Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What seems to work better for others?

2004-07-20 Thread R. Scott Perry

It seems that more smaller ones are easier to manage using categories. But
what uses less CPU/Memory usage?
Which way is faster?
Fewer larger files are slightly faster, but the difference is not likely to 
be noticed.

So my question is the same as asked previous (listed below) but  also, 
would it be better to simply use headers filter versus mailfrom and 
helo.or does it not matter?
MAILFROM and HELO will be quicker than HEADERS, since Declude JunkMail only 
needs to check a small portion of information, rather than all the headers.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] What seems to work better for others?

2004-07-19 Thread Robert

I am wondering what works better for other operators? To use 10 or 12
smaller txt filter files, or 2 or 3 larger ones?
It seems that more smaller ones are easier to manage using categories. But
what uses less CPU/Memory usage?
Which way is faster?

Thanks
Robert










---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What seems to work better for others?

2004-07-19 Thread Glenn Brooks
Also along this line of questions, my main filters are mailfrom and helo 
AND I also
am starting to collect a large number of files. Each filter file as approx. 
1500 lines.

So my question is the same as asked previous (listed below) but  also, 
would it be better to simply use headers filter versus mailfrom and 
helo.or does it not matter?

thanks in advance
gb
At 08:37 PM 7/19/2004 -0400, you wrote:
I am wondering what works better for other operators? To use 10 or 12
smaller txt filter files, or 2 or 3 larger ones?
It seems that more smaller ones are easier to manage using categories. But
what uses less CPU/Memory usage?
Which way is faster?
Thanks
Robert




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Glenn Brooks
WebWize, Inc.
713-682-7111
http://www.webwize.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What seems to work better for others?

2004-07-19 Thread Matt
It's better to have two filters, one for MAILFROM and one HELO rather 
than searching HEADERS for the same string.  The trick is that when 
matching MAILFROM or HELO, you are only matching one short string 
instead of ~1K of text contained within the headers.

If you are looking to save on processing power, it is best to have 
filters split into different files according to what they are used for.  
You can use some of the beta features from 1.79 to set a SKIPIFWEIGHT so 
that the filter rarely runs, and you can also set a MAXWEIGHT so that 
the filter will stop processing after a single hit (when you score the 
filter internally instead of within the global.cfg).  With things like 
MAILFROM, REVDNS and HELO filters, you aren't likely to save much 
processing this with MAXWEIGHT, but it is definitely better to do so.  
SKIPIFWEIGHT however can save you from processing the filter +70% of the 
time on a well tuned system and the effect can be very noticeable on 
large BODY filters.

Regarding loading the files, I have about 80 or so individual filters 
that must get loaded every time Declude runs.  Apparently Windows is 
efficient enough that these files are almost always present in memory 
and therefore don't need to be read from the disk, so the effect of 
having multiple files is rather small and should be of no concern unless 
you are pushing the limits of your server (when the 5-minute averages 
start peaking at around 50%).  If you are no where near that point, 
don't give it a thought, if you are at that point, there are multitudes 
of things to do, and you should keep in mind that most virus scanners 
are many times more processor intensive than a rather hefty JunkMail 
config, and attention should be focused there first.

Matt

Glenn Brooks wrote:
Also along this line of questions, my main filters are mailfrom and 
helo AND I also
am starting to collect a large number of files. Each filter file as 
approx. 1500 lines.

So my question is the same as asked previous (listed below) but  also, 
would it be better to simply use headers filter versus mailfrom and 
helo.or does it not matter?

thanks in advance
gb
At 08:37 PM 7/19/2004 -0400, you wrote:
I am wondering what works better for other operators? To use 10 or 12
smaller txt filter files, or 2 or 3 larger ones?
It seems that more smaller ones are easier to manage using 
categories. But
what uses less CPU/Memory usage?
Which way is faster?

Thanks
Robert




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Glenn Brooks
WebWize, Inc.
713-682-7111
http://www.webwize.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.