 2016 22:55:25 CEST Luedtke, Nicholas (HPE Linux 
Security) wrote:
> This sounds like a bad idea and if done needs to be accompanied by a lot of
> documentation.

Why? It's certainly less of a security hazard than the current flashplugin-
nonfree package.

> 
> -Nicholas
> 
> From: Holger Levsen 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 4:03:32 PM
> To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
> Cc: Bart Martens
> Subject: Re: flash plugin from ubuntu (was: flashplugin-nonfree and latest
> Flash security updates)
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:46:33PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Maybe the flashplugin-nonfree package should even be replaced by a package
> > that installs the ubuntu archive signing key, sets up the sources.list
> > line, and tweaks the unattended-updates config to allow automatic updates
> > from that repo.
> please, no.
> 
> 
> --
> cheers,
> Holger




Re: Call for testing: upcoming wordpress security update

2016-08-04 Thread Craig Small
I probably should login and fix that.

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:09 AM donoban  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 08/01/2016 11:30 AM, donoban wrote:
> > On 08/01/2016 10:28 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >> Hi
> >
> >> We would like to expose the packages for the upcoming wordpress
> >> update a bit for additional testing. Please find them at
> >
> >> https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/wordpress
> >
> >> and report any problem *introduced* by updating to these packages
> >>  directly to t...@security.debian.org and including Craig Small
> >>  .
> >
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >
> >> Regards, Salvatore
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Pretty off-topic, time ago I read this on Debian wiki:
> >
> > wiki.debian.org/WordPress#Upgrading_the_installed_WordPress_version
> >
> >  When I saw it I thought, "this breaks the Debian package upgrade
> > policy, but maybe this package is an exception".
> >
> > Now your email confirms WordPress packages respect Debian policy
> > and the Wiki is wrong.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
>
> You spend a lot of time and effort backporting bugfixes for old
> versions of programs and then your Wiki says: "Ey dude, delete all
> this stuff an download it from upstream".
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXoKmDAAoJEBQTENjj7Qilz/UP/iGtpDZJ69JJByXMnxNa/7eS
> Axe+wbbrVtsrhVENOvF5QkS8O4oASEnonx3IuWT7ZDN2T4SuYTNwaKIPfYk0Hhlj
> pS3qh/7oyp2g/VPAWpU5u20NMIVTpMXlvJrqFgoyans5/f1N+YBKkYbAv11p9ok3
> JDnYYzuWvZFUGdL4exvvmXJ9VZpngH5N6NE2k/8g1TSsKq4WI68El5f3QFgboZZv
> s3powMQQld1C4YeTxkw4UISBQ7GJPC8QRO+zDE0ekBGtkPvME4gVQBsRpgMCtAGC
> MBHbhWOwUTCAl7TSIBwEw3GxigVgnYEG6s4D9DA8iE5FB+oXt4Kmb2B0XHbiyLTN
> VYZ7js/f4WMqNncadfLCGKpJn4QfJHXhI6StZ0szqoJwspyXTshFHneaqZCXNCJ3
> 82qnNEVAkXhV5/95U3YJ1bYUSVv63P/ynV10/XuYPRU6h2Q8yzGHX1SNoWr/yfdl
> g59jEIGLMqjA0D/aA5fIgohP/MVgPFuGoNvxRR13fTgF3JtgnDw9eksgQCKY1GzG
> IoTygfa/l35ICcV5Cvbz7UugHx4hjnZvMSnlTpuel+t/EQPKf5B/mFeRdGDNGxGD
> /90oisr9Zp3QlIOiBRjOAkpm7tvA6bHBP3dNtVXWvav1Ob7IItVKTEwoT/ebEAez
> uRSucg2npQIVSdXaEwTT
> =ArAe
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>