Processed (with 2 errors): Re: packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye

2021-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 www.debian.org
Bug #998172 [whohas] packages.debian.org: reports incorrect info to 'whohas'
Bug reassigned from package 'whohas' to 'www.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #998172 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #998172 to the same values 
previously set
> user www.debian@packages.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> usertags -1 + packages
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> retitle -1 packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye
Bug #998172 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: reports incorrect info to 
'whohas'
Changed Bug title to 'packages.debian.org: missing security updates for 
bullseye' from 'packages.debian.org: reports incorrect info to 'whohas''.
> forcemerge 992258 -1
Bug #992258 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: packages.debian.org still has 
stable=buster and doesn't know about bullseye-security
Bug #998172 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: missing security updates for 
bullseye
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
Merged 992258 998172

-- 
992258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992258
998172: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998172
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye

2021-11-18 Thread Paul Wise 
Control: reassign -1 www.debian.org
Control: user www.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertags -1 + packages
Control: retitle -1 packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye
Control: forcemerge 992258 -1

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:17:25 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:

> That's not a valid pseudo package. Reassigning to whohas, the maintainer 
> probably knows best the actual data source used by whohas.

It looks like the issue is that Martin-Éric Racine has security updates
installed for firefox-esr-l10n-fi but packages.d.o does not have info
about security updates for bullseye but does for buster and stretch.

This has already been reported before:

   https://bugs.debian.org/992258

This is the data source used by whohas:

   
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=firefox-esr-l10n-fi=names=all=all

At the current time this page contains this:

   Package firefox-esr-l10n-fi

   * stretch (oldoldstable) (localization): Finnish language package for 
Firefox ESR
 78.15.0esr-1~deb9u1 [security]: all
   * buster (oldstable) (localization): Finnish language package for Firefox ESR
 78.15.0esr-1~deb10u1 [security]: all
   * bullseye (stable) (localization): Finnish language package for Firefox ESR
 78.14.0esr-1~deb11u1: all
   * bookworm (testing) (localization): Finnish language package for Firefox ESR
 78.14.0esr-1: all
   * sid (unstable) (localization): Finnish language package for Firefox ESR
 91.3.0esr-1: all
   * experimental (localization): Finnish language package for Firefox ESR
 91.1.0esr-1: all

The Debian archive API indicates these versions:

   $ rmadison -u debian firefox-esr-l10n-fi
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 52.8.1esr-1~deb8u1   | oldoldoldstable  | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 68.10.0esr-1~deb9u1  | oldoldstable | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 78.14.0esr-1~deb10u1 | oldstable| all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 78.14.0esr-1~deb11u1 | stable   | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 78.14.0esr-1 | testing  | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 78.14.0esr-1 | unstable | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1 | proposed-updates | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 91.0.1esr-1  | experimental | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 91.1.0esr-1  | experimental | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 91.2.0esr-1  | unstable | all
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi | 91.3.0esr-1  | unstable | all

A chdist with apt metadata for everything below testing has these:

   $ chdist old apt policy firefox-esr-l10n-fi
   firefox-esr-l10n-fi:
 Installed: (none)
 Candidate: 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1
 Version table:
78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1 500
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian-security stable-security/main 
amd64 Packages
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian proposed-updates/main amd64 
Packages
78.15.0esr-1~deb10u1 500
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian-security oldstable/updates/main 
amd64 Packages
78.15.0esr-1~deb9u1 500
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian-security oldoldstable/updates/main 
amd64 Packages
78.14.0esr-1~deb11u1 500
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian stable/main amd64 Packages
78.14.0esr-1~deb10u1 500
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian oldstable/main amd64 Packages
68.10.0esr-1~deb9u1 500
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian oldoldstable/main amd64 Packages
52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1 500
   500 https://deb.debian.org/debian-security oldoldstable/updates/main 
amd64 Packages

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: libssl.so.1.0.0 + libcrypto.so.1.0.0 libraries

2021-11-18 Thread Shlomi Fish 
Hi, Loris!

On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:40:50 +0100 (CET)
"sidewind...@libero.it"  wrote:

> Good evening,
> 
> I would need to find libssl.so.1.0.0 and libcrypto.so.1.0.0 libraries for
> Debian 11.1 i386 32bit version as a program of my use needs them.
> 
> Could you give me a link where to download them?
> 
> With best regards,Loris

1. Try using apt-file: https://www.computerhope.com/unix/apt-file.htm .

2. You may need to build openssl from source: https://www.openssl.org/ .

Do note that https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ is more appropriate.

-- 

Shlomi Fish   https://www.shlomifish.org/
Selina Mandrake - The Slayer (Buffy parody) - https://shlom.in/selina

 I am not solvable. I am Turing hard.

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - https://shlom.in/reply .

Re: [debian-installer page] No download link for s390x installer images?

2021-11-18 Thread Holger Wansing 
Hi,

Holger Wansing  wrote (Sun, 14 Nov 2021 13:30:09 +0100):
> Hi all,
> 
> is there a reason, why we don't show download links for daily s390x images, at
> https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/index.en.html ?
> 
> It has been like this from the beginning of s390x 9 years ago (when replacing 
> s390):
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/e610fb4482915d16225e7414ee1566bd0edfe868
> 
> However for official Debian releases, we have such links:
> https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/debian-installer/
> 
> Any ideas/comments?

s390 porters?

Does noone need installer images for s390 in testing?
Or how you get them?


Holger


-- 
Holger Wansing 
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

libssl.so.1.0.0 + libcrypto.so.1.0.0 libraries

2021-11-18 Thread sidewind...@libero.it 
Good evening,

I would need to find libssl.so.1.0.0 and libcrypto.so.1.0.0 libraries for 
Debian 11.1 i386 32bit version as a program of my use needs them.

Could you give me a link where to download them?

With best regards,Loris

Bug#999862: marked as done (sso.debian.org: SSO no longer seems to work)

2021-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:45:32 +
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#999862: sso.debian.org: SSO no longer seems to work
has caused the Debian Bug report #999862,
regarding sso.debian.org: SSO no longer seems to work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999862: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999862
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sso.debian.org
Severity: serious

I'm trying to log in to tracker.debian.org.  I've manually created a
fresh certificate and loaded it into both Firefox (94.0-1) and Chrome
(from Google), I visit tracker.debian.org but it does not recognise it
at all.  I also tried curl, as described on the wiki page
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianSingleSignOn:

curl --key $USER.key --cert $USER.crt https://sso.debian.org/ca/test/env

but that fails too.

So it would seem that sso.debian.org may no longer be functional,
which prevents me from logging into tracker.debian.org.

I don't know if this is a bug with tracker.debian.org or with
sso.debian.org so I'm starting with sso.debian.org.  I know the Wiki
says that SSO is deprecated, but it doesn't say that it's stopped
entirely!

Best wishes,

   Julian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:41:04AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 20:55 +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> 
> > So it would seem that sso.debian.org may no longer be functional,
> > which prevents me from logging into tracker.debian.org.
> 
> My current certificate still works on tracker.d.o and the sso test URL.
> 
> I created a new cert and imported it into my browser (Firefox ESR 91)
> and it worked for the sso.d.o test site and for tracker.d.o.
> 
> I wasn't able to get curl working with either the old or new certs.

Whoops!  I've figured out the problem - I was accidentally importing
my old expired certificate.  All works now.

Thanks so much for your help, and sorry for the noise.

Best wishes,

   Julian--- End Message ---

Fwd: WPS Office for PC and Mac

2021-11-18 Thread İrfan Yıldız 
-- Forwarded message -
Gönderen: WPS Office 
Date: 18 Kas 2021 Per 08:45
Subject: WPS Office for PC and Mac
To: 


The perfect time to download WPS Office
WPS Office is the smallest size office suite consisting of Writer,
Presentation, and Spreadsheets and PDF editor. And now the Windows and
macOS version is lifetime *free to edit*.

WPS Office for PC WPS Office for Mac


To know more about WPS Office, visit WPS.com
.