[Bug 1634229] [NEW] unable to launch nautilus
Public bug reported: When launching nautilus from the icon, it flashes, but nothing shows up. When launching from the terminal, it fails with this message: (nautilus:20100): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_dbus_interface_skeleton_unexport: assertion 'interface_->priv->connections != NULL' failed (nautilus:20100): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_dbus_interface_skeleton_unexport: assertion 'interface_->priv->connections != NULL' failed Could not register the application: Timeout was reached (nautilus:20100): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_icon_theme_get_for_screen: assertion 'GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed (nautilus:20100): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid (NULL) pointer instance (nautilus:20100): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_signal_connect_object: assertion 'G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE (instance)' failed Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS nautilus: Installed: 1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu5 Candidate: 1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu5 Version table: *** 1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu5 500 500 http://no.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu4 500 500 http://no.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-43.63-generic 4.4.21 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-43-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon Oct 17 21:00:42 2016 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'sidebar-width' b'249' b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'geometry' b"'958x738+0+24'" InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-09-10 (403 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20150805) SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-04-22 (178 days ago) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634229 Title: unable to launch nautilus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1634229/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1069843] Re: Nautilus consuming memory and cpu
Problem hits me also since upgrade on Ubuntu 12.10. Can we increase importance of this bug since nautilus randomly burns my laptop's battery. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069843 Title: Nautilus consuming memory and cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1069843/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 831842] Re: evolution crashed with signal 5 in e_load_ui_builder_definition()
Evolution always crashes when moving from one address to another address book from an address book. (If the email address is already present in the second address.) Evolution 3.2.3, Ubuntu 12.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831842 Title: evolution crashed with signal 5 in e_load_ui_builder_definition() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/831842/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 885621] [NEW] right mouse button is disabled
Public bug reported: After having an error where several right-mouse-button-click-windows pops up automatically and sometimes the hole screen freezes I did an update of the software. It was impossible to use Ubuntu with the problem. After software update the problem was gon but the right mouse button was disabled. If that was a temporary solution of the problem I do not know. Please advise I am using Macbuntu on Ubuntu 10.10. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-30.61-generic 2.6.35.13 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-30-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 3 17:21:05 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20110720.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885621 Title: right mouse button is disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/885621/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 885621] Re: right mouse button is disabled
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885621 Title: right mouse button is disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/885621/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481576] Re: Action on critical battery is not triggered - gnome-power-manager
I'm running Karmic, and am still experiencing this bug. I'll try bumping the time_action and time_critical values to more conservative settings, and will post an update soon. As I have an old battery, my Thinkpad's critical power level is around 5%. Hibernate should occur at 4%, or 3% at the absolute lowest. A time-based value seems better for a wider range of battery capacities, but the default 120 and 300 seconds are just too low. -- Action on critical battery is not triggered - gnome-power-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481576] Re: Action on critical battery is not triggered - gnome-power-manager
P.S. When running gnome-power-manager in verbose mode, I get no output before hibernate doesn't occur and the system dies. I mounted my partition -o sync, and tail -f gpm.log in another tab, just to make sure I wouldn't miss anything. -- Action on critical battery is not triggered - gnome-power-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 135548] Re: [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression
Thinkpad X32. Upgraded-from-Intrepid-to-Jaunty. Gnome Power Manager correctly detects the battery state, correctly issues a low battery warning but doesn't initiate hibernation until 0% battery is reached. Additionally, the normal battery light starts flashing orange at the appropriate time...but still no automatic hibernation. What happened? This used to be one of the most reliable and supported laptops *ever*! Manual hibernation and resume still work great. Which logs do I need to attach to debug this? Thanks, Nick -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 135548] Re: [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression
Here are what seem like the relevant logs based on this document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingGNOMEPowerManager#head-7d2eb767e44a7231fae6964dcf12bc27fe507c9d Please note that that my laptop *did* successfully hibernate, and return from hibernation from the gnome-power-cmd hibernate command. ** Attachment added: hal_and_gpm_logs.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27078942/hal_and_gpm_logs.tar.gz -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250517] Re: gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
I've been using iptraf to measure network traffic. My current statistics are comparable with John's. Because gvfs-copy is also significantly slower than scp, I wonder if FUSE might also be part of this bug? No time for me to check right now, but is sshfs as slow as gvfs-copy? -- gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250517] Re: gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
I don't have two Intrepid machines to test this further, but I can test Hardy-to-Intrepid if it would help. With the exception of the file operations dialogue, all line-speed measurements were taken with iptraf. Wireless G @ 54M sftp peak: 1229 KB/s. Average is about 1 MB/s sftp reports transfer speeds between 900 KB/s and 1.1 MB/s gvfs-copy peak: 1174 KB/s. Average is about 900 KB/s nautilus copy: Peak 12153 KB/s. Average is about 900 KB/s File operations dialogue reports transfer speed as between 700 and 800 KB/s Conclusion: wireless isn't fast enough to properly test this. Transfer rates are in the same ballpark. Hardy and Intrepid have resolved the worst of Gutsy's gvfs problems, for wireless, at least. The file operations dialogue seems to use some sort of transfer speed averaging function to smooth out the fluctuations in speed, but it needs work. I haven't looked at the code, but I would imagine that making the sampling period smaller (time or bytes transferred...which one work work better, I'm not sure). Of course, CPU usage will go up if the sampling period is too small... Maybe keep the refresh rate of the transfer speed function the same, but have it look at the last MB transferred, instead of however it's doing it now (I suspect it's looking at more than just 1 MB) At any rate, John, could you please test using sftp on your gigabit ethernet? I think 802.11g bandwidth is the bottleneck, for me -- which isn't so bad. ;-) Sebastien, are fuse mounts really not used? I tried to gvfs-copy my sftp://URL, but it fails with: Error copying file sftp://blah/blah: The specified location is not mounted. Does gvfs-copy not use ~/.gvfs, which is a mount of type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon? (for Hardy to Hardy. I haven't yet checked to see if Intrepid maintains this behaviour) -- gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250517] Re: gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
P.S. was there a major Hardy gvfs update between 2008-11-03 and 2009-02-13. -- gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250517] Re: gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
While not the same speed, I've noticed an improvement recently (using Intrepid). Is yours just as slow? -- gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250517] Re: gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
I'd like to confirm that this problem is even worse on a wireless network. -- gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
