[Bug 955955] Re: Keyboard shortcuts get reset at every login

2012-11-11 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 986208 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986208

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 986208
   Compiz does not remember user preferences upon system restart

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955955

Title:
  Keyboard shortcuts get reset at every login

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf2/+bug/955955/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 955955] Re: Keyboard shortcuts get reset at every login

2012-11-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
I don't think gsettings-data-convert was the cause of this bug (still
there is no reason to run it on every login).  This appears to be
compiz' fault, and should probably be a dup of one of the following two
bugs:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1063617
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/986208

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955955

Title:
  Keyboard shortcuts get reset at every login

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf2/+bug/955955/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 955955] Re: Keyboard shortcuts get reset at every login

2012-10-30 Thread Tom Jaeger
This appears to be the fault of gsettings-data-convert.  Deleting
/etc/xdg/autostart/gsettings-data-convert.desktop fixes this issue for
me.

** Also affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955955

Title:
  Keyboard shortcuts get reset at every login

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf2/+bug/955955/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1048484] Re: Seahorse can't change password GDBus.Error: org.freedesktop.Secret.Error.NoSuchObject:The collection does not exist

2012-10-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
Who decided not to update gnome-settings-daemon with the rest of gnome?

** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048484

Title:
  Seahorse can't change password GDBus.Error:
  org.freedesktop.Secret.Error.NoSuchObject:The collection does not
  exist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1048484/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1048484] Re: Seahorse can't change password GDBus.Error: org.freedesktop.Secret.Error.NoSuchObject:The collection does not exist

2012-10-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
The new interface was introduced in
9b12bfdd245867f928651bc5414cba67a3f84169, but it doesn't revert -- not
even close.  I think going back to 3.4.1 makes the most sense at this
point, since it doesn't look like bug #1008840 is getting addressed for
quantal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048484

Title:
  Seahorse can't change password GDBus.Error:
  org.freedesktop.Secret.Error.NoSuchObject:The collection does not
  exist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1048484/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 780117] Re: Brasero finishes without error but unusable media [on-the-fly mode] (Ubuntu 11.04-11.10)

2012-02-20 Thread Tom Jaeger
In case anybody needs to bring DVD+RWs back to life after brasero is
done with them, i figured out after much experimentation that the
sequence of the following two commands will work:

sudo dvd+rw-format -force /dev/cdrw
sudo dvd+rw-format -lead-out /dev/cdrw

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780117

Title:
  Brasero finishes without error but unusable media [on-the-fly mode]
  (Ubuntu 11.04-11.10)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/brasero/+bug/780117/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessible

2010-08-18 Thread Tom Jaeger
Just to be clear, we're letting this usability nightmare go on for
another release, correct?

On 08/18/2010 10:46 PM, Pedro Villavicencio wrote:
 Please do not change the status of the reports without adding a comment.
 
 ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
 
 ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
  Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = (unassigned)


-- 
current battery charge not easily accessible
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessable

2010-05-11 Thread Tom Jaeger
Please don't hijack this bug report.  This bug is about the removal of
the battery percentage info from g-p-m, not about the way this
information is presented.  If you want to argue tooltips vs. indicator
menus, please do so in bug #527458.


On 05/11/2010 03:24 PM, Alexander Fomichev wrote:
 AFAIK, long press on a visual element emulates right mouse button click. But 
 there would be no harm in implementing both variants: either the menu element 
 for touchscreen users or the tooltip info for mouse/touchpad owners. And of 
 course, hotkey for me :) , I hope they won't get rid of that in future 
 versions. 
 As for too big fingers, take a look at Android - even tiny and close webpage 
 links can be selected with a thumb in the Google's built-in browser. So I 
 think the matter is a good recognizing algorithm.


-- 
current battery charge not easily accessible
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessible

2010-05-11 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Summary changed:

- current battery charge not easily accessable
+ current battery charge not easily accessible

-- 
current battery charge not easily accessible
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 573460] Re: Battery indicator doesn't show percentage

2010-05-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 539912 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 539912
   [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable

-- 
Battery indicator doesn't show percentage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573460
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-04-07 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
window controls don't scale up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-04-07 Thread Tom Jaeger
Metacity/gnome-window-decorator supports .svg, so this is entirely
possible.  Besides, having blurry buttons is still better than having
tiny buttons that are next to impossible to click.

On 04/07/2010 08:08 AM, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
 As long as there is blurriness the bug still exsits. I don't see any way
 other than using vector graphics which can scale to fix the problem

-- 
window controls don't scale up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-04-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
Here's a proof of concept.

On 04/05/2010 05:29 PM, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
 Ideally things would be able to scale up but currently this is not
 possible
 
 ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = Wishlist


** Attachment added: scaling.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43296235/scaling.png

** Patch added: scaling.diff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43296238/scaling.diff

-- 
window controls don't scale up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-04-05 Thread Tom Jaeger
Could you elaborate on what the issue is here exactly?  I did some
preliminary testing (see above), and the buttons scaled up fine (modulo
blurriness).

On 04/05/2010 05:29 PM, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
 Ideally things would be able to scale up but currently this is not
 possible
 
 ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = Wishlist


-- 
window controls don't scale up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-01 Thread Tom Jaeger
Here's an idea:  Why not make the upper right hand corner of each window
an 'activity corner' in gnome 3?

On 04/01/2010 02:12 PM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
 Our intent is to encourage innovation, discussion, and design with the
 right of the window title bar. We have some ideas, and others are
 already springing up in the community. We welcome participation on the
 Ayatana list, where those can play out. This will be a fruitful topic
 for the design track at UDS in Brussels in May.

-- 
[Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 546650] Re: Unable to click items below notifications

2010-03-30 Thread Tom Jaeger
On 03/30/2010 01:03 PM, Mirco Müller wrote:
 The branch for fixing this in notify-osd I put up for review here:
 https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~macslow/notify-
 osd/fix-546650/+merge/22469
 
 This keeps the changes within notify-osd. I don't fully understand why
 only this works and the old way for creating the empty input-mask
 failed, because the resulting input-mask in both cases is a 1x1 pixel
 large bitmap in the top left corner of a notification-bubble's window.
 
 This will also still work with older version of gtk+. You can give that
 a try. Seb, if you want you can use the diff from that branch as a
 distro-patch for the moment until I rolled a new notify-osd release
 later this week. Still have to fight some other notify-osd bugs I want
 to put in this weeks release.
 

This seems awfully complicated.  Why don't you just use
gdk_window_input_shape_combine_region on an empty region?

-- 
Unable to click items below notifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546650
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Re: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-03-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
Is this really true?  I just replaced object_width/object_height by
width/height in my metacity-theme-1.xml file and then increased
button_width/button_height.  The buttons scale up as expected.  They are
are a little blurry, of course, but this wouldn't be an issue if they
were .svg files instead of .pngs.

On 03/18/2010 09:25 AM, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
 This was a design decision. Metacity cannot currently draw these kinds
 of buttons (not enough drawing options) or allow for larger sizes.
 
 ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

-- 
window controls don't scale up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 539912] Re: [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable

2010-03-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
I've attached a patch that adds the battery percentage when it is
useful.  I've also built the package which is temporarily available in
my PPA:

https://launchpad.net/~thjaeger/+archive/ppa/+packages

** Attachment added: percentage.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42415319/percentage.debdiff

-- 
[lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-03-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Also affects: metacity (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
window controls don't scale up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-03-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
Seconded.  This makes the new theme very awkward to use on a
high-resolution display -- and I'm in my 20s.

On 03/18/2010 11:13 AM, jgv wrote:
 Can you confirm this is a design decision and not a design flaw?
 
 So the designers have made a specific decision to ignore the needs of
 disabled Ubuntu users as of Lucid?
 
 
 -Oorspronkelijke bericht-
 Van: Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com
 Reply-to: Bug 532641 532...@bugs.launchpad.net
 Aan: jgv...@gmail.com
 Onderwerp: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up
 Datum: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:25:49 -
 
 
 This was a design decision. Metacity cannot currently draw these kinds
 of buttons (not enough drawing options) or allow for larger sizes.
 
 ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

-- 
window controls don't scale up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-24 Thread Tom Jaeger
On 03/24/2010 01:13 PM, Pako wrote:
 Oh, you made me cry

http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct

If you don't have anything nice (or meaningful) to say, don't say it.
This bug is already long enough.

-- 
[Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-22 Thread Tom Jaeger
On 03/22/2010 09:21 AM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
 While you might the merfect mouse sharpshooter, keeping in mind the
 needs of people with less precise mouse movements is also important -
 the precision needed to hit these buttons on the left among all the
 other control elements there is much higher than before - people with
 special needs and movement problems will have a much harder time
 navigating this environment.

Of course, if you're not very precise with your pointing device (or
visually impaired, or simply using a high-resolution screen) you're
pretty much screwed with the new theme anyway since it is apparently a
design decision (!) not to allow the buttons to scale (bug #532641,
status Won't fix) and, to add insult to injury, to not give any visual
feedback as to which button has been pressed (bug #532551).

Sadly, the design team doesn't feel the need to comment on those bugs
(especially the first one) either.

-- 
[Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 539912] [NEW] [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable

2010-03-16 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

Ever since the gnome-power-manager icon transition from the notification
area to the indicator applet it is unnecessary complicated to find out
what the current battery charge percentage is.  We used to be able to
just hover over the icon, but now we have to actually open g-p-m, select
the 'Laptop Battery' category, and then scroll down in the 'Details'
tab.  The remaining time estimate is not an adequate replacement for
this information, as it is inaccurate and depends on current battery
consumption.

I propose that the g-p-m menu include this information whenever the
percentage is not 100%.  So what currently reads Laptop battery 1 hour
50 minutes left should be Laptop battery 1 hour 50 minutes left
(38.4%).  I'll be happy to supply a patch if that's what it takes, but
I'm not currently familiar with the g-p-m source.

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 539912] Re: [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable

2010-03-16 Thread Tom Jaeger
Yeah, there's more obvious ways of shortening the menu text, like
writing 1:50 instead of 1 hour and 50 minutes or dropping Laptop
battery altogether.

On 03/16/2010 06:11 PM, Chris Coulson wrote:
 We just removed the percentage from the menu deliberately, because the
 menu was far too wide with the extra text. This could probably do with
 some more thought though
 
 ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
 
 ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
  Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)


-- 
[lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 187650] Re: gnome-panel incorrect order after unexpand

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 111893
   Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082
   GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start 
in some situations

-- 
gnome-panel incorrect order after unexpand
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187650
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 135384] Re: Dashboard not extended

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 111893
   Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082
   GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start 
in some situations

-- 
Dashboard not extended
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135384
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 128117] Re: Icons get mixed up in in non-Expanded panel

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 111893
   Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082
   GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start 
in some situations

-- 
Icons get mixed up in in non-Expanded panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128117
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 111893] Re: Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082
   GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start 
in some situations

-- 
Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111893
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-08 Thread Tom Jaeger
Martin Pitt wrote:
 So Scott says that something in the boot process steals vt7 (where X.org
 starts up). /etc/init.d/console-setup does not touch vt7, so that's not
 it. So we need to find what it is.
 
 Do all of the reporters have cryptsetup installed? If you don't need it
 for encrypted hard disk partitions, could you uninstall it and see if
 you can still reproduce this? Does any of the reporters have this
 problem but does not have had cryptsetup installed in the first place?

Since uninstalling cryptsetup, I haven't been able to reproduce this
problem.

-- 
[karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 396489] Re: gdm 2.26 Unable to log out with autologin enabled

2009-09-27 Thread Tom Jaeger
This doesn't seem right to me either.  Most installations are single-
user systems, where it makes more sense to re-login immediately.

-- 
gdm 2.26 Unable to log out with autologin enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396489
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 241757] Re: libgtk2.0-dev should depend on libxml2-utils because of gtk-builder-convert

2008-09-05 Thread Tom Jaeger
Just to clarify, does 'recommends' mean that libxml2-utils will be
installed in a pbuilder environment if the package build-depends on
libgtk2.0-dev?

-- 
libgtk2.0-dev should depend on libxml2-utils because of gtk-builder-convert
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241757
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 241757] [NEW] libgtk2.0-dev should depend on libxml2-utils because of gtk-builder-convert

2008-06-20 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported:

gtk-builder-convert produces garbage if libxml2-utils is not installed,
such as is the case in a pbuilder environment.  This was very difficult
to debug since there was no actual error message, I was only able to
track this down via strace.  Please consider a SRU, if someone else
encounters this issue, it will probably cost them a considerable amount
of time.

** Affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
libgtk2.0-dev should depend on libxml2-utils because of gtk-builder-convert
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241757
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 80921] Re: No subpixel rendering

2008-06-18 Thread Tom Jaeger
The patch from bugzilla has a more obvious problem: It doesn't work.  So I 
created this patch which will at least give people what they want even if it's 
not the right solution.  That's what quick-and-dirty workaround means.  
Obviously I wouldn't even think about submitting this upstream, but does 
anybody really think upstream is going to fix this anytime soon?  This really 
shouldn't be too hard to fix for someone with some knowledge of the inner 
workings of poppler and cairo, but apparently people don't care about subpixel 
smoothing.
Poppler leaves the cairo font options at their default settings, but the cairo 
documentation is quiet about how it is determined what the default settings are 
(strangly enough, if I draw into a pixbuf via a simple gtkmm/cairomm program, 
subpixel smoothing is enabled, but it'll use lcdfilterlegacy).  So I've decided 
that it's not worth my time going through the cairo source trying to figure 
this out.

-- 
No subpixel rendering
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80921
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 80921] Re: No subpixel rendering

2008-06-18 Thread Tom Jaeger
It doesn't matter.  I don't know where the font options come from, but
they definitely don't come from gconf.  So even if you don't explicitly
set the pixel order, it'll still assume RGB.

-- 
No subpixel rendering
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80921
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 80921] Re: No subpixel rendering

2008-06-17 Thread Tom Jaeger
Could someone please explain what the deal is with evince linking
against libpoppler2?

-- 
No subpixel rendering
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80921
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 80921] Re: No subpixel rendering

2008-06-17 Thread Tom Jaeger
Nevermind, evince/intrepid links against libpoppler3.

-- 
No subpixel rendering
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80921
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 80921] Re: No subpixel rendering

2008-06-17 Thread Tom Jaeger
quick-and-dirty workaround

** Attachment added: poppler-force-subpixel.patch
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15399169/poppler-force-subpixel.patch

-- 
No subpixel rendering
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80921
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 80921] Re: No subpixel rendering

2008-06-17 Thread Tom Jaeger
This deb should enable subpixel smoothing in evince.  It needs the
evince package from intrepid.

** Attachment added: libpoppler-glib3_0.8.2-2_i386.deb
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15399255/libpoppler-glib3_0.8.2-2_i386.deb

-- 
No subpixel rendering
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80921
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 173350] Re: Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl

2008-05-10 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #15359
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15359

** Also affects: xorg-server via
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15359
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 173350] Re: Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl

2008-04-11 Thread Tom Jaeger
What's not constructive about I'd be willing to work on this if there
was a chance for a freeze exception?

-- 
Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 173350] Re: Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl

2008-04-10 Thread Tom Jaeger
Sebastien: Upstream does think this bug doesn't matter.  Really, how
hard would it be to insert the equivalent of remove Lock = Caps_Lock
before remapping caps lock?  It probably won't take much longer than
insisting that this is not a gnome bug (even though it could trivially
be worked around there).  I'd actually be willing to familiarize myself
enough with the gnome-control-center code to fix this, except that it
wouldn't get in anyway, since the option is not on by default and
therefore not a priority for hardy.

-- 
Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 173350] Re: Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl

2008-04-10 Thread Tom Jaeger
Okay, so this really isn't gnome-control-center's fault.  Please move
the bug to libxklavier12.

-- 
Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 173350] Re: Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl

2008-04-10 Thread Tom Jaeger
I didn't really.  libxklavier is the library that actually takes care of
the keyboard settings, gnome-control-center is just the front-end.

-- 
Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 173350] Re: Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl

2008-04-10 Thread Tom Jaeger
I think I was wrong about libxklavier.  I don't actually know where the
changes to the keyboard settings are applied, it's probably some gconf
backend, who knows?  That's not the point, the point is that if I can
work around the issue by typing xmodmap -e remove Lock = Caps_Lock
before reassigning Caps Lock, then it must be trivial to fix - if you
know the codepaths involved.  It boggles the mind that the problem is
still around 4 months after the initial report.

-- 
Caps lock LED changes state even when caps lock is mapped to ctrl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs