[Declude.JunkMail] website design service spam emails
Okay. I am starting to get seriously annoyed with the spam email below that keeps hitting my own inbox a couple of times a day. Does anyone know a simple way for me to pick up on these mails in declude and add weight without affecting normal mails? Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet Services W: www.123marbella.com E : cr...@123marbella.com -Original Message- From: Don [mailto:zhuazhujih2...@msn.com] Sent: 19 February 2009 08:57 To: webmaster Subject: **Spam? [WEIGHT: 18]**website design service (CA) You are receiving this email because we wish you to use our web design service. We are web design studio from China. We are specialized in web page design, website development, graphics multi-media design, flash website design and other relevant services. We pride ourselves with our technical strength, professional vision, unique style, and most of all, our highly devoted professional designers. We are in position to offer website solution, graphics design, e-commerce solution, online promotion and other medium and small business oriented services. Core offerings Business website design Business website redesign Flash website design Flash website redesign Ecommerce website design Ecommerce website redesign Company website design Company catalog design Company logo design Graphic design Google search engine optimization ERP Solutions Pls check our website to see portfolio. Best regards, Don V.DASK Information Technologies Website team Contact: ittechrespo...@gmail.com Send address to ittechun...@gmail.com for unsubscribe --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] website design service spam emails
Sample headers would help in determining a way to filter these. Also, do you use Message Sniffer? Darin. - Original Message - From: Craig Edmonds cr...@123marbella.com To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:16 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] website design service spam emails Okay. I am starting to get seriously annoyed with the spam email below that keeps hitting my own inbox a couple of times a day. Does anyone know a simple way for me to pick up on these mails in declude and add weight without affecting normal mails? Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet Services W: www.123marbella.com E : cr...@123marbella.com -Original Message- From: Don [mailto:zhuazhujih2...@msn.com] Sent: 19 February 2009 08:57 To: webmaster Subject: **Spam? [WEIGHT: 18]**website design service (CA) You are receiving this email because we wish you to use our web design service. We are web design studio from China. We are specialized in web page design, website development, graphics multi-media design, flash website design and other relevant services. We pride ourselves with our technical strength, professional vision, unique style, and most of all, our highly devoted professional designers. We are in position to offer website solution, graphics design, e-commerce solution, online promotion and other medium and small business oriented services. Core offerings Business website design Business website redesign Flash website design Flash website redesign Ecommerce website design Ecommerce website redesign Company website design Company catalog design Company logo design Graphic design Google search engine optimization ERP Solutions Pls check our website to see portfolio. Best regards, Don V.DASK Information Technologies Website team Contact: ittechrespo...@gmail.com Send address to ittechun...@gmail.com for unsubscribe --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score?
Something is happening with our spam score that I don't quite understand. If you look below at the (sanitized) email headers you'll see that the CBL test scored 6 and spamheaders scored 3 and yet the final score for this email was Spam Score: [1] Shouldn't the score have been 9? On another note, if the CBL ip4rl test shows blocked what is the best way to hold this email? I assume that I would just up the weighting from 6 to my hold level? Do you guys hold email based only on an rbl response of blocked or do you require additional tests to fail? If a few folks would like to post their ip4r tests from the global.cfg I think that would be really helpful to a lot of people. I know that my global.cfg is a good number of years old and the ip4r tests are not tests that I've updated in a long time. Seeing what others are using would help me identify if I have tests I'm not using but should be using and vice versa. Thanks, Dave Return-Path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Thu Feb 19 03:29:48 2009 Received: from server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] ..com with SMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:29:48 -0600 Reply-To: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com In-Reply-To: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com.1329 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_=_extPart_000_0097_a3d0dac.a3d0dac Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Return-path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Subject:Vehicle Warranty - 60% OFF Dealers Price Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:30:57 -0600 Message-Id: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com Thread-Topic: RE: This email can save your life From: Continued Auto Coveragecontinuedautocover...@bestlevelterm.com To: x Importance: Normal X-invURIBL-Scan: Scanned by invURIBL 3.1.1 on 2/19/2009 3:29:58 AM X-invURIBL-Weight: 0 X-invURIBL-Range: CLEAN X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [4000100e]. X-RBL-Warning: SPFPASS: SPF returned PASS for this E-mail. X-Declude-Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com [65.60.20.131] X-Declude-RefID: X-Note: X-Note: Spam Score: [1] X-Note: Scan Time: 03:30:01 on 19 Feb 2009 X-Note: Spool File: 369855951432.eml X-Note: Server Name: mx2.bestlevelterm.com X-Note: SMTP Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com X-Note: Reverse DNS IP: server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] X-Note: Recipient(s): X-Note: Country Chain: [ARIN Unlisted]-destination X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] X-Note: --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score?
Dave, The last column of a test is the value added or subtracted if the test is NOT triggered. IF a test is NOT triggered it will not show up in the header. The most common that are used like this are: IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT FROMNOMATCH David Barker VP Operations Declude Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax dbar...@declude.com -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? Something is happening with our spam score that I don't quite understand. If you look below at the (sanitized) email headers you'll see that the CBL test scored 6 and spamheaders scored 3 and yet the final score for this email was Spam Score: [1] Shouldn't the score have been 9? On another note, if the CBL ip4rl test shows blocked what is the best way to hold this email? I assume that I would just up the weighting from 6 to my hold level? Do you guys hold email based only on an rbl response of blocked or do you require additional tests to fail? If a few folks would like to post their ip4r tests from the global.cfg I think that would be really helpful to a lot of people. I know that my global.cfg is a good number of years old and the ip4r tests are not tests that I've updated in a long time. Seeing what others are using would help me identify if I have tests I'm not using but should be using and vice versa. Thanks, Dave Return-Path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Thu Feb 19 03:29:48 2009 Received: from server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] ..com with SMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:29:48 -0600 Reply-To: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com In-Reply-To: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com.1329 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_=_extPart_000_0097_a3d0dac.a3d0dac Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Return-path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Subject:Vehicle Warranty - 60% OFF Dealers Price Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:30:57 -0600 Message-Id: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com Thread-Topic: RE: This email can save your life From: Continued Auto Coveragecontinuedautocover...@bestlevelterm.com To: x Importance: Normal X-invURIBL-Scan: Scanned by invURIBL 3.1.1 on 2/19/2009 3:29:58 AM X-invURIBL-Weight: 0 X-invURIBL-Range: CLEAN X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [4000100e]. X-RBL-Warning: SPFPASS: SPF returned PASS for this E-mail. X-Declude-Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com [65.60.20.131] X-Declude-RefID: X-Note: X-Note: Spam Score: [1] X-Note: Scan Time: 03:30:01 on 19 Feb 2009 X-Note: Spool File: 369855951432.eml X-Note: Server Name: mx2.bestlevelterm.com X-Note: SMTP Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com X-Note: Reverse DNS IP: server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] X-Note: Recipient(s): X-Note: Country Chain: [ARIN Unlisted]-destination X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] X-Note: --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] website design service spam emails
BODY 10 CONTAINS V.DASK Information Technologies Or BODY 10 CONTAINS ittechrespo...@gmail.com -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:17 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] website design service spam emails Okay. I am starting to get seriously annoyed with the spam email below that keeps hitting my own inbox a couple of times a day. Does anyone know a simple way for me to pick up on these mails in declude and add weight without affecting normal mails? Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet Services W: www.123marbella.com E : cr...@123marbella.com -Original Message- From: Don [mailto:zhuazhujih2...@msn.com] Sent: 19 February 2009 08:57 To: webmaster Subject: **Spam? [WEIGHT: 18]**website design service (CA) You are receiving this email because we wish you to use our web design service. We are web design studio from China. We are specialized in web page design, website development, graphics multi-media design, flash website design and other relevant services. We pride ourselves with our technical strength, professional vision, unique style, and most of all, our highly devoted professional designers. We are in position to offer website solution, graphics design, e-commerce solution, online promotion and other medium and small business oriented services. Core offerings Business website design Business website redesign Flash website design Flash website redesign Ecommerce website design Ecommerce website redesign Company website design Company catalog design Company logo design Graphic design Google search engine optimization ERP Solutions Pls check our website to see portfolio. Best regards, Don V.DASK Information Technologies Website team Contact: ittechrespo...@gmail.com Send address to ittechun...@gmail.com for unsubscribe --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score?
David, Here is the test: CBL IP4Rcbl.abuseat.org 127.0.0.2 6 0 According to these headers: X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] Wasn't the test triggered and a score of 6 should have been added to the total score? -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: 2009-02-19 08:37 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? Dave, The last column of a test is the value added or subtracted if the test is NOT triggered. IF a test is NOT triggered it will not show up in the header. The most common that are used like this are: IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT FROMNOMATCH David Barker VP Operations Declude Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax dbar...@declude.com -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? Something is happening with our spam score that I don't quite understand. If you look below at the (sanitized) email headers you'll see that the CBL test scored 6 and spamheaders scored 3 and yet the final score for this email was Spam Score: [1] Shouldn't the score have been 9? On another note, if the CBL ip4rl test shows blocked what is the best way to hold this email? I assume that I would just up the weighting from 6 to my hold level? Do you guys hold email based only on an rbl response of blocked or do you require additional tests to fail? If a few folks would like to post their ip4r tests from the global.cfg I think that would be really helpful to a lot of people. I know that my global.cfg is a good number of years old and the ip4r tests are not tests that I've updated in a long time. Seeing what others are using would help me identify if I have tests I'm not using but should be using and vice versa. Thanks, Dave Return-Path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Thu Feb 19 03:29:48 2009 Received: from server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] ..com with SMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:29:48 -0600 Reply-To: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com In-Reply-To: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com.1329 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_=_extPart_000_0097_a3d0dac.a3d0dac Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Return-path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Subject:Vehicle Warranty - 60% OFF Dealers Price Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:30:57 -0600 Message-Id: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com Thread-Topic: RE: This email can save your life From: Continued Auto Coveragecontinuedautocover...@bestlevelterm.com To: x Importance: Normal X-invURIBL-Scan: Scanned by invURIBL 3.1.1 on 2/19/2009 3:29:58 AM X-invURIBL-Weight: 0 X-invURIBL-Range: CLEAN X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [4000100e]. X-RBL-Warning: SPFPASS: SPF returned PASS for this E-mail. X-Declude-Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com [65.60.20.131] X-Declude-RefID: X-Note: X-Note: Spam Score: [1] X-Note: Scan Time: 03:30:01 on 19 Feb 2009 X-Note: Spool File: 369855951432.eml X-Note: Server Name: mx2.bestlevelterm.com X-Note: SMTP Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com X-Note: Reverse DNS IP: server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] X-Note: Recipient(s): X-Note: Country Chain: [ARIN Unlisted]-destination X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] X-Note: --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score?
David, Never mind. I found in the logs where those tests you mentioned are giving the email a credit (negative weight) and thus the total weight is adjusted accordingly. I have IPNOTINMX and NOLEGITCONTENT set up under HIDETESTS which explains why the confusion on the total score. BTW -- I would still like to see some people post their ip4r tests to the list. I have a hunch I'm missing some valuable tests in my list. Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: 2009-02-19 08:56 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? David, Here is the test: CBL IP4Rcbl.abuseat.org 127.0.0.2 6 0 According to these headers: X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] Wasn't the test triggered and a score of 6 should have been added to the total score? -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: 2009-02-19 08:37 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? Dave, The last column of a test is the value added or subtracted if the test is NOT triggered. IF a test is NOT triggered it will not show up in the header. The most common that are used like this are: IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT FROMNOMATCH David Barker VP Operations Declude Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax dbar...@declude.com -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? Something is happening with our spam score that I don't quite understand. If you look below at the (sanitized) email headers you'll see that the CBL test scored 6 and spamheaders scored 3 and yet the final score for this email was Spam Score: [1] Shouldn't the score have been 9? On another note, if the CBL ip4rl test shows blocked what is the best way to hold this email? I assume that I would just up the weighting from 6 to my hold level? Do you guys hold email based only on an rbl response of blocked or do you require additional tests to fail? If a few folks would like to post their ip4r tests from the global.cfg I think that would be really helpful to a lot of people. I know that my global.cfg is a good number of years old and the ip4r tests are not tests that I've updated in a long time. Seeing what others are using would help me identify if I have tests I'm not using but should be using and vice versa. Thanks, Dave Return-Path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Thu Feb 19 03:29:48 2009 Received: from server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] ..com with SMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:29:48 -0600 Reply-To: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com In-Reply-To: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com.1329 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_=_extPart_000_0097_a3d0dac.a3d0dac Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Return-path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Subject:Vehicle Warranty - 60% OFF Dealers Price Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:30:57 -0600 Message-Id: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com Thread-Topic: RE: This email can save your life From: Continued Auto Coveragecontinuedautocover...@bestlevelterm.com To: x Importance: Normal X-invURIBL-Scan: Scanned by invURIBL 3.1.1 on 2/19/2009 3:29:58 AM X-invURIBL-Weight: 0 X-invURIBL-Range: CLEAN X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [4000100e]. X-RBL-Warning: SPFPASS: SPF returned PASS for this E-mail. X-Declude-Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com [65.60.20.131] X-Declude-RefID: X-Note: X-Note: Spam Score: [1] X-Note: Scan Time: 03:30:01 on 19 Feb 2009 X-Note: Spool File: 369855951432.eml X-Note: Server Name: mx2.bestlevelterm.com X-Note: SMTP Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com X-Note: Reverse DNS IP: server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] X-Note: Recipient(s): X-Note: Country Chain: [ARIN Unlisted]-destination X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] X-Note: --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score?
Post the following tests from your global.cfg: CBL SPAMHEADERS IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT FROMNOMATCH David -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:56 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? David, Here is the test: CBL IP4Rcbl.abuseat.org 127.0.0.2 6 0 According to these headers: X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] Wasn't the test triggered and a score of 6 should have been added to the total score? -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: 2009-02-19 08:37 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? Dave, The last column of a test is the value added or subtracted if the test is NOT triggered. IF a test is NOT triggered it will not show up in the header. The most common that are used like this are: IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT FROMNOMATCH David Barker VP Operations Declude Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax dbar...@declude.com -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Score? Something is happening with our spam score that I don't quite understand. If you look below at the (sanitized) email headers you'll see that the CBL test scored 6 and spamheaders scored 3 and yet the final score for this email was Spam Score: [1] Shouldn't the score have been 9? On another note, if the CBL ip4rl test shows blocked what is the best way to hold this email? I assume that I would just up the weighting from 6 to my hold level? Do you guys hold email based only on an rbl response of blocked or do you require additional tests to fail? If a few folks would like to post their ip4r tests from the global.cfg I think that would be really helpful to a lot of people. I know that my global.cfg is a good number of years old and the ip4r tests are not tests that I've updated in a long time. Seeing what others are using would help me identify if I have tests I'm not using but should be using and vice versa. Thanks, Dave Return-Path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Thu Feb 19 03:29:48 2009 Received: from server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] ..com with SMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:29:48 -0600 Reply-To: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com In-Reply-To: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com.1329 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_=_extPart_000_0097_a3d0dac.a3d0dac Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Return-path: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com Subject:Vehicle Warranty - 60% OFF Dealers Price Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:30:57 -0600 Message-Id: 20090219033057.ggnppl...@mx2.bestlevelterm.com Thread-Topic: RE: This email can save your life From: Continued Auto Coveragecontinuedautocover...@bestlevelterm.com To: x Importance: Normal X-invURIBL-Scan: Scanned by invURIBL 3.1.1 on 2/19/2009 3:29:58 AM X-invURIBL-Weight: 0 X-invURIBL-Range: CLEAN X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=65.60.20.131; X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [4000100e]. X-RBL-Warning: SPFPASS: SPF returned PASS for this E-mail. X-Declude-Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com [65.60.20.131] X-Declude-RefID: X-Note: X-Note: Spam Score: [1] X-Note: Scan Time: 03:30:01 on 19 Feb 2009 X-Note: Spool File: 369855951432.eml X-Note: Server Name: mx2.bestlevelterm.com X-Note: SMTP Sender: yourautopolicyvxw...@bestlevelterm.com X-Note: Reverse DNS IP: server1.taxhelpis.com [65.60.20.131] X-Note: Recipient(s): X-Note: Country Chain: [ARIN Unlisted]-destination X-Note: Failed Weights: CBL [6], SPAMHEADERS [3], SPFPASS [0] X-Note: --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came
