Bug#898931: Fwd: Bug#898931: Acknowledgement (ITP: looking-glass -- An extremely low latency KVM FrameRelay implementation for guests with VGA PCI Passthrough)
And another upstream release before I could find a sponsor. * Package name : looking-glass Packaging link : https://salsa.debian.org/lhw-guest/looking-glass Version : 0+a12 Upstream Author : Geoffrey McRae * URL : https://github.com/gnif/LookingGlass * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: C Description : An extremely low latency KVM FrameRelay implementation for guests with VGA PCI Passthrough
Bug#898931: Acknowledgement (ITP: looking-glass -- An extremely low latency KVM FrameRelay implementation for guests with VGA PCI Passthrough)
A few things have changed since the initial ITP. The package had license issues which have been resolved upstream. The packaging is already finished and available at the link below. * Package name: looking-glass Packaging link : https://salsa.debian.org/lhw-guest/looking-glass Version : 0+a11 Upstream Author : Geoffrey McRae * URL : https://github.com/gnif/LookingGlass * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: C Description : An extremely low latency KVM FrameRelay implementation for guests with VGA PCI Passthrough
Bug#898931: ITP: looking-glass -- An extremely low latency KVM FrameRelay implementation for guests with VGA PCI Passthrough
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller <l...@ring0.de> * Package name: looking-glass Version : 0+a10 Upstream Author : Geoffrey McRae <ge...@hostfission.com> * URL : https://github.com/gnif/LookingGlass/ * License : GPL2+ with OpenSSL Exception Programming Lang: C Description : An extremely low latency KVM FrameRelay implementation for guests with VGA PCI Passthrough LookingGlass enables you to use shared memory to pass rendered frames from a virtual machine back to the host system. This is exceptionally useful for IOMMU/VFIO graphics card passthrough setups.
Bug#885661: ITP: cli-helpers -- Helper library for creating Python CLI applications
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller <l...@ring0.de> * Package name: cli-helpers Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Amjith Ramanujam <amjit...@gmail.com> * URL : http:github.com/dbcli/cli_helpers * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Helper library for creating Python CLI applications A Python package that makes it easy to perform common tasks when building command-line apps. Mostly needed for the newer versions of mycli and pgcli
Bug#725396: RFS: network-manager-ssh/0.9.4-1 [ITP] - ssh vpn for network manager
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "network-manager-ssh" * Package name: network-manager-ssh Version : 0.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Dan Fruehauf <malko...@gmail.com> * URL : https://github.com/danfruehauf/NetworkManager-ssh * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: network-manager-ssh - network management framework (SSH plugin core) network-manager-ssh-gnome - network management framework (SSH plugin GNOME GUI) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/network-manager-ssh Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-manager-ssh/network-manager-ssh_0.9.4-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/danfruehauf/NetworkManager-ssh Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #725396) Regards, Lennart Weller
Bug#725396:
This sounds like a nice plugin. I would package it if nobody else is working on it.
Bug#794250: pgcli packaging progress
Hey, I already finished the packaging a while back when pgcli didn't need pgspecial yet. I just updated my version to 0.20.1 and added a reference to your package in my git[1] and also added the git-dpm stuff. My normal sponsor is currently really busy and I myself was too, so I hadn't looked for someone else to sponsor it. I would prefer uploading it to collab-maint git and in case it is still a requirement for PAPT then do a subversion export from there. So to answer your questions. Still interested in maintaining or co-maintaining pgcli but I do need a sponsor for it. I also need one for mycli in case you are interested (same developer just mysql/mariadb). Lennart [1] https://git.ring0.de/debian/python-pgcli November 23 2015 5:15 PM, "ChangZhuo Chen"wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > Are you still interesting in pgcli packaging? I am working on its > dependency python-pgspecial [0], and it will be ready once the upstream > fix the license issue [1]. > > Please let me know if you need help or sponsor. > > [0] https://bugs.debian.org/805882 > [1] https://github.com/dbcli/pgspecial/issues/7 > > -- > ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) > Debian Developer > Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D
Bug#794251: need to update python-pymysql ?
Potentially yes. I'm currently trying to get it to work with 0.6.2, if you want you can follow that progress on the github tracker[0]. Otherwise I will have no choice but to ask the PyMySQL-maintainers to update the debian version. Lennart [0] https://github.com/dbcli/mycli/issues/155 September 22 2015 12:30 PM, j...@free.fr wrote: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/mycli", line 5, in > from pkg_resources import load_entry_point > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 2876, in > > working_set = WorkingSet._build_master() > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 451, in > _build_master > return cls._build_from_requirements(__requires__) > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 464, in > _build_from_requirements > dists = ws.resolve(reqs, Environment()) > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 639, in resolve > raise DistributionNotFound(req) > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: PyMySQL>=0.6.6
Bug#797654: ITP: s3backer -- Amazon AWS S3-backed virtual hard disk device
September 1 2015 5:27 PM, "Nikolaus Rath" <nikol...@rath.org> wrote: > Why compare it with something that has been unmaintained for years and is > not even in Debian? (Leaving alone the fact that there are at least 3 > projects calling themselves s3fs, but AFAIK they're all in similar > states). > > Contrasting it with something like S3QL would probably be more helpful > :-). As you said there are three different projects with the name s3fs. But the one I was referring to, s3fs-fuse[1], is actively maintained while s3fs (python)[2] and s3fslite[3] are not. The name doesn't really matter though as the approach of all of them and S3QL is pretty much the same. Create an S3 based filesystem. s3backer on the other hand exposes just a single "block" device to the system and allows common filesystems to be used on top of it. I kinda like that approach so I went with it. Cheers, Lennart Weller [1] https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse [2] https://fedorahosted.org/s3fs/ [3] https://github.com/russross/s3fslite
Bug#797654: ITP: s3backer -- Amazon AWS S3-backed virtual hard disk device
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller <l...@ring0.de> * Package name: s3backer Version : 1.4.1 Upstream Author : Archie L. Cobbs <arc...@dellroad.org> * URL : https://www.github.com/archiecobbs/s3backer * License : GPL, OpenSSL Programming Lang: C Description : Amazon AWS S3-backed virtual hard disk device s3backer is a filesystem that contains a single file backed by the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3). The blocks of the file are stored as S3 objects. This way s3backer acts as a virtual hard disk device. s3backer also offers encryption as part of the VHD. s3backer offers some great benefits over s3fs as any filesystem can be used on top of the VHD removing all inconsistencies which might occur with a naive implementation of a filesystem. Currently there is a license conflict between the GPL code and OpenSSL. I have forwarded some of the common solutions to the upstream author.
Bug#794570: ITP: python-prompt-toolkit -- Python library for building interactive command lines
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller l...@ring0.de * Package name: python-prompt-toolkit Version : 0.45 Upstream Author : Jonathan Slenders * URL : https://github.com/jonathanslenders/python-prompt-toolkit * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Python library for building interactive command lines prompt_toolkit is a GNU readline replacement written in pure Python supporting advanced features like syntax highlighting, multi line editing and code completion. The package is a dependency of pgcli and mycli (#794250, #794251) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150804142314.21415.53080.report...@lhw.ring0.de
Bug#794250: ITP: pgcli -- CLI for PostgreSQL with syntax highlighting and completion
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller l...@ring0.de * Package name: pgcli Version : 0.18.0 Upstream Author : Amjith Ramanujam amjit...@gmail.com * URL : http://pgcli.com/ * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Python Description : CLI for PostgreSQL with syntax highlighting and completion This is a PostgreSQL client that does auto-completion and syntax highlighting. The CLI is also capable of pretty printing tabular data Reasons for ITP: Usefuly utility for people who like to do their SQL work on the Shell. I intend to maintain this with either sponsorship from PATP or my personal sponsor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150731171957.29633.26292.report...@lhw.ring0.de
Bug#794251: ITP: mycli -- CLI for MySQL/MariaDB with syntax highlighting and completion
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller l...@ring0.de * Package name: mycli Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Amjith Ramanujam amjit...@gmail.com * URL : http://mycli.net * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Python Description : CLI for MySQL/MariaDB with syntax highlighting and completion This is a MySQL/Mariadb client that does auto-completion and syntax highlighting. The CLI is also capable of pretty printing tabular data Reasons for ITP: Usefuly utility for people who like to do their SQL work on the Shell. I intend to maintain this with either sponsorship from PATP or my personal sponsor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150731172211.30047.55061.report...@lhw.ring0.de
Bug#792228: ITP: termdebug -- Tools for recording and replaying terminal I/O
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller l...@ring0.de * Package name: termdebug Version : 2.2 Upstream Author : G.P Halkes * URL : http://os.ghalkes.nl/termdebug.html * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: C Description : Tools for recording and replaying terminal I/O Termdebug is a set of utilities to record and replay the input and output of terminal programs. Its main goal is to aid in developing and debugging terminal programs. Similar to termrec/termplay and nethack-recorder/player, neither of which is packaged for debian, but also records terminal input. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150712221234.27048.60723.report...@lhw.ring0.de
Bug#667989: ITP: s2tc -- S2TC is a patent-free S3TC compatible texture compression
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart l...@ring0.de * Package name: s2tc Version : 0~git20110809 Upstream Author : Rudolf Polzer divver...@alientrap.org * URL : https://github.com/divVerent/s2tc * License : MIT/X11 Programming Lang: C/C++ Description : S2TC is a patent-free S3TC compatible texture compression implementation S2TC is a patent-free S3TC compatible implementation and provides texture compression to Mesa. The package also includes tools to compress/decompress S2TC textures and convert S3TC textures to S2TC ones using the patent-free algorithm. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120407210739.8751.39434.reportbug@nas.local
Bug#594800: (no subject)
The nvidia-texture-tools are now in debian unstable[1]. If you need any help with creating the package for 0ad drop me a message and I will see how I can be of assistance to you. [1] http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/nvidia-texture-tools -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f7b8308.1000...@ring0.de
Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools
Am 29.03.2012 02:17, schrieb Paul Wise: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 22:40 +0200, Lennart Weller wrote: Because I did not plan to have it submitted to debian when I created it for my ubuntu ppa. Hmm, OK. In what way do you think it's broken? Also I did submit [1] the patch for the library versioning but it got ignored so far. Every software which would benefit from the library currently uses the two year old version 2.0.8 and there is more then one open request so why should the library be hidden from the system? Firstly, source code version and SONAME are completely different things. There is no reason to start the SONAME at 2, it should start at 0. Secondly, if upstream is not producing properly versioned shared libraries, it is very inappropriate to trample their SONAME name-space and much better to use a Debian-specific SONAME. If upstream chooses 0 as the SONAME and then makes two new releases with an incompatible ABI, they will be up to SONAME 2 which will be ABI incompatible with the Debian SONAME 2. The SONAME starting with 2 was suggested by my supporter and I understand the reasoning for it. The upstream developer seems to only break ABI in major versions and if someone creates a package for version 1.* than there won't be any conflicts. Also the upstream package does not contain any SO versioning for the current stable release. But I will contact the upstream developer about these concerns. 02-multiarch.patch looks like it *does* need forwarding. This way of implementing multi-arch support is debian specific so I don't think upstream would need this. Which is also written in the abstract of the patch. Building the library with this patch would definitely go against the the multi-arch solution of e.g. RHEL-based distributions. I don't know CMake that well but it appears that upstream is incorrectly hard-coding the lib install directory. Anyone wanting to customise the library dir will get the wrong result. RHEL/Fedora distributions don't support proper multi-arch, they only have bi-arch (aka multilib). When they start switching to proper multi-arch, they are going to need that patch so it is best to get it upstream now. In the upstream version you can currently choose the PREFIX of the installation but it will always be installed to PREFIX/lib. That was fixed by my patch. But as I said I will talk with the upstream author and try to have it added to his version. I used this naming scheme because it is frequently used by other libraries like libc-bin, ncurses-bin, libnotify-bin, libglib2.0-bin and so on. Of course I'm free to any suggestions on this part. Well, ultimately the library isn't the most important part of the package, the important bit is the command-line tools and they should be named appropriately. The libraries come from an embedded code copy of nvidia-oss, not from nvidia-texture-tools itself. I would say the name of the package with the binaries should reflect the above. Embedded code copies are discouraged in Debian. There are also the libsquish and poshlib embedded code copies. Please inform the security team about these issues if the package reaches the archive. http://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies http://code.google.com/p/nvidia-oss/ http://code.google.com/p/libsquish/ http://hookatooka.com/poshlib/ In addition, libsquish can be built with SSE or Altivec on the appropriate platforms, increasing its speed. By embedding libsquish, nvidia-texture-tools is missing out on that speed-up. Since As you can see in the nvidia-oss repository there was no changeset since 2009 where as nvidia-texture-tools received changes to former nvidia-oss directories upto the stable release in 2010 and is still being updated for the next release. Thats why I didn't use the nvidia-oss version. With the other libraries you have a fair point and I will package them seperatly for the next upstream release. I removed gnuwin32 binary files, auto-generated Visual Studio project files (because they had no license header and were not necessary) and a custom configure script which broke automatic cmake building and basically called just cmake in the first place. I will look into it to add this information to the package. You should have a get-orig-source debian/rules target to automatically build/repack the tarball. Please see debian-policy for info on that. Okay I will look into that and add the target. I guess you missed removal of the non-free nvidia logo? Those icons were also inside the visual studio project directories. I didn't even notice that I erased them as the whole directory structure wasn't important to the package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f74a041.3020...@ring0.de
Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools
Am 29.03.2012 14:10, schrieb Fabio: If you are packaging 2.0.8 please have a look at the README.txt and patches at: http://trac.wildfiregames.com/browser/ps/trunk/libraries/nvtt/ The issue139.patch is particularly important: it fixed image corruption I noticed on 0.A.D., see here: http://www.wildfiregames.com/forum/index.php? showtopic=13617view=findpostp=211880 Thanks, Fabio I will look through the patches and add the ones which seem important until the next release update. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f74a085.4020...@ring0.de
Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools
Am 28.03.2012 04:48, schrieb Paul Wise: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Lennart Weller wrote: * Package name: nvidia-texture-tools Version : 2.0.8 Upstream Author : Ignacio Castano icast...@nvidia.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/ * License : MIT/Expat, BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: C++ Description : image processing and texture manipulation tools NVIDIA Texture Tools is a collection of image processing and texture manipulation tools, designed to be integrated in game tools and asset conditioning pipelines. The primary features of the library are mipmap and normal map generation, format conversion and DXT compression. I had intended to package this and have some early packaging already, so if you need a sponsor I can do that. I've been talking to upstream about some deficiencies in the software and its dependencies (that are not yet in Debian). I would suggest that you wait until these discussions are concluded and the upstreams have made new releases before working on the package. I already got a sponsor for the package and I already completed the packaging a few month back but thanks for offering your help. The package is already in collab-maint [1]. And in the new queue for unstable. It was mainly meant to allow to build 0ad. Here [2] is the ITP for 0ad which requires nvidia-texture-tools to continue. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/nvidia-texture-tools.git;a=summary [2] http://bugs.debian.org/594800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f72e736.8030...@ring0.de
Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools
Am 28.03.2012 13:51, schrieb Paul Wise: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 12:25 +0200, Lennart Weller wrote: I already got a sponsor for the package and I already completed the packaging a few month back but thanks for offering your help. How come you didn't file an ITP *before* packaging it? That is what ITPs are for. Because I did not plan to have it submitted to debian when I created it for my ubuntu ppa. The package is already in collab-maint [1]. And in the new queue for unstable. It was mainly meant to allow to build 0ad. Here [2] is the ITP for 0ad which requires nvidia-texture-tools to continue. I see. Here is a quick review of your packaging: Your library versioning is broken, you should use a Debian-specific SONAME until upstream sets that. Personally I don't think the libs should be public, better to put them in a private dir. In what way do you think it's broken? Also I did submit [1] the patch for the library versioning but it got ignored so far. Every software which would benefit from the library currently uses the two year old version 2.0.8 and there is more then one open request so why should the library be hidden from the system? 02-multiarch.patch looks like it *does* need forwarding. This way of implementing multi-arch support is debian specific so I don't think upstream would need this. Which is also written in the abstract of the patch. Building the library with this patch would definitely go against the the multi-arch solution of e.g. RHEL-based distributions. You might want to run wrap-and-sort -sa so that diffs of the debian/ dir are more readable. Didn't know that tool. Thanks for mentioning it. Otherwise I would have done this myself manually in the future. IMO libnvtt-bin should be called nvidia-texture-tools. I used this naming scheme because it is frequently used by other libraries like libc-bin, ncurses-bin, libnotify-bin, libglib2.0-bin and so on. Of course I'm free to any suggestions on this part. The package version has +dfsg in it but there is no indication of how the upstream tarball was repacked and what was non-free. I removed gnuwin32 binary files, auto-generated Visual Studio project files (because they had no license header and were not necessary) and a custom configure script which broke automatic cmake building and basically called just cmake in the first place. I will look into it to add this information to the package. [1] http://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/issues/detail?id=170 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f737746.6050...@ring0.de
Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller l...@ring0.de * Package name: nvidia-texture-tools Version : 2.0.8 Upstream Author : Ignacio Castano icast...@nvidia.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/ * License : MIT/Expat, BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: C++ Description : image processing and texture manipulation tools NVIDIA Texture Tools is a collection of image processing and texture manipulation tools, designed to be integrated in game tools and asset conditioning pipelines. The primary features of the library are mipmap and normal map generation, format conversion and DXT compression. The sourcecode contains algorithms protected by US patent 5,956,431 aka S3TC. Though from what I've read on debian-legal this should be okay as the patent is not actively enforced. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120327191527.2568.48901.reportbug@silverline
Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools
Am 28.03.2012 01:01, schrieb Ben Hutchings: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:15:27PM +0200, Lennart Weller wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lennart Weller l...@ring0.de * Package name: nvidia-texture-tools Version : 2.0.8 Upstream Author : Ignacio Castano icast...@nvidia.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/ * License : MIT/Expat, BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: C++ Description : image processing and texture manipulation tools NVIDIA Texture Tools is a collection of image processing and texture manipulation tools, designed to be integrated in game tools and asset conditioning pipelines. The primary features of the library are mipmap and normal map generation, format conversion and DXT compression. The sourcecode contains algorithms protected by US patent 5,956,431 aka S3TC. Though from what I've read on debian-legal this should be okay as the patent is not actively enforced. Since you've accepted as fact that this software infringes those patents, it looks like you're about to violate item 1 of the Debian patent policy. Ben. S3TC is not actively enforced by S3. And I took this thread [1] as a reference to create the ITP anyway. According to this thread from 2010 there are at least three other projects already using the S3TC algorithms. And there is more than one project which depends on this package. e.g. 0ad and wine [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/12/msg00062.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f725148.3050...@ring0.de