External check
CVE-2015-0278: RESERVED CVE-2015-0819: RESERVED CVE-2015-0821: RESERVED CVE-2015-0822: RESERVED CVE-2015-0823: RESERVED CVE-2015-0824: RESERVED CVE-2015-0825: RESERVED CVE-2015-0826: RESERVED CVE-2015-0827: RESERVED CVE-2015-0828: RESERVED CVE-2015-0829: RESERVED CVE-2015-0830: RESERVED CVE-2015-0831: RESERVED CVE-2015-0832: RESERVED CVE-2015-0834: RESERVED CVE-2015-0835: RESERVED CVE-2015-0836: RESERVED -- The output might be a bit terse, but the above ids are known elsewhere, check the references in the tracker. The second part indicates the status of that id in the tracker at the moment the script was run. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1yqupd-00062x...@soler.debian.org
Bug#761859: prototype ready
Hi, On Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Depending on your layout, you don't really need two different JSON > files, though. how would you distinguish between "squeeze", which includes lts and security, and "squeeze", which doesnt? Same for "wheezy" (and security and not). cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#761859: prototype ready
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > surely. I just wasn't sure whether this should be done on the security-tracker > side or by it's users... or I could provide two versions: json-full and json(- > aggregated) - do you think that would be useful? To clarify, I replied to this mail and meant the part above. I see value in both having "this is fixed in suite X" and in "this is fixed in those subsets of suite X". Depending on your layout, you don't really need two different JSON files, though. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAD77+gTZz6VjhDY71=ge7_sCoMSjbK3aA9k=ydgwbrosdvz...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#761859: prototype ready
Hi, On Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, Paul Wise wrote: > I think it would be useful to provide the non-aggregated version for > folks who only use some of the stable suites. Not sure if the sectracker > has information about stable-proposed-updates but if so it would be good > to include it too. it hasn't, see "#645201 track uploads to proposed-updates" cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
