Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway
The WHITELIST FROM directive uses the sender of the message as specified in the message envelope (MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]), which may or may not correspond to the From: line in the headers of the message itself. In this case, it did not. The filters operate on the message file, not on the envelope. That is why you can have different results like in this case. The X-Declude-Sender: x-header is the sender as specified in the envelope. David Franco-Rocha Declude Technical / Engineering - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 12:00 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway You might need WHITELIST from .xx.com (the smtp sender address looks to be in the fromat [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Harry Vanderzand To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:17 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway have an addres that I have whitelisted WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg Yet somehow it got marked as spam There was a matchin a filter file How is this possible? Should whitelisting not take precedence? See headers below Received: from mailface.roving.com [63.251.135.75] by intown.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A17A068C; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:54 -0500Received: from ws06 (unknown [10.200.200.61])by mailface.roving.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224448C003for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:42:37 -0500 (EST)Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:53 -0500 (EST)From: Ken Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: We Need Your InputMIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_Part_13064663_1921543487.1142624633764"X-Roving-Queued: 20060317 02:43:53.764X-Mailer: Roving Constant Contact 0 (http://www.constantcontact.com)X-Return-Path-Hint: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Roving-ID: 1101247029557X-Lumos-SenderID: 1011230829116X-Roving-CampaignId: 1101247029557X-Roving-StreamId: 0X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.251.135.75]X-Declude-Spoolname: D11790199df6a.smdX-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 22.X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: FIVETEN-BULK [3], MYFILTER [19], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT11 [11], WEIGHT12 [12], WEIGHT15 [15], WEIGHT19 [19]X-Note: REMOTEIP: 63.251.135.75X-Note: REVDNS: mailface.roving.comX-Note: FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Note: TO: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: FIVETEN-BULK, MYFILTER, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT11, WEIGHT12, WEIGHT15, WEIGHT19 [22]X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: UX-UIDL: 428964605X-IMail-ThreadID: 11790199df6a Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway
check your declude logs.. post them here, they would be able to give us more info Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry VanderzandSent: Sábado, 18 de Marzo de 2006 11:18 a.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway have an addres that I have whitelisted WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg Yet somehow it got marked as spam There was a matchin a filter file How is this possible? Should whitelisting not take precedence? See headers below Received: from mailface.roving.com [63.251.135.75] by intown.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A17A068C; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:54 -0500Received: from ws06 (unknown [10.200.200.61])by mailface.roving.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224448C003for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:42:37 -0500 (EST)Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:53 -0500 (EST)From: Ken Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: We Need Your InputMIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_Part_13064663_1921543487.1142624633764"X-Roving-Queued: 20060317 02:43:53.764X-Mailer: Roving Constant Contact 0 (http://www.constantcontact.com)X-Return-Path-Hint: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Roving-ID: 1101247029557X-Lumos-SenderID: 1011230829116X-Roving-CampaignId: 1101247029557X-Roving-StreamId: 0X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.251.135.75]X-Declude-Spoolname: D11790199df6a.smdX-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 22.X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: FIVETEN-BULK [3], MYFILTER [19], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT11 [11], WEIGHT12 [12], WEIGHT15 [15], WEIGHT19 [19]X-Note: REMOTEIP: 63.251.135.75X-Note: REVDNS: mailface.roving.comX-Note: FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Note: TO: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: FIVETEN-BULK, MYFILTER, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT11, WEIGHT12, WEIGHT15, WEIGHT19 [22]X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: UX-UIDL: 428964605X-IMail-ThreadID: 11790199df6a Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway
Harry, This is the actual sender of the email X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.251.135.75] Not From: Ken Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:18 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway have an addres that I have whitelisted WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg Yet somehow it got marked as spam There was a match in a filter file How is this possible? Should whitelisting not take precedence? See headers below Received: from mailface.roving.com [63.251.135.75] by intown.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A17A068C; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:54 -0500 Received: from ws06 (unknown [10.200.200.61]) by mailface.roving.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224448C003 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:42:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:53 -0500 (EST) From: Ken Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: We Need Your Input MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_13064663_1921543487.1142624633764 X-Roving-Queued: 20060317 02:43:53.764 X-Mailer: Roving Constant Contact 0 (http://www.constantcontact.com) X-Return-Path-Hint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Roving-ID: 1101247029557 X-Lumos-SenderID: 1011230829116 X-Roving-CampaignId: 1101247029557 X-Roving-StreamId: 0 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.251.135.75] X-Declude-Spoolname: D11790199df6a.smd X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 22. X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: FIVETEN-BULK [3], MYFILTER [19], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT11 [11], WEIGHT12 [12], WEIGHT15 [15], WEIGHT19 [19] X-Note: REMOTEIP: 63.251.135.75 X-Note: REVDNS: mailface.roving.com X-Note: FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Note: TO: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: FIVETEN-BULK, MYFILTER, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT11, WEIGHT12, WEIGHT15, WEIGHT19 [22] X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: U X-UIDL: 428964605 X-IMail-ThreadID: 11790199df6a Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2 519-741-1222 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway
You might need WHITELIST from .xx.com (the smtp sender address looks to be in the fromat [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Harry Vanderzand To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:17 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway have an addres that I have whitelisted WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg Yet somehow it got marked as spam There was a matchin a filter file How is this possible? Should whitelisting not take precedence? See headers below Received: from mailface.roving.com [63.251.135.75] by intown.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A17A068C; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:54 -0500Received: from ws06 (unknown [10.200.200.61])by mailface.roving.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224448C003for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:42:37 -0500 (EST)Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:53 -0500 (EST)From: Ken Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: We Need Your InputMIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_Part_13064663_1921543487.1142624633764"X-Roving-Queued: 20060317 02:43:53.764X-Mailer: Roving Constant Contact 0 (http://www.constantcontact.com)X-Return-Path-Hint: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Roving-ID: 1101247029557X-Lumos-SenderID: 1011230829116X-Roving-CampaignId: 1101247029557X-Roving-StreamId: 0X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.251.135.75]X-Declude-Spoolname: D11790199df6a.smdX-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 22.X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: FIVETEN-BULK [3], MYFILTER [19], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT11 [11], WEIGHT12 [12], WEIGHT15 [15], WEIGHT19 [19]X-Note: REMOTEIP: 63.251.135.75X-Note: REVDNS: mailface.roving.comX-Note: FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Note: TO: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: FIVETEN-BULK, MYFILTER, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT11, WEIGHT12, WEIGHT15, WEIGHT19 [22]X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: UX-UIDL: 428964605X-IMail-ThreadID: 11790199df6a Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222
