Processed: your mail

2014-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle #621911 ITA: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all 
 interfaces
Bug #621911 [wnpp] O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all 
interfaces
Bug #628614 [wnpp] O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all 
interfaces
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all 
interfaces' from 'O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all 
interfaces'
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all 
interfaces' from 'O: wmifinfo -- Dockapp that shows information for all 
interfaces'

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
621911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621911
628614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628614
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140652785921514.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:39:29 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:

 Hi Reinhard,
 
 On 28.07.2014 02:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
 andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
   * Does it make sense for me to switch my package?
 The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development
 you probably want to switch to using it, too.
 
 In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more
 than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in
 debian/testing.
 
 I discussed this with Moritz in the ITP bug. Moritz ended this discussion
 [a], and as I wasn't convinced by his arguments, I continued my work. If in
 the end really only one copy is allowed in the next stable release, I think
 it should be FFmpeg.
 
 In consequence this means that any package that builds
 against the ffmpeg packages currently in NEW won't make it into
 testing either. I am therefore surprised about the given answer to the
 question above.
 
 It remains to be seen, what the release team prefers: frustrated users and
 developers or both forks in jessie.
 
The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo
fight it out among themselves and pick a winner.  We're not going to
ship both and hand that mess over to the security team.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#756267: ITP: julia-factcheck -- Midje-like testing for Julia

2014-07-28 Thread Bálint Réczey
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu

* Package name: julia-factcheck
  Version : 0.1.2
  Upstream Author : Zach Allaun z...@hackerschool.com
* URL : https://github.com/zachallaun/FactCheck.jl
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: Julia
  Description : Midje-like testing for Julia

Test framework for Julia, the high-performance programming language


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAK0OdpwwyJfCJxOcPgZ-Nt5uspgTHtV9nNPFWxk=D=amjfk...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Alessio Treglia
Ciao,

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
 The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo
 fight it out among themselves and pick a winner.  We're not going to
 ship both and hand that mess over to the security team.

Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at
this stage. It's too late for Jessie.
Rather I'd suggest to start reconsidering such switch for Jessie+1.

Cheers.

-- 
Alessio Treglia  | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer|  quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAMHuwoz9xxOPmzprD=aa0xuZkk7Vj4puvJkKYa=9dkgu4jt...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 28, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:

 Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at
 this stage. It's too late for Jessie.
Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an 
immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.

Personally I feel that we have inflicted libav on our users for way more 
time than it was sensible to do.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#705767: O: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management

2014-07-28 Thread Christoph Berg
retitle 705767 RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream
reassign 705767 ftp.debian.org
thanks

Re: To 705...@bugs.debian.org 2014-06-30 20140630105724.ga6...@msg.df7cb.de
 Re: To 705...@bugs.debian.org 2013-11-01 
 20131101220208.ga19...@msgid.df7cb.de
  Re: To Debian Bug Tracking System 2013-04-19 
  20130419185520.ga7...@msgid.df7cb.de
   I request an adopter for the pycocuma package. I'm not using it
   anymore, so it should go to a new maintainer.
  
  I've upgraded the bug to 'O' now.
  
  Unfortunately, I'm not aware of a replacement (short of using Gmail).
 
 Any takers? Otherwise I'd propose removing pycocuma.

Please remove pycocuma. I've received no feedback on the O bug.

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#705767: O: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management

2014-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 705767 RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream
Bug #705767 [wnpp] O: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management
Changed Bug title to 'RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream' from 'O: pycocuma -- 
Pythonic Contact and Customer Management'
 reassign 705767 ftp.debian.org
Bug #705767 [wnpp] RM: pycocuma -- RoM; dead upstream
Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #705767 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #705767 to the same values 
previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
705767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14065441707360.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#739538: marked as done (ITP: haskell-setlocale -- Haskell bindings to setlocale())

2014-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:00:07 +
with message-id e1xbif1-0003ef...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#739538: fixed in haskell-setlocale 1.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #739538,
regarding ITP: haskell-setlocale -- Haskell bindings to setlocale()
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
739538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sven Bartscher sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de

* Package name: libghc-setlocale
  Version : 0.0.3
  Upstream Author : Name l@web.de
* URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/setlocale
* License : PublicDomain
  Programming Lang: haskell
  Description : Haskell bindings to setlocale()

This package provides haskell bindings to setlocale()

I'm going to maintain this package together with a co-maintainer,
Thomas Bartscher.
We're going to need a sponsor.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: haskell-setlocale
Source-Version: 1.0.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
haskell-setlocale, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 739...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sven Bartscher sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de (supplier of updated 
haskell-setlocale package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:52:21 +0200
Source: haskell-setlocale
Binary: libghc-setlocale-dev libghc-setlocale-prof libghc-setlocale-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group 
pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Bartscher sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de
Description:
 libghc-setlocale-dev - ${haskell:ShortDescription}${haskell:ShortBlurb}
 libghc-setlocale-doc - ${haskell:ShortDescription}${haskell:ShortBlurb}
 libghc-setlocale-prof - ${haskell:ShortDescription}${haskell:ShortBlurb}
Closes: 739538
Changes:
 haskell-setlocale (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (Closes: #739538)
Checksums-Sha1:
 7fe4e4be8dd421511dc0d55f94e195d33643dc4a 2181 haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.dsc
 c75f986ee3226d3f33e1e84904f49c94e8b3f521 1994 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz
 ba82e8b6b08cb64bdf34093ebd78665f80e78c05 1972 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 5541aace0bd6f3b9510f212c549da5e0320b43e5 27020 
libghc-setlocale-doc_1.0.0-1_all.deb
 eef84e5eea6c530a483ee8ac8b3392995a3d6233 25458 
libghc-setlocale-dev_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb
 68c366d56f03d7f1bb366d36e72909914b05f208 26372 
libghc-setlocale-prof_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 96da18214042259d1722864049bcaa875138b088bef0cc7c130139d00cafe971 2181 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.dsc
 f15fab0209350e2450a411098ad2c83d30dc0cda861f44a57f8829291380ddae 1994 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz
 0ff5c2fd3729930a8e4a58833c71ea5b855f9202a0c3712471095e1f871dc1e0 1972 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 9f0f059e97955a43f6f1532727c7c625f0c6bc951c02732606ea9524972a6b51 27020 
libghc-setlocale-doc_1.0.0-1_all.deb
 824602879bffc1d0d8d6d9d3972e1d1c5d875e6c2fdb2a3ea9e9dc8df9c17d6a 25458 
libghc-setlocale-dev_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb
 a605cbab782bea1fc52780acf38eb6b9479b301d8ac1a2c6d613980383687c94 26372 
libghc-setlocale-prof_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb
Files:
 f86f871a25b91bec19955b1768861c10 27020 doc extra 
libghc-setlocale-doc_1.0.0-1_all.deb
 e250ff8f71164d5bcac558cdb2539834 25458 haskell extra 
libghc-setlocale-dev_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb
 117a2d0f1d862c9356f4b1d3cd0ccbad 26372 haskell extra 
libghc-setlocale-prof_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb
 bb50c4d5b3bcbc5344cbc7e806090809 2181 haskell extra 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.dsc
 f94921ad6057e2eda77a0f5239170388 1994 haskell extra 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz
 996c01d9b76cb68400bcadde8377ce3f 1972 haskell extra 
haskell-setlocale_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTvpcnAAoJED2QirPw+/Ufe8AP/iFn58dwzjPv8knCLz32h/QG
ryg+KX7nmBPjfA9ibQ9ZdRQYTSoI1r+txaeoo+BfsCLNcky8IZfs2DrsdVgfPrPJ

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun

Hi Julien,

On 28.07.2014 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:

It remains to be seen, what the release team prefers: frustrated users and
developers or both forks in jessie.


The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo
fight it out among themselves and pick a winner.


I am not interested in a fight and would prefer it very much if this 
discussion remained purely technical.
Having a fresh memory of the last fight that took place on debian-devel, 
I do not think that repeating a similar disaster is a good idea.



 We're not going to ship both and hand that mess over to the security team.


Could you please explain what mess you are talking about?

According to the changelog[1], there have been 8 security updates for 
ffmpeg in squeeze. Two of them (4:0.5.6-2 and 4:0.5.6-3) do not contain 
security related fixes, but rather fix build failures of the previous 
security upload, so they do not really count.
That makes about 6 security fix uploads in about 3 years for squeeze, 
i.e. 1 upload per 6 month.


If there were both forks in Jessie, this might double the number of 
uploads to 12 in 3 years, but probably some of them could also go 
through stable-updates instead of stable-security.


Is that an unbearable burden?

A lot of other software in Debian has already alternatives, like desktop 
environments, web browsers, text editors and even init systems.


Why should this not be the case for a multimedia framework?

There is also one particularly similar case, as in the packages are 
forks and require many security updates:

MySQL and MariaDB are currently in Debian testing.

Just for comparison, MySQL in squeeze had 3 uploads to stable-security 
and 3 to oldstable(-security) [2].


As I mentioned this particular example in my discussion with Moritz, he 
said that the security team will be working with the release

team to sort this out for jessie[3].

Now, 5 months later, he seems to have changed his mind, as I am not 
aware of any such attempt, but instead Moritz seems to support both [4][5].


Thanks in advance for taking the time to answer these questions.

Best regards,
Andreas


1: 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.5.10-1_changelog 

2: 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/m/mysql-5.1/mysql-5.1_5.1.73-1_changelog

3: https://bugs.debian.org/729203#435
4: https://bugs.debian.org/754940
5: https://bugs.debian.org/754941


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d62f9a.7040...@googlemail.com



Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
umlae...@debian.org wrote:
 Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an
  immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.

 at least in theory.

Plus I would definitely appreciate to see some bug stats supporting
such a theory.

Cheers.

(IOhannes et Multimedia guys, please let's keep debian-devel in the
loop, I feel this is much more of general interest than a thing that
needs to be addressed internally in pkg-multimedia)

-- 
Alessio Treglia  | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer|  quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAMHuwowu6VQ85Xr-8W0d4rMDHWqF=nfxounncundfpzkgof...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

(resending, to keep debian-devel and the bug-report in the loop)

personally i would welcome if both libav and ffmpeg could co-exist
within Debian¹.
as i see it, libav and ffmpeg have diverged, and as such i would like
to have the choice which one to use.


On 2014-07-28 11:55, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 On Jul 28, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
 
 Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg 
 now at this stage.

+ 1
i don't think that dropping libav is appropriate at all.

 Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be
 an immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.

at least in theory.


 Personally I feel that we have inflicted libav on our users for
 way more time than it was sensible to do.

i would appreciate it, if you (and anybody else) used a less flammable
| touchy language.


fgmadr
IOhannes



¹ but then i'm not a member of the security team :-)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=PGZV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d6345a.6050...@debian.org



Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
 On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
  In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more
  than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in
  debian/testing. In consequence this means that any package that builds
  against the ffmpeg packages currently in NEW won't make it into
  testing either. I am therefore surprised about the given answer to the
 
 More than uncomfortable does not mean will not be included

Yes, it does.

Someone will have to convince the security team somehow, likely by offering
to do the work themselves _and_ convincing them that these new members will
be around for long enough.

However:

The change in Debian-specific symbol versioning and sonames being done to
ffmpeg so that it is co-installable with libav *is* a problem.

It has to be done in coordination with the Canonical guys, so that both
Debian and Ubuntu do the same thing re.  ffmpeg sonames and symbol
versioning.  Otherwise, the ffmpeg packages will be of very limited use
(useless to run third-party binary-only games ;-p).

I understand perfectly that the soname and symbol versioning clash with
libav is not ffmpeg's fault, but that's water (well, sewage) under the
bridge.  We have to deal with it.  Here's an alternative proposal that
should be less painful [to our users] in the long run:

You need one of the two upstreams to do a *large* major soname bump (at
least one order of magnitude higher than what they're currently using), so
that both projects can keep evolving with little chance of soname clashes.

Symbol versioning will take care of the rest, since both libs carry over
their major soname into the symbol version.  As it was done upstream,
cross-distro/third-party compatibility problems are not increased.

Debian will have to package this new bumped upstream release, and get rid
of anything built against the old one.  It will be easier for Debian if it
is ffmpeg upstream that does the soname bump, otherwise we're talking about
a huge number of binNMUs.

But this is all academic if the security team is not prepared to deal with
both libav and ffmpeg at the same time.  That effectively forces a choice of
either libav, or ffmpeg, and not both.

-- 
  One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140728115209.gb12...@khazad-dum.debian.net



Bug#746745: marked as done (ITP: python-pandocfilters -- python bindings for Pandoc's filters)

2014-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:09 +
with message-id e1xbjb7-00074g...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#746745: fixed in python-pandocfilters 1.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #746745,
regarding ITP: python-pandocfilters -- python bindings for Pandoc's filters
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
746745: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746745
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Humenda shume...@gmx.de

* Package name: python-pandocfilters
  Version : 1.2
  Upstream Author : John MacFarlane
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pandocfilters/
* License : BSD3
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : python bindings for Pandoc's filters
   Pandoc is a powerful utility to transform various input formats into a wide
   range of output formats. To alter the exported output document, Pandoc allows
   the usage of filters, which are pipes that read a JSON serialization of the
   Pandoc AST from stdin, transform it in some way, and write it to stdout.
   .
   This package provides Python/Python3 bindings.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: python-pandocfilters
Source-Version: 1.2.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-pandocfilters, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 746...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastian Humenda shume...@gmx.de (supplier of updated python-pandocfilters 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:04:06 +0200
Source: python-pandocfilters
Binary: python-pandocfilters python3-pandocfilters
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Team debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sebastian Humenda shume...@gmx.de
Description:
 python-pandocfilters - python bindings for Pandoc's filters
 python3-pandocfilters - python3 bindings for Pandoc's filters
Closes: 746745
Changes:
 python-pandocfilters (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #746745)
Checksums-Sha1:
 5ef67f503f87bd286c7a8dbe1477ba4df5c91612 2161 python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.dsc
 6abe48f6ba5b1746c919a3464179d1a242613d4e 7310 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 7f61654efd7580b28aadcdf69db61bf8171e9e35 2244 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 0e8696b3ed592708360cce31a88920d21a797e76 10290 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb
 7b9a5699cf56d99907b7152780183c9eb75de2bf 10370 
python3-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 541d84dab540a53bc50269806acea5139dd23293ae0a3bb36e20df6cb1785a38 2161 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.dsc
 83dc6e837f0101477b1f8f3e184bf764686b3175e515e3c4ea8525b4ae485f74 7310 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 c9bae6d4548bfa2e6a965925ec23442bdf985abc6aaca427776dda68c990f73b 2244 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 b78b4642a1b938b9aa8db1d4f890aaf53fe981b621d0defbb6e34cba5756955b 10290 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb
 927f5bbd4682119912bbcf867e78ddb10a901d6420e5056b021d97a3de4ecca2 10370 
python3-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb
Files:
 5f897bec618189b41d67a31c5a8de640 10290 python optional 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb
 e34b8d1193599e6e11953342f4e97906 10370 python optional 
python3-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1_all.deb
 86eb42c9d7dfbc843f0fe4919208708e 2161 python optional 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.dsc
 a83eeccd0df79c0f3cf91e0af949a367 7310 python optional 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 d6793f016f4727631982acd3cbd0ef2a 2244 python optional 
python-pandocfilters_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT0AO/AAoJEBH0lP5vGG7N1lIP/Ri4EbWvE8ZVijEPRgmCd9xd
a5RVETIGdqosgncg3mF/LwHyAnyAyw0fLq5cyzNhg4DfUXZG8kPIGt0K9RF5Zd4h
Rwhmum51FapH9/hOIl39J3rJjGcQRlc8W+iB3go8HdGo2sz4rXHLrsAv1lTHEfxR
ThwY1iT1HP4KBU7Eee25J/yo+pzJwlo+/laDeaaQcLvuS8Xy5zIQARsHODSM1NUq
5FGqJ371SngnbwNtMQNobivGsBjDXeVhWt82fw2bwNOEHEx3qgxWtUnlrJ8qhy2j

Bug#752866: marked as done (ITP: rabbiter -- Twitter client for Rabbit)

2014-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:09 +
with message-id e1xbjb7-000755...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#752866: fixed in rabbiter 2.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #752866,
regarding ITP: rabbiter -- Twitter client for Rabbit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
752866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Owner: Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: rabbiter
  Version : 2.0.2-1
  Upstream Author : Kouhei Sutou k...@cozmixng.org
* URL or Web page : http://rabbit-shocker.org/en/rabbiter/
* License : GPL-2+
  Description : Twitter client for Rabbit

 Rabbiter is a tool that collects tweets related to the talk and sends
 them to Rabbit as comments.
 .
 Rabbiter receives comments from twitter and sends them to Rabbit.
 Rabbit shows them in your slides. It is very useful when you talk on
 public events/conferences. 

---
Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org
  uwab...@debian.or.jp
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: rabbiter
Source-Version: 2.0.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rabbiter, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 752...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org (supplier of updated rabbiter package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:47:40 +0900
Source: rabbiter
Binary: rabbiter
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers 
pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org
Description:
 rabbiter   - Twitter client for Rabbit
Closes: 752866
Changes:
 rabbiter (2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #752866)
Checksums-Sha1:
 55b47b92ddd20a23c6d516a5f384dd609621def9 1986 rabbiter_2.0.2-1.dsc
 7abeb4d7dbce276eb18705cbcf6313feaf266c02 14088 rabbiter_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 4d6f909923ab4cc05591053b05754b1408084083 7932 rabbiter_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 91813c426cab964cb8e45a18e0d219cc8cf4c2ae 12756 rabbiter_2.0.2-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 a5466d92035416b7fce43a364d6711953f7f1815b70dcc9abfeb318101dfa5c2 1986 
rabbiter_2.0.2-1.dsc
 24316a17eec65d0553eff8bc56ada4e277c179627257879e40d6bd28252d5238 14088 
rabbiter_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 2844fa99108e82e1ec9c13b3e5d83342c335466fdbeceabeb0eb0c7ba9861196 7932 
rabbiter_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 e572f08460a6d9084985d01b9736afa844c0b7472c8f85f653ddfde9a25c1454 12756 
rabbiter_2.0.2-1_all.deb
Files:
 ab3b3a8a54a1f902c02b560fef01775e 12756 ruby optional rabbiter_2.0.2-1_all.deb
 2cfe4f3f26832fadd927025539612a47 1986 ruby optional rabbiter_2.0.2-1.dsc
 6611ebf75c183eac4c75ec18acc73911 14088 ruby optional rabbiter_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 93388d947ed9c09c67fe858cc505786a 7932 ruby optional 
rabbiter_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=CtO0
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Bug#754804: marked as done (ITP: python-flask-httpauth -- Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes)

2014-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:08 +
with message-id e1xbjb6-00074f...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#754804: fixed in python-flask-httpauth 2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #754804,
regarding ITP: python-flask-httpauth -- Basic and Digest HTTP authentication 
for Flask routes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
754804: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754804
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org

* Package name: python-flask-httpauth
  Version : 2.2.1
  Upstream Author : Miguel Grinberg miguelgrinber...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/miguelgrinberg/flask-httpauth/
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes

Flask-HTTPAuth is a simple extension that provides Basic and Digest HTTP
authentication for Flask routes.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: python-flask-httpauth
Source-Version: 2.2.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-flask-httpauth, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 754...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org (supplier of updated python-flask-httpauth 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:13:01 +
Source: python-flask-httpauth
Binary: python-flask-httpauth
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org
Changed-By: Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org
Description:
 python-flask-httpauth - Basic and Digest HTTP authentication for Flask routes
Closes: 754804
Changes:
 python-flask-httpauth (2.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial upload. Closes: #754804.
Checksums-Sha1:
 3e9a5f44d89c45947c5abd45d763a04ac80a8ab8 2020 python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.dsc
 c8dc847469f74ce3a54c25d84efb43748ab7a8f4 25472 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 a6963d02cb81b940023402b52d38f9943ab9c247 3128 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 3fab063083ab6a6e86f15a923a66949958dece9b 28804 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 51d63638cc51a109be2daf9cd853131c7ff05f8dca83164a2125703d2f9dbd05 2020 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.dsc
 edbc12b01fc53545ba17fa8824d728f8b712fc85ded905d22496715977b86672 25472 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 600aa2551dbd62a9654d4c99e9ba6fa613efcf60835fe99fce72bfc19a781c97 3128 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 2a4fa7ab54d2f91f6016a84da936b92cf75b4e4fd759402656cebe9f26e9052b 28804 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1_all.deb
Files:
 f5375693fc9a87e3eeed54fb4c6ae5ac 28804 python optional 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1_all.deb
 b0070380991752218b8125b2fdc44de3 2020 python optional 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.dsc
 4f4b0a9681019c9f3def207741bd1eed 25472 python optional 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 36db5cedc198fafc97915c668190fe0b 3128 python optional 
python-flask-httpauth_2.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=zC5P
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Bug#755957: marked as done (ITP: git-reintegrate -- Git extension to manage integration branches)

2014-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:06 +
with message-id e1xbjb4-00072o...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#755957: fixed in git-reintegrate 0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #755957,
regarding ITP: git-reintegrate -- Git extension to manage integration branches
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
755957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com

* Package name: git-reintegrate
  Version : 0.3
  Upstream Author : Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/felipec/git-reintegrate
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: Ruby
  Description : Git extension to manage integration branches

This tools allows to define which feature branches will be part of
your integration branches, and help you update the latter as new
versions of the feature branches are available.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: git-reintegrate
Source-Version: 0.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
git-reintegrate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 755...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org (supplier of updated git-reintegrate package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:39:08 +0200
Source: git-reintegrate
Binary: git-reintegrate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org
Changed-By: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org
Description:
 git-reintegrate - Git extension to manage integration branches
Closes: 755957
Changes:
 git-reintegrate (0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #755957).
Checksums-Sha1:
 ddecf1e61145ce4b08ca02fd04b0f19393f01e88 1291 git-reintegrate_0.3-1.dsc
 71466b857bcedc652f29117530ec5208afa47b11 15644 git-reintegrate_0.3.orig.tar.gz
 2e05769ab79807b1eedca54c6f1008da267749ba 1908 
git-reintegrate_0.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 54ff7694a086e78382fe0baa76d4b46c2f5b57c3 9826 git-reintegrate_0.3-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 675b773ca6cf80908dbf66be3fb27ca7f57dcc4d6da265c933b4f3bc1207c547 1291 
git-reintegrate_0.3-1.dsc
 5d7173f71bfedf1c2f7c99f0615567a14ca4b60664bfc23bf0a4d9350cd46933 15644 
git-reintegrate_0.3.orig.tar.gz
 218f4b9e4234c0a36ac6a62fed2b53111dee98d2196f29185397694b496a7ec3 1908 
git-reintegrate_0.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 c50146e7eec54bca1a3559e5db3cd6e4674d01d489ecc36f17029b6203b92ff0 9826 
git-reintegrate_0.3-1_all.deb
Files:
 4b6d1bfc1020ba6f36085f74572ae33b 9826 vcs optional 
git-reintegrate_0.3-1_all.deb
 63b81a533e317b2c56f8e2a17be75f0d 1291 vcs optional git-reintegrate_0.3-1.dsc
 067115f6e276cabff9cce231368534a2 15644 vcs optional 
git-reintegrate_0.3.orig.tar.gz
 d481008ab2ca9d1fc8fd5782467db950 1908 vcs optional 
git-reintegrate_0.3-1.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iD8DBQFT0Y42V1uVslwzwbgRAhrRAKC3xzxe0/JG5O9+thEkgnijXGfiywCcD6bF
+Z/zgangabAUpp0a9K68eDQ=
=s0Ti
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Bug#756279: ITP: ui-gxmlcpp -- High-level C++ wrapper library for libxml2/libxslt

2014-07-28 Thread Stephan Sürken
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephan Sürken abs...@debian.org

* Package name: ui-gxmlcpp
  Version : 1.4.3 (tarball to be released on SF soon)
  Upstream Author : Stephan Sürken abs...@debian.org
* URL : http://ui-gxmlcpp.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL2+
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : High-level C++ wrapper library for libxml2/libxslt

ui-gxmlcpp is a high-level C++ wrapper around libxml2 and
libxslt. It might be a choice for if your needs are some subset
of:

 - XML DOM Tree parsing.
 - Basic read/write support from/to trees via XPath.
 - Serialization.
 - Stylesheets and stylesheet translation support.
 - XMLSchema and RelaxNG validation.

If your needs are lower-level (e.g., proper DOM tree API
support or SAX parsing), gdome2 or xml++ will be the right
choices.
---

This is the continuation of 'sp-gxmlcpp' (already in Debian).

FYI: 'sp-gxmlcpp' has been renamed to 'ui-gxmlcpp' at some
point, and also got a dependency on 'ui-utilcpp'. As the latter
is now in Debian too, we can provide updates.

The old 'sp' and new 'ui' lib* binary packages will not
conflict, and will be installable in parallel. 'sp-gxmlcpp'
however may eventually be removed completely from the archive
later.

Hth!

Stephan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140728120709.32114.59908.report...@weslok.olx.intra



Bug#433319: xfonts-bolkhov: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 433319 O: xfonts-bolkhov -- Cyrillic fonts for X
noowner 433319
tag 433319 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting xfonts-bolkhov. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of xfonts-bolkhov back from ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting xfonts-bolkhov, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 433319 ITA: xfonts-bolkhov -- Cyrillic fonts for X
 owner 433319 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 433...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.346002.26281.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#521391: ifrench: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 521391 O: ifrench -- The French dictionary for ispell (Hydro-Quebec 
version)
noowner 521391
tag 521391 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting ifrench. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of ifrench back from ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting ifrench, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 521391 ITA: ifrench -- The French dictionary for ispell (Hydro-Quebec 
version)
 owner 521391 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 521...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.409683.26290.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#491008: qutim: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 491008 RFP: qutim -- instant messenger written in C++ and Qt4
noowner 491008
tag 491008 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qutim. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of qutim back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging qutim, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 491008 ITP: qutim -- instant messenger written in C++ and Qt4
 owner 491008 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 491...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.227156.26650.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#597093: diaspora: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 597093 RFP: diaspora -- Distributed and contextual social networking
noowner 597093
tag 597093 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging diaspora. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of diaspora back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging diaspora, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 597093 ITP: diaspora -- Distributed and contextual social networking
 owner 597093 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 597...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.918951.26590.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#541690: fonts-indic-nonfree: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 541690 RFP: fonts-indic-nonfree -- Non free fonts for Indian languages
noowner 541690
tag 541690 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fonts-indic-nonfree. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of fonts-indic-nonfree back 
from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging fonts-indic-nonfree, please send a 
mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 541690 ITP: fonts-indic-nonfree -- Non free fonts for Indian languages
 owner 541690 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 541...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.635164.26416.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#592494: xseticon: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 592494 RFP: xseticon -- Sets the icon of an X11 window to the specified 
.png image
noowner 592494
tag 592494 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xseticon. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of xseticon back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging xseticon, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 592494 ITP: xseticon -- Sets the icon of an X11 window to the 
specified .png image
 owner 592494 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 592...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.159611.26641.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#592135: color: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 592135 RFP: color -- create ANSI escape codes to color shell output
noowner 592135
tag 592135 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging color. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of color back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging color, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 592135 ITP: color -- create ANSI escape codes to color shell output
 owner 592135 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 592...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.762428.26569.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#527162: gitorious: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 527162 RFP: gitorious -- Git based tool for collaborating on 
distributed open source projects
noowner 527162
tag 527162 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gitorious. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of gitorious back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging gitorious, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 527162 ITP: gitorious -- Git based tool for collaborating on 
distributed open source projects
 owner 527162 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 527...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.458592.26392.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#603293: festige: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 603293 RFP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst
noowner 603293
tag 603293 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging festige. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of festige back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging festige, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 603293 ITP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst
 owner 603293 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 603...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.964504.26599.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#430140: hoard: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 430140 RFP: hoard -- Fast, scalable, and efficient replacement memory 
allocator
noowner 430140
tag 430140 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hoard. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of hoard back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging hoard, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 430140 ITP: hoard -- Fast, scalable, and efficient replacement memory 
allocator
 owner 430140 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 430...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.008448.26467.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#465331: cytoscape: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 465331 RFP: cytoscape -- scientific network analysis and
noowner 465331
tag 465331 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cytoscape. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of cytoscape back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging cytoscape, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 465331 ITP: cytoscape -- scientific network analysis and
 owner 465331 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 465...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.116349.26635.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#608466: abcl: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 608466 RFP: abcl -- A full implementation of the Common Lisp language 
running in JVM
noowner 608466
tag 608466 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging abcl. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of abcl back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging abcl, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 608466 ITP: abcl -- A full implementation of the Common Lisp language 
running in JVM
 owner 608466 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 608...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.249472.26653.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#624278: ruby-debug: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 624278 RFP: ruby-debug -- Faster implementation of the standard debug.rb
noowner 624278
tag 624278 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ruby-debug. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of ruby-debug back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging ruby-debug, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 624278 ITP: ruby-debug -- Faster implementation of the standard 
debug.rb
 owner 624278 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 624...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.677839.26422.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#625615: tipp10: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 625615 RFP: tipp10 -- touch typing tutor
noowner 625615
tag 625615 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tipp10. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of tipp10 back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging tipp10, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 625615 ITP: tipp10 -- touch typing tutor
 owner 625615 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 625...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.989132.26605.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#613210: replicatorg: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 613210 RFP: replicatorg -- Simple 3D printing program
noowner 613210
tag 613210 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging replicatorg. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of replicatorg back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging replicatorg, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 613210 ITP: replicatorg -- Simple 3D printing program
 owner 613210 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 613...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.412786.26386.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#553996: nec2c: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 553996 O: nec2c -- translation of the NEC2 FORTRAN source code to
noowner 553996
tag 553996 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting nec2c. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of nec2c back from ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting nec2c, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 553996 ITA: nec2c -- translation of the NEC2 FORTRAN source code to
 owner 553996 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 553...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.432827.26293.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#570439: lessfs: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 570439 RFP: lessfs -- A high performance inline data
noowner 570439
tag 570439 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging lessfs. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of lessfs back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging lessfs, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 570439 ITP: lessfs -- A high performance inline data
 owner 570439 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 570...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.19.26491.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#543169: mochiweb: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 543169 RFP: mochiweb -- Erlang library for building lightweight
noowner 543169
tag 543169 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mochiweb. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of mochiweb back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging mochiweb, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 543169 ITP: mochiweb -- Erlang library for building lightweight
 owner 543169 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 543...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.849158.26581.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#543296: pycdio: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 543296 RFP: pycdio -- Python interface to libcdio optical media control 
library
noowner 543296
tag 543296 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pycdio. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of pycdio back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging pycdio, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 543296 ITP: pycdio -- Python interface to libcdio optical media 
control library
 owner 543296 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 543...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.369503.26515.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#628157: worklog: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 628157 O: worklog -- Keep Track of Time worked on Projects
noowner 628157
tag 628157 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting worklog. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of worklog back from ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting worklog, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 628157 ITA: worklog -- Keep Track of Time worked on Projects
 owner 628157 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 628...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.367489.26284.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#651944: friendica: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 651944 RFP: friendica -- PHP/MySQL based decentral social network 
platform
noowner 651944
tag 651944 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging friendica. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of friendica back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging friendica, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 651944 ITP: friendica -- PHP/MySQL based decentral social network 
platform
 owner 651944 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 651...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.234060.26362.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#647995: cellprofiler: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 647995 RFP: cellprofiler -- quantitatively measure phenotypes
noowner 647995
tag 647995 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cellprofiler. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of cellprofiler back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging cellprofiler, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 647995 ITP: cellprofiler -- quantitatively measure phenotypes
 owner 647995 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 647...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.740629.26566.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#656728: minivmac: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 656728 RFP: minivmac -- a miniature early Macintosh emulator
noowner 656728
tag 656728 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging minivmac. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of minivmac back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging minivmac, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 656728 ITP: minivmac -- a miniature early Macintosh emulator
 owner 656728 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 656...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.413049.26521.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#645103: aspsms-t: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 645103 RFP: aspsms-t -- aspsms-t is an open source /*GPL*/ jabber2sms 
transport written in perl // http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t
noowner 645103
tag 645103 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging aspsms-t. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of aspsms-t back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging aspsms-t, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 645103 ITP: aspsms-t -- aspsms-t is an open source /*GPL*/ jabber2sms 
transport written in perl // http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t
 owner 645103 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 645...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.143535.26350.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#650394: tigervnc: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 650394 RFP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)
noowner 650394
tag 650394 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tigervnc. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of tigervnc back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging tigervnc, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 650394 ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)
 owner 650394 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 650...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.046847.26620.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#652580: beret: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 652580 RFP: beret -- A 2d puzzle platformer game
noowner 652580
tag 652580 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging beret. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of beret back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging beret, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 652580 ITP: beret -- A 2d puzzle platformer game
 owner 652580 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 652...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.211848.26359.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#650785: anox: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 650785 RFP: anox -- anoX permits to run an application in another X 
server
noowner 650785
tag 650785 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging anox. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of anox back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging anox, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 650785 ITP: anox -- anoX permits to run an application in another X 
server
 owner 650785 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 650...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.499613.26533.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#657241: python-pyhash: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 657241 RFP: python-pyhash -- a python non-cryptographic hash library
noowner 657241
tag 657241 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-pyhash. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of python-pyhash back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging python-pyhash, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 657241 ITP: python-pyhash -- a python non-cryptographic hash library
 owner 657241 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 657...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.097852.26479.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#643595: snes9x: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 643595 RFP: snes9x -- Cross-platform SNES emulator
noowner 643595
tag 643595 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging snes9x. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of snes9x back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging snes9x, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 643595 ITP: snes9x -- Cross-platform SNES emulator
 owner 643595 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 643...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.051452.26473.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#647573: flaskext.uploads: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 647573 RFP: flaskext.uploads -- Upload handling utility for flask 
applications
noowner 647573
tag 647573 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging flaskext.uploads. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of flaskext.uploads back from 
ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging flaskext.uploads, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 647573 ITP: flaskext.uploads -- Upload handling utility for flask 
applications
 owner 647573 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 647...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.720288.26428.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#651101: pymysql: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 651101 RFP: pymysql -- Pure Python DB-API Interface for MySQL
noowner 651101
tag 651101 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pymysql. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of pymysql back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging pymysql, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 651101 ITP: pymysql -- Pure Python DB-API Interface for MySQL
 owner 651101 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 651...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.785325.26572.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#648668: libjreen: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 648668 RFP: libjreen -- powerful Jabber/XMPP library
noowner 648668
tag 648668 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libjreen. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libjreen back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libjreen, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 648668 ITP: libjreen -- powerful Jabber/XMPP library
 owner 648668 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 648...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.085090.26629.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#628285: xul-ext-pencil: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 628285 RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool
noowner 628285
tag 628285 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xul-ext-pencil. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of xul-ext-pencil back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging xul-ext-pencil, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 628285 ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool
 owner 628285 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 628...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.480685.26395.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#636317: libagar: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 636317 RFP: libagar -- a portable GUI toolkit
noowner 636317
tag 636317 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libagar. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libagar back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libagar, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 636317 ITP: libagar -- a portable GUI toolkit
 owner 636317 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 636...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.325491.26509.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#639311: veracity: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 639311 RFP: veracity -- a DVCS with corporate capabilities
noowner 639311
tag 639311 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging veracity. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of veracity back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging veracity, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 639311 ITP: veracity -- a DVCS with corporate capabilities
 owner 639311 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 639...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.070300.26626.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#658302: libdigidocpp: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 658302 RFP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for processing BDOC digital 
signatures
noowner 658302
tag 658302 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdigidocpp. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libdigidocpp back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libdigidocpp, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 658302 ITP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for processing BDOC digital 
signatures
 owner 658302 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.204725.26647.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#658303: qesteidutil: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 658303 RFP: qesteidutil -- Estonian ID card management utility
noowner 658303
tag 658303 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qesteidutil. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of qesteidutil back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging qesteidutil, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 658303 ITP: qesteidutil -- Estonian ID card management utility
 owner 658303 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.871414.26584.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#662985: gm-assistant: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 662985 RFP: gm-assistant -- Game Master assistant for role-playing games
noowner 662985
tag 662985 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gm-assistant. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of gm-assistant back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging gm-assistant, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 662985 ITP: gm-assistant -- Game Master assistant for role-playing 
games
 owner 662985 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 662...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.828571.26578.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#659348: librejs: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 659348 RFP: librejs -- browser plugin to block non-free JavaScript
noowner 659348
tag 659348 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging librejs. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of librejs back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging librejs, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 659348 ITP: librejs -- browser plugin to block non-free JavaScript
 owner 659348 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 659...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.456236.26527.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#660125: heybuddy: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 660125 RFP: heybuddy -- light identi.ca microblogging client
noowner 660125
tag 660125 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging heybuddy. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of heybuddy back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging heybuddy, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 660125 ITP: heybuddy -- light identi.ca microblogging client
 owner 660125 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.900368.26317.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#660433: libre-jigsaw: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 660433 RFP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game
noowner 660433
tag 660433 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libre-jigsaw. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libre-jigsaw back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libre-jigsaw, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 660433 ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game
 owner 660433 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.586825.26545.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#658304: qdigidoc: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 658304 RFP: qdigidoc -- QT-based Digidoc client
noowner 658304
tag 658304 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qdigidoc. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of qdigidoc back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging qdigidoc, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 658304 ITP: qdigidoc -- QT-based Digidoc client
 owner 658304 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.852229.26311.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#658300: libdigidoc: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 658300 RFP: libdigidoc -- C++ library for processing DDOC digital 
signatures (deprecated)
noowner 658300
tag 658300 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdigidoc. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libdigidoc back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libdigidoc, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 658300 ITP: libdigidoc -- C++ library for processing DDOC digital 
signatures (deprecated)
 owner 658300 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.521586.26536.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#657278: python-scrapelib: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 657278 RFP: python-scrapelib -- library for scraping websites
noowner 657278
tag 657278 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-scrapelib. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of python-scrapelib back from 
ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging python-scrapelib, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 657278 ITP: python-scrapelib -- library for scraping websites
 owner 657278 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 657...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.168946.26488.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#668556: dparser: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 668556 RFP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator
noowner 668556
tag 668556 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging dparser. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of dparser back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging dparser, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 668556 ITP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator
 owner 668556 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 668...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.391371.26518.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#679013: metaphoneptbr: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 679013 RFP: metaphoneptbr -- metaphone implementation for brazilian 
portuguese
noowner 679013
tag 679013 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging metaphoneptbr. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of metaphoneptbr back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging metaphoneptbr, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 679013 ITP: metaphoneptbr -- metaphone implementation for brazilian 
portuguese
 owner 679013 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.036125.26617.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#669068: trelby: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 669068 RFP: trelby -- movie screenplay writing software
noowner 669068
tag 669068 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging trelby. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of trelby back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging trelby, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 669068 ITP: trelby -- movie screenplay writing software
 owner 669068 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 669...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.034208.26335.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#691191: cucumber-rails: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 691191 RFP: cucumber-rails -- A gem that allow you to execute feature 
documentation
noowner 691191
tag 691191 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cucumber-rails. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of cucumber-rails back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging cucumber-rails, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 691191 ITP: cucumber-rails -- A gem that allow you to execute feature 
documentation
 owner 691191 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 691...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.877808.26314.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#693230: multimail: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 693230 O: multimail -- Offline reader for BW, QWK,OMEN and SOUP
noowner 693230
tag 693230 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting multimail. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of multimail back from ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting multimail, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 693230 ITA: multimail -- Offline reader for BW, QWK,OMEN and SOUP
 owner 693230 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 693...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.452534.26296.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#691349: libopencm3: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 691349 RFP: libopencm3 -- firmware library for ARM Cortex-M3 and 
similar microcontrollers
noowner 691349
tag 691349 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libopencm3. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libopencm3 back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libopencm3, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 691349 ITP: libopencm3 -- firmware library for ARM Cortex-M3 and 
similar microcontrollers
 owner 691349 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 691...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.971247.26326.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#675202: strap-base: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 675202 RFP: strap-base -- Code-base for Strap - A GUI for aligning 
proteins by sequence and structure
noowner 675202
tag 675202 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging strap-base. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of strap-base back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging strap-base, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 675202 ITP: strap-base -- Code-base for Strap - A GUI for aligning 
proteins by sequence and structure
 owner 675202 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 675...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.478259.26530.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#693774: grub-loopback-iso: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 693774 RFP: grub-loopback-iso -- Boot a compatible loopback
noowner 693774
tag 693774 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging grub-loopback-iso. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of grub-loopback-iso back from 
ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging grub-loopback-iso, please send a mail 
to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 693774 ITP: grub-loopback-iso -- Boot a compatible loopback
 owner 693774 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 693...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.718123.26563.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#694134: leaflet-tilejson: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 694134 RFP: leaflet-tilejson -- leaflet-tilejson adds support for the 
TileJSON specification to the Leaflet map client
noowner 694134
tag 694134 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging leaflet-tilejson. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of leaflet-tilejson back from 
ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging leaflet-tilejson, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 694134 ITP: leaflet-tilejson -- leaflet-tilejson adds support for the 
TileJSON specification to the Leaflet map client
 owner 694134 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 694...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.546996.26404.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#697781: hamster-time-tracker: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 697781 RFP: hamster-time-tracker -- The linux time tracker
noowner 697781
tag 697781 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hamster-time-tracker. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of hamster-time-tracker back 
from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging hamster-time-tracker, please send a 
mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 697781 ITP: hamster-time-tracker -- The linux time tracker
 owner 697781 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 697...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.807113.26305.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#697137: whohas: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 697137 O: whohas -- query multiple distributions' package archives
noowner 697137
tag 697137 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting whohas. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of whohas back from ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting whohas, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 697137 ITA: whohas -- query multiple distributions' package archives
 owner 697137 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 697...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.473109.26299.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#696137: libtie-cache-perl: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 696137 O: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in Memory
noowner 696137
tag 696137 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting libtie-cache-perl. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libtie-cache-perl back from 
ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting libtie-cache-perl, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 696137 ITA: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in Memory
 owner 696137 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 696...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.493503.26302.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#698825: ad2openldap: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 698825 RFP: ad2openldap -- Replication tool to populate OpenLDAP with 
objects from AD
noowner 698825
tag 698825 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ad2openldap. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of ad2openldap back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging ad2openldap, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 698825 ITP: ad2openldap -- Replication tool to populate OpenLDAP with 
objects from AD
 owner 698825 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 698...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.629252.26551.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699175: gdb-heap: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699175 RFP: gdb-heap -- gdb extension to debug dynamic memory 
allocation problems
noowner 699175
tag 699175 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gdb-heap. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of gdb-heap back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging gdb-heap, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699175 ITP: gdb-heap -- gdb extension to debug dynamic memory 
allocation problems
 owner 699175 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553028.829501.26308.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#698278: fortunes-br: changing back from ITA to O

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 698278 O: fortunes-br -- fortune cookies in Portuguese
noowner 698278
tag 698278 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting fortunes-br. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from adopting the package.

This is an automatic email to change the status of fortunes-br back from ITA
(Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity
during the last 10 months.

If you are still interested in adopting fortunes-br, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 698278 ITA: fortunes-br -- fortune cookies in Portuguese
 owner 698278 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to
time, by mailing 698...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to
adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553025.390527.26287.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699113: begin: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699113 RFP: begin -- an output modifier
noowner 699113
tag 699113 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging begin. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of begin back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging begin, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699113 ITP: begin -- an output modifier
 owner 699113 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.259073.26500.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699830: python-pygame2: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699830 RFP: python-pygame2 -- Python Multimedia Development Library
noowner 699830
tag 699830 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-pygame2. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of python-pygame2 back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging python-pygame2, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699830 ITP: python-pygame2 -- Python Multimedia Development Library
 owner 699830 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.301799.26506.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699496: apr-json: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699496 RFP: apr-json -- JSON serializer / deserializer for use with 
Apache Portable Runtime (APR)
noowner 699496
tag 699496 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging apr-json. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of apr-json back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging apr-json, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699496 ITP: apr-json -- JSON serializer / deserializer for use with 
Apache Portable Runtime (APR)
 owner 699496 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.000430.26608.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699811: seed7: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699811 RFP: seed7 -- interpreter and compiler of the Seed7 programming 
language
noowner 699811
tag 699811 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging seed7. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of seed7 back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging seed7, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699811 ITP: seed7 -- interpreter and compiler of the Seed7 programming 
language
 owner 699811 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.433577.26524.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700060: growlight: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700060 RFP: growlight -- Disk manipulation and system preparation tool
noowner 700060
tag 700060 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging growlight. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of growlight back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging growlight, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700060 ITP: growlight -- Disk manipulation and system preparation tool
 owner 700060 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.569976.26407.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700106: libconfig-properties-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700106 RFP: libconfig-properties-perl -- Perl implementation of the 
java.util.Properties API
noowner 700106
tag 700106 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libconfig-properties-perl. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libconfig-properties-perl 
back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libconfig-properties-perl, please send 
a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700106 ITP: libconfig-properties-perl -- Perl implementation of the 
java.util.Properties API
 owner 700106 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.854408.26446.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699411: python-statsdpy: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699411 RFP: python-statsdpy -- event based statsd implementation
noowner 699411
tag 699411 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-statsdpy. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of python-statsdpy back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging python-statsdpy, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699411 ITP: python-statsdpy -- event based statsd implementation
 owner 699411 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.345282.26377.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700425: qrcode: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700425 RFP: qrcode -- python module to create QR codes
noowner 700425
tag 700425 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qrcode. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of qrcode back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging qrcode, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700425 ITP: qrcode -- python module to create QR codes
 owner 700425 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.674229.26557.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700390: scilab-financial: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700390 RFP: scilab-financial -- Library of financial computations 
functions based on Scilab
noowner 700390
tag 700390 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging scilab-financial. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of scilab-financial back from 
ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging scilab-financial, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700390 ITP: scilab-financial -- Library of financial computations 
functions based on Scilab
 owner 700390 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.963599.26461.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699579: python-django-chimere: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699579 RFP: python-django-chimere -- collaborative and thematic maps 
application for Django
noowner 699579
tag 699579 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-django-chimere. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of python-django-chimere back 
from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging python-django-chimere, please send a 
mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699579 ITP: python-django-chimere -- collaborative and thematic maps 
application for Django
 owner 699579 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.614439.26413.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700028: qtweetlib: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700028 RFP: qtweetlib -- qtweetlib is a QT library for talking to 
twitter
noowner 700028
tag 700028 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qtweetlib. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of qtweetlib back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging qtweetlib, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700028 ITP: qtweetlib -- qtweetlib is a QT library for talking to 
twitter
 owner 700028 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.564648.26542.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700103: libdata-uniqid-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700103 RFP: libdata-uniqid-perl -- Perl extension for simple genrating 
of unique id's
noowner 700103
tag 700103 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdata-uniqid-perl. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libdata-uniqid-perl back 
from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libdata-uniqid-perl, please send a 
mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700103 ITP: libdata-uniqid-perl -- Perl extension for simple genrating 
of unique id's
 owner 700103 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.806232.26575.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699299: flakey: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699299 RFP: flakey -- code checker using pep8 and pyflakes
noowner 699299
tag 699299 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging flakey. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of flakey back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging flakey, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699299 ITP: flakey -- code checker using pep8 and pyflakes
 owner 699299 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.897766.26452.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#699403: xorg-gtest: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 699403 RFP: xorg-gtest -- X.Org dummy testing environment for Google 
Test
noowner 699403
tag 699403 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xorg-gtest. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of xorg-gtest back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging xorg-gtest, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 699403 ITP: xorg-gtest -- X.Org dummy testing environment for Google 
Test
 owner 699403 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.742691.26431.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700487: salor-hospitality: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700487 RFP: salor-hospitality -- Professional Point of Sale system for 
the Hospitality Industry, Restaurants and Hotels
noowner 700487
tag 700487 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging salor-hospitality. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of salor-hospitality back from 
ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging salor-hospitality, please send a mail 
to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700487 ITP: salor-hospitality -- Professional Point of Sale system for 
the Hospitality Industry, Restaurants and Hotels
 owner 700487 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.078852.26341.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#700903: headoverheels: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 700903 RFP: headoverheels -- remake of the classical game from the '80s
noowner 700903
tag 700903 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging headoverheels. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of headoverheels back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging headoverheels, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 700903 ITP: headoverheels -- remake of the classical game from the '80s
 owner 700903 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.215765.26494.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#701661: haskell-process: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 701661 RFP: haskell-process -- Process libraries in Haskell
noowner 701661
tag 701661 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging haskell-process. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of haskell-process back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging haskell-process, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 701661 ITP: haskell-process -- Process libraries in Haskell
 owner 701661 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.369139.26380.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#702028: openecard: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 702028 RFP: openecard -- lightweight eID client, integrates major 
international standards
noowner 702028
tag 702028 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging openecard. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of openecard back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging openecard, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 702028 ITP: openecard -- lightweight eID client, integrates major 
international standards
 owner 702028 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.011938.26332.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#701103: libanyevent-yubico-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 701103 RFP: libanyevent-yubico-perl -- AnyEvent based Perl module for 
validating YubiKey OTPs
noowner 701103
tag 701103 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libanyevent-yubico-perl. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of libanyevent-yubico-perl back 
from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging libanyevent-yubico-perl, please send a 
mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 701103 ITP: libanyevent-yubico-perl -- AnyEvent based Perl module for 
validating YubiKey OTPs
 owner 701103 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.591767.26410.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#702149: vmodsynth: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 702149 RFP: vmodsynth -- a modular software synthesizer
noowner 702149
tag 702149 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging vmodsynth. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of vmodsynth back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging vmodsynth, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 702149 ITP: vmodsynth -- a modular software synthesizer
 owner 702149 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553031.181820.26644.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#702164: esteidcerts: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 702164 RFP: esteidcerts -- Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP 
certificates
noowner 702164
tag 702164 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging esteidcerts. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of esteidcerts back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging esteidcerts, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 702164 ITP: esteidcerts -- Estonian ID card root, intermediate and 
OCSP certificates
 owner 702164 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.656355.26419.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#702162: estonianidcard: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 702162 RFP: estonianidcard -- Metapackage installing all the packages 
for Estonian ID card support
noowner 702162
tag 702162 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging estonianidcard. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of estonianidcard back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging estonianidcard, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 702162 ITP: estonianidcard -- Metapackage installing all the packages 
for Estonian ID card support
 owner 702162 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.765889.26434.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#702223: hunspell-gu: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 702223 RFP: hunspell-gu -- Gujarati dictionary for hunspell
noowner 702223
tag 702223 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hunspell-gu. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of hunspell-gu back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging hunspell-gu, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 702223 ITP: hunspell-gu -- Gujarati dictionary for hunspell
 owner 702223 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553029.277023.26368.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



Bug#701126: python-shove: changing back from ITP to RFP

2014-07-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 701126 RFP: python-shove -- python module for object storage to be 
accessed in a dictionary style
noowner 701126
tag 701126 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-shove. 
Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of python-shove back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging python-shove, please send a mail to
cont...@bugs.debian.org with:

 retitle 701126 ITP: python-shove -- python module for object storage to be 
accessed in a dictionary style
 owner 701126 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1406553030.607515.26548.nullmai...@xanadu.blop.info



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >