Bug#1059787: src:xfce4-power-manager: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

2024-01-01 Thread Paul Gevers

Source: xfce4-power-manager
Version: 4.18.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.18.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing 
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in 
testing [1]. Your package src:xfce4-power-manager has been trying to 
migrate for 31 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. The version in 
unstable has arch:all binaries built by the uploader. Unfortunately the 
binNMU infrastructure doesn't support binNMU'ing arch:all (and DAK still 
doesn't throw away uploaded binaries). Hence, a source-only upload is 
required. Normally I do that (a no-change source-only NMU) for packages 
in this state, but given the large amount of open bugs, I don't feel 
comfortable taking that responsibility.


If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer 
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be 
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on 
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. 
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that 
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.


This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new 
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.


I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if 
that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect 
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and trixie, so 
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.


If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to 
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.


Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=xfce4-power-manager



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1039957: light-locker: Bug 1039957: light-locker: coredump from light-locker

2023-07-24 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi,

On 24-07-2023 15:27, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:

so what you're saying is that you're a KDE user (not Xfce)


Indeed.


but you're
still using LightDM (not KDM), and light-locker is still started as part
of your desktop session.


I'm not aware that I ever did that actively. It seems that also nothing 
obvious changed for me since I deinstalled light-locker. So everything 
*looks* like before.



In any case, if you don't use it on your box it's quite ok to remove it.


I tried to say in my previous message that I already did that.

Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1039957: light-locker: Bug 1039957: light-locker: coredump from light-locker

2023-07-23 Thread Paul Gevers
Package: light-locker
Version: 1.8.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #1039957

Hi,

I just found this coredump in my journal. Like the original reporter,
I'm a user of KDE (on trixie). I removed light-locker to see if I spotted any
change and I'm not seeing it yet.

Paul

Here's the dump:

jul 23 20:11:29 mulciber systemd-coredump[2250]: Process 2157 (light-locker) of 
user 1000 dumped core.
 
 Module libsystemd.so.0 from 
deb systemd-253.5-1.amd64
 Stack trace of thread 2157:
 #0  0x7f43ad4f6557 
g_log_structured_array (libglib-2.0.so.0 + 0x61557)
 #1  0x7f43ad4f69ae 
g_log_default_handler (libglib-2.0.so.0 + 0x619ae)
 #2  0x7f43ad4f6c20 g_logv 
(libglib-2.0.so.0 + 0x61c20)
 #3  0x7f43ad4f6ecf g_log 
(libglib-2.0.so.0 + 0x61ecf)
 #4  0x5570baa14085 n/a 
(light-locker + 0xb085)
 #5  0x7f43ad61015b 
g_type_create_instance (libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x3815b)
 #6  0x7f43ad5f3e60 n/a 
(libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x1be60)
 #7  0x7f43ad5f5496 
g_object_new_with_properties (libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x1d496)
 #8  0x7f43ad5f6311 
g_object_new (libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x1e311)
 #9  0x5570baa168e2 
gs_listener_new (light-locker + 0xd8e2)
 #10 0x5570baa124c2 n/a 
(light-locker + 0x94c2)
 #11 0x7f43ad61015b 
g_type_create_instance (libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x3815b)
 #12 0x7f43ad5f3e60 n/a 
(libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x1be60)
 #13 0x7f43ad5f5496 
g_object_new_with_properties (libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x1d496)
 #14 0x7f43ad5f6311 
g_object_new (libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x1e311)
 #15 0x5570baa12b02 
gs_monitor_new (light-locker + 0x9b02)
 #16 0x5570baa113fa main 
(light-locker + 0x83fa)
 #17 0x7f43ad2056ca 
__libc_start_call_main (libc.so.6 + 0x276ca)
 #18 0x7f43ad205785 
__libc_start_main_impl (libc.so.6 + 0x27785)
 #19 0x5570baa1154a _start 
(light-locker + 0x854a)
 
 Stack trace of thread 2196:
 #0  0x7f43ad263156 
__futex_abstimed_wait_common64 (libc.so.6 + 0x85156)
 #1  0x7f43ad265818 
__pthread_cond_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0x87818)
 #2  0x7f439a50c059 n/a 
(iris_dri.so + 0x10c059)
 #3  0x7f439a4be17b n/a 
(iris_dri.so + 0xbe17b)
 #4  0x7f439a50bf97 n/a 
(iris_dri.so + 0x10bf97)
 #5  0x7f43ad2663ec 
start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0x883ec)
 #6  0x7f43ad2e6a1c 
__clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x108a1c)
 
 Stack trace of thread 2199:
 #0  0x7f43ad263156 
__futex_abstimed_wait_common64 (libc.so.6 + 0x85156)
 #1  0x7f43ad265818 
__pthread_cond_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0x87818)
 #2  0x7f439a50c059 n/a 
(iris_dri.so + 0x10c059)
 #3  0x7f439a4be17b n/a 
(iris_dri.so + 0xbe17b)
 #4  0x7f439a50bf97 n/a 
(iris_dri.so + 0x10bf97)
 #5  0x7f43ad2663ec 
start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0x883ec)
 #6  0x7f43ad2e6a1c 
__clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x108a1c)
 
 Stack trace of thread 2200:
 #0  0x7f43ad263156 
__futex_abstimed_wait_common64 (libc.so.6 + 0x85156)
 

Re: Bug#1004680: upgrade-reports: beep when selecting logout

2022-02-01 Thread Paul Gevers

Control: reassign -1 src:xfce4
Control: found -1 4.16
Control: retitle -1 xfce logout beeps after upgrade to bullseye

Hi Roger,

I am reassiging the bug to xfce4. The maintainers can take a look and 
see if it need further reassigning.


Paul

On 01-02-2022 19:17, slow_sp...@att.net wrote:

Sure, do whatever you think is best.


On 2/1/22 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:

Hi Roger,

Please reply to the bug. I'm now wondering if I can forward this 
information there (it's valuable, as it help reassign to a package 
where they can further investigate).


Paul

On 01-02-2022 00:30, slow_sp...@att.net wrote:
Xfce 4.16.  I go to what should be the Whisker menu, but it just says 
Applications now.  I select the lowest item on the list, which is Log 
Out.  As soon as it is selected, it beeps.  The sound comes from the 
computer's internal speaker.


AlsaMixer has not such settings to address that.

But still, the odd thing is that it started after upgrade from Buster 
and Xfce 4.12.


On 1/31/22 14:34, Paul Gevers wrote:

Hi Roger,

How do you logout? Are you in a terminal or are you running some 
desktop environment? Which one?


Paul








OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature