Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-21 Thread Darin Cox
Actually the question was whether zipping would help them...but copying the
data into RAM, zipping it, and copying it back to the USB drive before
copying to an internal drive kind of defeats the purpose...and would take
more time that just copying.

That aside, my experience over the past 20 years with image compression is
significantly different.  That's why I went into my mini discourse...wanting
to point out that a generalization didn't really work when image formats
vary significantly in how they respond to zip compression.

I see significantly higher compression than you indicate on uncompressed
formats.   Generally around 1/3 of the original size, so comparable to the
Word documents you mentioned.  Since compression rates can vary so widely
with different formats, I think a discussion of the differences was
warranted...especially since the discussion was around a particular format,
TIFF, which is most often uncompressed, or perhaps run length compressed
with palette color images.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Michael Graveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files


I think the question was about zipping graphic files, which as a general
rule, don't get much smaller after they're zipped (as compared to text
files, etc.).  I wasn't taking about the compression contained in a
particular graphic format.  I get about 15%-25% reduction zipping the
uncompressed BMP file vs about 70% from a Word doc (using the stock
Winzip settings).  I should have been clearer in my first response.

Mike

At 06:43 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Huh?  The logic flaw in trying to zip first, then copy aside (since the
file
would have to first be copied into RAM, then zipped, then stored back onto
the USB drive...better just to copy)... uncompressed TIFFs (TIFFs have had
an option for LZW compression since the mid 90s) compress pretty well as
they contain raw raster data, as do BMPs and many other uncompressed
formats.

If you're referring to JPEGs and GIFs, that's because they are already
compressed.  JPEGs have built-in lossy compression, but high quality JPEGs
(low compression) can still see decent compression, and GIFs are already
LZW
compressed, which means more LZW compression generally doesn't yield much.

So, it depends on the type of image, but TIFFs are generally uncompressed
these days due to the LZW copyright fiasco, or may have run-length encoding
which still compresses reasonably well with LZW.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Michael Graveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files


Graphic files as a general rule don't compress well.

Mike

At 03:26 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
 Jeff Pereira wrote:
 What's killing me is not so much the amount of data, but the fact that
 there are so many small files.  I'm gonna have to try XCOPY on the
 next folder and see how that works.
 
 I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to
 ZIP them and copy that over.
 
 Jim

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Jeff Pereira
Hi -

Sorry for the OT post, but I am in need of assistance.

I have 200,000 + TIFF (70 GB Worth)images on an external USB 2.0 hard
drive that I need to copy to my local hard drive.  It is taking
forever.

Does anyone know what the fastest way to do this is ?

Drag and Drop ??  Cut and Paste ??

Drop to a command prompt ??  Xcopy ??

Please help.

TIA

jeff
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Paul Navarre
I don't know the answer you are specifically looking for, but you might take
the drive out of the USB case and mount it directly into the PC as a slave
drive. Copying (regardless of method) should go much more quickly then.

Paul Navarre

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Pereira
 Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 12:00 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files
 
 Hi -
 
 Sorry for the OT post, but I am in need of assistance.
 
 I have 200,000 + TIFF (70 GB Worth)images on an external USB 2.0 hard
 drive that I need to copy to my local hard drive.  It is taking
 forever.
 
 Does anyone know what the fastest way to do this is ?
 
 Drag and Drop ??  Cut and Paste ??
 
 Drop to a command prompt ??  Xcopy ??
 
 Please help.
 
 TIA
 
 jeff
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Larry Craddock
Depending upon the drive there may not be a great way. Got this from a web 
page on USB2:


Unfortunately, the phrase USB 2.0 does not necessarily mean 480Mbps of 
throughput. USB 2.0 now has three different signaling rates: Low Speed 
(1.5Mbps), Full Speed (12Mbps), and Hi-Speed (480Mbps). The marketing and 
advertising departments of product manufacturers like to put the words USB 
2.0 on all of their product packages. This can be really deceptive since 
most consumers will see USB 2.0 and compare it to an older product with the 
USB 1.1 moniker and think USB2 must be better than USB 1.1! Naturally, the 
consumer is unaware of the difference between Full Speed and High Speed 
(this is something akin to the old naming snafu with floppy disks: does 
double density or high density hold more?).


And naturally those specs are in 'bits per second' and your images are in 
gigabytes ... so unless you're getting the 480mbps speed the math's not on 
your side ...

@ 1.5mbps it'd take approximately 103 hours to transfer 70Gbytes (560 
gigabits) of data
@ 12mbps it'd take approximately 13 hours
@ 480mbps it'd take approximately 20 minutes

Just guessing but that may be more of an issue than the method you use. As 
suggested, the quickest way is to remove the drive from the USB package and 
connect it directly to your IDE interface.

Larry Craddock
- Original Message - 
From: Jeff Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files


Hi -
Sorry for the OT post, but I am in need of assistance.
I have 200,000 + TIFF (70 GB Worth)images on an external USB 2.0 hard
drive that I need to copy to my local hard drive.  It is taking
forever.
Does anyone know what the fastest way to do this is ?
Drag and Drop ??  Cut and Paste ??
Drop to a command prompt ??  Xcopy ??
Please help.
TIA
jeff
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Michael Graveen
Does the computer/server you're connecting your external hard drive to have 
USB 2.0 ports?  I usually get about 650MB/minute with this kind of 
setup.  A 70GB should take about 2 hours.

Mike
At 01:59 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Hi -
Sorry for the OT post, but I am in need of assistance.
I have 200,000 + TIFF (70 GB Worth)images on an external USB 2.0 hard
drive that I need to copy to my local hard drive.  It is taking
forever.
Does anyone know what the fastest way to do this is ?
Drag and Drop ??  Cut and Paste ??
Drop to a command prompt ??  Xcopy ??
Please help.
TIA
jeff
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Jim
Jeff Pereira wrote:
What's killing me is not so much the amount of data, but the fact that
there are so many small files.  I'm gonna have to try XCOPY on the
next folder and see how that works.
I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to 
ZIP them and copy that over.

Jim
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Brad Morgan
 
 I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to 
 ZIP them and copy that over.
 

In this case that won't work.  To zip them will require copying them over
the USB 2.0 connection anyway and that appears to be the bottleneck.

Using xcopy should be the most efficient, but the huge number of files is
really the limiting factor.

Brad


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Michael Graveen
Graphic files as a general rule don't compress well.
Mike
At 03:26 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Jeff Pereira wrote:
What's killing me is not so much the amount of data, but the fact that
there are so many small files.  I'm gonna have to try XCOPY on the
next folder and see how that works.
I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to 
ZIP them and copy that over.

Jim
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Darin Cox
Huh?  The logic flaw in trying to zip first, then copy aside (since the file
would have to first be copied into RAM, then zipped, then stored back onto
the USB drive...better just to copy)... uncompressed TIFFs (TIFFs have had
an option for LZW compression since the mid 90s) compress pretty well as
they contain raw raster data, as do BMPs and many other uncompressed
formats.

If you're referring to JPEGs and GIFs, that's because they are already
compressed.  JPEGs have built-in lossy compression, but high quality JPEGs
(low compression) can still see decent compression, and GIFs are already LZW
compressed, which means more LZW compression generally doesn't yield much.

So, it depends on the type of image, but TIFFs are generally uncompressed
these days due to the LZW copyright fiasco, or may have run-length encoding
which still compresses reasonably well with LZW.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Michael Graveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files


Graphic files as a general rule don't compress well.

Mike

At 03:26 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Jeff Pereira wrote:
What's killing me is not so much the amount of data, but the fact that
there are so many small files.  I'm gonna have to try XCOPY on the
next folder and see how that works.

I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to
ZIP them and copy that over.

Jim

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Michael Graveen
I think the question was about zipping graphic files, which as a general 
rule, don't get much smaller after they're zipped (as compared to text 
files, etc.).  I wasn't taking about the compression contained in a 
particular graphic format.  I get about 15%-25% reduction zipping the 
uncompressed BMP file vs about 70% from a Word doc (using the stock 
Winzip settings).  I should have been clearer in my first response.

Mike
At 06:43 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Huh?  The logic flaw in trying to zip first, then copy aside (since the file
would have to first be copied into RAM, then zipped, then stored back onto
the USB drive...better just to copy)... uncompressed TIFFs (TIFFs have had
an option for LZW compression since the mid 90s) compress pretty well as
they contain raw raster data, as do BMPs and many other uncompressed
formats.
If you're referring to JPEGs and GIFs, that's because they are already
compressed.  JPEGs have built-in lossy compression, but high quality JPEGs
(low compression) can still see decent compression, and GIFs are already LZW
compressed, which means more LZW compression generally doesn't yield much.
So, it depends on the type of image, but TIFFs are generally uncompressed
these days due to the LZW copyright fiasco, or may have run-length encoding
which still compresses reasonably well with LZW.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Graveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files
Graphic files as a general rule don't compress well.
Mike
At 03:26 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Jeff Pereira wrote:
What's killing me is not so much the amount of data, but the fact that
there are so many small files.  I'm gonna have to try XCOPY on the
next folder and see how that works.

I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to
ZIP them and copy that over.

Jim
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.