RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior
Scott, To get around this problem do you think this is possible? Add a lot of negative weight to the message that has a recipient as postmaster so it won't get bounced. Then create a test that will route the message back to the postmaster's account? This would then route the message to the postmaster and not the other recipients? I am only pursing this because some really offensive email has been getting through where they are including the postmaster@ address in the mail. Is it possible to accomplish something like that? Darrell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior We have our domains postmaster addresses whitelisted. I noticed that a message coming in that has multiple recipients will be delivered to all the recipients mailboxes as long as it has a whitelisted postmaster address. This is not exactly the desired behavior I am looking for. Unfortunately, that is the behavior that is required. The problem is that you are dealing with a single E-mail with multiple recipients, not multiple E-mails. We are working on some creative ways to get around this, but there would still be some definite limitations. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior
To get around this problem do you think this is possible? Add a lot of negative weight to the message that has a recipient as postmaster so it won't get bounced. Then create a test that will route the message back to the postmaster's account? It might be possible to do something like that. An action ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] would prevent the other users from seeing the E-mail. Perhaps adding a filter that includes a line ALLRECIPS 0 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED], and then having the action for that filter set to ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]? That way, any E-mail that was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would get sent only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior
Scott, We have achieved the desired behavior with that setup. I sent a test message tripping off one of the filters and the mail was delivered to the postmaster and was not delivered to the other recipients. This is just a testament on how flexible this product is.. Thanks for the help Darrell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior To get around this problem do you think this is possible? Add a lot of negative weight to the message that has a recipient as postmaster so it won't get bounced. Then create a test that will route the message back to the postmaster's account? It might be possible to do something like that. An action ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] would prevent the other users from seeing the E-mail. Perhaps adding a filter that includes a line ALLRECIPS 0 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED], and then having the action for that filter set to ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]? That way, any E-mail that was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would get sent only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior
We have achieved the desired behavior with that setup. I sent a test message tripping off one of the filters and the mail was delivered to the postmaster and was not delivered to the other recipients. Thanks for that update Darrell. Sounds like something that should be implemented by any one whitelisting postmaster or root or abuse. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior
John, You are absolutely right on this should be implemented instead of whitelisting the postmaster or abuse account. This week I can't tell you how many messages got through because postmaster@ was listed as a recipient. That shouldn't happen anymore... Darrell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior We have achieved the desired behavior with that setup. I sent a test message tripping off one of the filters and the mail was delivered to the postmaster and was not delivered to the other recipients. Thanks for that update Darrell. Sounds like something that should be implemented by any one whitelisting postmaster or root or abuse. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior
We have our domains postmaster addresses whitelisted. I noticed that a message coming in that has multiple recipients will be delivered to all the recipients mailboxes as long as it has a whitelisted postmaster address. This is not exactly the desired behavior I am looking for. It should have blocked this mail from all recipients except the postmaster. 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 WORDFILTER:13 DSBL:5 WIREHUB-DNSBL:3 NOPOSTMASTER:1 BASE64:5 SNIFFER:8 . Total weight = 35 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 E-mail whitelisted - automatically passing all spam tests [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 L1 Message OK 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 Subject: Pe**nis Enlargement Pills - Order today! 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 12.233.204.136 ID: 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 L2 Message OK 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 Subject: Pe**nis Enlargement Pills - Order today! 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 12.233.204.136 ID: 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 L3 Message OK 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 Subject: Penis Enlargement Pills - Order today! 03/24/2003 22:08:17 Qc816661e001c6824 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 12.233.204.136 ID: 20030324 220817 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1812) processing e:\imail\spool\Qc816661e001c6824.SMD 20030324 220817 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1812) ldeliver mail1.gannett-tv.com dlarock-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4166 20030324 220817 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1812) ldeliver wfmy.com 2wantstoknow-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4166 20030324 220817 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1812) forwarded message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20030324 220817 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1812) finished e:\imail\spool\Qc816661e001c6824.SMD status=1 Any thoughts? Darrell --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question On behavior
We have our domains postmaster addresses whitelisted. I noticed that a message coming in that has multiple recipients will be delivered to all the recipients mailboxes as long as it has a whitelisted postmaster address. This is not exactly the desired behavior I am looking for. Unfortunately, that is the behavior that is required. The problem is that you are dealing with a single E-mail with multiple recipients, not multiple E-mails. We are working on some creative ways to get around this, but there would still be some definite limitations. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
