Re: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?

2001-11-30 Thread Christian Kurz

On 30/11/01, David Ehle wrote:
 Is the wu-ftpd in testing secure? It seems to be 2.6.1 a stinker.

Not so far. But calling a software where the source and the fix are
available, so that you can build a fixed version on your own is
inappropriate. Especially if you are using Win98 and Netscape, both
closed source products, for mailing. Do you also call mail both
companies calling their software a stinker and asking them directly
for fixed versions?

Christian
-- 
   Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org)
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16  63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853



msg04542/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?

2001-11-30 Thread Howland, Curtis
The article I read about it on the Register...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23082.html

The hole affects thousands of users of virtually
every Linux release.
Because of the wide implications, Core, working with
CERT, and, at
one point, SecurityFocus' Vulnerability Help team,
arranged a
coordinated release with Caldera, SuSE, TurboLinux,
Debian, Red
Hat, and other Linux vendors, so that patches would
be available for
every distribution simultaneously. December 3rd was
picked for the
release. 

That plan went out the window Tuesday, when Red Hat
unilaterally
issued its own advisory.

So I will assume that Debian has a fix that is being tested, if not in
testing. I'm very surprised it hasn't been released or mentioned yet
myself.

Curt-

-Original Message-
From: David Ehle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 14:20
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Cc: Debian-Security (E-mail)
Subject: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?



Hello all,

Is the wu-ftpd in testing secure? It seems to be 2.6.1 a stinker.
Testing is using 2.6.1-5, is that also compromised?  I have been
watching it all day but haven't seen any updates.

If it is not secure has a patched version been made available anywhere?
I can't seem to find any mention at http://www.debian.org/security/

Thanks!
David.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?

2001-11-30 Thread David Ehle
Thanks Curtis,

   I know the maintainer has put together a fixed version for
Potato/stable, I am wondering if he has had time to do the testing yet,
or if we rollback to the testing one or what. I'm just hoping that
rollback won't be a dependency  nightmare... the stable version is
wu-ftpd_2.6.0-6 available from:
ftp.debian.org but NOT (as of about 6:00pm my local time)
ftp.us.debian.org.

Anyway thanks for the info.

here are some other info sources i've found:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/242750
http://www.wu-ftpd.org  (they only put up something around 3:00 pm
local-chicago time)

Later,
  David.


Howland, Curtis wrote:
 
 The article I read about it on the Register...
 
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23082.html
 
 The hole affects thousands of users of virtually
 every Linux release.
 Because of the wide implications, Core, working with
 CERT, and, at
 one point, SecurityFocus' Vulnerability Help team,
 arranged a
 coordinated release with Caldera, SuSE, TurboLinux,
 Debian, Red
 Hat, and other Linux vendors, so that patches would
 be available for
 every distribution simultaneously. December 3rd was
 picked for the
 release.
 
 That plan went out the window Tuesday, when Red Hat
 unilaterally
 issued its own advisory.
 
 So I will assume that Debian has a fix that is being tested, if not in
 testing. I'm very surprised it hasn't been released or mentioned yet
 myself.
 
 Curt-
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David Ehle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 14:20
 To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
 Cc: Debian-Security (E-mail)
 Subject: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?
 
 Hello all,
 
 Is the wu-ftpd in testing secure? It seems to be 2.6.1 a stinker.
 Testing is using 2.6.1-5, is that also compromised?  I have been
 watching it all day but haven't seen any updates.
 
 If it is not secure has a patched version been made available anywhere?
 I can't seem to find any mention at http://www.debian.org/security/
 
 Thanks!
 David.
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?

2001-11-30 Thread Christian Kurz
On 30/11/01, David Ehle wrote:
 Is the wu-ftpd in testing secure? It seems to be 2.6.1 a stinker.

Not so far. But calling a software where the source and the fix are
available, so that you can build a fixed version on your own is
inappropriate. Especially if you are using Win98 and Netscape, both
closed source products, for mailing. Do you also call mail both
companies calling their software a stinker and asking them directly
for fixed versions?

Christian
-- 
   Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org)
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16  63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853


pgpGLP5tbcbdB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?

2001-11-29 Thread Howland, Curtis
The article I read about it on the Register...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23082.html

"The hole affects thousands of users of virtually
every Linux release.
Because of the wide implications, Core, working with
CERT, and, at
one point, SecurityFocus' "Vulnerability Help" team,
arranged a
coordinated release with Caldera, SuSE, TurboLinux,
Debian, Red
Hat, and other Linux vendors, so that patches would
be available for
every distribution simultaneously. December 3rd was
picked for the
release. 

That plan went out the window Tuesday, when Red Hat
unilaterally
issued its own advisory."

So I will assume that Debian has a fix that is being tested, if not in
"testing". I'm very surprised it hasn't been released or mentioned yet
myself.

Curt-

-Original Message-
From: David Ehle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 14:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian-Security (E-mail)
Subject: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?



Hello all,

Is the wu-ftpd in testing secure? It seems to be 2.6.1 a stinker.
Testing is using 2.6.1-5, is that also compromised?  I have been
watching it all day but haven't seen any updates.

If it is not secure has a patched version been made available anywhere?
I can't seem to find any mention at http://www.debian.org/security/

Thanks!
David.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?

2001-11-29 Thread David Ehle

Thanks Curtis,

   I know the maintainer has put together a fixed version for
Potato/stable, I am wondering if he has had time to do the testing yet,
or if we rollback to the testing one or what. I'm just hoping that
rollback won't be a dependency  nightmare... the stable version is
wu-ftpd_2.6.0-6 available from:
ftp.debian.org but NOT (as of about 6:00pm my local time)
ftp.us.debian.org.

Anyway thanks for the info.

here are some other info sources i've found:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/242750
http://www.wu-ftpd.org  (they only put up something around 3:00 pm
local-chicago time)

Later,
  David.


Howland, Curtis wrote:
 
 The article I read about it on the Register...
 
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23082.html
 
 The hole affects thousands of users of virtually
 every Linux release.
 Because of the wide implications, Core, working with
 CERT, and, at
 one point, SecurityFocus' Vulnerability Help team,
 arranged a
 coordinated release with Caldera, SuSE, TurboLinux,
 Debian, Red
 Hat, and other Linux vendors, so that patches would
 be available for
 every distribution simultaneously. December 3rd was
 picked for the
 release.
 
 That plan went out the window Tuesday, when Red Hat
 unilaterally
 issued its own advisory.
 
 So I will assume that Debian has a fix that is being tested, if not in
 testing. I'm very surprised it hasn't been released or mentioned yet
 myself.
 
 Curt-
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David Ehle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 14:20
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Debian-Security (E-mail)
 Subject: Secure wu-ftpd for Testing?
 
 Hello all,
 
 Is the wu-ftpd in testing secure? It seems to be 2.6.1 a stinker.
 Testing is using 2.6.1-5, is that also compromised?  I have been
 watching it all day but haven't seen any updates.
 
 If it is not secure has a patched version been made available anywhere?
 I can't seem to find any mention at http://www.debian.org/security/
 
 Thanks!
 David.
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]