Re: Bad links in the install documents on the website
James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As one of the webmasters for the Debian web site, I run a urlchecker over the site. There are a lot of broken links in the install documentation. It is not a priority to fix the broken links for previous releases, but the ones for potato should be fixed before the release. I've checked the English documentation (with checkbot) and there are no bad links on the updated stuff. Which is getting pushed up to master right now. I cannot be responsible for the translation lags of the porters or bad links in their documents. It's just not feasible. Sorry. BTW, the urlchecker has many problems and a new python script will be used after www.d.o is upgraded to potato. If you find a listed link is valid, just blame the urlchecker. :) I use checkbotworks fine. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/
Re: Bug#69023: www.debian.org: What is free hardware? (in distrib/packages.wml)
Marko Cehaja writes: Dear On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 06:14:36PM +0200, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote: Package: www.debian.org Version: 2812 Severity: normal Packages in this area are free themselves but depend on other software or hardware that is not free I can't speak for the author of the website, but maybe it relates to hardware for which one needs software which is not free. Like hardware with closed specifications or somethng. Probably that's the case. If it is, probably a note about that should be included, and probably something like hardware with closed specifications is much better than non free hardware Saludos, Jesus. -- Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona| Grupo de Sistemas y Comunicaciones [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos tel: +34 91 664 74 72 | c/ Tulipan s/n fax: +34 91 664 74 90 | 28933 Mostoles, Spain
Re: Bad links in the install documents on the website
Since it seemed that the spanish translation was a month behind, and Enrique might be on vacation, I have updated (most) of the translation so most of the problems associated with the (.es) files should be removed. Could we make a nice robot that sent an e-mail of bad lnks to the maintainer (or translation grup) of documentation? I guess we just need some rules saying things like: - for all files ending in .es.html I need to pester: debian-l10n-spanish ;) Javi On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 04:57:05AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As one of the webmasters for the Debian web site, I run a urlchecker over the site. There are a lot of broken links in the install documentation. It is not a priority to fix the broken links for previous releases, but the ones for potato should be fixed before the release. I've checked the English documentation (with checkbot) and there are no bad links on the updated stuff. Which is getting pushed up to master right now. I cannot be responsible for the translation lags of the porters or bad links in their documents. It's just not feasible. Sorry. BTW, the urlchecker has many problems and a new python script will be used after www.d.o is upgraded to potato. If you find a listed link is valid, just blame the urlchecker. :) I use checkbotworks fine. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Updating www pages for 2.2
I have checked in today (after updating installation and release notes spanish translations) and found out that the www pages are not 2.2 ready. I did this for the spanish translations (changed the /index latest release and some notes on releases/potato/index and releases/index). Should I do this to for the english pages? Is anybody out there? :P Best regards. Javi