Re: apt 0.9.7 build failures
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Touko Korpela touko.korp...@iki.fi wrote: (I'm not maintainer, just curious) apt 0.9.7 failed to build like this on several architectures (armel,armhf,ia64,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x) I guess it was some toolchain issue that is now fixed? I don't really get where this error came from given that nsgmls is installed (otherwise it couldn't complain - and it is a direct dependency of po4a which is the tool which uses it, we don't). The DTD on the other hand should be in debiandoc-sgml which is a direct build-dependency of src:apt … Combined with the fact that it failed only on some archs. Should they be tried again on buildds? Freeze is coming, do you still want to upload new version before it happens? As you can see, we uploaded a new version which doesn't fail. It seems to built fine on all archs, but that can also be related to the fact that the path failing here isn't used anymore. I took the liberty to finish what i had started in 0.9.4: Dividing the documentation buildprocess. As the sgml documentation is shipped only in :all packages we don't build them anymore on the buildd. Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caaz6_fc+3rpzgdj_k+ej3az1-u9u1cgqamcrp2sqphjemad...@mail.gmail.com
Re: apt 0.9.7 build failures
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 03:03:09 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: (I'm not maintainer, just curious) apt 0.9.7 failed to build like this on several architectures (armel,armhf,ia64,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x) I guess it was some toolchain issue that is now fixed? Should they be tried again on buildds? Freeze is coming, do you still want to upload new version before it happens? Known sgml-base or dpkg bug, don't worry about it. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
apt 0.9.7 build failures
(I'm not maintainer, just curious) apt 0.9.7 failed to build like this on several architectures (armel,armhf,ia64,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x) I guess it was some toolchain issue that is now fixed? Should they be tried again on buildds? Freeze is coming, do you still want to upload new version before it happens? make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-apt_0.9.7-armel-4pGMQm/apt-0.9.7/test/interactive-helper' make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-apt_0.9.7-armel-4pGMQm/apt-0.9.7/test/interactive-helper' make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-apt_0.9.7-armel-4pGMQm/apt-0.9.7/test' make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-apt_0.9.7-armel-4pGMQm/apt-0.9.7/doc' Discard de/apt.conf.de.5.xml (117 of 153 strings; only 76.47% translated; need 80%). nsgmls:OSFD0:2:62:W: cannot generate system identifier for public text -//DebianDoc//DTD DebianDoc//EN nsgmls:OSFD0:2:62:E: reference to entity DEBIANDOC for which no system identifier could be generated nsgmls:OSFD0:2:0: entity was defined here nsgmls:OSFD0:2:62:E: DTD did not contain element declaration for document type name po4a::sgml: Error while running nsgmls -p. Please check if nsgmls and the DTD are installed. make[2]: *** [po4a] Error 25 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-apt_0.9.7-armel-4pGMQm/apt-0.9.7/doc' make[1]: *** [manpages] Error 2 make: *** [build/build-manpages-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave error exit status 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120629000309.GA28823@lisko
