Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle #621911 ITA: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all interfaces Bug #621911 [wnpp] O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all interfaces Bug #628614 [wnpp] O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all interfaces Changed Bug title to 'ITA: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all interfaces' from 'O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all interfaces' Changed Bug title to 'ITA: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all interfaces' from 'O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all interfaces' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 621911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621911 628614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628614 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140652785921514.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:39:29 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Hi Reinhard, On 28.07.2014 02:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: * Does it make sense for me to switch my package? The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development you probably want to switch to using it, too. In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in debian/testing. I discussed this with Moritz in the ITP bug. Moritz ended this discussion [a], and as I wasn't convinced by his arguments, I continued my work. If in the end really only one copy is allowed in the next stable release, I think it should be FFmpeg. In consequence this means that any package that builds against the ffmpeg packages currently in NEW won't make it into testing either. I am therefore surprised about the given answer to the question above. It remains to be seen, what the release team prefers: frustrated users and developers or both forks in jessie. The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo fight it out among themselves and pick a winner. We're not going to ship both and hand that mess over to the security team. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#756267: ITP: julia-factcheck -- Midje-like testing for Julia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu * Package name: julia-factcheck Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Author : Zach Allaun z...@hackerschool.com * URL : https://github.com/zachallaun/FactCheck.jl * License : MIT Programming Lang: Julia Description : Midje-like testing for Julia Test framework for Julia, the high-performance programming language -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAK0OdpwwyJfCJxOcPgZ-Nt5uspgTHtV9nNPFWxk=D=amjfk...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
Ciao, On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo fight it out among themselves and pick a winner. We're not going to ship both and hand that mess over to the security team. Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at this stage. It's too late for Jessie. Rather I'd suggest to start reconsidering such switch for Jessie+1. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMHuwoz9xxOPmzprD=aa0xuZkk7Vj4puvJkKYa=9dkgu4jt...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
On Jul 28, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at this stage. It's too late for Jessie. Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed. Personally I feel that we have inflicted libav on our users for way more time than it was sensible to do. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#705767: O: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management
retitle 705767 RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream reassign 705767 ftp.debian.org thanks Re: To 705...@bugs.debian.org 2014-06-30 20140630105724.ga6...@msg.df7cb.de Re: To 705...@bugs.debian.org 2013-11-01 20131101220208.ga19...@msgid.df7cb.de Re: To Debian Bug Tracking System 2013-04-19 20130419185520.ga7...@msgid.df7cb.de I request an adopter for the pycocuma package. I'm not using it anymore, so it should go to a new maintainer. I've upgraded the bug to 'O' now. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of a replacement (short of using Gmail). Any takers? Otherwise I'd propose removing pycocuma. Please remove pycocuma. I've received no feedback on the O bug. Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#705767: O: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 705767 RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream Bug #705767 [wnpp] O: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management Changed Bug title to 'RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream' from 'O: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management' reassign 705767 ftp.debian.org Bug #705767 [wnpp] RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #705767 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #705767 to the same values previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 705767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705767 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14065441707360.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#739538: marked as done (ITP: haskell-setlocale -- Haskell bindings to setlocale())
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:00:07 + with message-id e1xbif1-0003ef...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#739538: fixed in haskell-setlocale 1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #739538, regarding ITP: haskell-setlocale -- Haskell bindings to setlocale() to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 739538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739538 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sven Bartscher sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de * Package name: libghc-setlocale Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Name l@web.de * URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/setlocale * License : PublicDomain Programming Lang: haskell Description : Haskell bindings to setlocale() This package provides haskell bindings to setlocale() I'm going to maintain this package together with a co-maintainer, Thomas Bartscher. We're going to need a sponsor. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: haskell-setlocale Source-Version: 1.0.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of haskell-setlocale, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 739...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sven Bartscher sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de (supplier of updated haskell-setlocale package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:52:21 +0200 Source: haskell-setlocale Binary: libghc-setlocale-dev libghc-setlocale-prof libghc-setlocale-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Sven Bartscher sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de Description: libghc-setlocale-dev - ${haskell:ShortDescription}${haskell:ShortBlurb} libghc-setlocale-doc - ${haskell:ShortDescription}${haskell:ShortBlurb} libghc-setlocale-prof - ${haskell:ShortDescription}${haskell:ShortBlurb} Closes: 739538 Changes: haskell-setlocale (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. (Closes: #739538) Checksums-Sha1: 7fe4e4be8dd421511dc0d55f94e195d33643dc4a 2181 haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.dsc c75f986ee3226d3f33e1e84904f49c94e8b3f521 1994 haskell-setlocale_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz ba82e8b6b08cb64bdf34093ebd78665f80e78c05 1972 haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz 5541aace0bd6f3b9510f212c549da5e0320b43e5 27020 libghc-setlocale-doc_1.0.0-1_all.deb eef84e5eea6c530a483ee8ac8b3392995a3d6233 25458 libghc-setlocale-dev_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb 68c366d56f03d7f1bb366d36e72909914b05f208 26372 libghc-setlocale-prof_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 96da18214042259d1722864049bcaa875138b088bef0cc7c130139d00cafe971 2181 haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.dsc f15fab0209350e2450a411098ad2c83d30dc0cda861f44a57f8829291380ddae 1994 haskell-setlocale_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz 0ff5c2fd3729930a8e4a58833c71ea5b855f9202a0c3712471095e1f871dc1e0 1972 haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz 9f0f059e97955a43f6f1532727c7c625f0c6bc951c02732606ea9524972a6b51 27020 libghc-setlocale-doc_1.0.0-1_all.deb 824602879bffc1d0d8d6d9d3972e1d1c5d875e6c2fdb2a3ea9e9dc8df9c17d6a 25458 libghc-setlocale-dev_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb a605cbab782bea1fc52780acf38eb6b9479b301d8ac1a2c6d613980383687c94 26372 libghc-setlocale-prof_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb Files: f86f871a25b91bec19955b1768861c10 27020 doc extra libghc-setlocale-doc_1.0.0-1_all.deb e250ff8f71164d5bcac558cdb2539834 25458 haskell extra libghc-setlocale-dev_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb 117a2d0f1d862c9356f4b1d3cd0ccbad 26372 haskell extra libghc-setlocale-prof_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb bb50c4d5b3bcbc5344cbc7e806090809 2181 haskell extra haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.dsc f94921ad6057e2eda77a0f5239170388 1994 haskell extra haskell-setlocale_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz 996c01d9b76cb68400bcadde8377ce3f 1972 haskell extra haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTvpcnAAoJED2QirPw+/Ufe8AP/iFn58dwzjPv8knCLz32h/QG ryg+KX7nmBPjfA9ibQ9ZdRQYTSoI1r+txaeoo+BfsCLNcky8IZfs2DrsdVgfPrPJ
Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
Hi Julien, On 28.07.2014 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote: It remains to be seen, what the release team prefers: frustrated users and developers or both forks in jessie. The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo fight it out among themselves and pick a winner. I am not interested in a fight and would prefer it very much if this discussion remained purely technical. Having a fresh memory of the last fight that took place on debian-devel, I do not think that repeating a similar disaster is a good idea. We're not going to ship both and hand that mess over to the security team. Could you please explain what mess you are talking about? According to the changelog[1], there have been 8 security updates for ffmpeg in squeeze. Two of them (4:0.5.6-2 and 4:0.5.6-3) do not contain security related fixes, but rather fix build failures of the previous security upload, so they do not really count. That makes about 6 security fix uploads in about 3 years for squeeze, i.e. 1 upload per 6 month. If there were both forks in Jessie, this might double the number of uploads to 12 in 3 years, but probably some of them could also go through stable-updates instead of stable-security. Is that an unbearable burden? A lot of other software in Debian has already alternatives, like desktop environments, web browsers, text editors and even init systems. Why should this not be the case for a multimedia framework? There is also one particularly similar case, as in the packages are forks and require many security updates: MySQL and MariaDB are currently in Debian testing. Just for comparison, MySQL in squeeze had 3 uploads to stable-security and 3 to oldstable(-security) [2]. As I mentioned this particular example in my discussion with Moritz, he said that the security team will be working with the release team to sort this out for jessie[3]. Now, 5 months later, he seems to have changed his mind, as I am not aware of any such attempt, but instead Moritz seems to support both [4][5]. Thanks in advance for taking the time to answer these questions. Best regards, Andreas 1: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.5.10-1_changelog 2: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/m/mysql-5.1/mysql-5.1_5.1.73-1_changelog 3: https://bugs.debian.org/729203#435 4: https://bugs.debian.org/754940 5: https://bugs.debian.org/754941 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d62f9a.7040...@googlemail.com
Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed. at least in theory. Plus I would definitely appreciate to see some bug stats supporting such a theory. Cheers. (IOhannes et Multimedia guys, please let's keep debian-devel in the loop, I feel this is much more of general interest than a thing that needs to be addressed internally in pkg-multimedia) -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMHuwowu6VQ85Xr-8W0d4rMDHWqF=nfxounncundfpzkgof...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 (resending, to keep debian-devel and the bug-report in the loop) personally i would welcome if both libav and ffmpeg could co-exist within Debian¹. as i see it, libav and ffmpeg have diverged, and as such i would like to have the choice which one to use. On 2014-07-28 11:55, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jul 28, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at this stage. + 1 i don't think that dropping libav is appropriate at all. Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed. at least in theory. Personally I feel that we have inflicted libav on our users for way more time than it was sensible to do. i would appreciate it, if you (and anybody else) used a less flammable | touchy language. fgmadr IOhannes ¹ but then i'm not a member of the security team :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT1jRXAAoJELZQGcR/ejb45GYP/2a06m3B6PRGyjV6oGS1xwDg 0if/Lssn500F8yjrYFKnexKGZg6xncKVKJ+NJncX3pIWMKu/fOXKJusC5Z5eMdvg Ecruo7sXBojUnUxtaibGExkjdCWHv4wC/xwx/gQVUg3ijQGr5CQgZKXRPzf6dAG5 Sc4KS7w1SBtgLWaKvsOVhljSB39lye1cUk8vgkPkvSytJPiFMo1QSCDlbNz5JGbf 4c8viga5W9KCH5zMLzZTRQOkiPQpZMPsd/l220YX6ADwlBhnG/yRFBx7SBOnVDYb BIWb4MFrsCikzC5gJrJZdVAkB96AWOWR6J8N0s8LI2Y1ZwOIM4nJB1FNeQvFRaJI xe5p3dTI5DS7Kvc6i4LjKcO5m1EdZXeS1vV/OMDrLtgpfDC7pfhn3lImaYMPGCpA 60GNGo/PnbUMWGT3Z5JCeX/Q59X53d8DrW7gTcrQoSr6y0DN8AFEpcuDCYbd2ubt /A+0MeocRPNKGiNB7lEfvpSD3x3e4pGlSFB1AMgnwCGmpXzHeA51LzbDJGtfdWon x8L7OD5QD/LwRqQtAncRpf9jB56oJvktmznluSuCcJeY9ADSYH2YDPC1g3CCnuKG SOJpSClZrPjlc2511emDcnOaMJhkyjeQ8R+I67+I05r0jBdk2FDnFASsNVVcRV5o lzO+UTdVUs0nWsiDa+CX =PGZV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d6345a.6050...@debian.org
Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in debian/testing. In consequence this means that any package that builds against the ffmpeg packages currently in NEW won't make it into testing either. I am therefore surprised about the given answer to the More than uncomfortable does not mean will not be included Yes, it does. Someone will have to convince the security team somehow, likely by offering to do the work themselves _and_ convincing them that these new members will be around for long enough. However: The change in Debian-specific symbol versioning and sonames being done to ffmpeg so that it is co-installable with libav *is* a problem. It has to be done in coordination with the Canonical guys, so that both Debian and Ubuntu do the same thing re. ffmpeg sonames and symbol versioning. Otherwise, the ffmpeg packages will be of very limited use (useless to run third-party binary-only games ;-p). I understand perfectly that the soname and symbol versioning clash with libav is not ffmpeg's fault, but that's water (well, sewage) under the bridge. We have to deal with it. Here's an alternative proposal that should be less painful [to our users] in the long run: You need one of the two upstreams to do a *large* major soname bump (at least one order of magnitude higher than what they're currently using), so that both projects can keep evolving with little chance of soname clashes. Symbol versioning will take care of the rest, since both libs carry over their major soname into the symbol version. As it was done upstream, cross-distro/third-party compatibility problems are not increased. Debian will have to package this new bumped upstream release, and get rid of anything built against the old one. It will be easier for Debian if it is ffmpeg upstream that does the soname bump, otherwise we're talking about a huge number of binNMUs. But this is all academic if the security team is not prepared to deal with both libav and ffmpeg at the same time. That effectively forces a choice of either libav, or ffmpeg, and not both. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140728115209.gb12...@khazad-dum.debian.net
Bug#746745: marked as done (ITP: python-pandocfilters -- python bindings for Pandoc's filters)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:09 + with message-id e1xbjb7-00074g...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#746745: fixed in python-pandocfilters 1.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #746745, regarding ITP: python-pandocfilters -- python bindings for Pandoc's filters to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 746745: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746745 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sebastian Humenda shume...@gmx.de * Package name: python-pandocfilters Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : John MacFarlane * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pandocfilters/ * License : BSD3 Programming Lang: Python Description : python bindings for Pandoc's filters Pandoc is a powerful utility to transform various input formats into a wide range of output formats. To alter the exported output document, Pandoc allows the usage of filters, which are pipes that read a JSON serialization of the Pandoc AST from stdin, transform it in some way, and write it to stdout. . This package provides Python/Python3 bindings. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: python-pandocfilters Source-Version: 1.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-pandocfilters, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 746...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastian Humenda shume...@gmx.de (supplier of updated python-pandocfilters package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:04:06 +0200 Source: python-pandocfilters Binary: python-pandocfilters python3-pandocfilters Architecture: source all Version: 1.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Team debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Sebastian Humenda shume...@gmx.de Description: python-pandocfilters - python bindings for Pandoc's filters python3-pandocfilters - python3 bindings for Pandoc's filters Closes: 746745 Changes: python-pandocfilters (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #746745) Checksums-Sha1: 5ef67f503f87bd286c7a8dbe1477ba4df5c91612 2161 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.dsc 6abe48f6ba5b1746c919a3464179d1a242613d4e 7310 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz 7f61654efd7580b28aadcdf69db61bf8171e9e35 2244 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz 0e8696b3ed592708360cce31a88920d21a797e76 10290 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb 7b9a5699cf56d99907b7152780183c9eb75de2bf 10370 python3-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 541d84dab540a53bc50269806acea5139dd23293ae0a3bb36e20df6cb1785a38 2161 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.dsc 83dc6e837f0101477b1f8f3e184bf764686b3175e515e3c4ea8525b4ae485f74 7310 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz c9bae6d4548bfa2e6a965925ec23442bdf985abc6aaca427776dda68c990f73b 2244 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz b78b4642a1b938b9aa8db1d4f890aaf53fe981b621d0defbb6e34cba5756955b 10290 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb 927f5bbd4682119912bbcf867e78ddb10a901d6420e5056b021d97a3de4ecca2 10370 python3-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb Files: 5f897bec618189b41d67a31c5a8de640 10290 python optional python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb e34b8d1193599e6e11953342f4e97906 10370 python optional python3-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb 86eb42c9d7dfbc843f0fe4919208708e 2161 python optional python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.dsc a83eeccd0df79c0f3cf91e0af949a367 7310 python optional python-pandocfilters_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz d6793f016f4727631982acd3cbd0ef2a 2244 python optional python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT0AO/AAoJEBH0lP5vGG7N1lIP/Ri4EbWvE8ZVijEPRgmCd9xd a5RVETIGdqosgncg3mF/LwHyAnyAyw0fLq5cyzNhg4DfUXZG8kPIGt0K9RF5Zd4h Rwhmum51FapH9/hOIl39J3rJjGcQRlc8W+iB3go8HdGo2sz4rXHLrsAv1lTHEfxR ThwY1iT1HP4KBU7Eee25J/yo+pzJwlo+/laDeaaQcLvuS8Xy5zIQARsHODSM1NUq 5FGqJ371SngnbwNtMQNobivGsBjDXeVhWt82fw2bwNOEHEx3qgxWtUnlrJ8qhy2j
Bug#752866: marked as done (ITP: rabbiter -- Twitter client for Rabbit)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:09 + with message-id e1xbjb7-000755...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#752866: fixed in rabbiter 2.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #752866, regarding ITP: rabbiter -- Twitter client for Rabbit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 752866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Owner: Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org Severity: wishlist * Package name: rabbiter Version : 2.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Kouhei Sutou k...@cozmixng.org * URL or Web page : http://rabbit-shocker.org/en/rabbiter/ * License : GPL-2+ Description : Twitter client for Rabbit Rabbiter is a tool that collects tweets related to the talk and sends them to Rabbit as comments. . Rabbiter receives comments from twitter and sends them to Rabbit. Rabbit shows them in your slides. It is very useful when you talk on public events/conferences. --- Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org uwab...@debian.or.jp GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: rabbiter Source-Version: 2.0.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rabbiter, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 752...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org (supplier of updated rabbiter package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:47:40 +0900 Source: rabbiter Binary: rabbiter Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org Description: rabbiter - Twitter client for Rabbit Closes: 752866 Changes: rabbiter (2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #752866) Checksums-Sha1: 55b47b92ddd20a23c6d516a5f384dd609621def9 1986 rabbiter_2.0.2-1.dsc 7abeb4d7dbce276eb18705cbcf6313feaf266c02 14088 rabbiter_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz 4d6f909923ab4cc05591053b05754b1408084083 7932 rabbiter_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz 91813c426cab964cb8e45a18e0d219cc8cf4c2ae 12756 rabbiter_2.0.2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: a5466d92035416b7fce43a364d6711953f7f1815b70dcc9abfeb318101dfa5c2 1986 rabbiter_2.0.2-1.dsc 24316a17eec65d0553eff8bc56ada4e277c179627257879e40d6bd28252d5238 14088 rabbiter_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz 2844fa99108e82e1ec9c13b3e5d83342c335466fdbeceabeb0eb0c7ba9861196 7932 rabbiter_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz e572f08460a6d9084985d01b9736afa844c0b7472c8f85f653ddfde9a25c1454 12756 rabbiter_2.0.2-1_all.deb Files: ab3b3a8a54a1f902c02b560fef01775e 12756 ruby optional rabbiter_2.0.2-1_all.deb 2cfe4f3f26832fadd927025539612a47 1986 ruby optional rabbiter_2.0.2-1.dsc 6611ebf75c183eac4c75ec18acc73911 14088 ruby optional rabbiter_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz 93388d947ed9c09c67fe858cc505786a 7932 ruby optional rabbiter_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT1grQAAoJEHg5YZ3UOWaOm2AP/RxL4ioOkL6bnYiMCJwyYL6s 4ibwwejcPHGzeaqfAhAIM+1PpR3IMyZ0hjEHCaosdiX2OlMHM3tSgy9SWiPI+u+r 512q7YAPQPY+Pe6d5bGprz5pJL+PT9hDeB53keWSpSbRiQ9kJqPZeseIHQe0t3hr WCFSFTggdcBvZw+ObvevDP4HsvYMDwlMDUBh2Ctw7XHsGMR00DGEsgfrZu55lUTt +B4DvH8iZqtORnY6zhvcu+/b7/m5S2tFmkRbaj71aS45Ak0ggjv3tZZUSvbbNLll TlFBsNb8osaMYXsArLWjWilLd7uKATMIyZ1wPAlnzb6GSddss6IehK0ZD5dpOMqe qk36SqG6B8eKoIfgkCzy23fQRNYdIIsxQ4aD8kGdtEp+TzjK+RV73lyYaUwF1sKi Q2JoAnIgGVRBdbNp2JqGtSNrU+PPNo5doAhJRMPVOEhxYcOo8VTEp9pWffm9WUD0 oNaGZrU+YoQ1qJPGGiGZu7hx2cI5/dZAJJKwMEf8EXYPJF/kWOE6r1G38lJoESVX OLGjjVfwGpdtLTMR3RK5HtHynD7PjIRAuzh4E146mqNflbZTioD+gYJrf4qVXPKq dYGosZv6JQGXtJ5zOBMwLcJZ/lLTUz69+5DbVv/MiwhaeapsSOxllDfCHSC6sSnj LaQxLaw0QxS7qiPLH0SX =CtO0 -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#754804: marked as done (ITP: python-flask-httpauth -- Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:08 + with message-id e1xbjb6-00074f...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#754804: fixed in python-flask-httpauth 2.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #754804, regarding ITP: python-flask-httpauth -- Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 754804: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754804 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org * Package name: python-flask-httpauth Version : 2.2.1 Upstream Author : Miguel Grinberg miguelgrinber...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/miguelgrinberg/flask-httpauth/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes Flask-HTTPAuth is a simple extension that provides Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: python-flask-httpauth Source-Version: 2.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-flask-httpauth, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 754...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org (supplier of updated python-flask-httpauth package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:13:01 + Source: python-flask-httpauth Binary: python-flask-httpauth Architecture: source all Version: 2.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org Changed-By: Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org Description: python-flask-httpauth - Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes Closes: 754804 Changes: python-flask-httpauth (2.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial upload. Closes: #754804. Checksums-Sha1: 3e9a5f44d89c45947c5abd45d763a04ac80a8ab8 2020 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.dsc c8dc847469f74ce3a54c25d84efb43748ab7a8f4 25472 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz a6963d02cb81b940023402b52d38f9943ab9c247 3128 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz 3fab063083ab6a6e86f15a923a66949958dece9b 28804 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 51d63638cc51a109be2daf9cd853131c7ff05f8dca83164a2125703d2f9dbd05 2020 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.dsc edbc12b01fc53545ba17fa8824d728f8b712fc85ded905d22496715977b86672 25472 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz 600aa2551dbd62a9654d4c99e9ba6fa613efcf60835fe99fce72bfc19a781c97 3128 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz 2a4fa7ab54d2f91f6016a84da936b92cf75b4e4fd759402656cebe9f26e9052b 28804 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1_all.deb Files: f5375693fc9a87e3eeed54fb4c6ae5ac 28804 python optional python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1_all.deb b0070380991752218b8125b2fdc44de3 2020 python optional python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.dsc 4f4b0a9681019c9f3def207741bd1eed 25472 python optional python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz 36db5cedc198fafc97915c668190fe0b 3128 python optional python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT0/EWAAoJEF3Y4L+Ro9PaD8kQAJl1sK0vA5NM/3oUSf2jtPUc SNc8yAbDwfcwX8DjpZThUgBEBkc4qNxheCsO+W988zAIhINHp7HnkBLhTm+8iIXF QFeii5j6LMO6aQHb3oQqko2D3BS4cxzwo5BGIeODiVIkEP1Cc2iNfB57wvdklWQd tGKkp2W6e21IsmO1zJWX8aT4MfhLUd5teYExTnx38YwSrV79K6RWq3EWqALe3dUR hyX2TkxRz2o5tLV8i362b5vxGpS/tNBdJCtdA5uiavMqJ2ThfVI4jL7GwUUskVg7 cH+dNthkAAHgPtmw75LeWQwE011gIoNo+c+9xD31svE7uzi56V4gLrYKamjHfS0a 8NCKckREBQWR3QvJzd8dDoBbeu1ZmYesvU4JipisMz3JAbnRWzRO4lUkzU0uLXzP Ko81+QHl+GYEsB1gsdObf5rA3IWa4wJsCQ37JIaeKqdLO+GkOUf5HjJ74oe4NMNt gTbd42eAc0k+oQXt71sSnvmS6OwIECn1aWGPOv3BecfTTFsh7z6Zmmt2VHTEKbSe dJilfOGb0MlmWpp2a33j5FE3NtVc+SNCxCa19kggSudX9YQtKdbzfrO2U+LV6neO PmE2w4rTsm1MJqtY88UID5QrPWefKOq7WOjhbl08WMfLXEJ1nkhlggNgYjt4o/ao n9U5FZrwK3hDvv8Atfbg =zC5P -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#755957: marked as done (ITP: git-reintegrate -- Git extension to manage integration branches)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:06 + with message-id e1xbjb4-00072o...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#755957: fixed in git-reintegrate 0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #755957, regarding ITP: git-reintegrate -- Git extension to manage integration branches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 755957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com * Package name: git-reintegrate Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/felipec/git-reintegrate * License : GPL Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Git extension to manage integration branches This tools allows to define which feature branches will be part of your integration branches, and help you update the latter as new versions of the feature branches are available. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: git-reintegrate Source-Version: 0.3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of git-reintegrate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 755...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org (supplier of updated git-reintegrate package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:39:08 +0200 Source: git-reintegrate Binary: git-reintegrate Architecture: source all Version: 0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org Changed-By: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org Description: git-reintegrate - Git extension to manage integration branches Closes: 755957 Changes: git-reintegrate (0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #755957). Checksums-Sha1: ddecf1e61145ce4b08ca02fd04b0f19393f01e88 1291 git-reintegrate_0.3-1.dsc 71466b857bcedc652f29117530ec5208afa47b11 15644 git-reintegrate_0.3.orig.tar.gz 2e05769ab79807b1eedca54c6f1008da267749ba 1908 git-reintegrate_0.3-1.debian.tar.xz 54ff7694a086e78382fe0baa76d4b46c2f5b57c3 9826 git-reintegrate_0.3-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 675b773ca6cf80908dbf66be3fb27ca7f57dcc4d6da265c933b4f3bc1207c547 1291 git-reintegrate_0.3-1.dsc 5d7173f71bfedf1c2f7c99f0615567a14ca4b60664bfc23bf0a4d9350cd46933 15644 git-reintegrate_0.3.orig.tar.gz 218f4b9e4234c0a36ac6a62fed2b53111dee98d2196f29185397694b496a7ec3 1908 git-reintegrate_0.3-1.debian.tar.xz c50146e7eec54bca1a3559e5db3cd6e4674d01d489ecc36f17029b6203b92ff0 9826 git-reintegrate_0.3-1_all.deb Files: 4b6d1bfc1020ba6f36085f74572ae33b 9826 vcs optional git-reintegrate_0.3-1_all.deb 63b81a533e317b2c56f8e2a17be75f0d 1291 vcs optional git-reintegrate_0.3-1.dsc 067115f6e276cabff9cce231368534a2 15644 vcs optional git-reintegrate_0.3.orig.tar.gz d481008ab2ca9d1fc8fd5782467db950 1908 vcs optional git-reintegrate_0.3-1.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iD8DBQFT0Y42V1uVslwzwbgRAhrRAKC3xzxe0/JG5O9+thEkgnijXGfiywCcD6bF +Z/zgangabAUpp0a9K68eDQ= =s0Ti -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#756279: ITP: ui-gxmlcpp -- High-level C++ wrapper library for libxml2/libxslt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stephan Sürken abs...@debian.org * Package name: ui-gxmlcpp Version : 1.4.3 (tarball to be released on SF soon) Upstream Author : Stephan Sürken abs...@debian.org * URL : http://ui-gxmlcpp.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL2+ Programming Lang: C++ Description : High-level C++ wrapper library for libxml2/libxslt ui-gxmlcpp is a high-level C++ wrapper around libxml2 and libxslt. It might be a choice for if your needs are some subset of: - XML DOM Tree parsing. - Basic read/write support from/to trees via XPath. - Serialization. - Stylesheets and stylesheet translation support. - XMLSchema and RelaxNG validation. If your needs are lower-level (e.g., proper DOM tree API support or SAX parsing), gdome2 or xml++ will be the right choices. --- This is the continuation of 'sp-gxmlcpp' (already in Debian). FYI: 'sp-gxmlcpp' has been renamed to 'ui-gxmlcpp' at some point, and also got a dependency on 'ui-utilcpp'. As the latter is now in Debian too, we can provide updates. The old 'sp' and new 'ui' lib* binary packages will not conflict, and will be installable in parallel. 'sp-gxmlcpp' however may eventually be removed completely from the archive later. Hth! Stephan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140728120709.32114.59908.report...@weslok.olx.intra
Bug#433319: xfonts-bolkhov: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 433319 O: xfonts-bolkhov -- Cyrillic fonts for X noowner 433319 tag 433319 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting xfonts-bolkhov. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of xfonts-bolkhov back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting xfonts-bolkhov, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 433319 ITA: xfonts-bolkhov -- Cyrillic fonts for X owner 433319 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 433...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.346002.26281.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#521391: ifrench: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 521391 O: ifrench -- The French dictionary for ispell (Hydro-Quebec version) noowner 521391 tag 521391 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting ifrench. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of ifrench back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting ifrench, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 521391 ITA: ifrench -- The French dictionary for ispell (Hydro-Quebec version) owner 521391 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 521...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.409683.26290.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#491008: qutim: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 491008 RFP: qutim -- instant messenger written in C++ and Qt4 noowner 491008 tag 491008 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qutim. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qutim back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qutim, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 491008 ITP: qutim -- instant messenger written in C++ and Qt4 owner 491008 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 491...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.227156.26650.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#597093: diaspora: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 597093 RFP: diaspora -- Distributed and contextual social networking noowner 597093 tag 597093 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging diaspora. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of diaspora back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging diaspora, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 597093 ITP: diaspora -- Distributed and contextual social networking owner 597093 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 597...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.918951.26590.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#541690: fonts-indic-nonfree: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 541690 RFP: fonts-indic-nonfree -- Non free fonts for Indian languages noowner 541690 tag 541690 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fonts-indic-nonfree. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of fonts-indic-nonfree back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging fonts-indic-nonfree, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 541690 ITP: fonts-indic-nonfree -- Non free fonts for Indian languages owner 541690 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 541...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.635164.26416.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#592494: xseticon: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 592494 RFP: xseticon -- Sets the icon of an X11 window to the specified .png image noowner 592494 tag 592494 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xseticon. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of xseticon back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging xseticon, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 592494 ITP: xseticon -- Sets the icon of an X11 window to the specified .png image owner 592494 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 592...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.159611.26641.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#592135: color: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 592135 RFP: color -- create ANSI escape codes to color shell output noowner 592135 tag 592135 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging color. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of color back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging color, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 592135 ITP: color -- create ANSI escape codes to color shell output owner 592135 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 592...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.762428.26569.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#527162: gitorious: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 527162 RFP: gitorious -- Git based tool for collaborating on distributed open source projects noowner 527162 tag 527162 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gitorious. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gitorious back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging gitorious, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 527162 ITP: gitorious -- Git based tool for collaborating on distributed open source projects owner 527162 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 527...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.458592.26392.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#603293: festige: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 603293 RFP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst noowner 603293 tag 603293 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging festige. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of festige back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging festige, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 603293 ITP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst owner 603293 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 603...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.964504.26599.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#430140: hoard: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 430140 RFP: hoard -- Fast, scalable, and efficient replacement memory allocator noowner 430140 tag 430140 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hoard. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of hoard back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging hoard, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 430140 ITP: hoard -- Fast, scalable, and efficient replacement memory allocator owner 430140 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 430...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.008448.26467.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#465331: cytoscape: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 465331 RFP: cytoscape -- scientific network analysis and noowner 465331 tag 465331 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cytoscape. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cytoscape back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging cytoscape, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 465331 ITP: cytoscape -- scientific network analysis and owner 465331 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 465...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.116349.26635.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#608466: abcl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 608466 RFP: abcl -- A full implementation of the Common Lisp language running in JVM noowner 608466 tag 608466 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging abcl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of abcl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging abcl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 608466 ITP: abcl -- A full implementation of the Common Lisp language running in JVM owner 608466 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 608...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.249472.26653.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#624278: ruby-debug: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 624278 RFP: ruby-debug -- Faster implementation of the standard debug.rb noowner 624278 tag 624278 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ruby-debug. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ruby-debug back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging ruby-debug, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 624278 ITP: ruby-debug -- Faster implementation of the standard debug.rb owner 624278 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 624...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.677839.26422.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#625615: tipp10: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 625615 RFP: tipp10 -- touch typing tutor noowner 625615 tag 625615 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tipp10. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of tipp10 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging tipp10, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 625615 ITP: tipp10 -- touch typing tutor owner 625615 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 625...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.989132.26605.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#613210: replicatorg: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 613210 RFP: replicatorg -- Simple 3D printing program noowner 613210 tag 613210 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging replicatorg. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of replicatorg back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging replicatorg, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 613210 ITP: replicatorg -- Simple 3D printing program owner 613210 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 613...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.412786.26386.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#553996: nec2c: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 553996 O: nec2c -- translation of the NEC2 FORTRAN source code to noowner 553996 tag 553996 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting nec2c. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of nec2c back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting nec2c, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 553996 ITA: nec2c -- translation of the NEC2 FORTRAN source code to owner 553996 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 553...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.432827.26293.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#570439: lessfs: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 570439 RFP: lessfs -- A high performance inline data noowner 570439 tag 570439 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging lessfs. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of lessfs back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging lessfs, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 570439 ITP: lessfs -- A high performance inline data owner 570439 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 570...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.19.26491.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#543169: mochiweb: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 543169 RFP: mochiweb -- Erlang library for building lightweight noowner 543169 tag 543169 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mochiweb. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of mochiweb back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging mochiweb, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 543169 ITP: mochiweb -- Erlang library for building lightweight owner 543169 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 543...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.849158.26581.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#543296: pycdio: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 543296 RFP: pycdio -- Python interface to libcdio optical media control library noowner 543296 tag 543296 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pycdio. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of pycdio back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging pycdio, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 543296 ITP: pycdio -- Python interface to libcdio optical media control library owner 543296 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 543...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.369503.26515.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#628157: worklog: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 628157 O: worklog -- Keep Track of Time worked on Projects noowner 628157 tag 628157 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting worklog. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of worklog back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting worklog, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 628157 ITA: worklog -- Keep Track of Time worked on Projects owner 628157 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 628...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.367489.26284.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#651944: friendica: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 651944 RFP: friendica -- PHP/MySQL based decentral social network platform noowner 651944 tag 651944 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging friendica. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of friendica back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging friendica, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 651944 ITP: friendica -- PHP/MySQL based decentral social network platform owner 651944 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 651...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.234060.26362.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#647995: cellprofiler: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 647995 RFP: cellprofiler -- quantitatively measure phenotypes noowner 647995 tag 647995 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cellprofiler. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cellprofiler back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging cellprofiler, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 647995 ITP: cellprofiler -- quantitatively measure phenotypes owner 647995 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 647...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.740629.26566.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#656728: minivmac: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 656728 RFP: minivmac -- a miniature early Macintosh emulator noowner 656728 tag 656728 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging minivmac. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of minivmac back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging minivmac, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 656728 ITP: minivmac -- a miniature early Macintosh emulator owner 656728 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 656...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.413049.26521.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#645103: aspsms-t: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 645103 RFP: aspsms-t -- aspsms-t is an open source /*GPL*/ jabber2sms transport written in perl // http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t noowner 645103 tag 645103 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging aspsms-t. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of aspsms-t back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging aspsms-t, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 645103 ITP: aspsms-t -- aspsms-t is an open source /*GPL*/ jabber2sms transport written in perl // http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t owner 645103 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 645...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.143535.26350.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#650394: tigervnc: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 650394 RFP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC) noowner 650394 tag 650394 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tigervnc. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of tigervnc back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging tigervnc, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 650394 ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC) owner 650394 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 650...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.046847.26620.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#652580: beret: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 652580 RFP: beret -- A 2d puzzle platformer game noowner 652580 tag 652580 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging beret. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of beret back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging beret, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 652580 ITP: beret -- A 2d puzzle platformer game owner 652580 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 652...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.211848.26359.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#650785: anox: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 650785 RFP: anox -- anoX permits to run an application in another X server noowner 650785 tag 650785 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging anox. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of anox back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging anox, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 650785 ITP: anox -- anoX permits to run an application in another X server owner 650785 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 650...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.499613.26533.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#657241: python-pyhash: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 657241 RFP: python-pyhash -- a python non-cryptographic hash library noowner 657241 tag 657241 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-pyhash. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-pyhash back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-pyhash, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 657241 ITP: python-pyhash -- a python non-cryptographic hash library owner 657241 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 657...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.097852.26479.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#643595: snes9x: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 643595 RFP: snes9x -- Cross-platform SNES emulator noowner 643595 tag 643595 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging snes9x. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of snes9x back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging snes9x, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 643595 ITP: snes9x -- Cross-platform SNES emulator owner 643595 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 643...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.051452.26473.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#647573: flaskext.uploads: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 647573 RFP: flaskext.uploads -- Upload handling utility for flask applications noowner 647573 tag 647573 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging flaskext.uploads. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of flaskext.uploads back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging flaskext.uploads, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 647573 ITP: flaskext.uploads -- Upload handling utility for flask applications owner 647573 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 647...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.720288.26428.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#651101: pymysql: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 651101 RFP: pymysql -- Pure Python DB-API Interface for MySQL noowner 651101 tag 651101 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pymysql. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of pymysql back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging pymysql, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 651101 ITP: pymysql -- Pure Python DB-API Interface for MySQL owner 651101 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 651...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.785325.26572.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#648668: libjreen: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 648668 RFP: libjreen -- powerful Jabber/XMPP library noowner 648668 tag 648668 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libjreen. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libjreen back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libjreen, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 648668 ITP: libjreen -- powerful Jabber/XMPP library owner 648668 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 648...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.085090.26629.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#628285: xul-ext-pencil: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 628285 RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool noowner 628285 tag 628285 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xul-ext-pencil. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of xul-ext-pencil back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging xul-ext-pencil, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 628285 ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool owner 628285 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 628...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.480685.26395.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#636317: libagar: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 636317 RFP: libagar -- a portable GUI toolkit noowner 636317 tag 636317 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libagar. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libagar back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libagar, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 636317 ITP: libagar -- a portable GUI toolkit owner 636317 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 636...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.325491.26509.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#639311: veracity: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 639311 RFP: veracity -- a DVCS with corporate capabilities noowner 639311 tag 639311 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging veracity. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of veracity back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging veracity, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 639311 ITP: veracity -- a DVCS with corporate capabilities owner 639311 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 639...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.070300.26626.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#658302: libdigidocpp: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658302 RFP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for processing BDOC digital signatures noowner 658302 tag 658302 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdigidocpp. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libdigidocpp back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libdigidocpp, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658302 ITP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for processing BDOC digital signatures owner 658302 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.204725.26647.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#658303: qesteidutil: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658303 RFP: qesteidutil -- Estonian ID card management utility noowner 658303 tag 658303 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qesteidutil. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qesteidutil back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qesteidutil, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658303 ITP: qesteidutil -- Estonian ID card management utility owner 658303 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.871414.26584.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#662985: gm-assistant: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 662985 RFP: gm-assistant -- Game Master assistant for role-playing games noowner 662985 tag 662985 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gm-assistant. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gm-assistant back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging gm-assistant, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 662985 ITP: gm-assistant -- Game Master assistant for role-playing games owner 662985 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 662...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.828571.26578.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#659348: librejs: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 659348 RFP: librejs -- browser plugin to block non-free JavaScript noowner 659348 tag 659348 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging librejs. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of librejs back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging librejs, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 659348 ITP: librejs -- browser plugin to block non-free JavaScript owner 659348 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 659...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.456236.26527.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#660125: heybuddy: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 660125 RFP: heybuddy -- light identi.ca microblogging client noowner 660125 tag 660125 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging heybuddy. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of heybuddy back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging heybuddy, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 660125 ITP: heybuddy -- light identi.ca microblogging client owner 660125 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.900368.26317.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#660433: libre-jigsaw: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 660433 RFP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game noowner 660433 tag 660433 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libre-jigsaw. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libre-jigsaw back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libre-jigsaw, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 660433 ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game owner 660433 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.586825.26545.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#658304: qdigidoc: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658304 RFP: qdigidoc -- QT-based Digidoc client noowner 658304 tag 658304 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qdigidoc. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qdigidoc back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qdigidoc, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658304 ITP: qdigidoc -- QT-based Digidoc client owner 658304 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.852229.26311.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#658300: libdigidoc: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658300 RFP: libdigidoc -- C++ library for processing DDOC digital signatures (deprecated) noowner 658300 tag 658300 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdigidoc. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libdigidoc back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libdigidoc, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658300 ITP: libdigidoc -- C++ library for processing DDOC digital signatures (deprecated) owner 658300 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.521586.26536.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#657278: python-scrapelib: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 657278 RFP: python-scrapelib -- library for scraping websites noowner 657278 tag 657278 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-scrapelib. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-scrapelib back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-scrapelib, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 657278 ITP: python-scrapelib -- library for scraping websites owner 657278 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 657...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.168946.26488.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#668556: dparser: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 668556 RFP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator noowner 668556 tag 668556 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging dparser. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of dparser back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging dparser, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 668556 ITP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator owner 668556 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 668...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.391371.26518.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#679013: metaphoneptbr: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679013 RFP: metaphoneptbr -- metaphone implementation for brazilian portuguese noowner 679013 tag 679013 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging metaphoneptbr. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of metaphoneptbr back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging metaphoneptbr, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679013 ITP: metaphoneptbr -- metaphone implementation for brazilian portuguese owner 679013 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.036125.26617.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#669068: trelby: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 669068 RFP: trelby -- movie screenplay writing software noowner 669068 tag 669068 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging trelby. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of trelby back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging trelby, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 669068 ITP: trelby -- movie screenplay writing software owner 669068 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 669...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.034208.26335.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#691191: cucumber-rails: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 691191 RFP: cucumber-rails -- A gem that allow you to execute feature documentation noowner 691191 tag 691191 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cucumber-rails. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cucumber-rails back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging cucumber-rails, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 691191 ITP: cucumber-rails -- A gem that allow you to execute feature documentation owner 691191 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 691...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.877808.26314.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#693230: multimail: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 693230 O: multimail -- Offline reader for BW, QWK,OMEN and SOUP noowner 693230 tag 693230 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting multimail. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of multimail back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting multimail, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 693230 ITA: multimail -- Offline reader for BW, QWK,OMEN and SOUP owner 693230 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 693...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.452534.26296.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#691349: libopencm3: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 691349 RFP: libopencm3 -- firmware library for ARM Cortex-M3 and similar microcontrollers noowner 691349 tag 691349 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libopencm3. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libopencm3 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libopencm3, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 691349 ITP: libopencm3 -- firmware library for ARM Cortex-M3 and similar microcontrollers owner 691349 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 691...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.971247.26326.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#675202: strap-base: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 675202 RFP: strap-base -- Code-base for Strap - A GUI for aligning proteins by sequence and structure noowner 675202 tag 675202 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging strap-base. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of strap-base back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging strap-base, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 675202 ITP: strap-base -- Code-base for Strap - A GUI for aligning proteins by sequence and structure owner 675202 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 675...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.478259.26530.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#693774: grub-loopback-iso: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 693774 RFP: grub-loopback-iso -- Boot a compatible loopback noowner 693774 tag 693774 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging grub-loopback-iso. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of grub-loopback-iso back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging grub-loopback-iso, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 693774 ITP: grub-loopback-iso -- Boot a compatible loopback owner 693774 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 693...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.718123.26563.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#694134: leaflet-tilejson: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 694134 RFP: leaflet-tilejson -- leaflet-tilejson adds support for the TileJSON specification to the Leaflet map client noowner 694134 tag 694134 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging leaflet-tilejson. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of leaflet-tilejson back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging leaflet-tilejson, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 694134 ITP: leaflet-tilejson -- leaflet-tilejson adds support for the TileJSON specification to the Leaflet map client owner 694134 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 694...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.546996.26404.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#697781: hamster-time-tracker: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 697781 RFP: hamster-time-tracker -- The linux time tracker noowner 697781 tag 697781 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hamster-time-tracker. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of hamster-time-tracker back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging hamster-time-tracker, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 697781 ITP: hamster-time-tracker -- The linux time tracker owner 697781 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 697...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.807113.26305.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#697137: whohas: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 697137 O: whohas -- query multiple distributions' package archives noowner 697137 tag 697137 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting whohas. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of whohas back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting whohas, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 697137 ITA: whohas -- query multiple distributions' package archives owner 697137 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 697...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.473109.26299.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#696137: libtie-cache-perl: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 696137 O: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in Memory noowner 696137 tag 696137 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting libtie-cache-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of libtie-cache-perl back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting libtie-cache-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 696137 ITA: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in Memory owner 696137 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 696...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.493503.26302.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#698825: ad2openldap: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 698825 RFP: ad2openldap -- Replication tool to populate OpenLDAP with objects from AD noowner 698825 tag 698825 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ad2openldap. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ad2openldap back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging ad2openldap, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 698825 ITP: ad2openldap -- Replication tool to populate OpenLDAP with objects from AD owner 698825 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 698...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.629252.26551.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699175: gdb-heap: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699175 RFP: gdb-heap -- gdb extension to debug dynamic memory allocation problems noowner 699175 tag 699175 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gdb-heap. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gdb-heap back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging gdb-heap, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699175 ITP: gdb-heap -- gdb extension to debug dynamic memory allocation problems owner 699175 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.829501.26308.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#698278: fortunes-br: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 698278 O: fortunes-br -- fortune cookies in Portuguese noowner 698278 tag 698278 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting fortunes-br. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of fortunes-br back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting fortunes-br, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 698278 ITA: fortunes-br -- fortune cookies in Portuguese owner 698278 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 698...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.390527.26287.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699113: begin: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699113 RFP: begin -- an output modifier noowner 699113 tag 699113 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging begin. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of begin back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging begin, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699113 ITP: begin -- an output modifier owner 699113 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.259073.26500.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699830: python-pygame2: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699830 RFP: python-pygame2 -- Python Multimedia Development Library noowner 699830 tag 699830 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-pygame2. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-pygame2 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-pygame2, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699830 ITP: python-pygame2 -- Python Multimedia Development Library owner 699830 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.301799.26506.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699496: apr-json: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699496 RFP: apr-json -- JSON serializer / deserializer for use with Apache Portable Runtime (APR) noowner 699496 tag 699496 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging apr-json. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of apr-json back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging apr-json, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699496 ITP: apr-json -- JSON serializer / deserializer for use with Apache Portable Runtime (APR) owner 699496 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.000430.26608.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699811: seed7: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699811 RFP: seed7 -- interpreter and compiler of the Seed7 programming language noowner 699811 tag 699811 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging seed7. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of seed7 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging seed7, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699811 ITP: seed7 -- interpreter and compiler of the Seed7 programming language owner 699811 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.433577.26524.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700060: growlight: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700060 RFP: growlight -- Disk manipulation and system preparation tool noowner 700060 tag 700060 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging growlight. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of growlight back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging growlight, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700060 ITP: growlight -- Disk manipulation and system preparation tool owner 700060 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.569976.26407.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700106: libconfig-properties-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700106 RFP: libconfig-properties-perl -- Perl implementation of the java.util.Properties API noowner 700106 tag 700106 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libconfig-properties-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libconfig-properties-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libconfig-properties-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700106 ITP: libconfig-properties-perl -- Perl implementation of the java.util.Properties API owner 700106 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.854408.26446.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699411: python-statsdpy: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699411 RFP: python-statsdpy -- event based statsd implementation noowner 699411 tag 699411 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-statsdpy. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-statsdpy back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-statsdpy, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699411 ITP: python-statsdpy -- event based statsd implementation owner 699411 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.345282.26377.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700425: qrcode: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700425 RFP: qrcode -- python module to create QR codes noowner 700425 tag 700425 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qrcode. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qrcode back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qrcode, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700425 ITP: qrcode -- python module to create QR codes owner 700425 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.674229.26557.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700390: scilab-financial: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700390 RFP: scilab-financial -- Library of financial computations functions based on Scilab noowner 700390 tag 700390 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging scilab-financial. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of scilab-financial back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging scilab-financial, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700390 ITP: scilab-financial -- Library of financial computations functions based on Scilab owner 700390 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.963599.26461.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699579: python-django-chimere: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699579 RFP: python-django-chimere -- collaborative and thematic maps application for Django noowner 699579 tag 699579 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-django-chimere. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-django-chimere back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-django-chimere, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699579 ITP: python-django-chimere -- collaborative and thematic maps application for Django owner 699579 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.614439.26413.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700028: qtweetlib: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700028 RFP: qtweetlib -- qtweetlib is a QT library for talking to twitter noowner 700028 tag 700028 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qtweetlib. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qtweetlib back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qtweetlib, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700028 ITP: qtweetlib -- qtweetlib is a QT library for talking to twitter owner 700028 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.564648.26542.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700103: libdata-uniqid-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700103 RFP: libdata-uniqid-perl -- Perl extension for simple genrating of unique id's noowner 700103 tag 700103 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdata-uniqid-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libdata-uniqid-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libdata-uniqid-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700103 ITP: libdata-uniqid-perl -- Perl extension for simple genrating of unique id's owner 700103 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.806232.26575.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699299: flakey: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699299 RFP: flakey -- code checker using pep8 and pyflakes noowner 699299 tag 699299 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging flakey. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of flakey back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging flakey, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699299 ITP: flakey -- code checker using pep8 and pyflakes owner 699299 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.897766.26452.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#699403: xorg-gtest: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699403 RFP: xorg-gtest -- X.Org dummy testing environment for Google Test noowner 699403 tag 699403 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xorg-gtest. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of xorg-gtest back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging xorg-gtest, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699403 ITP: xorg-gtest -- X.Org dummy testing environment for Google Test owner 699403 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.742691.26431.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700487: salor-hospitality: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700487 RFP: salor-hospitality -- Professional Point of Sale system for the Hospitality Industry, Restaurants and Hotels noowner 700487 tag 700487 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging salor-hospitality. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of salor-hospitality back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging salor-hospitality, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700487 ITP: salor-hospitality -- Professional Point of Sale system for the Hospitality Industry, Restaurants and Hotels owner 700487 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.078852.26341.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#700903: headoverheels: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700903 RFP: headoverheels -- remake of the classical game from the '80s noowner 700903 tag 700903 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging headoverheels. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of headoverheels back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging headoverheels, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700903 ITP: headoverheels -- remake of the classical game from the '80s owner 700903 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.215765.26494.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#701661: haskell-process: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 701661 RFP: haskell-process -- Process libraries in Haskell noowner 701661 tag 701661 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging haskell-process. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of haskell-process back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging haskell-process, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 701661 ITP: haskell-process -- Process libraries in Haskell owner 701661 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.369139.26380.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#702028: openecard: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702028 RFP: openecard -- lightweight eID client, integrates major international standards noowner 702028 tag 702028 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging openecard. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of openecard back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging openecard, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702028 ITP: openecard -- lightweight eID client, integrates major international standards owner 702028 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.011938.26332.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#701103: libanyevent-yubico-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 701103 RFP: libanyevent-yubico-perl -- AnyEvent based Perl module for validating YubiKey OTPs noowner 701103 tag 701103 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libanyevent-yubico-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libanyevent-yubico-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libanyevent-yubico-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 701103 ITP: libanyevent-yubico-perl -- AnyEvent based Perl module for validating YubiKey OTPs owner 701103 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.591767.26410.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#702149: vmodsynth: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702149 RFP: vmodsynth -- a modular software synthesizer noowner 702149 tag 702149 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging vmodsynth. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of vmodsynth back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging vmodsynth, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702149 ITP: vmodsynth -- a modular software synthesizer owner 702149 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.181820.26644.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#702164: esteidcerts: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702164 RFP: esteidcerts -- Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates noowner 702164 tag 702164 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging esteidcerts. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of esteidcerts back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging esteidcerts, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702164 ITP: esteidcerts -- Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates owner 702164 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.656355.26419.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#702162: estonianidcard: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702162 RFP: estonianidcard -- Metapackage installing all the packages for Estonian ID card support noowner 702162 tag 702162 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging estonianidcard. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of estonianidcard back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging estonianidcard, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702162 ITP: estonianidcard -- Metapackage installing all the packages for Estonian ID card support owner 702162 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.765889.26434.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#702223: hunspell-gu: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702223 RFP: hunspell-gu -- Gujarati dictionary for hunspell noowner 702223 tag 702223 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hunspell-gu. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of hunspell-gu back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging hunspell-gu, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702223 ITP: hunspell-gu -- Gujarati dictionary for hunspell owner 702223 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.277023.26368.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#701126: python-shove: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 701126 RFP: python-shove -- python module for object storage to be accessed in a dictionary style noowner 701126 tag 701126 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-shove. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-shove back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-shove, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 701126 ITP: python-shove -- python module for object storage to be accessed in a dictionary style owner 701126 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.607515.26548.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info