Re: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 14:52:37 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 00:09:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > Please give back telepathy-salut on armel, armhf, sparc: > > > > gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc > > > Given back. > Looks like it failed in the same way. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 00:09:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Please give back telepathy-salut on armel, armhf, sparc: > > gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc > Given back. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
On 29/07/14 22:08, Julien Cristau wrote: > Are you sure this isn't a parallel makefile bug? Good catch (maybe). The Makefile.am looks fine, but the resulting generated rules in Makefile.in are pretty scary, and it's entirely possible that they aren't safe for parallel "make install". The private shared library in question is only there to support a plugin architecture that is not considered API-stable and has no non-test users in-tree, so disabling plugins and linking it statically might work better. I'll try that at some point. telepathy-gabble has a similar plugin architecture that does have some in-tree plugins, but it gets away with it because its equivalent library is in a different directory, and recursive make limits the possible parallelization. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d8cc57.6040...@debian.org
Re: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 00:09:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Please give back telepathy-salut on armel, armhf, sparc: > > gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc > > All three architectures failed to relink the private library > libsalut-plugins.so for the installed rpath, with the error: > > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/.libs/libsalut-plugins.so: file not recognized: File > truncated > > but building on three porterboxes (abel, harris, smetana) succeeded. I > suspect some toolchain bug might have been fixed since the upload? > Are you sure this isn't a parallel makefile bug? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc
Please give back telepathy-salut on armel, armhf, sparc: gb telepathy-salut_0.8.1-3 . armel armhf sparc All three architectures failed to relink the private library libsalut-plugins.so for the installed rpath, with the error: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/.libs/libsalut-plugins.so: file not recognized: File truncated but building on three porterboxes (abel, harris, smetana) succeeded. I suspect some toolchain bug might have been fixed since the upload? Thanks, S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d6d843.6090...@debian.org
