Re: Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]
Andreas Tille wrote: > Its the only e-mail I've found at > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWannaBuildInfrastructure > > which was the first hit on site:debian.org for WannaBuild. I've removed it from the wiki page. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 01:23:20PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Its the only e-mail I've found at > > > >https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWannaBuildInfrastructure > > > > which was the first hit on site:debian.org for WannaBuild. > > > https://www.debian.org/intro/organization#wanna-build Fine - may be the Wiki page should just redirect to this place? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]
On 12/21/2016 01:05 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:47:38AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or 1.18.17 (see bug #848422). >>> >>> The chroots will be updated in a few hours. >> >> It's also generally safe to assume that the relevant teams are aware of >> things like widespread dpkg and buildd breakage. > > Yes, I did not intend to assume something else but I was a bit worried due > to upcoming deadlines for packages that need to reach testing ... > Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? >> >> I have no idea who that is, but it's not an address I've ever seen >> referenced in relation to wanna-build. > > Its the only e-mail I've found at > >https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWannaBuildInfrastructure > > which was the first hit on site:debian.org for WannaBuild. > https://www.debian.org/intro/organization#wanna-build HTH, Julien
Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]
Hi Adam, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:47:38AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or > >>1.18.17 (see bug #848422). > > > >The chroots will be updated in a few hours. > > It's also generally safe to assume that the relevant teams are aware of > things like widespread dpkg and buildd breakage. Yes, I did not intend to assume something else but I was a bit worried due to upcoming deadlines for packages that need to reach testing ... > >>Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build > >>people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? > > I have no idea who that is, but it's not an address I've ever seen > referenced in relation to wanna-build. Its the only e-mail I've found at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWannaBuildInfrastructure which was the first hit on site:debian.org for WannaBuild. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]
On 2016-12-21 11:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 21/12/16 12:39, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or 1.18.17 (see bug #848422). The chroots will be updated in a few hours. It's also generally safe to assume that the relevant teams are aware of things like widespread dpkg and buildd breakage. [...] Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? I have no idea who that is, but it's not an address I've ever seen referenced in relation to wanna-build. Regards, Adam
Re: Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]
On 21/12/16 12:39, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or > 1.18.17 (see bug #848422). The chroots will be updated in a few hours. FWIW, we use sbuild on the build daemons. Cheers, Emilio > > Kind regards and thanks for working on Debian infrastructure > >Andreas. > > - Forwarded message from Andreas Tille - > > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:04:52 +0100 > From: Andreas Tille > To: Debian Mentors List , > bach.hen...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any > architecture - but why? > > Hi Christian, > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> On 12/21/2016 11:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> >>> When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures >>> a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is >>> not build after > 36 hours. >> >> They have been tried a lot of times already, you can see that by looking at >> "all (10)" for example (in the amd64 case). >> >> A failed log looks like this: >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=r-cran-treescape&arch=amd64&ver=1.10.18-3&stamp=1482303093 >> >> It appears to be the case that the fix for the maintscript issue with dpkg >> is still affecting the buildds and r-base-core is uninstallable - in this >> case probably because the chroots haven't been updated yet and dpkg comes >> preinstalled in the chroots. >> >> This doesn't count as a build failure, because the build dependencies of >> the package couldn't be installed successfully, so it's not your own >> packages fault. The buildds will periodically try to build the package >> again until the underlying problem is fixed. >> >> You could ask the wanna-build people to manually update the chroots to fix >> this issue if you don't want to wait until the next automatic update. >> (IIRC that happens twice a week.) > > Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build > people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? > > I think this will affect several packages so it should be fixed soon. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. >
Please update pbuilder environments on build daemons [Was: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?]
Hi, as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or 1.18.17 (see bug #848422). Kind regards and thanks for working on Debian infrastructure Andreas. - Forwarded message from Andreas Tille - Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:04:52 +0100 From: Andreas Tille To: Debian Mentors List , bach.hen...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why? Hi Christian, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/21/2016 11:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures > > a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is > > not build after > 36 hours. > > They have been tried a lot of times already, you can see that by looking at > "all (10)" for example (in the amd64 case). > > A failed log looks like this: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=r-cran-treescape&arch=amd64&ver=1.10.18-3&stamp=1482303093 > > It appears to be the case that the fix for the maintscript issue with dpkg > is still affecting the buildds and r-base-core is uninstallable - in this > case probably because the chroots haven't been updated yet and dpkg comes > preinstalled in the chroots. > > This doesn't count as a build failure, because the build dependencies of > the package couldn't be installed successfully, so it's not your own > packages fault. The buildds will periodically try to build the package > again until the underlying problem is fixed. > > You could ask the wanna-build people to manually update the chroots to fix > this issue if you don't want to wait until the next automatic update. > (IIRC that happens twice a week.) Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? I think this will affect several packages so it should be fixed soon. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de
