Processed: Re: Bug#948384: abandoning elasticsearch

2021-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> retitle -1 RFP: elasticsearch -- "Open Source" (but non-free and not 
> OSI-compliant), Distributed, RESTful Search Engine
Bug #948384 [wnpp] O: elasticsearch -- Open Source, Distributed, RESTful
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: elasticsearch -- "Open Source" (but non-free and not 
OSI-compliant), Distributed, RESTful Search Engine' from 'O: elasticsearch -- 
Open Source, Distributed, RESTful'.
> tag -1 + wontfix
Bug #948384 [wnpp] RFP: elasticsearch -- "Open Source" (but non-free and not 
OSI-compliant), Distributed, RESTful Search Engine
Added tag(s) wontfix.

-- 
948384: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#948384: abandoning elasticsearch

2021-02-14 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: retitle -1 RFP: elasticsearch -- "Open Source" (but non-free and not 
OSI-compliant), Distributed, RESTful Search Engine
Control: tag -1 + wontfix

Hi,

Kartik Kulkarni wrote:
> Due to lack of time and other constraints last year I was unable to
> look into the package at all and I think it's better for someone else
> to package it.

Nobody will gonna package this for Debian anymore since they changed
their license to the non-free SSPL. MongoDB got kicked out because of
doing that. Tagging as wontfix for now.

> I do not know if I should just put it back as RFP

Yes.

> but for now I have retitled it as O.

That's wrong as "O:" is just for packages _already_ in Debian. I'm
retitling it back to RFP with this mail accordingly.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#948384: abandoning elasticsearch

2021-01-02 Thread Kartik Kulkarni
Due to lack of time and other constraints last year I was unable to
look into the package at all and I think it's better for someone else
to package it.
I do not know if I should just put it back as RFP but for now I have
retitled it as O.
I apologize for holding it for so long and not giving it back sooner.

Regards,
Kartik Kulkarni