Re: xcb-util-wm: Changes to 'refs/tags/xcb-util-wm-0.3.9-1'
Hi, Cyril Brulebois writes: > Arnaud Fontaine (13/06/2012): >> Julien Cristau writes: >> >> > apparently you changed the -dev package name. That's usually >> > wrong, -dev packages should not be versioned. Please either >> > explain or revert that change. >> >> Unfortunately, all xcb packages have a versioned -dev packages, which >> I agree is wrong. Considering that libxcb-ewmh is only used by a >> single package, I agree that I should have fixed that instead of >> renaming it with a versioned name. Really sorry about that, I will >> revert that change and upload it again. > > Or just fix unagi for now, and “unversion” -dev packages for wheezy+1? > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=unagi&suite=sid > > → BD-Uninstallable for 5 days. Well, Luca blocked xcb-util-wm in NEW waiting for a reply from the release team because the SONAME has been bumped, but he mistakenly accepted unagi. I'm still waiting for xcb-util-wm to be accepted and will upload unagi straightaway. Cheers, -- Arnaud Fontaine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gv5s6z5@duckcorp.org
Re: xcb-util-wm: Changes to 'refs/tags/xcb-util-wm-0.3.9-1'
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 00:19:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Arnaud Fontaine (13/06/2012): > > Julien Cristau writes: > > > > > apparently you changed the -dev package name. That's usually wrong, > > > -dev packages should not be versioned. Please either explain or > > > revert that change. > > > > Unfortunately, all xcb packages have a versioned -dev packages, which I > > agree is wrong. Considering that libxcb-ewmh is only used by a single > > package, I agree that I should have fixed that instead of renaming it > > with a versioned name. Really sorry about that, I will revert that > > change and upload it again. > > Or just fix unagi for now, and “unversion” -dev packages for wheezy+1? > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=unagi&suite=sid > > → BD-Uninstallable for 5 days. > Well the new xcb-util-wm has been waiting in new for much of that time. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617222617.gb12...@radis.cristau.org
Re: xcb-util-wm: Changes to 'refs/tags/xcb-util-wm-0.3.9-1'
Arnaud Fontaine (13/06/2012): > Julien Cristau writes: > > > apparently you changed the -dev package name. That's usually wrong, > > -dev packages should not be versioned. Please either explain or > > revert that change. > > Unfortunately, all xcb packages have a versioned -dev packages, which I > agree is wrong. Considering that libxcb-ewmh is only used by a single > package, I agree that I should have fixed that instead of renaming it > with a versioned name. Really sorry about that, I will revert that > change and upload it again. Or just fix unagi for now, and “unversion” -dev packages for wheezy+1? https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=unagi&suite=sid → BD-Uninstallable for 5 days. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#661073: [xorg] Same here due to 'FontPath "unix/:7100"'
Package: xorg Version: 1:7.6+13 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- The same happened to me when I updated to unstable and I needed days to find out why. It all boiled down to the line 'FontPath "unix/:7100"' in xorg.conf. (And unfortunately, I did not find this bug entry until I had found out.) Like the reporter's, my system is quite old (about 14 years). Is this FontPath entry obsolete? If so, would it possible to remove the line when upgrading, or at least to give a hint? Ciao, Eike --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 Debian Release: wheezy/sid 500 testing-proposed-updates ftp.de.debian.org 500 testing security.eu.debian.org 500 testing ftp.de.debian.org 500 stable-updates ftp.de.debian.org 500 stable security.eu.debian.org 500 stable ftp.de.debian.org 500 proposed-updates ftp.de.debian.org 200 unstableftp.de.debian.org 1 experimentalftp.de.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ===-+-=== xserver-xorg (>= 1:7.6+13) | 1:7.6+13 libgl1-mesa-glx | 8.0.2-2 OR libgl1 | libgl1-mesa-dri | 8.0.2-2 libglu1-mesa| 8.0.2-2 xfonts-base (>= 1:1.0.0-1) | 1:1.0.3 xfonts-100dpi(>= 1:1.0.0-1) | 1:1.0.3 xfonts-75dpi (>= 1:1.0.0-1) | 1:1.0.3 xfonts-scalable (>= 1:1.0.0-1) | 1:1.0.3-1 x11-apps| 7.7~2 x11-session-utils | 7.6+2 x11-utils | 7.7~1 x11-xfs-utils | 7.7~1 x11-xkb-utils | 7.7~1 x11-xserver-utils | 7.7~3 xauth | 1:1.0.7-1 xinit | 1.3.1-1 xfonts-utils| 1:7.7~1 xkb-data| 2.5.1-1 xorg-docs-core | 1:1.6-1 xterm | 278-1 OR x-terminal-emulator | xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.11) | 2:1.12.1.902-1 xserver-xorg-video-all | OR xorg-driver-video | xserver-xorg-input-all | 1:7.6+13 OR xorg-driver-input | xserver-xorg-input-evdev| 1:2.7.0-1+b1 libc6 (>= 2.7) | 2.13-33 xkb-data (>= 1.4) | 2.5.1-1 x11-xkb-utils | 7.7~1 Recommends (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== libgl1-mesa-dri| 8.0.2-2 Suggests (Version) | Installed -+-=== xorg-docs| 1:1.6-1 -8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<-- Please attach the file: /tmp/reportbug-ng-xorg-CBP8pA.txt to the mail. I'd do it myself if the output wasn't too long to handle. Thank you! ->8--->8--->8--->8--->8--->8--->8--->8--->8-- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: reassign 677886 to src:mesa, severity of 677886 is wishlist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 677886 src:mesa Bug #677886 [mesa-utils] mesa: please compile with --enable-gallium-g3dvl to provide `libvdpau_r600` Bug reassigned from package 'mesa-utils' to 'src:mesa'. No longer marked as found in versions mesa-demos/8.0.1-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677886 to the same values previously set > severity 677886 wishlist Bug #677886 [src:mesa] mesa: please compile with --enable-gallium-g3dvl to provide `libvdpau_r600` Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677886 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133995247429972.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#677884: xkb-data: should be Multi-Arch: foreign
17.06.2012 в 16:09:10 +0200 Cyril Brulebois напиÑал: > Stepan Golosunov (17/06/2012): > > As xkb-data is an "Architecture: all" package with no dependencies or > > maintainer scripts, it should be marked "Multi-Arch: foreign". > > > > Otherwise, foreign-architecture xserver-xorg won't be installable [â¦] > > Because of course you *need* a foreign X server? Because, for example, I might want to cross-grade the whole system without crossgrading dpkg and xorg at the same time. Or because I just want to check which version works better. Also, there are other packages depending on xkb-data. And some of them are already "Multi-Arch: same". In any case, adding Multi-Arch: header to xkb-data is a trivial change. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617150309.ga20...@sghpc.golosunov.pp.ru
Bug#677173: 3.2.19-1: after some time, the USB keyboard no longer works
Jonathan Nieder (17/06/2012): > I guess you didn't read the quoted part above my text? (If that's not > it, you have not explained yourself adequately, so please try again.) I did read it, and that's not what I'm complaining about. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#677173: 3.2.19-1: after some time, the USB keyboard no longer works
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jonathan Nieder (17/06/2012): >> This is a contentless reply to let the Debian X maintainers know about >> their new bug. :) Please feel free to reassign back to the kernel if >> the cause seems to be there. > > Next time I see a contentless reassign, that's just going to be -done. I guess you didn't read the quoted part above my text? (If that's not it, you have not explained yourself adequately, so please try again.) > Now I don't see any X log anyway. What a great bug report. Vincent, please attach output from reportbug --template xserver-xorg-input-evdev Ciao, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617141239.GG12429@burratino
Bug#677884: xkb-data: should be Multi-Arch: foreign
Stepan Golosunov (17/06/2012): > Package: xkb-data > Version: 2.5.1-1 > Severity: normal > User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: multiarch > > As xkb-data is an "Architecture: all" package with no dependencies or > maintainer scripts, it should be marked "Multi-Arch: foreign". > > Otherwise, foreign-architecture xserver-xorg won't be installable […] Because of course you *need* a foreign X server? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#677173: 3.2.19-1: after some time, the USB keyboard no longer works
Jonathan Nieder (17/06/2012): > This is a contentless reply to let the Debian X maintainers know about > their new bug. :) Please feel free to reassign back to the kernel if > the cause seems to be there. Next time I see a contentless reassign, that's just going to be -done. Now I don't see any X log anyway. What a great bug report. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#677886: mesa: please compile with --enable-gallium-g3dvl to provide `libvdpau_r600`
Package: mesa-utils Version: 8.0.1-2+b3 Severity: normal Dear Debian folks, `xserver-xorg-video-radeon` 6.14.3 changelog contains the following [1]. Highlights: * Support for more cards, in particular Llano APUs. * KMS page flipping fixes. * vdpau/XvMC support (currently only available for >= R3xx via Gallium3D). Asking on IRC channel #radeon how to use that tstellar told me to build Mesa with `--enable-gallium-g3dvl`. I think that creates the library `libvdpau_r600` which for example MPlayer can use. Is it possible to build and package that library? Thanks, Paul PS: I am sorry for probably assigning this report to the wrong package. [1] http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2011-November/001750.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#677884: xkb-data: should be Multi-Arch: foreign
Package: xkb-data Version: 2.5.1-1 Severity: normal User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: multiarch As xkb-data is an "Architecture: all" package with no dependencies or maintainer scripts, it should be marked "Multi-Arch: foreign". Otherwise, foreign-architecture xserver-xorg won't be installable: % LANG=C sudo apt-get -d install xorg:amd64 xserver-xorg:amd64 xserver-xorg-core:amd64 libaudit0:amd64 libxfont1:amd64 xinit:amd64 xauth:amd64 x11-xkb-utils:amd64 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xorg:amd64 : Depends: xfonts-base:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: xfonts-100dpi:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: xfonts-75dpi:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: xfonts-scalable:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: x11-apps:amd64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: x11-session-utils:amd64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: x11-xserver-utils:amd64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: xfonts-utils:amd64 Depends: xkb-data:amd64 but it is not installable Depends: xorg-docs-core:amd64 but it is not installable xserver-xorg:amd64 : Depends: xkb-data:amd64 (>= 1.4) but it is not installable xserver-xorg-core:amd64 : Depends: xserver-common:amd64 (>= 2:1.12.1.902-1) but it is not installable Depends: keyboard-configuration:amd64 but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (400, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617134327.ga19...@sghpc.golosunov.pp.ru
Bug#677173: 3.2.19-1: after some time, the USB keyboard no longer works
Hi, On 2012-06-12, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I have a USB keyboard attached to my laptop, and I use it as the main > keyboard. I was using it, and suddenly it no longer worked at all (for > instance, xev didn't report any event). The device was still seen by > /lib/udev/findkeyboards and by lsusb. And the laptop keyboard was > still working. I had to unplug the keyboard and plug it in again so > that keys worked again (I also had to log out and log in again to make > special keys work, due to some X window bug I think). > > I've had this problem twice: now and a week ago. Never before, AFAIK. [...] > Bus 008 Device 007: ID 05ac:0221 Apple, Inc. Aluminum Keyboard (ISO) [...] > The keyboard has a USB hub: [...] > A mouse was attached to this hub and was still working when the > keyboard was no longer working. On 2012-06-17 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > The problem has just occurred again: the keyboard no longer works > from X. But it still works in a VT. If I run > > /lib/udev/keymap -i input/event1 > > from an xterm, the keyboard works for this command (but no longer > once I terminate it). If I quit the X session, a new X session is > started by gdm3, and the keyboard also works from this new X session. [...] > Reassigned to xserver-xorg-input-evdev to be like Ubuntu: > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/+bug/1002951 > "keyboard input of 1st keyboard is ignored in X after a while" This is a contentless reply to let the Debian X maintainers know about their new bug. :) Please feel free to reassign back to the kernel if the cause seems to be there. Thanks. Ciao, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617125917.GD12429@burratino
Processed: Re: Bug#654329: libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available through libatomic-ops-dev
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 654329 wontfix Bug #654329 [src:libdrm] libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available through libatomic-ops-dev Added tag(s) wontfix. > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654329: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654329 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133993143916310.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#654329: libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available through libatomic-ops-dev
tag 654329 wontfix kthxbye On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 00:07:45 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > found 654329 2.4.33-1 > thanks > > Hi, > > please do consider applying the patch, as it does truly fix an FTBFS > on m68k. > Yeah, no. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617111025.gt12...@radis.cristau.org
Bug#677864: compiz 0.8 should not release with wheezy
Source: compiz Version: 0.8.4-5.2 Severity: serious I don't think the current compiz package is in a fit state to be released with wheezy. It badly needs love. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#654329: libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED
Aurelien Jarno (17/06/2012): > The configuration of debian-ports is correct. This mail has been > intentionally bounced to this bug report, as shown by the headers: > > ReSent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:20:47 + (UTC) > ReSent-From: Thorsten Glaser > ReSent-To: 654...@bugs.debian.org > ReSent-Subject: libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED > ReSent-Message-ID: Oh so that wasn't even some debian-ports glitch (client or server side)? Great. I'M SO GLAD WE HAVE MORE NOISE! Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#654329: libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:25:58AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Debian Ports Archive Maintainer (17/06/2012): > > Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser > > Uploader: Thorsten Glaser (no PGP/MIME please, use Inline OpenPGP instead) > > > > Host: leda.debian.net > > Accepted: libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.changes > > Files: > > libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1.dsc > > libdrm_2.4.33.orig.tar.gz > > libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1.diff.gz > > libdrm-dev_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libdrm2_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libdrm2-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libdrm-nouveau1a_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libdrm-nouveau1a-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libdrm-radeon1_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libdrm-radeon1-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libkms1_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > libkms1-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > > You need to fix your configuration. > The configuration of debian-ports is correct. This mail has been intentionally bounced to this bug report, as shown by the headers: ReSent-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:20:47 + (UTC) ReSent-From: Thorsten Glaser ReSent-To: 654...@bugs.debian.org ReSent-Subject: libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED ReSent-Message-ID: -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617102455.gj30...@hall.aurel32.net
Processed: clone #677851
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 677851 -1 -2 -3 Bug #677851 [xfonts-base] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Bug 677851 cloned as bugs 677857-677859 > reassign -1 xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.3 Bug #677857 [xfonts-base] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Bug reassigned from package 'xfonts-base' to 'xfonts-100dpi'. No longer marked as found in versions xfonts-base/1:1.0.3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677857 to the same values previously set Bug #677857 [xfonts-100dpi] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Marked as found in versions xfonts-100dpi/1:1.0.3. > retitle -1 xfonts-100dpi: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Bug #677857 [xfonts-100dpi] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Changed Bug title to 'xfonts-100dpi: should be Multi-Arch: foreign' from 'xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign' > reassign -2 xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.3 Bug #677858 [xfonts-base] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Bug reassigned from package 'xfonts-base' to 'xfonts-75dpi'. No longer marked as found in versions xfonts-base/1:1.0.3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677858 to the same values previously set Bug #677858 [xfonts-75dpi] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Marked as found in versions xfonts-75dpi/1:1.0.3. > retitle -2 xfonts-75dpi: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Bug #677858 [xfonts-75dpi] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Changed Bug title to 'xfonts-75dpi: should be Multi-Arch: foreign' from 'xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign' > reassign -3 xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.3-1 Bug #677859 [xfonts-base] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Bug reassigned from package 'xfonts-base' to 'xfonts-scalable'. No longer marked as found in versions xfonts-base/1:1.0.3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677859 to the same values previously set Bug #677859 [xfonts-scalable] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Marked as found in versions xfonts-scalable/1:1.0.3-1. > retitle -3 xfonts-scalable: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Bug #677859 [xfonts-scalable] xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign Changed Bug title to 'xfonts-scalable: should be Multi-Arch: foreign' from 'xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677851: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677851 677857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677857 677858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677858 677859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1339928148813.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: 3.2.19-1: after some time, the USB keyboard no longer works
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 677173 xserver-xorg-input-evdev Bug #677173 [src:linux] after some time, the USB keyboard no longer works in the current X session Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'xserver-xorg-input-evdev'. No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.19-1 and linux/3.2.20-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677173 to the same values previously set > found 677173 1:2.7.0-1+b1 Bug #677173 [xserver-xorg-input-evdev] after some time, the USB keyboard no longer works in the current X session Marked as found in versions xserver-xorg-input-evdev/1:2.7.0-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677173 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133992608122769.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#677851: xfonts-base: should be Multi-Arch: foreign
Package: xfonts-base Version: 1:1.0.3 Severity: normal User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: multiarch xfonts-base should be marked "Multi-Arch: foreign" (given that it is "Architecture: all" and depends only on a "Multi-Arch: foreign" package). Otherwise, foreign-architecture xorg won't be installable: % LANG=C sudo apt-get -d install xorg:amd64 xserver-xorg:amd64 xserver-xorg-core:amd64 libaudit0:amd64 libxfont1:amd64 xinit:amd64 xauth:amd64 x11-xkb-utils:amd64 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xorg:amd64 : Depends: xfonts-base:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: xfonts-100dpi:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: xfonts-75dpi:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: xfonts-scalable:amd64 (>= 1:1.0.0-1) but it is not installable Depends: x11-apps:amd64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: x11-session-utils:amd64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: x11-xserver-utils:amd64 but it is not going to be installed Depends: xfonts-utils:amd64 Depends: xkb-data:amd64 but it is not installable Depends: xorg-docs-core:amd64 but it is not installable xserver-xorg:amd64 : Depends: xkb-data:amd64 (>= 1.4) but it is not installable xserver-xorg-core:amd64 : Depends: xserver-common:amd64 (>= 2:1.12.1.902-1) but it is not installable Depends: keyboard-configuration:amd64 but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (400, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xfonts-base depends on: ii xfonts-utils 1:7.7~1 xfonts-base recommends no packages. Versions of packages xfonts-base suggests: ii xnest [xserver] 2:1.12.1.902-1 ii xserver-xephyr [xserver] 2:1.12.1.902-1 ii xserver-xorg [xserver]1:7.6+13 ii xvfb [xserver]2:1.12.1.902-1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120617093349.ga15...@sghpc.golosunov.pp.ru
Bug#654329: libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED
Debian Ports Archive Maintainer (17/06/2012): > Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser > Uploader: Thorsten Glaser (no PGP/MIME please, use Inline OpenPGP instead) > > Host: leda.debian.net > Accepted: libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.changes > Files: > libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1.dsc > libdrm_2.4.33.orig.tar.gz > libdrm_2.4.33-1+m68k.1.diff.gz > libdrm-dev_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libdrm2_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libdrm2-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libdrm-nouveau1a_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libdrm-nouveau1a-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libdrm-radeon1_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libdrm-radeon1-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libkms1_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb > libkms1-dbg_2.4.33-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb You need to fix your configuration. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
