[libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-21 Thread Dr. Bernhard Dippold
Hi Rick, 

sorry for replying late - but at the moment all I can do is marking the mails 
I want to reply and reply later on...

 Hi, all new friends,
 
 
 I agree with Nik. On the other hand, I'm very impressed with he work that
 has been done in such a short time.

We will have to discuss the logo topic in quite a short time - but at the
moment it was necessary to come up with something people can use.
(you probably read my latest mails on the logo).
 
 
 I'm new here and I've followed this mailing list for a while to get an idea
 of how the collaboration is done.

Welcome to our team!

You already did the second step: Not only reading, but posting on the list. 
Great!

We know that our structure is far away from being optimized with regards to 
new contributors, so please bare with us and ask, if there is anything you
don't understand.

If you want to, you might write down your experience with our team and
put it on the wiki (you already know about it?) for future newbies.
You might propose improvements to our workflow as well...

Did you follow Christoph's Kick-off effort?

You'll see that we are heading towards the basic decisions in LibreOffice
design.
 
 A short presentation:
 
 I'm a designer and project manager. I work on Mac, Windows and Linux, but my
 major platform is design. I've never participated in open source development
 before, but I've worked with open source scripts/programs in many projects
 for years.

Our team is (probably) different from most of the OS development areas, because
- we aren't developers
- we work collaboratively instead of merging different patches to dedicated 
topics
- we think our work influences the entire community
- we have a lot of fun

(okay - the last two points might fit to other teams as well ;-) )
 
 
 i would be happy if a can contribute and help.

I'm sure you will be able to help us - just read the mails sent here and jump 
in 
whenever you like to...

Best regards

Bernhard




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-12 Thread Nik

Hi Bernhard!, all!


On 2/6/2011 9:06 AM, Dr. Bernhard Dippold wrote:

I'm sorry I keep bringing this up, but I think it's necessary to discuss
and plan for this.
Most people will see our logo before they even try the software. We
might lose them before we even shake their hand.

You really think that we lose most of our possible customers because
of our poor logo? I didn't think it would be *that* bad...

Best regards

Bernhard

=)

You're right, probably a gross over-exaggeration.
But here's an interesting (well, kinda boring actually) story;

At the end of last semester, one of our students asked me how to go 
deeper than simple web-dev.
He wanted PHP. I opened up Eclipse and Netbeans homepages and told him 
these 2 were the bees-knees.
I expected he would opt for Eclipse because they had a better (not 
usability-wise) website (wasn't always the case, that).
He said Hmmm, I'll give this (Netbeans) a try and I asked him out of 
curiosity, why not eclipse?. He said;


Their logo looks like it was made in a high-school design 
competition... That made me smile.


Such a simple, uneducated choice huh? but who here is not guilty of 
having judged a book by it's cover?
Sadly, almost all my books have nice covers. I'm not really ashamed, 
that's the power of good Design.


-Nik

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-07 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Bernhard,

I'm sorry to appear a bit disruptive, but I think that the changes
concerning the logo already address some parts of the community
branding. Although I'm happy if we can further refine our branding, I
fear that such changes lead to a bit confusion ... I've already seen a
lot of Material created for the trade fairs (shirts, banner, pens,
lanyards, ...) being affected of such changes. Moreover, blogger and
press already use the given material ... so I am a bit doubtful
concerning any change at the moment.

Thus, if there are issues to combine the document symbol with the rest
of the graphic items, would it be helpful to just foucs on the text
LibreOffice and a subline? If we need something neat, why not play
with the triangle that may be added somewhere - it can also be
considered to be a (current) key visual.

What do you think?

Cheers,
Christoph

Am Sonntag, den 06.02.2011, 13:44 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Dippold:
 Hi Nik, all,
 
 here my ideas:
 
 Dr. Bernhard Dippold schrieb:
  Hi Nik, all,
 
  sorry for not replying earlier, but...
 
  Nik wrote:
  [...]
 
  If we were feeling adventurous, I think small changes could really
  improve the look of the current logo; (refer to R05)
  *http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibOlogo_reconfigs03.jpg*
  - Clip the L so it is cut by the same gap which slices the paper icon:
  for continuation.
 
  Good idea - even if I don't think we should do the same with the b2
  as in R06.
 
  I've already tried to reduce the distance between symbol and L even
  more by extending the green corner to the L - not really a valid idea,
  but you might get what I mean, when I'll upload the draft tomorrow
  (today only mail access).
 
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibO_Logo_idea.png
 
 Still with the darker grey, no consistency in borders, distance between
 symbol and corner still to be improved and many other things...
 
 I'd like to see the symbol as integrated part of the logo - and with 
 less difference in height between symbol and text, allowing the text to 
 be readable in smaller scales too.
 
 I prefer b) very much over a), because the corner becomes too large and 
 I like optical illusion (negative visualization of the upper part of the 
 L), but I wanted to show you both.
 
 Best regards
 
 Bernhard
 
 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-07 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi all,

I totally forgot to mention ... The LibO banners Cor brought to the
FOSDEM were based on our installer images and just looked *amazing* - so
although we talk about some issues, the quality was just great. There
was even a person who came and asked to get one of those simple
printouts after the FOSDEM.

Moreover, I got some feedback by one core developer who really liked the
clean design of the current splash screen :-)

Cheers,
Christoph

Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 22:34 +0100 schrieb Christoph Noack:
 Hi Bernhard,
 
 I'm sorry to appear a bit disruptive, but I think that the changes
 concerning the logo already address some parts of the community
 branding. Although I'm happy if we can further refine our branding, I
 fear that such changes lead to a bit confusion ... I've already seen a
 lot of Material created for the trade fairs (shirts, banner, pens,
 lanyards, ...) being affected of such changes. Moreover, blogger and
 press already use the given material ... so I am a bit doubtful
 concerning any change at the moment.
 
 Thus, if there are issues to combine the document symbol with the rest
 of the graphic items, would it be helpful to just foucs on the text
 LibreOffice and a subline? If we need something neat, why not play
 with the triangle that may be added somewhere - it can also be
 considered to be a (current) key visual.
 
 What do you think?
 
 Cheers,
 Christoph
 
 Am Sonntag, den 06.02.2011, 13:44 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Dippold:
  Hi Nik, all,
  
  here my ideas:
  
  Dr. Bernhard Dippold schrieb:
   Hi Nik, all,
  
   sorry for not replying earlier, but...
  
   Nik wrote:
   [...]
  
   If we were feeling adventurous, I think small changes could really
   improve the look of the current logo; (refer to R05)
   *http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibOlogo_reconfigs03.jpg*
   - Clip the L so it is cut by the same gap which slices the paper icon:
   for continuation.
  
   Good idea - even if I don't think we should do the same with the b2
   as in R06.
  
   I've already tried to reduce the distance between symbol and L even
   more by extending the green corner to the L - not really a valid idea,
   but you might get what I mean, when I'll upload the draft tomorrow
   (today only mail access).
  
  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibO_Logo_idea.png
  
  Still with the darker grey, no consistency in borders, distance between
  symbol and corner still to be improved and many other things...
  
  I'd like to see the symbol as integrated part of the logo - and with 
  less difference in height between symbol and text, allowing the text to 
  be readable in smaller scales too.
  
  I prefer b) very much over a), because the corner becomes too large and 
  I like optical illusion (negative visualization of the upper part of the 
  L), but I wanted to show you both.
  
  Best regards
  
  Bernhard
  
  
 
 
 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-07 Thread Jeff Chimene
On 02/07/2011 03:48 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
 Hi Jeff,
 
 yes, all the material is available. Just being curious, what do you
 intend to do?

Thanks, Christoph

Here's the relevant thread:

http://www.mail-archive.com/design@libreoffice.org/msg00747.html

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-07 Thread drew
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:52 -0700, Jeff Chimene wrote:
 On 02/07/2011 03:48 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
  Hi Jeff,
  
  yes, all the material is available. Just being curious, what do you
  intend to do?
 
 Thanks, Christoph
 
 Here's the relevant thread:
 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/design@libreoffice.org/msg00747.html
 

Hi Jeff,

Here is a pdf file that should work for the 5' x 2.5' banner

http://oucv.org/libreoffice/banner_60inx30in.pdf


//drew






-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-07 Thread drew
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 18:59 -0500, drew wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:52 -0700, Jeff Chimene wrote:
  On 02/07/2011 03:48 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
   Hi Jeff,
   
   yes, all the material is available. Just being curious, what do you
   intend to do?
  
  Thanks, Christoph
  
  Here's the relevant thread:
  
  http://www.mail-archive.com/design@libreoffice.org/msg00747.html
  
 
 Hi Jeff,
 
 Here is a pdf file that should work for the 5' x 2.5' banner
 
 http://oucv.org/libreoffice/banner_60inx30in.pdf
 

and here is 35 x 20

http://oucv.org/libreoffice/banner_35inx20in.pdf

Both files are set for 75 dpi

Thanks


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-07 Thread drew
  
  Hi Jeff,
  
  Here is a pdf file that should work for the 5' x 2.5' banner
  
  http://oucv.org/libreoffice/banner_60inx30in.pdf
  
 
 and here is 35 x 20
 
 http://oucv.org/libreoffice/banner_35inx20in.pdf
 
 Both files are set for 75 dpi
 

Sorry for one more mail on this:

- you can find the svg files in the same location just change the file
descriptor. 

Just export to pdf from inkscape if you need to make a change.

[I did make one last change to each so check that you clear you cache
before grabbing the pdf files]

Drew





-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-07 Thread Jeff Chimene
On 02/07/2011 05:24 PM, drew wrote:

 Hi Jeff,

 Here is a pdf file that should work for the 5' x 2.5' banner

 http://oucv.org/libreoffice/banner_60inx30in.pdf


 and here is 35 x 20

 http://oucv.org/libreoffice/banner_35inx20in.pdf

 Both files are set for 75 dpi

 
 Sorry for one more mail on this:
 
 - you can find the svg files in the same location just change the file
 descriptor. 
 
 Just export to pdf from inkscape if you need to make a change.
 
 [I did make one last change to each so check that you clear you cache
 before grabbing the pdf files]
 
 Drew

OK I'll look at them now.

Bernhard:

 are you following this thread?

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



[libreoffice-design] Re: [libreoffice-design] Logo proposal without TDF line

2011-02-05 Thread Dr. Bernhard Dippold
Hi Nik, all,

sorry for not replying earlier, but...

Nik wrote:
 [... skipping the short version - too much to reply inline...
 
 Hi Bernhard!
 I know I told you I'd be busy with my research but you keep raising 
 interesting topics that lure me back! =)

Should I say I'm sorry? Only if this activities here reduce the quality of
your main work, your private life, your sleep quality or any other more 
important task. ;-)

OK - I'm very glad that you're here! :-)

 Besides, some /*very*/ important stuff is being decided right now, that 
 if I miss out on, I know it will never get changed again.
 That is the way of Open-Source huh? like a big machine on rails that can 
 only go forward, not back =)

Of course it can - but it cost's nearly as much as in the corporate world. 
(Sometimes money, but more credibility, consistency and fun...)
 
 On 1/31/2011 9:12 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
  Do you think we can present this logo (or something similar) to the 
  Steering Committee as our Design Team proposal for an official logo of 
  LibreOffice for external use?
 
  Comments? Critics? Improvements?
 
 If the possibility of /small/ changes are possible to the logo in this 
 context, can we take this opportunity to address some if its shortcomings?

I didn't talk to the Steering Committee on this question, but I think we can.

 [...] It wouldn't entail major changes, but the longer we trudge on with an 
 interim logo, the more certain I become that it will remain the *only* 
 logo tried.

At least for some time. 

The point is that some people want to use a logo for representing
LibreOffice outside the community now. So we are restricted in time, 
but not as much to avoid any discussion on improvement.

We just shouldn't need more than one or wo weeks to come to a final
version.
 
 [...]
 R03 is what I would recommend, I think the gap could decrease and 
 because the letter L has a good corner effect, it perfectly juxtaposes 
 the icon when aligned.
 This way, the entire arrangement would look like one visual block 
 which is what you want; White space /around/ the logo, rather than 
 /between/.

I support this standing - we don't need as much space between the parts
of the logo.
 [...]
 
 If we were feeling adventurous, I think small changes could really 
 improve the look of the current logo; (refer to R05)
 *http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibOlogo_reconfigs03.jpg*
 - Clip the L so it is cut by the same gap which slices the paper icon: 
 for continuation.

Good idea - even if I don't think we should do the same with the b2
as in R06.

I've already tried to reduce the distance between symbol and L even
more by extending the green corner to the L - not really a valid idea,
but you might get what I mean, when I'll upload the draft tomorrow 
(today only mail access).

 - Lighten the colours to mid-grey instead of dark-grey, this will still 
 print well and compliments the green better.

The lighter grey looks more friendly, but there are some drawbacks,
we need to keep in mind: 

1. Reproduction of grey tones are problematic on prints, the lighter
the color is, the more differ prints on different printers.
2. Contrast to the background will be reduced, thus leading to a even 
more restrictive Branding Guideline (keep the white background of
the logo).

I think the positive aspects of the lighter grey are more important - I
just wanted to mention.

Your green gradient introduces a new green tone different from the 
existing green branding colors (I didn't compare - it's just my 
impression).

Especially with the next point this becomes important:

 - Colour the broken corner of the paper icon to create a focal point 
 that leads the eye through the logo

I like the colored corner. It integrates the symbol with the text and 
adds a visible distinction from the TDF symbol by keeping it's 
relationship.

But with your new gradient the general impression of the green
moves towards yellow.

I would like to avoid modifying the Initial Branding Colors before we
work on the Community Branding.

 
 I'm not sure giving the members logos is the entire solution because 
 it just creates many logo variations.
 I think creating badges for community members with a non-TDF logo 
 /attached/ will send the right message without diluting the brand.

I don't mind if they are logos or logos with badges.

But we are on the same side: Being allowed to use a visible reference
proving that someone belongs to an LibO Team is a positive motivation.

 Because it suggests affiliation without suggesting ownership.
 I think Charles mentioned this in an Email to the Design list (I've 
 CC'ed him), I was really excited by the prospect of making team badges,
 but because I'm short on time, I've only got roughs (plenty of 
 glitches). I thought the topic could wait, but these are related things.

I still think that they have some more time. Before anybody can use them,
it is necessary to create rules about their usage (who is allowed to use