Re: Derby 10.16.1.2 artifacts release

2024-01-28 Thread Rick Hillegas
Producing an official Derby release involves a lot of checkins to the 
Subversion-controlled source code. Only committers have the ability to 
checkin source code.


What you could do is build an unofficial set of jars, sign them, and 
post them on a public artifactory.


-Rick

On 1/28/24 8:29 AM, Andrea Selva wrote:

Hi

On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 5:56 PM Bryan Pendleton 
wrote:


I don't know of any plans to build another release of 10.16.

It is fairly straightforward for you to build your own release with
the fix. Rick published information about how to do this here, does
that help for you?


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7147?focusedCommentId=17805250=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17805250


Those instructions help to create the jars locally, but would be helpful to
have an official release in a public maven repository. Do you know if there
is anything I can do to help with this?



bryan

Andrea
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:46 AM Andrea Selva 
wrote:

Hi folks,
looking at 10.16 branch seems that DERBY-7147 has been backported and

checking at file tools/ant/properties/release.properties the
release.id.long is bumped to 10.16.1.2.

There is any plan to ship the release 10.16.1.2?

Thanks
   Andrea





Re: Derby 10.16.1.2 artifacts release

2024-01-28 Thread Andrea Selva
Hi

On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 5:56 PM Bryan Pendleton 
wrote:

> I don't know of any plans to build another release of 10.16.
>
> It is fairly straightforward for you to build your own release with
> the fix. Rick published information about how to do this here, does
> that help for you?
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7147?focusedCommentId=17805250=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17805250


Those instructions help to create the jars locally, but would be helpful to
have an official release in a public maven repository. Do you know if there
is anything I can do to help with this?

>
>
> bryan
>
> Andrea

> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:46 AM Andrea Selva 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> > looking at 10.16 branch seems that DERBY-7147 has been backported and
> checking at file tools/ant/properties/release.properties the
> release.id.long is bumped to 10.16.1.2.
> >
> > There is any plan to ship the release 10.16.1.2?
> >
> > Thanks
> >   Andrea
>


Re: JDK 22 RDP2 & Deprecate sun.misc.Unsafe Memory-Access Methods…

2024-01-28 Thread Rick Hillegas
Thanks, David. Derby found no problems with build 22-ea+33-2356. See 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7159


On 1/26/24 3:11 AM, David Delabassee wrote:

Greetings!

We are starting 2024 with JDK 22 as it has just entered Rampdown Phase 2 [1]. 
And with the initial JDK 22 Release Candidates now less than 2 weeks away (Feb. 
8th) [2], it is time to shift our attention to JDK 23.

After multiple rounds of incubations and preview, the Foreign Function & Memory 
API is becoming standard and permanent in JDK 22. If we put its 'Function' angle 
aside, this API also offers a standard and secure way to access off-heap API. And 
that brings us to the heads-up below 'Deprecate the memory-access methods in 
sun.misc.Unsafe for removal in a future release' as developers still using 
sun.misc.Unsafe for accessing memory are strongly encouraged to start preparing 
their plans to migrate away from those unsafe methods.

[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/2024-January/008675.html
[2] https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/22/


## Heads-up: Deprecate the Memory-Access Methods in sun.misc.Unsafe for Removal 
in a Future Release

The effort focused on enforcing the integrity of the Java platform [3] 
continues! The next phase in that long but important initiative will most 
likely target the sun.misc.Unsafe API used for accessing memory. Those methods 
alone represent 79 methods out of the 87 sun.misc.Unsafe methods!

This draft JEP [4] outlines the plan to deprecate for removal the 
sun.misc.Unsafe Memory-Access methods, the reasons, and the standard 
alternatives. As the draft plan suggests, the first step will be to deprecate 
all memory-access methods (on-heap, off-heap, and bimodal) for removal. This 
will cause compile-time deprecation warnings for code that refers to the 
methods, alerting library developers to their forthcoming removal. In addition, 
a new command-line option will allow users to receive runtime warnings when 
those methods are used. This command-line will help users to assess if their 
codebase uses those unsafe API to access memory. It should be mentioned that 
other tools such as JFR and jdeprscan can also be used to detect the use of 
those deprecated APIs.

Library developers are strongly encouraged to migrate from sun.misc.Unsafe to 
the supported replacements, so that applications can migrate smoothly to modern 
JDKs. The initial step will be to conduct investigations to understand if, how, 
and where sun.misc.Unsafe methods are used to access memory.

[3] https://openjdk.org/jeps/8305968
[4] https://openjdk.org/jeps/8323072


## Heads-up: Java Array Element Alignment - Weakening of Some Methods 
Guarantees ?

Some methods make promises about Java array element alignment that are too 
strong. There are some ongoing reflexions to change the implementation (and the 
specification) of `MethodHandles::byteArrayViewVarHandle`, 
`MethodHandles::byteBufferViewVarHandle`, `ByteBuffer::alignedSlice`, and 
`ByteBuffer::alignmentOffset` to weaken the guarantees they make about the 
alignment of Java array elements, in order to bring them in line with the 
guarantees made by an arbitrary JVM implementation.

For more details, make sure to check JDK-8320247 [5] and the related PR [6] but 
in a nutshell, the new behaviour would be :
- The `VarHandle` returned by `MethodHandles::byteArrayViewVarHandle` would 
only support `get` and `set` methods, and all other access methods would throw 
an exception.
- The `VarHandle` returned by `MethodHandles::byteBufferViewHandle` would only 
support the `get` and `set` access methods when a heap buffer is used, and all 
other access methods would throw an exception when used with a heap buffer. 
Direct byte buffers will continue to work the same way.
- The `ByteBuffer::alignmentOffset` and `ByteBuffer::alignedSlice` methods 
would throw an exception if the buffer is a heap buffer, and the given 
`unitSize` is greater than 1.

If you have relevant feedback about this potential change, please make sure to 
bring it to the core-libs-dev mailing list [7], or comment on the PR [6].

[5] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320247
[6] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16681
[7] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/


## JDK 22 Early-Access Builds

JDK 22 Early-Access builds 33 are now available [8], and are provided under the 
GNU General Public License v2, with the Classpath Exception. The Release Notes 
[9] and the javadocs [10] are also available.

### Changes in recent JDK 22 builds that may be of interest:

- JDK-8320597: RSA signature verification fails on signed data that does not 
encode params correctly [Reported by Apache POI]
- JDK-8322214: Return value of XMLInputFactory.getProperty() changed from 
boolean to String in JDK 22 early access builds [Reported by Apache POI]
- JDK-8322725: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2023d
- JDK-8321480: ISO 4217 Amendment 176 Update
- JDK-8314468: Improve Compiler loops
- JDK-8314295: Enhance 

[jira] [Commented] (DERBY-7159) Make it possible to build and test Derby with Open JDK 22

2024-01-28 Thread Richard N. Hillegas (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17811657#comment-17811657
 ] 

Richard N. Hillegas commented on DERBY-7159:


Derby built cleanly (including javadoc) with Open JDK build 22-ea+33-2356. The 
tests ran cleanly with both the classpath and modulepath.

> Make it possible to build and test Derby with Open JDK 22
> -
>
> Key: DERBY-7159
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7159
> Project: Derby
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: Build tools
>Affects Versions: 10.18.0.0
>Reporter: Richard N. Hillegas
>Assignee: Richard N. Hillegas
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: derby-7159-01-aa-addJdk22VM.diff
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)