Re: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 14:52:37 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 00:09:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > Please give back telepathy-salut on armel, armhf, sparc: > > > > gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc > > > Given back. > Looks like it failed in the same way. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Question about buildd/wanna-build
On 27.07.2014 00:47, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:00:50PM +0200, Khaled Blah wrote: >> I have set up a buildd system (sucessfully) and I am rather content with >> it. However, when looking at https://buildd.debian.org I can see that >> for most packages the build log has been added to the wanna-build DB >> (which one can read by clicking on the link in the "status" column). I >> do not understand how this happens and I don't think it's being done >> manually. Yet, I can't find the code that does just that in the >> wanna-build or sbuild/buildd repos. Can anyone here enlighten me as to >> how this works? > > there is [1] for an introduction to the system. [2], [3], and [4] contain some > code. > > Kind regards > Philipp Kern > > [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/ > [2] https://buildd.debian.org/git/wanna-build.git > [3] https://buildd.debian.org/git/pgstatus.git > [4] https://buildd.debian.org/git/wbpy.git > Hi Philipp, thank you for your reply. It was the repo in [4] that I either missed when checking out the buildd tools or it was not listed anywhere. After a but of code study I managed to bring it to life on our system. Regards, -- Khaled Blah System Administrator, Mara Systems (www.marasystems.de) Bismarckstr. 24 66111 Saarbruecken GERMANY -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d8efbe.7010...@marasystems.de
Re: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 00:09:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Please give back telepathy-salut on armel, armhf, sparc: > > gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc > Given back. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
On 29/07/14 22:08, Julien Cristau wrote: > Are you sure this isn't a parallel makefile bug? Good catch (maybe). The Makefile.am looks fine, but the resulting generated rules in Makefile.in are pretty scary, and it's entirely possible that they aren't safe for parallel "make install". The private shared library in question is only there to support a plugin architecture that is not considered API-stable and has no non-test users in-tree, so disabling plugins and linking it statically might work better. I'll try that at some point. telepathy-gabble has a similar plugin architecture that does have some in-tree plugins, but it gets away with it because its equivalent library is in a different directory, and recursive make limits the possible parallelization. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d8cc57.6040...@debian.org
