[Bug 1037196] [NEW] Set network proxy to none, yet http_proxy env var is still set in bash after new login
Public bug reported: I configured a proxy using gnome-control-center (launched via the proxy config in chromium). I then changed it to none. After several restarts, the http_proxy environment variable is _still_ set to what I'd set it to. I had to add lines to my .bashrc to unset it. In gconf, it appears that the http_proxy values are blank. I don't see it stashed elsewhere in any of the environment related files, but it must still be somewhere. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu0.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-27.43-generic 3.2.21 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-27-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Aug 15 12:27:14 2012 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: activity-log-manager-control-center 0.9.4-0ubuntu3 deja-dup22.0-0ubuntu2 gnome-bluetooth 3.2.2-0ubuntu5 indicator-datetime 0.3.94-0ubuntu2 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037196 Title: Set network proxy to none, yet http_proxy env var is still set in bash after new login To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1037196/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1037196] Re: Set network proxy to none, yet http_proxy env var is still set in bash after new login
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037196 Title: Set network proxy to none, yet http_proxy env var is still set in bash after new login To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1037196/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 917152] [NEW] nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening
Public bug reported: My downloads directory has 1177 files in it. With nautilus opened on Downloads, I press ctrl F, and type any word. Initial search takes 10+ seconds (presumably to build the index?) Subsequent searches are fast enough to be useful. The initial time is a problem, because nautilus does not report to the user what it's doing. Most non technical users will give up, and close the window, believing that nautilus search is slow, and probably won't reuse search. Multiple approaches to fixing this could be taken; e.g. background build of indices, or just better user messaging (Because this is the first time you've used search, we need to create an index. Your future searches will be fast.) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.2.1-0ubuntu3.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic-pae 3.0.9 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jan 16 08:19:36 2012 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-15 (92 days ago) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917152 Title: nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/917152/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 917152] Re: nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917152 Title: nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/917152/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 917152] Re: nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening
Then there is a bug. My disk gets 96.5MB average read, according to the Benchmark utility. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917152 Title: nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/917152/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 917152] Re: nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening
Sorry, I really think this is a bug. Searching 1177 titles should take less than 1 second, even reading them off disk. It's not wishlist to say that 10+ seconds is too slow. ls can read the directory contents in 0.033s. If you're telling me that it waits to display items until it has also scanned all of their contents, then that's also a bug. It should display results as it finds them, and any logical implementation of this would display title results first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917152 Title: nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn user what's happening To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/917152/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192508] Re: mouse keys turns on randomly
Are you typing anywhere near the numpad when it turns on? The notification that it is turning on would at least rule out your assertion. -- mouse keys turns on randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192508] Re: mouse keys turns on randomly
Ah, a comment in that thread is the key to this, I think - shift numlock is the hotkey that turns the feature on and off. I bet that I've been hitting that shortcut accidentally. Since it's such a destructive shortcut (i.e. it wrecks the number pad's function) could this bug be resolved by popping up an obvious-but-automatically-disappearing alert when the shortcut is selected? And, could we have an option in the settings dialog for mousekeys to permanently disable the shortcut? I bet the combination of both of those would solve this issue for most people. -- mouse keys turns on randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192508] Re: mouse keys turns on randomly
I tried running apport, to no avail. This is still a bug, and occurs fairly frequently (every couple of days). There seems to be a hotkey on the numpad which turns it on. -- mouse keys turns on randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192508] Re: mouse keys turns on randomly
This still happens in lucid. -- mouse keys turns on randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 553329] [NEW] Incorrect wallpaper behaviour for dual screen (in lucid beta 1)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: metacity In ubuntu 9.10, the default wallpapers would stretch across both screens (using twinview, resolution is 3360x1050). In ubuntu 10.04, the default wallpapers do not stretch across both screens, using any of the options. I have to download a wallpaper that's explicitly 3360x1050 to make this work. I don't know where the regression is - whether it's the art, the nvidia driver, or the logic used by the desktop background widget to handle stretch across dual screens. ** Affects: metacity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Incorrect wallpaper behaviour for dual screen (in lucid beta 1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found
Confirmed. The mkfs workaround worked for me. -- Fails repeatably with DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 517794] Re: Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time
This happened again, and I was able to get some info from a different TTY. Here's the relevant part from /var/log/messages - compiz crashes. Feb 24 13:17:06 fridge kernel: [349959.691938] compiz.real[22928]: segfault at 5 ip 08055c3c sp bfc0a410 error 4 in compiz.real[8048000+34000] This bug is actually intermittent - it does not always happen on first login after all. Zapping X sometimes causes it; first login sometimes works fine. Last time that this happened, ctrl alt bksp was not enough to recover from it; I had to completely reboot the machine. I didn't capture Xorg.log from that startup, but my current one is attached. lsusb: Bus 002 Device 004: ID 0a12:1004 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04f2:0402 Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0e9c: Streamzap, Inc. Streamzap Remote Control Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 007: ID 046d:c408 Logitech, Inc. Marble Mouse (4-button) Bus 001 Device 002: ID 058f:6254 Alcor Micro Corp. USB Hub Bus 001 Device 004: ID 05e3:0716 Genesys Logic, Inc. Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation C55 Host Bridge (rev a2) 00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a2) 00:00.6 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:00.7 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:01.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:01.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:01.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:01.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:01.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:01.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:01.6 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:02.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:02.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:02.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C55 Memory Controller (rev a1) 00:03.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation C55 PCI Express bridge (rev a1) 00:07.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation C55 PCI Express bridge (rev a1) 00:09.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Host Bridge (rev a2) 00:0a.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP51 LPC Bridge (rev a3) 00:0a.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation MCP51 SMBus (rev a3) 00:0a.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Memory Controller 0 (rev a3) 00:0b.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP51 USB Controller (rev a3) 00:0b.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP51 USB Controller (rev a3) 00:0d.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 IDE (rev a1) 00:0e.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller (rev a1) 00:0f.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller (rev a1) 00:10.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP51 PCI Bridge (rev a2) 00:14.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G92 [GeForce 8800 GT] (rev a2) 03:06.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 03:07.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs CA0106 Soundblaster 03:08.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6306 Fire II IEEE 1394 OHCI Link Layer Controller (rev c0) -- Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 517794] Re: Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time
** Attachment added: /var/log/Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39741300/Xorg.0.log -- Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 517794] Re: Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time
Ah, I grabbed the wrong thing from /var/log/messages. I zapped X again and hit the problem. This time, there was no message about compiz crashing; instead the only message was: Feb 24 15:18:30 fridge bonobo-activation-server (reubenf-9075): could not associate with desktop session: Failed to connect to socket /tmp /dbus-21KoScej9t: Connection refused So I looked back to the earlier occasion on which I got stuck, and sure enough: Feb 24 13:17:42 fridge bonobo-activation-server (reubenf-23344): could not associate with desktop session: Failed to connect to socket /tmp /dbus-bSazBlS28S: Connection refused So, this seems to be the cause. FWIW this time I was able to zap X a couple of times and get a session that is responsive; I wonder if I couldn't earlier because of the dead compiz on top of the bonobo issue. Xorg from bonobo-detached X attached. -- Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 517794] Re: Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time
** Attachment added: This is the Xorg.0.log from a non-responsive X (presumably because bonobo-activation-server wasn't attached) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39744686/Xorg.0.log -- Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 454234] Re: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
The patched ppa did not work for me - the error message went away, but nautilus still fails to load on gnome initialization / manual launch from the terminal. This is a critical bug. -- eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 524959] [NEW] Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Nautilus won't load on system startup, or from the terminal. I tried the patched version from https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/454234, and while that made the eel_preferences message disappear, it didn't resolve the issue. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Feb 20 11:54:51 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic i686 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 524959] Re: Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39451273/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39451274/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39451275/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 524959] Re: Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal
Interestingly, there were several nautilus processes in an uninterruptible state. I rebooted the computer, and now my desktop / nautilus is back. -- Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 524959] Re: Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal
Thanks, please see my second comment. This was reproducible until I rebooted the computer. So this must be an intermittent issue. -- Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 517794] [NEW] Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-session After booting my computer, when first logging into Gnome, nothing reponds to left or right click events. The GDM login screen _does_ respond to the mouse, so it's only once I'm logged in that the bug happens. The cursor is visible onscreen and moves around. When I restart X (ctrl alt backspace) and re-login, the mouse works normally. ** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250000] Re: gnome-terminal not started as an interactive shell
Come on guys, it's an easy bug to verify, and it's serious. Closing it doing nobody a favor. I don't use GNOME on a regular basis, so I can't verify for you. -- gnome-terminal not started as an interactive shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250000] Re: gnome-terminal not started as an interactive shell
Ah. But konsole (in KDE) *does* have the contents of .bash_profile successfully picked up. So either gnome-terminal is not picking up the environment variables set at login, or gnome isn't sourcing .bash_profile at login. The .bashrc is ubuntu is complicated and (at least was) partially buggy. Users should use .bash_profile for their own settings, so it's important that it work properly. -- gnome-terminal not started as an interactive shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250000] [NEW] gnome-terminal not started as an interactive shell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal The bash started by gnome-terminal (invoked from the Gnome menu) didn't know it was supposed to be an interactive shell. This means that a user's .bash_profile is not sourced. So I edited the gnome-terminal applet to add the option --command=bash --login, which made .bash_profile start to work. ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal The bash started by gnome-terminal (invoked from the Gnome menu) didn't know it was supposed to be an interactive shell. This means that a user's .bash_profile is not sourced. So I edited the gnome-terminal applet to add the option --command=bash - --login, which made it start to work. + --login, which made .bash_profile start to work. -- gnome-terminal not started as an interactive shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114341] Re: Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory
This is still a problem. The output doesn't show that the files are in /home/reubenf. Furthermore, it's gotten worse. The usage percentage next to reubenf (if I run scan home) is ALWAYS 100%, and ALWAYS the total size of it + subfolders. It should show how much of the overall usage is actually within the home folder (i.e. files) as opposed to in subfolders. -- Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114341] Re: Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory
Sorry, but you're wrong. This is a bug in the UI design. It's a disk usage analyzer. If I scan home, baobob should be able to indicate to me that there are large files in my home directory taking up space. I'm not asking you to show me the files directly - just make the UI clearer so that you can see that there is file usage IN home. You should treat the root of the tree differently from sub-directories, since otherwise you'll never be able to make it clear that you're counting it. 100% is useless and duplicative information - you should change that to show the actual *contents* of the home directory. Get a UI designer involved in the project and get his or her advice if you don't like mine. -- Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 152331] GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gimp See attached file. When I open it with GIMP, I get the error message: JPEG Image Message: Not a JPEG file: starts with 0x42 0x4d. As I user I don't care. Also, I note that KDE apps can open it. ** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- GIMP can't open JPEG for editing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 152331] Re: GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
** Attachment added: rubberchicken.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9970564/rubberchicken.jpg -- GIMP can't open JPEG for editing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 152331] Re: GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
2.4.0-RC / gutsy -- GIMP can't open JPEG for editing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 152331] Re: GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
Interesting that it worked for you. Hopefully you're on a later RC than I am. -- GIMP can't open JPEG for editing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 152331] Re: GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
Understood that it's not a valid jpeg, but I don't think completely crapping out is the right response from Gimp. Ideally it would say this does not look like a valid JPEG, but here it is anyway. The KDE apps (gwenview, konqueror, etc) all open it silently, which is perhaps correct given their use cases. It was sourced from a google image search, and saved by firefox. The file name is jpg online. (If you search images.google.com for rubber chicken you should find it and be able to reproduce the issue.) -- GIMP can't open JPEG for editing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114341] Re: Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory
Yes, this is easily reproducible. 1) Copy a DVD ISO image to your home folder. Name it .bigfile [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -al .bigfile -rw-r--r-- 1 reuben reuben 3740401664 2007-05-18 08:02 .bigfile 2) Run disk analyzer 3) Where is it? -- Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114341] Re: Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory
I understand, but the output does not indicate that the used space is directly *in* the home folder. It lists /home/reuben as being 100%, and then the summation underneath (the subdirs) adds up to only, say, 50%. It is not clear that the home directory itself has files that are taking up the space. Perhaps the fix would be to add an item for files within this folder 50% to the listing. The graphic is also inaccurate - it does not display these files. -- Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114341] Re: Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory
Respectfully, I disagree with it being obvious. I'm an experienced user, and I did not find the output at all obvious. The problem is that the meaning of the home folder, i.e. the folder at the top of the listing, is overloaded. It contains a sum of ALL of the sub folders, plus a phantom group of files which are not displayed anywhere in the UI. Try the above steps on some newbie users, and I bet they will be confused (i.e. unable to quickly locate the large file in the home dir). I see what you mean about the graphic (the folder itself being in the center), but again when you mouse over you get the sum, not the specific size. I.e. when I mouse over, I get 15.8GB, which is [files not displayed anywhere].size + [subfolders].size. -- Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114341] Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory
You have been subscribed to a public bug: My home directory was full but I didn't know why. I ran disk usage analyzer (baobob). The %s of all listed items added up to about 8%. The biggest listed item was a folder named mp3, which was about 2.5GB. I dug around using the CLI, and found an 11GB .xsession-errors file in my home directory. This was not picked up by the disk analyzer. ** Affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Disk Usage Analyzer does not detect files in the directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114341 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
