[Bug 1094061] [NEW] trivial build products should not be in source package

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

Packaging trivial build products such as shell/cc-shell-marshal.{c,h}
unnecessarily complicates building from source, __especially__ since
debian/patches/60_ubuntu_nav_bar.patch renders the originals invalid
anyway.

Consider the typical approach for shadowing the package with additional patches:
$ apt-get source gnome-control-center
$ cd gnome-control-center-3.4.2
$ git init
$ git add .
$ git commit -m Base package
$ dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot -us -uc
. everything builds fine, now cleanup and rebuild .
$ git reset --hard HEAD
$ git clean -xdf
$ dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot -us -uc
. build fails because trivial build products have current datetime so won't 
be rebuilt :(

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094061

Title:
  trivial build products should not be in source package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1094061/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1094075] [NEW] gnome-control-center should not have hard dependency on gnome-icon-theme-symbolic

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

A hard dependency on a icon theme package makes replacing that package
impossible (or ugly in the extreme by using Breaks).

At most, use a Recommends dependency. Even better would be to use a
virtual package for symbolic icons ;)

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094075

Title:
  gnome-control-center should not have hard dependency on gnome-icon-
  theme-symbolic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1094075/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1093938] Re: gnome-panel should not have hard dependency to gnome-icon-theme-symbolic

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Hi Jeremy,

Firstly, I think you didn't look closely at the code snippet that I
included.  As packaged, gnome-panel does not render the icons for the
user menu, so it doesn't really matter if the icons are found or not
(that is, no functionality is broken by not having gnome-icon-theme-
symbolic installed).

Secondly, I think the purpose of symbolic icons has wandered from its original 
mission. Excerpted from the README of gnome-icon-theme-symbolic:
Icons follow the naming specification, but have a -symbolic suffix, so only
applications specifically looking up these symbolic icons will render them. If
a -symbolic icon is missing, the app will fall back to the regular name.

If you'd prefer, I could change this bug (and similarly for g-c-c and
totem) to package should use g_themed_icon_new_from_names() for
symbolic icons.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093938

Title:
  gnome-panel should not have hard dependency to gnome-icon-theme-
  symbolic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/1093938/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1093938] [NEW] gnome-panel should not have hard dependency to gnome-icon-theme-symbolic

2012-12-26 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

1. An icon theme file should not be a hard dependency.  How would a different 
icon theme provide alternate icons?
2. The 4 symbolic icons referred to are part of the now-defunct User menu, 
which no longer draws the icons anyway:

static GtkWidget *
panel_menu_item_presence_new (..)
{
..
#if 0
if (use_icon) {
GtkWidget *image;
image = gtk_image_new_from_icon_name (icon,
  panel_menu_icon_get_size 
());
gtk_container_add (GTK_CONTAINER (item), image);
}
#endif

** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Patch added: patch to debian/control.in
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093938/+attachment/3468592/+files/0001-Remove-bogus-dependency-on-gnome-icon-theme-symbolic.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093938

Title:
  gnome-panel should not have hard dependency to gnome-icon-theme-
  symbolic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/1093938/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 962458] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
@Sebastien,

Before I report this upstream, is there a reason why you believe this is
an upstream bug and not related to any of the *over 6000 lines* of
debian + ubuntu patches?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962458

Title:
  [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/962458/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 968769] [NEW] Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

The power plug-in preferentially selects '*-symbolic' icons first (in
plugins/power/gpm-common.c:gpm_upower_get_device_icon).

This looks out-of-place with non-symbolic indicators -- see attached
screenshot.

** Affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968769

Title:
  Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/968769/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 968769] Re: Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
** Attachment added: Screenshot of notification area
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968769/+attachment/2964321/+files/symbolic_power_icons_seem_wrong.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968769

Title:
  Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/968769/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 968769] Re: Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Attached is a screenshot of notification area with appropriate icon
usage (icons are from gnome-power-manager).

** Attachment added: UPS icon from gnome-power-manager
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/968769/+attachment/2964322/+files/icons_from_gnome_power_manager.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968769

Title:
  Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/968769/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 968772] [NEW] gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

Now that gnome-power-manager is no longer part of the
notification/indicator subsystem, it's status icon set should be moved
into the 'gnome' icon theme.

The absence of appropriate icons is forcing devs to economize with poor
substitutions.  For example, the power plug-in of gnome-settings-daemon
uses 'battery-*-symbolic' icon names preferentially now, which looks
terrible. See attached screenshot.

** Affects: gnome-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968772

Title:
  gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-icon-theme/+bug/968772/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 968772] Re: gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
** Attachment added: Screenshot of 'UPS charged' notification with 'gnome' 
icon theme
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968772/+attachment/2964338/+files/symbolic_power_icons_seem_wrong.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968772

Title:
  gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-icon-theme/+bug/968772/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 968772] Re: gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
** Attachment added: Screenshot with gnome-power-manager icons substituted
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-icon-theme/+bug/968772/+attachment/2964339/+files/icons_from_gnome_power_manager.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968772

Title:
  gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-icon-theme/+bug/968772/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 968772] Re: gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Cross-reference to corresponding bug #968769 in gnome-settings-daemon
wrt using '*-symbolic' icon names.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968772

Title:
  gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-icon-theme/+bug/968772/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 965487] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in engine_update_composite_device()

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
@RedSingularity,

As I expected and noted, this bug is *not* a duplicate of bug# 962458,
as confirmed by the completed i386 stack backtrace. This bug dies in
engine_update_composite_device, whereas the amd64 stack backtrace for
bug# 962458 indicates that crash @ engine_get_icon_priv.

In the future, please don't assume that two bugs are related because
they crash in the same binary.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965487

Title:
  [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in
  engine_update_composite_device()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/965487/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 962458] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 965487
   [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in 
engine_update_composite_device()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962458

Title:
  [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/962458/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 966697] [NEW] Transparent panel has themed widgets

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

GTK+ 3.4 has introduced a bug with transparent panels.  Specifically,
upstream gtk+ commit 7603e6e4 breaks setting the background-image
style property to a cairo pattern.  This is the method that gnome-panel
uses to simulate transparent backgrounds.

** Affects: gnome-panel
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966697

Title:
  Transparent panel has themed widgets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/966697/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 966697] Re: Transparent panel has themed widgets

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
NB: I logged this bug against gnome-panel because that's where it's
going to be seen, but it's actually a bug in GTK -- the upstream bug is
against GTK.

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #672858
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672858

** Also affects: gnome-panel via
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672858
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966697

Title:
  Transparent panel has themed widgets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/966697/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 962458] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-03-26 Thread Peter Hurley
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 965487 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965487

Bug 964654 may not be a duplicate. That report has no valid stack
backtrace to confirm that it even originates from the same function, and
it's on a different arch. Please un-duplicate this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962458

Title:
  [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/962458/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 960757] Re: whoopsie crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_newv()

2012-03-22 Thread Peter Hurley
This crash happened while trying to install Precise Beta 1 22/03/12 from
LiveCd.

See bug# 962455 and bug# 962458.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960757

Title:
  whoopsie crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_newv()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/960757/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 828392] Re: light-themes don't display well in gnome-panel 3+

2012-03-02 Thread Peter Hurley
It seems that this bug is becoming sort of a meta-bug for several issues
in different packages.

Bug 885691 (which was marked a duplicate of this) specifically addressed
the themed background gradient not drawn correctly.  A patch to gnome-
panel was submitted for that bug and the upstream bug, gnome-bugs
663397, on remote watch here.

The original reporter of this bug seems to refer primarily to the
gradient background issue as being the impetus for this report. There
are certainly other bugs that impact the visual quality of light-themes
with gnome-panel 3.  I would be happy to cross-ref those here if that's
helpful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828392

Title:
  light-themes don't display well in gnome-panel 3+

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/828392/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 924098] [NEW] bluetooth-applet doesn't autostart in Classic desktop

2012-01-30 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

Gnome-bluetooth version 3.2.0-0ubuntu2 on oneiric

When logging in 'Classic desktop', the bluetooth-applet is not
autostarted.

This happens because the autostart .desktop file ('/etc/xdg/autostart
/bluetooth-applet.desktop') erroneous specifies the
AutostartCondition=GNOME3 if-session gnome-fallback. When starting the
'Classic desktop', the session name is 'gnome-classic' so the
AutostartCondition fails.

Commenting out the Autostart= key fixes this problem.

Cross-reference to Fedora bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multipleid=708658

** Affects: gnome-bluetooth (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-bluetooth in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924098

Title:
  bluetooth-applet doesn't autostart in Classic desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/924098/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 913637] [NEW] --with-sub-version build option is always - (should be -revision)

2012-01-08 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

An error in debian/rules causes the -with-sub-version build option to
always be set to -, regardless of the changelog version.

NB: debian/rules is a makefile and make *always* expands $.  To prevent
$ expansion (so that awk substitution works), use $$ instead.

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913637

Title:
  --with-sub-version build option is always - (should be -revision)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/913637/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 913637] Re: --with-sub-version build option is always - (should be -revision)

2012-01-08 Thread Peter Hurley
** Patch added: Fix_blank_sub_version.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913637/+attachment/2663657/+files/Fix_blank_sub_version.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913637

Title:
  --with-sub-version build option is always - (should be -revision)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/913637/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 799203] Re: Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-30 Thread Peter Hurley
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 06:10 -0400, Omer Akram wrote:
 I just switched to Guest session and started empathy and I had the
 option there to setup IRC account and it worked.
 
 ** Summary changed:
 
 - Regression of bug #433714
 + cannot add IRC account during initial setup

This report (and the initial report #433714) is about setting up an
*new* IRC account with empathy when no accounts are defined.

When you start empathy and no accounts are defined, the Welcome to
Empathy dialog is displayed with 3 radio buttons.

From there, if you select No, I want a new account, it is not possible
to create an IRC account. The only account type listed is Jabber.

This was reported as Fixed Released in #433714 which makes this a
regression of that bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799203

Title:
  cannot add IRC account during initial setup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/799203/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 799203] Re: Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-20 Thread Peter Hurley
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 16:00 -0400, Brendan Donegan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm on a fresh install of Natty and I don't have this problem. After
 selecting 'Yes, I have an existing account I want to use' (I think
 that's the option) I can choose IRC as an account type, among a long
 list of others. Is this the option you're selecting too?

This bug (and the original report) is for the situation when the user
does not 'have an existing account'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799203

Title:
  Regression of bug #433714

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/799203/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 799203] [NEW] Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-18 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: empathy

Initial bug report is here
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/433714)

This is a regression in Natty - it's not possible to setup an IRC
account without creating some other account (non-IRC) in Empathy first.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: empathy 2.34.0-0ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0-0.1-core2-rt 3.0.0-rc2
Uname: Linux 3.0-0-core2-rt x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jun 18 13:27:10 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: empathy
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799203

Title:
  Regression of bug #433714

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/799203/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 799203] Re: Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-18 Thread Peter Hurley
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799203

Title:
  Regression of bug #433714

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/799203/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs