Re: [Fwd: Re: gdm in Gnome 2.4 shutdown even harder]
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:58:49PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: I guess it was misdirected ... Huh? I am completely confused as to why you sent this message to debian-x. Can you provide some context, please? -- G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a Debian GNU/Linux | DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory [EMAIL PROTECTED] | test would pass it just fine. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ethan Benson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[Fwd: Re: gdm in Gnome 2.4 shutdown even harder]
I guess it was misdirected ... ---BeginMessage--- I had the same problem and found an easy solution, I'll post it here even if nobody's really interested in it ;-). In /etc/gdm/gdm.conf you have to set SecureSystemMenu=false like that you will get the old behaviour. Bye, Marcel -- Marcel Gschwandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] The day Microsoft invents something that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners. -- Ernst Jan Plugge ---End Message---
