Bug#775436: ITP: xlennart -- An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of Bill and Wingdows
Hi, Ben Hutchings writes: > Practically, it's more important to maintain good relations with Lennart > Poettering than with Bill Gates. fwiw I don't think Lennart Poettering personally would care very much. He has a thick skin and has more than once poked fun at people for poking fun at him. I agree with other people in this thread that there really is no ethical (or technical) difference between xbill and xlennart. Which is why I was mildly shocked to learn that debain has xbill in it's archives. I never seen it before to today, but I find it wildly inappropriate to attack persons in that manner. The fact that Lennart has publicly criticized the open source community for such ad hominem attacks [1] only exacerbates things -- one would *think* that the open source community take this post as an opportunity to prove him wrong. I know that CoC-incantations are frowned upon, but I hope that this goes at least against the spirit of having a CoC (even if maybe -- haven't checked in detail -- not the wording). Which should be to treat people openly and with respect. I don't think Lennart personally would care, no, but I think *we* should care to paint the Opensource community as better than this. From that point of view, if there was a vote and I'd get a vote I would also vote against having xbill in the archive as being a poor taste ad-hominem attack (I mean, for crying out loud, there is an actualy blood-spatter squashing animation in the game, even if it is a poor one). In my opinion it is certainly not an argument to also let xlennart in. [1] https://plus.google.com/app/basic/stream/z13rdjryqyn1xlt3522sxpugoz3gujbhh04 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87zj9i1nw2.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb
Hi Dominique, I think the open issues should be fixed now. Could you please have a look and upload if appropriate? Best, Axel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87eh2ngwx0.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Bug#703188: Re: Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb
Hi, I'll hunt down proper licenses for these two files then. >> • The ruby-pygments.rb thingy This obviously wasn't really clear. I was refering to a comment in the rejection notes about the name of the package (ruby-pygments.rb as opposed to ruby-pygments). I agree with Gergely Nagy, that this is a little bit puzzling, but warranted given that the gem is called that. Best, Axel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874n3pwrph.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Bug#703188: Offer to sponsor ruby-pygments.rb
Hi Dominique, Dominique Dumont writes: > Axel, if you're willing to take over packaging of ruby-pygments.rb, I'll find > the time to sponsor this package. thanks, that is very kind. If I'm correct the way to move forward would be addressing the issues raised in [1]? I will have a look at that tomorrow then. Best, Axel [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/2013-July/015643.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87bny0zcam.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Bug#735295: Packaging
Hi Youhei, I hope you forgive my youthfull indescretion, but after our mails I simply assumed you appreciate the help and did the packaging. You should find it at [1] (so, in the regular place). I also just went ahead and sent an RFS to speed things up (after I verified that everything looks in order). Best, Axel http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-parslet.git;a=summary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zjmjantb.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Bug#735290: Initial packaging
Hi, I have created some initial packaging at [1]. I created it with gem2deb and encountered two issues: • Upstream has a dependency on ruby-multi-json < 1.8. I think this is a stale dependency and reported it upstream (it builds and tests fine with 1.8.4) • There appears to be an additional build-dependency on blankslate. I have not investigated this further yet. Best, Axel [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-toml.git;a=summary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y524avov.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Bug#703188: Any progress?
Hi, there has been 5 months since the last activity on this bug and afaict there has been no changes to the packaging either. Are there still efforts of fixing the package behind the scenes? ruby-pygments.rb is a dependency of the new upstream version of jekyll, so we would like to see this happen. If there is anything I can do to speed this up, please let me know. Best, Axel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3dpckkd.fsf@rincewind.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
