POP3-Server recommendation
Hello List, since the upgrade to sarge, UW-pop3d won't allow Plain-text logins over a non-SSL connection anymore. I've tracked this down to a change in libc-client (which I think is sensible). unfortunately, though, some of my users need this functionality, so I'll have to swich the server. What I'm looking for is basically a drop-in replacement, i.e. a POP3-server that uses system accounts, /var/mail/user and doesn't need to be configured a lot. teapop, popa3d and mailutils-pop3d seem quite promising in this respect, what are your experiences? BTW, performance isn't too much of an issue, it's quite a big box and only few users. thanks, --Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3-Server recommendation
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Christopher Taylor wrote: since the upgrade to sarge, UW-pop3d won't allow Plain-text logins over a non-SSL connection anymore. I've tracked this down to a change in libc-client (which I think is sensible). You can re-enable plaintext logins if you really want: thanks for the pointer! Unfortunately, this is only half-way documented in /usr/share/doc/libc-client2002edebian/README.Debian, see #266689. I agree, the I accept... line should be documented at least in README.Debian. A nice big debconf-warning on upgrade would have been nice, too ;) --Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: arpwatch and arp packets ...urgent
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:32:00AM +0100, m wrote: comp comp comp computers in LAN publicIP |||| === server ---++++... SNAT 192.168.x.x proxy_arp I want to be able to set public IP's for computers in LAN. Is any other solution ? I dont know about it - if you so - please let me know :) either try explicit routing for the official ips, as was suggested, or give the server another nic, so you can create a proper dmz. hth, --Chris -- Christopher Taylor | Whatever tomorrow brings / I'll be there / [EMAIL PROTECTED] | with open arms and open eyes Tel:+49 30 46796495 | --Incubus, Drive Mobile: +49 177 3397697 | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: arpwatch and arp packets ...urgent
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:32:00AM +0100, m wrote: comp comp comp computers in LAN publicIP |||| === server ---++++... SNAT 192.168.x.x proxy_arp I want to be able to set public IP's for computers in LAN. Is any other solution ? I dont know about it - if you so - please let me know :) either try explicit routing for the official ips, as was suggested, or give the server another nic, so you can create a proper dmz. hth, --Chris -- Christopher Taylor | Whatever tomorrow brings / I'll be there / [EMAIL PROTECTED] | with open arms and open eyes Tel:+49 30 46796495 | --Incubus, Drive Mobile: +49 177 3397697 |
Re: Pat on the back
Robert Brockway wrote: Hi. I just wanted to say thanks to the security team for the rapid deployment of the fixed versions of OpenSSH (twice). I fully agree. thanks a lot! --Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pat on the back
Robert Brockway wrote: Hi. I just wanted to say thanks to the security team for the rapid deployment of the fixed versions of OpenSSH (twice). I fully agree. thanks a lot! --Chris
Re: execute application from webinterface
Jens Gutzeit wrote: On Monday 01 September 2003 21:53, mario ohnewald wrote: What is the securest way of starting a application, like ping, from a webinterface as a diffrent user. what's wrong with making the program suid-to-some-other-user (not root) and then just executing it? I reallize this doesn't work for ping, which is suid-to-root anyway. Greetings, --Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: execute application from webinterface
Jens Gutzeit wrote: On Monday 01 September 2003 21:53, mario ohnewald wrote: What is the securest way of starting a application, like ping, from a webinterface as a diffrent user. what's wrong with making the program suid-to-some-other-user (not root) and then just executing it? I reallize this doesn't work for ping, which is suid-to-root anyway. Greetings, --Chris
Re: Stupid package installer wanted: uppity robots need not apply
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 18:31, Dale Amon wrote: PKGLIST2=another.deb another2.deb for $pkg in $PKGLIST1; do ^ - I think the problem is right there ;) dpkg --install $pkg yes done --Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stupid package installer wanted: uppity robots need not apply
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 18:31, Dale Amon wrote: PKGLIST2=another.deb another2.deb for $pkg in $PKGLIST1; do ^ - I think the problem is right there ;) dpkg --install $pkg yes done --Chris
