Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-06-02 Thread Maykel Moya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

El 01/06/13 23:15, Chris Boot escribió:

 If you do object, please let me know before 2013-06-08.
 
 I also intend to go over the bugs currently open against ulogd and 
 update/close them as required, starting tomorrow.

I have no objection at all.

Regards,
maykel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=VcWz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51ab77c3.6080...@mmoya.org



Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-06-01 Thread Chris Boot
On 27/05/13 13:39, Chris Boot wrote:
 Now that ulogd-1.x is end-of-life (All production systems should
 migrate to the stable series ulogd-2.x as soon as possible as we do
 not plan to make more 1.x releases.[1]), I'd like to suggest making
 the ulogd package transitional. Do you support this suggestion?
 
 Laszlo: I'd be happy to adopt ulogd to do the transition if you would
 like.

Hi Maykel, Laszlo,

I'd really like to go ahead with the transition from ulogd to ulogd2 if
you don't object. To this end, I intend to take ownership of this bug
next weekend (on or after the 8th of June) and to upload a new version
of ulogd shortly thereafter, which will turn all of the binary packages
into empty transitional packages that depend on ulogd2.

If you do object, please let me know before 2013-06-08.

I also intend to go over the bugs currently open against ulogd and
update/close them as required, starting tomorrow.

Thanks,
Chris

-- 
Chris Boot
bo...@bootc.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-05-27 Thread Chris Boot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 23/05/2013 14:23, Maykel Moya wrote:
 El 23/05/13 07:57, W. van den Akker escribió:
 
 Any progress in this? I like to see v2.0 into debian due to ipv6 
 logging capabilities.
 
 Thanks to nice work by Chris Boot ulogd2 finally entered sid[1].
 See the ITP[2] for further info.
 
 Regards, maykel
 
 [1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/ulogd2 [2]
 http://bugs.debian.org/502305
 

Hi folks,

Indeed, I have uploaded my ulogd2 package. It would be great if you
could have a look and let me know your comments. One of the reasons I
did it as a new package was because I simply couldn't see a way of
converting the configuration between ulogd-1.x and ulogd-2.x at all;
they are very different programs indeed.

Now that ulogd-1.x is end-of-life (All production systems should
migrate to the stable series ulogd-2.x as soon as possible as we do
not plan to make more 1.x releases.[1]), I'd like to suggest making
the ulogd package transitional. Do you support this suggestion?

Laszlo: I'd be happy to adopt ulogd to do the transition if you would
like.

Best regards,
Chris

[1] http://netfilter.org/projects/ulogd/index.html

- -- 
Chris Boot
bo...@bootc.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=taF4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a35417.9040...@bootc.net



Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-05-27 Thread W. van den Akker
Are thinking about backporting it?
My production system is running still 1.x

Greetings,
Willem

On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 13:39 +0100, Chris Boot wrote:

 On 23/05/2013 14:23, Maykel Moya wrote:
  El 23/05/13 07:57, W. van den Akker escribió:
  
  Any progress in this? I like to see v2.0 into debian due to ipv6 
  logging capabilities.
  
  Thanks to nice work by Chris Boot ulogd2 finally entered sid[1].
  See the ITP[2] for further info.
  
  Regards, maykel
  
  [1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/ulogd2 [2]
  http://bugs.debian.org/502305
  
 
 Hi folks,
 
 Indeed, I have uploaded my ulogd2 package. It would be great if you
 could have a look and let me know your comments. One of the reasons I
 did it as a new package was because I simply couldn't see a way of
 converting the configuration between ulogd-1.x and ulogd-2.x at all;
 they are very different programs indeed.
 
 Now that ulogd-1.x is end-of-life (All production systems should
 migrate to the stable series ulogd-2.x as soon as possible as we do
 not plan to make more 1.x releases.[1]), I'd like to suggest making
 the ulogd package transitional. Do you support this suggestion?
 
 Laszlo: I'd be happy to adopt ulogd to do the transition if you would
 like.
 
 Best regards,
 Chris
 
 [1] http://netfilter.org/projects/ulogd/index.html
 




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-05-27 Thread Chris Boot
On 27/05/2013 15:39, W. van den Akker wrote:
 Are thinking about backporting it?
 My production system is running still 1.x

I'd like to, but only once I am completely happy with the packaging. I
have lots of changes lined up for the -2 version that I hope to upload
later in the week. It would also be great to have an answer to my
question about creating transitional packages first.

[adding Laszlo as a CC as he wasn't on the first message, my apologies]

Cheers,
Chris

 On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 13:39 +0100, Chris Boot wrote:
 On 23/05/2013 14:23, Maykel Moya wrote:
  El 23/05/13 07:57, W. van den Akker escribió:
  
  Any progress in this? I like to see v2.0 into debian due to ipv6 
  logging capabilities.
  
  Thanks to nice work by Chris Boot ulogd2 finally entered sid[1].
  See the ITP[2] for further info.
  
  Regards, maykel
  
  [1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/ulogd2 [2]
  http://bugs.debian.org/502305
  

 Hi folks,

 Indeed, I have uploaded my ulogd2 package. It would be great if you
 could have a look and let me know your comments. One of the reasons I
 did it as a new package was because I simply couldn't see a way of
 converting the configuration between ulogd-1.x and ulogd-2.x at all;
 they are very different programs indeed.

 Now that ulogd-1.x is end-of-life (All production systems should
 migrate to the stable series ulogd-2.x as soon as possible as we do
 not plan to make more 1.x releases.[1]), I'd like to suggest making
 the ulogd package transitional. Do you support this suggestion?

 Laszlo: I'd be happy to adopt ulogd to do the transition if you would
 like.

 Best regards,
 Chris

 [1] http://netfilter.org/projects/ulogd/index.html

-- 
Chris Boot
bo...@bootc.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-05-23 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi,

Any progress in this?
I like to see v2.0 into debian due to ipv6 logging capabilities.
If needed I can assist.

Greetings,
Willem


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-05-23 Thread Maykel Moya
El 23/05/13 07:57, W. van den Akker escribió:

 Any progress in this? I like to see v2.0 into debian due to ipv6
 logging capabilities.

Thanks to nice work by Chris Boot ulogd2 finally entered sid[1]. See
the ITP[2] for further info.

Regards,
maykel

[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/ulogd2
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/502305


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/519e1865.1060...@mmoya.org



Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-02-05 Thread Maykel Moya
El 05/02/13 07:23, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) escribió:

 On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 04:22 +0100, Maykel Moya wrote:
 El 05/02/13 03:22, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) escribió:
  I see. Your work have good parts, but contains trivial mistakes as
 well. In short, what's your plans? Do you want to do it yourself or let
 me to do it? In the latter, do you allow me to use parts of your works?
 My plans are basically learn packaging by doing and trying to improve
 the current ulogd situation in Debian. A challenge for a newcomer.
  As you write, it'll be a big challenge for you. Easier and smaller
 packages would suit you better IMHO.
 
 I have no problem with you to use part of my works but with respect to
 the you-or-me thing, do you have any inconvenience with working together
 on this?
  Of course, I'll credit whatever I'll use from your work. We can work
 together, no problem. Still, I advise you to check and learn other,
 smaller packages as well.

Hi Laszlo

Go ahead then. I'm looking forward to see the fix to the library version
issue[1].

It'd be *nice* if you keep a public repo with the packaging work.

Regards,
maykel

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/02/msg00025.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5110de2e.2060...@mmoya.org



Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-02-04 Thread Maykel Moya
El 05/02/13 03:22, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) escribió:

 Hi Maykel,
 
 On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 00:38 +0100, Maykel Moya wrote:
 Please take a look at bug 395302[1] and previous ITP[2].
  I see. Your work have good parts, but contains trivial mistakes as
 well. In short, what's your plans? Do you want to do it yourself or let
 me to do it? In the latter, do you allow me to use parts of your works?

Hello Laszlo

My plans are basically learn packaging by doing and trying to improve
the current ulogd situation in Debian. A challenge for a newcomer.

I have no problem with you to use part of my works but with respect to
the you-or-me thing, do you have any inconvenience with working together
on this?

Regards,
maykel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51107b04@mmoya.org



Bug#699767: ITA: ulogd -- The Netfilter Userspace Logging Daemon

2013-02-04 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 04:22 +0100, Maykel Moya wrote:
 El 05/02/13 03:22, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) escribió:
   I see. Your work have good parts, but contains trivial mistakes as
  well. In short, what's your plans? Do you want to do it yourself or let
  me to do it? In the latter, do you allow me to use parts of your works?
 My plans are basically learn packaging by doing and trying to improve
 the current ulogd situation in Debian. A challenge for a newcomer.
 As you write, it'll be a big challenge for you. Easier and smaller
packages would suit you better IMHO.

 I have no problem with you to use part of my works but with respect to
 the you-or-me thing, do you have any inconvenience with working together
 on this?
 Of course, I'll credit whatever I'll use from your work. We can work
together, no problem. Still, I advise you to check and learn other,
smaller packages as well.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1360045432.21674.308.camel@julia