[Bug 1883516] Re: display is freezing randomly
Dear Daniel, thank you for your assistance, unfortunately I cannot run anything when the display freezes. The system seems to run, since sound is playing, but the display does not update at all. I have to make a hard reset by pushing the power button for a while to get the system running again. However, it did not happen for a while now. I try to keep my system up to date, so maybe a kernel patch has fixed the issue. I will let you know if it happens again and try to disable shell extensions then. Best Regards, Gregor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883516 Title: display is freezing randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1883516/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1854386] Re: Stuck on show applications overlay (can't close it)
Sorry again there was a problem with gnome-shell extension (Temperature) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854386 Title: Stuck on show applications overlay (can't close it) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1854386/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1854386] Re: Stuck on show applications overlay (can't close it)
Bug continues on GNOME Shell 3.36.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854386 Title: Stuck on show applications overlay (can't close it) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1854386/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1778011] Re: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power
** Attachment added: "prime-select query = intel" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-prime/+bug/1778011/+attachment/5214282/+files/gpu-manager.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778011 Title: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1778011/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1778011] Re: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power
Hi, Thinkpad P1 Quadro P1000. prime-select also not working. after prime-select intel and a rebeoot nouveau is driving the GPU but not intel. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778011 Title: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1778011/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1238266] Re: Error setting owner: Operation not permitted when extracting Eclipse in saucy
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238266 Title: Error setting owner: Operation not permitted when extracting Eclipse in saucy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1238266/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1036002] [NEW] Can confirm problem with the same chipset
Public bug reported: Hi, I can confirm the error with my wlan-stick. It works perfectly in an initial install of ubuntu 12.04 after updating to the latest patch state via update-manager the device just stopped working properly. Due this happend to my old install and could not solve it, I decided to have a look using the device with live-cd of ubuntu 12.04. It worked without any problems. So I did a fresh install of ubuntu 12.04 and it still worked as it should. After (and even while) updating the system via update-manager to latest patch level, the device did see much less networks in the area and finally could not connect with my own wlan. Heres my device (had the same problem with a netgear usb device WNA 1000M using the same chipset = store refund and bough another device, due I thought it was simply broken): Bus 001 Device 003: ID 050d:2103 Belkin Components F7D2102 802.11n N300 Micro Wireless Adapter v3000 [Realtek RTL8192CU] I tracked some logging of syslog which is hopefully helpful for you (will add it later, because I cannot access the textfile at the moment). ** Affects: gnome-nettool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-nettool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036002 Title: Can confirm problem with the same chipset To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-nettool/+bug/1036002/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 868850] Re: the background panel doesn't let you add xml wallpapers
The corresponding gsettings comand line would be: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background picture-uri 'file:///home/user/Pictures/wallpaper.xml' But you should be very careful what you put in that XML file. Relative paths aren't supported, for example. If one of the images can't be found, Unity will crash and can only be resurrected by resetting the above to something invalid or a valid picture. While I'd like to have user configurable animated background like you all, I can see that the feature is not quite ready for general consumption yet. Yes, this is a feature request. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868850 Title: the background panel doesn't let you add xml wallpapers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/868850/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 888355] Re: users-admin should not allow creation of users with encrypted home who aren't asked for password on login
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 577563 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577563 In 11.10, hitting the super/meta/whatever key and typing Users gets me Users and Groups (= users-admin) and also User Accounts (= gnome- control-center?). User Accounts is the one that shows up in System Settings... from the button in the upper right. If we're not supposed to use users-admin anymore, shouldn't it be removed? I upgraded from 11.04, if that helps. Should I file a separate bug? If it's no longer maintained, surely it should be uninstalled when the user upgrades. I can confirm that the new applet doesn't allow the same issue to arise, because it just doesn't allow you to do either of the two conflicting things. This seems like a, well, not really optimal solution to the problem, but I can't argue it's not a solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888355 Title: users-admin should not allow creation of users with encrypted home who aren't asked for password on login To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/888355/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 577563] Re: Automatic login fails and computer hangs (Lucid)
So does Ubuntu plan to switch to the new upstream applet in a future version? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577563 Title: Automatic login fails and computer hangs (Lucid) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/577563/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 888355] [NEW] users-admin should not allow creation of users with encrypted home who aren't asked for password on login
Public bug reported: Tested in Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10. Steps to reproduce: 1) Go to Users and Groups (users-admin) 2) Click Add 3) Pick any name 4) Check Encrypt home folder to protect sensitive data 5) Click OK 6) Set any password 7) Check Don't ask for password on login 8) Click OK Expected result: An error is raised at some point, because the user will not be able to log in. Actual result: User is created normally. On login, the user is not prompted for their password, so the login fails. In Ubuntu 11.04, some cryptic error messages display and the GUI hangs; in Ubuntu 11.10, you're returned to the login screen. Since the user is not prompted for their password, the home directory cannot be decrypted, so login will fail. The two options are contradictory, and it should be impossible to select both. It might also be worthwhile if the program responsible for login (gdm?) detected this conflict and prompted the user for their password, ignoring the preference not to be prompted. However, the preferences are still logically contradictory, so the administrator should not be allowed to select both when creating a user. Bug #581303 and Bug #577563 are related, but were filed against gdm and eCryptfs. The problem should still be fixed in users-admin regardless of whether there's a workaround in gdm. ** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888355 Title: users-admin should not allow creation of users with encrypted home who aren't asked for password on login To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/888355/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 577563] Re: Automatic login fails and computer hangs (Lucid)
In reply to comment #1: the bug is not invalid, and this is not a local issue. See bug #888355 for detailed steps to reproduce. The combination of these two preferences makes login impossible. The user administration tool should make such combinations impossible (bug #888355), but if they do occur somehow, gdm should ask for the password so that it can decrypt the home directory. At the very least, it should raise a clear error message. Currently it gives very cryptic errors and login hangs (on Ubuntu 11.04), or it gives no error message at all and just returns you to the login screen (on Ubuntu 11.10). There's definitely room for improvement here. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577563 Title: Automatic login fails and computer hangs (Lucid) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/577563/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 823760] [NEW] No search results
Public bug reported: When I search anything in any combination of preferences, like search in current account/current folder/all accounts, search in headers and/or Body of mails, I don't get results, even I search for phrases, Names a.s.o., I can see in the preview of folders or mails. Attached you find a concerning screenshot. Best regards Gregor ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: evolution 2.32.2-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Aug 10 09:11:59 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANGUAGE=de_DE:en LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SourcePackage: evolution UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug apport-lpi i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823760 Title: No search results To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/823760/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 823760] Re: No search results
** Attachment added: Screetshot search results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823760/+attachment/2265430/+files/screenshot_search2.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823760 Title: No search results To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/823760/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 823760] Re: No search results
I add a further screenshot, before I started the search, that you see, the searched phraseexists in an email. ** Attachment added: Screenshot before search https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/823760/+attachment/2265435/+files/screenshot_search1.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823760 Title: No search results To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/823760/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 364089] Re: clock applet jumps in time when set to display seconds
I submitted a one-line patch to the upstream bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585668. Just change timeouttime = (G_USEC_PER_SEC - tv.tv_usec)/1000+1; to timeouttime = (G_USEC_PER_SEC - tv.tv_usec)/1000+20; in applets/clock/clock.c. Not such an elegant solution, but it works for me. -- clock applet jumps in time when set to display seconds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388656] Re: Non-intuitive term Move to trash
The only reason to use Delete is because users are familiar with it from other platforms, IMO. I don't think Move to Trash is awkward, it's just that it will add to Windows users' confusion when using Linux for the first time, and right now that's a bad thing. Delete isn't lying, either, but it's misleading. Many users will expect that the file is gone forever. Move to Trash is a clear hint that the file isn't really gone. Cut is different because it has a conventional meaning that users are familiar with -- no one will mistake cut for delete forever. This isn't an issue of dictionary definitions, it's a matter of user expectations. So it's a tradeoff. I think the tradeoff right now tilts strongly in favor of usability for Windows users, and we should use Delete for now but reconsider the issue when our overall usability is good enough that we can sacrifice a few things like this (like Mac can). For now it's a very easy-to-implement usability fix that has only a minor downside. -- Non-intuitive term Move to trash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 490093] Re: [users-admin] Password is reset to old value when it's been changed using about-me
the gnome keyring (for evolution) changed to my new pasword, but for the rest my old password kept valid. -- [users-admin] Password is reset to old value when it's been changed using about-me https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388656] Re: Non-intuitive term Move to trash
There are two obvious choices: 1) Use Move to Trash. This will confuse some users initially, and therefore cause a bad first impression. However, regular Ubuntu users will be more likely to understand what deletion actually does. 2) Use Delete. Users used to Windows will have an easier time, creating a better first impression. However, regular Ubuntu users will be more likely to assume that deletion from Nautilus is irreversible. Right now, IMO, we need to put top priority on first impressions. It's much better for a user to not know about the Trash, than to not use Ubuntu at all. Little things like this do add up and create an overall impression that Linux isn't as easy to use as Windows -- that's what Hundred Paper Cuts is all about. In the long run, Bug #1 should be fixed, and then we can switch back to correct terminology and educate users with nothing lost. Also, the concept of Trash should become obsolete in two or three years with a switch to btrfs and snapshotting. So I would suggest that we switch to Delete for the time being and see what happens. We can always switch back later with nothing lost. This is assuming we only have two options, though. What if we used Delete, but gave a strong visual cue that the file was going to the Trash? For instance, have the icon shrink and fly over to the Trash icon in the corner, like when a window minimizes in some setups? This would possibly be the best of both worlds, but might make it too hard to do to really be a paper cut. -- Non-intuitive term Move to trash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388656] Re: Non-intuitive term Move to trash
I have a friend who uses a Linux computer occasionally, and he complained it wasn't very usable. I asked him for an example, and he said that when he wanted to delete a file, he right-clicked and couldn't find any option to do it. He's not very computer-savvy and didn't think of trying other ways (like hitting the Delete key), so he blamed Linux. I'm glad to see someone else agrees that this is a problem. The problem is that people expect to see Delete and will look for it; they might not spot Move to Trash at all, or if they do, they might be unsure what it does. It makes it less clear that the file is easily recoverable, but that's not an advantage for users who can't find the option to begin with. The sort of user who doesn't know what the Recycling Bin/Trash is is exactly the sort of user who will probably get confused if standard options' names change. We have at least three anecdotal accounts of confusion over Move to Trash and even a usability study, so IMO the evidence is firmly on the side of using Delete. This could always be changed back later if it causes demonstrable problems; apparently they aren't significant enough for other OSes to change the terminology. (Konqueror (KDE) seems to use Move to Trash as well, FWIW, but Thunar (Xfce) uses Delete, and so does every version of Windows AFAIK. What does Mac do, out of curiosity? I'd bet Delete.) -- Non-intuitive term Move to trash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 24961] Re: Evolution-Exchange Backend crashed on startup
this happens on every startup of the session even before evolution it self is started -- Evolution-Exchange Backend crashed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Sebastien, I understand the reasoning behind shipping the current GNOME version. I think that the frustration about this bug results from the fact that we some samba users are often early adapters in former Windows-only environments, and these regressions make our position often very difficult. It is hard to argue for a more diverse IT landscape when basic interoperability just stops working. Anyway, I'm really looking forward to this issue to go away, and I think we are all fully aware of and grateful for the effort that developers and volunteers put into Ubuntu and upstream projects every day. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 70005] Re: segfault on apt-get upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 75273 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75273 same problem here after a broken Java install using Adept, on a fresh Kubuntu Gutsy 7.10 x86. The solution in comment #6 worked, thanks a lot Joel! -- segfault on apt-get upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70005 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 37073] Re: can't delete calendar
I cannot reproduce this bug. I created 4 local calenders, and I could create events in each of them and delete all of them. Will mark the bug as unconfirmed, please reopen if you still face this issue. Ubuntu: Dapper latest, i386 -- can't delete calendar https://launchpad.net/bugs/37073 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 37073] Re: can't delete calendar
I was not able to reproduce the bug, so I set it to unconfirmed. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Unconfirmed -- can't delete calendar https://launchpad.net/bugs/37073 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
