Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]

2016-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 01:23:20PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Its the only e-mail I've found at
> > 
> >https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWannaBuildInfrastructure
> > 
> > which was the first hit on site:debian.org for WannaBuild.
> > 
> https://www.debian.org/intro/organization#wanna-build

Fine - may be the Wiki page should just redirect to this place?

Kind regards

Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]

2016-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Adam,

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:47:38AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or
> >>1.18.17 (see bug #848422).
> >
> >The chroots will be updated in a few hours.
> 
> It's also generally safe to assume that the relevant teams are aware of
> things like widespread dpkg and buildd breakage.

Yes, I did not intend to assume something else but I was a bit worried due
to upcoming deadlines for packages that need to reach testing ...
 
> >>Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build
> >>people"?  If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact?
> 
> I have no idea who that is, but it's not an address I've ever seen
> referenced in relation to wanna-build.

Its the only e-mail I've found at

   https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWannaBuildInfrastructure

which was the first hit on site:debian.org for WannaBuild.

Kind regards

 Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]

2016-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or
1.18.17 (see bug #848422).

Kind regards and thanks for working on Debian infrastructure

   Andreas.

- Forwarded message from Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> -

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:04:52 +0100
From: Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>
To: Debian Mentors List <debian-ment...@lists.debian.org>, bach.hen...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any 
architecture - but why?

Hi Christian,

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 12/21/2016 11:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > 
> > When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures
> > a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is
> > not build after > 36 hours.
> 
> They have been tried a lot of times already, you can see that by looking at
> "all (10)" for example (in the amd64 case).
> 
> A failed log looks like this:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=r-cran-treescape=amd64=1.10.18-3=1482303093
> 
> It appears to be the case that the fix for the maintscript issue with dpkg
> is still affecting the buildds and r-base-core is uninstallable - in this
> case probably because the chroots haven't been updated yet and dpkg comes
> preinstalled in the chroots.
> 
> This doesn't count as a build failure, because the build dependencies of
> the package couldn't be installed successfully, so it's not your own
> packages fault. The buildds will periodically try to build the package
> again until the underlying problem is fixed.
> 
> You could ask the wanna-build people to manually update the chroots to fix
> this issue if you don't want to wait until the next automatic update.
> (IIRC that happens twice a week.)

Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build
people"?  If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact?

I think this will affect several packages so it should be fixed soon.

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



- End forwarded message -

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: Rebuild r-bioc-iranges on some architectures

2016-08-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Pino,

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 08:16:49AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> 
> Andreas: no actual action needed on your side for this, but please do
> tighten properly the build dependencies of your packages.

I could upload a minor upstream bump which triggers rebuild
automatically.  May be this saves manual work at your side.

And yes, in principle I try to get Build-Depends correctly but
sometimes mistakes are happening.  Sorry for this.

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de