Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Invuribl
One potential area of concern is that Sniffer will add rules for domains listed on surbl. So a domain could potentiallyincorrectly get listed in surbl and then in Sniffer. Causing both tests to false positive. So there is some overlap between the tests. That said, I think surbl.org and Sniffer both work hard to eliminate false positives so the event when it happens should be mighty rare. So having the combined score of 28 weighted below 30 could be a good thing - Original Message - From: Serge To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:23 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Invuribl Hi all, I have been using sniffer for a year and recently add INVURIBL. i am trying to find the corrolation between the 2 test to set the weight. I tag at 10 and delete at 30.. I had sniffer at 14. nowi added invuribl with a max weight of 14. i have spamcop at 9. and a set of negative weight filter to compensate for most FP. Should i lower sniffer now that I added Invuribl ? (this is an isp setting)
[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Invuribl
Hi all, I have been using sniffer for a year and recently add INVURIBL. i am trying to find the corrolation between the 2 test to set the weight. I tag at 10 and delete at 30.. I had sniffer at 14. nowi added invuribl with a max weight of 14. i have spamcop at 9. and a set of negative weight filter to compensate for most FP. Should i lower sniffer now that I added Invuribl ? (this is an isp setting)
[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Invuribl
Hi all, I have been using sniffer for a year and recently add INVURIBL. i am trying to find the corrolation between the 2 test to set the weight. I tag at 10 and delete at 30.. I had sniffer at 14. nowi added invuribl with a max weight of 14. i have spamcop at 9. and a set of negative weight filter to compensate for most FP. Should i lower sniffer now that I added Invuribl ? (this is an isp setting)
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Invuribl
On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 1:23:21 PM, Serge wrote: S Hi all, S S I have been using sniffer for a year and recently add INVURIBL. S i am trying to find the corrolation between the 2 test to set the weight. S I tag at 10 and delete at 30.. S I had sniffer at 14. S now i added invuribl with a max weight of 14. S i have spamcop at 9. S and a set of negative weight filter to compensate for most FP. S Should i lower sniffer now that I added Invuribl ? S (this is an isp setting) I'm pretty sure the only reason to decrease a weight would be if a test became less accurate... so you should probably leave it as it is. Presumably, if both tests hit you would be _very sure_ it was spam. MHO Hope this helps, _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Invuribl
Presumably, if both tests hit you would be _very sure_ it was spam. Presumably, yes... Be careful about deleting on that combination, here are false positives with tests failing both SNIFFER and INVURIBL. Awhile back (thanks Scott Fisher), I asked the list about COUNTRY tests. One of the tests I had was using the TESTSFAILED that included both SNIFFER and INVURIBL in a combo test. Then the COUNTRY test was used to see if that email originated outside of USA and/or started in USA then bounced to another country, then back to USA. In our testing, those that failed those 2 tests, were indeed SPAM. But on some emails that filed both our combo test (SNIFFER and INVURIBL) and originated in USA and destined to USA, were true emails. Ironically, these emails do not fail the ROUTING test in Declude. I would recommend using the TESTSFAILED for SNIFFER and INVURIBL and then another one testing that combo test with the use of another external filter for COUNTRY. Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:19 PM To: Serge Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Invuribl On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 1:23:21 PM, Serge wrote: S Hi all, S S I have been using sniffer for a year and recently add INVURIBL. i am S trying to find the corrolation between the 2 test to set the weight. S I tag at 10 and delete at 30.. I had sniffer at 14. S now i added invuribl with a max weight of 14. S i have spamcop at 9. S and a set of negative weight filter to compensate for most FP. S Should i lower sniffer now that I added Invuribl ? S (this is an isp setting) I'm pretty sure the only reason to decrease a weight would be if a test became less accurate... so you should probably leave it as it is. Presumably, if both tests hit you would be _very sure_ it was spam. MHO Hope this helps, _M --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
