[Bug 358391] Re: Window games should start in the centre of the screen
** Changed in: amphetamine (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358391 Title: Window games should start in the centre of the screen -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
rather than doing anything drastic, how about just providing brief examples; something like Create an archive (e.g. zip, tar.gz, etc) -- Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 607709] Re: Unused upstream files missing in the source package
forwarded https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628209 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #628209 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628209 ** Changed in: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Confirmed -- Unused upstream files missing in the source package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-good0.10 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 12613] Re: Xpdf renders really slow, non-responsive
** Changed in: xpdf (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Confirmed -- Xpdf renders really slow, non-responsive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 488710] Re: pdftops too slow with certain PDF files
as of xpdf 3.02-9, pdftops is not provided. ** Changed in: xpdf (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- pdftops too slow with certain PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 238817] Re: Poppler needs an option to turn off printing of watermark
this doesn't affect xpdf directly anymore since it uses poppler now. ** Changed in: xpdf (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- Poppler needs an option to turn off printing of watermark https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
can we at least get some kind of confirmation that it is going to be easy to switch the buttons back to normal? gconf is great, but it really isn't viable for most of ubuntu's users (the point-and-clickers). also can we get a confirmation that the buttons will continue to look professional on the right? currently if you switch them to the right and fix their order (min,max,close), most themes just look bad since the button coloring and fading is designed for the expected order when on the left. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
Mark Shuttleworth wrote: This is a difference between Ubuntu and several other community distributions. It may feel less democratic, but it's more meritocratic, and most importantly it means (a) we should have the best people making any given decision, and (b) it's worth investing your time to become the best person to make certain decisions, because you should have that competence recognised and rewarded with the freedom to make hard decisions and not get second-guessed all the time. I must respectfully say that this logic is a bit flawed. Isn't the best person to make any decision actually the original (upstream) developer? And if that's the case then sticking with their defaults should always be optimal. If you want to change their code, then you need be very proactive and persistent to sway their opinions. However, even bringing the change up with upstream will probably seem quite rude. They have already chosen to paint their bikeshed blue, and you want it purple; but its their bikeshed. What gives you the authority to impose your views on their property? If you really want to paint their bikeshed, you should really demonstrate to a very good reason to do so (as yet unseen yet for the button change). On the contrary, you have asked the community for data to support upstream non- divergence, but the correct approach is for you to justify the divergence to upstream and the community. On the other hand, if you try, they may happily adopt your viewpoint; they'll push the change, and it will eventually roll into an Ubuntu release. As it stands now, this is the wrong way of going about this change. Best wishes, Mike -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
