[Bug 646986] [NEW] Facebook contacts are not displayed in Empathy's contact list
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy The contact list remains empty. when there should be contacts displayed. Empathy is connected and there are people/friends in the Facebook chat (checked in Facebook site) but non of the contacts are displayed. In addition when a contact coming online there is a notification being displayed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: empathy 2.31.92-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Sep 24 18:38:54 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/empathy InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha amd64 (20100803.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: empathy ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- Facebook contacts are not displayed in Empathy's contact list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646986] Re: Facebook contacts are not displaying in contact list
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646986/+attachment/1632019/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646986/+attachment/1632020/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646986/+attachment/1632021/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646986/+attachment/1632022/+files/XsessionErrors.txt ** Summary changed: - Facebook contacts are not displaying in contact list + Facebook contacts are not displayed in Empathy's contact list -- Facebook contacts are not displayed in Empathy's contact list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 614702] [NEW] Evolution calandar month view wont save week start day
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution when setting Sunday as first work day it changes at first but wont save. when starting evolution in the next use it returns to the default Monday. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: evolution 2.30.2-0ubuntu11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-14.19-generic 2.6.35 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-14-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Aug 7 13:42:10 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha amd64 (20100803.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- Evolution calandar month view wont save week start day https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 614702] Re: Evolution calandar month view wont save week start day
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53223637/Dependencies.txt -- Evolution calandar month view wont save week start day https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 614705] [NEW] Evolution calandar month view compress weekends wont work properly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Compress week ends always compresses Saturday and Sunday and not the non working day as marked, in my case Friday and Saturday. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: evolution 2.30.2-0ubuntu11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-14.19-generic 2.6.35 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-14-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Aug 7 13:49:07 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha amd64 (20100803.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- Evolution calandar month view compress weekends wont work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 614705] Re: Evolution calandar month view compress weekends wont work properly
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53223953/Dependencies.txt -- Evolution calandar month view compress weekends wont work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 614479] Re: Empathy not working
one of the 55 updates solved the problem thank you On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 20:18 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Thank you for your bug report, could you try if that's still an issue with the current libglib version? -- Empathy not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 614479] [NEW] Empathy not working
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy When trying to launch empathy i get an empty (as of window decoration filled with white) contact list that the only way to close it is end the process. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: empathy 2.31.5.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-14.19-generic 2.6.35 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-14-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Aug 6 20:24:06 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha amd64 (20100803.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: empathy ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- Empathy not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 614479] Re: Empathy not working
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53179879/Dependencies.txt -- Empathy not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 557513] Re: Send to does not work properly
sorry i wasent clear in my description. after i press send the new message dialog dissapear and _then_ nothing happens On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:03 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: click in another part of the application and see if it's responsive or not?. -- Send to does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 557513] Re: Send to does not work properly
how do i check that? it wont start another instance nor it's window will apear when trying to lunch/reshow it from the indicator applet (which indicates that evolution is running) On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 18:16 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: Thank you for the report, Does the application enter in a freeze state or its responsive? ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Send to does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 557513] [NEW] Send to does not work properly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution When trying to use send to on a file or when using send from OOo writer the evolution process starts but does not send anything and not opening the application by doing so it forces me to shut down the process and restart it manually. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: evolution 2.28.3-0ubuntu8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 7 21:43:30 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100224.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Send to does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 557513] Re: Send to does not work properly
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43373410/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43373411/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43373412/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43373413/XsessionErrors.txt -- Send to does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 540494] [NEW] Emapthy max out the CPU on startup
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy When ever i startup empathy the cpu is maxed out and the application GUI is not responding. lasting for 1-3 min and then it's starts to work as expected ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 17 22:23:02 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/empathy InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100224.1) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: empathy 2.29.92-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.utf8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: empathy Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Emapthy max out the CPU on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 540494] Re: Emapthy max out the CPU on startup
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41164087/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41164088/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41164089/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41164090/XsessionErrors.txt -- Emapthy max out the CPU on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532914] Re: unlocking the keyring after startup sends you back to login screen
you guessed right it appears on first enter here's a screenshot ** Attachment added: Screenshot-Unlock Login Keyring.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40491928/Screenshot-Unlock%20Login%20Keyring.png -- unlocking the keyring after startup sends you back to login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532914] [NEW] unlocking the keyring after startup sends you back to login screen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring after booting up the keyring comes up asking for password (different bug) when provided the password it terminates the session and sends you back to the login screen. when logging in again all seems to be ok ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Mar 5 22:57:10 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100224.1) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gnome-keyring 2.29.90git20100218-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-15.22-generic SourcePackage: gnome-keyring Uname: Linux 2.6.32-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- unlocking the keyring after startup sends you back to login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532914] Re: unlocking the keyring after startup sends you back to login screen
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40277038/Dependencies.txt -- unlocking the keyring after startup sends you back to login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 515878] Re: Button to switch between breadcrums and addressline not available
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 508632 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508632 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 508632 Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone -- Button to switch between breadcrums and addressline not available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515878 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 508632] Re: Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone
Im missing this feature as well -- Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532191] [NEW] menu icons are missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gconf-editor The menu icons are missing throughout th system i found (on forums) a work around: checking the menus_have_icons key in gconf-editor ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 4 23:02:36 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gconf-editor InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100224.1) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gconf-editor 2.28.0-1ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-15.22-generic SourcePackage: gconf-editor Uname: Linux 2.6.32-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- menu icons are missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf-editor in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532191] Re: menu icons are missing
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40198515/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40198517/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40198519/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40198521/XsessionErrors.txt ** Package changed: gconf-editor (Ubuntu) = gconf (Ubuntu) -- menu icons are missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 427544] [NEW] rhythmbox dependency is broken karmic 9.10
Public bug reported: it impossible to install rhythmbox desktop:~$ sudo apt-get install rhythmbox Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: rhythmbox: Depends: media-player-id but it is not installable E: Broken packages ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: Fix Released ** Package changed: ubuntu = rhythmbox (Ubuntu) -- rhythmbox dependency is broken karmic 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 405667] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon crashed with signal 5 in g_thread_join()
this bug affects me too karmic 9.10 AMD64 ** Attachment added: auth.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30369151/auth.log -- gnome-keyring-daemon crashed with signal 5 in g_thread_join() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
RE: [Bug 197762] Re: file transfers on USB disk are very slow
I've just remembered why the user base of Linux is so small I do actually expect my mechanic to find and fix what's wrong with my car when I just tell him it won't start And I don’t care if it's the engine the battery or the radiator You have to understand that most users have no idea where the problem is coming from or if its two separate ones They are just using the system and see the problems -Original Message- From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Theodore Ts'o Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:43 PM To: kuli...@afikim.org.il Subject: [Bug 197762] Re: file transfers on USB disk are very slow On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:45:56PM -0700, Ron Brogden wrote: Theodore, if I may ask you - are you just another random Linux user here or are you actually officially associated with Ubuntu in a support role? I see that you are associated with IBM, have written some file system utilities and appear to be connected with kernel development but am unsure your role here with respects to this bug. I'm a linux kernel developer, and yes, I'm the maintaining of the ext4 filesystem and e2fsprogs. I started paying attention to this problem because someone sent a note to the LKML (Linux Kernel Mailiung List) complaining that kernel developers don't pay attention to Ubuntu bugs. Keep in mind most Ubuntu users get Ubuntu for free, and pay no support fees; so it's not surprising that you will see very few Ubuntu support personnel paying attention to bugs like this one. So at some level, the Ubuntu user community and Canonical has a choice to make. If they are willing to let users just whine and whine and whine and _not_ help us by running experiments and opening separate bugs for each problem, and give full information (and we will provide them with explicit instructions on how to run those experiments), fine. We can just go back to ignoring Ubuntu launchpad as being totally, completely, worthless for actually fixing bugs. It can just be a place toxic sewer pit for users to whine, and if Canonical wants to pay someone to try to extract useful information (lots of luck; theres very little here) after the fact, they can go right ahead. We'll just file Ubuntu into the there's no intelligent life here category, and ignore pleas for help on LKML when people ask developers to pay attention to Launchpad bugs. Alternatively, if the goal is to have one part of the community helping another, then the users have to be helpful. That means doing research before filing bugs, and filing separate bugs for separate issues. Launchpad fails miserably when there are more than 80 comments; it's slow and painful to use. So I am trying to see if we can salvage the Launchpad culture so it can be useful, but ultimately, maybe it's a losing battle, and we should give up. Obviously most folks have no idea why their USB transfers are slow but they know something is up. It should be no surprise that they post unclear bug reports since there is no real way for them to tell whether their file manager, the kernel or some other bit of software is the cause. All they know is something is wrong and for those that dual boot, it does not happen with Windows (not my situation but it is far from uncommon). Of course this is frustrating for the bug fixer but then the response should be a request for hardware that displays the problem at the very least (which I believe has been offered here). The problem is that we need to separate out the reports. When something is as vague as disk transfers are slow, there's a extremely high probability that there may be multiple things going on. Some people might be having genuine hardware problems; others might be having filesystem issues. Eric's (epv's) problem *might* be the classic ext3/fsync stalled write problem --- I can't tell, because _he_ hasn't filed a separate bug report and given information about his problem. Do you really expect a car mechanic to fix all problem descriptions of the form my car is hard to start simultaneously? They all have the same symptoms, so *obviously* they must have same root cause. NOT. Since you are apparently a file system expert, how about writing a quick utility that gives out the details you think would be pertinent for assessing file transfer speeds over USB? This could then be used as a benchmark and hopefully show once and for all where the bottleneck is occuring. Presumably hacking the cp source (or dd or whatever) to add in some timing information is not a huge undertaking. The 'dd' program already provides this information. For example, like this: sudo dd if=/dev/sdXX of=/dev/null bs=32k count=32k But we have people whining on this bug about how they are GUI persons only, and don't have time to do any research on the bug. If all they are doing is whining, then maybe they should really go to Windows or MacOS. Or they should get a paid support contract from some Linux
[Bug 349462] Re: ImportError: /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so: undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS4_DecodeUTF8
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349467 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349467 this is a python bug since i get the same problem with update-manager and screenlets desktop:~$ update-manager Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/update-manager, line 29, in module import gtk File /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py, line 38, in module import gobject as _gobject File /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/gobject/__init__.py, line 33, in module from glib import spawn_async, idle_add, timeout_add, timeout_add_seconds, \ File /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/__init__.py, line 30, in module from glib._glib import * ImportError: /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so: undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS4_DecodeUTF8 -- ImportError: /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so: undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS4_DecodeUTF8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygobject in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 349472] Re: update-manager won't start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349467 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349467 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 349467 update-manager fails to install todays updates due to undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS4_DecodeUTF8 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 349462 ImportError: /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so: undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS4_DecodeUTF8 -- update-manager won't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygobject in ubuntu (via bug 349462). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 342185] Re: new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 251417 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251417 well now it has been fixed as thought its not the same though very similar to the supposed dupe any way now the count is right and it shows notification even if im currently watching a different folder -- new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 342185] Re: new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution
* Is this reproducible? it happens all the time * If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? there no steps to take only recive new mails to different imap folders for example having new messages in the inbox folder and in the university mail folder only show the number of messages in one of them ignoring the rest * Could you take a screenshot showing the issue? ill try to be fast enough to catch the notification in a screenshot -- new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 342185] Re: [jaunty] new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23819661/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23819662/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23819663/ProcStatus.txt -- [jaunty] new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 342185] [NEW] [jaunty] new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution the new notification system shows only the number of new messages of one folder and not the total number of new messages in all the folders im using a imap account with a few folders and the mail is automaticly sorted to the folders ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: evolution 2.25.92-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution Uname: Linux 2.6.28-9-generic x86_64 ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- [jaunty] new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 342185] Re: new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution
not sure that this is a dupe attached is sceenshot that will clear what i mean ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2384/Screenshot.png ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 251417 Notification icon should report which account has new email -- new notification show wrong number of new messages in evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 330442] Re: theme manager installation success message shows html tags
this bug is not fixed yet. -- theme manager installation success message shows html tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 333282] Re: [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets
today python updates fixed the bug and the screenlets appliation works again marking bug fixed ** Changed in: pygobject (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 197762] Re: file transfers on USB disk are very slow
well, I want to help, I did some experiments with Jaunty alpha4 and I get slowdowns when writing only, should I start a new bug or use the one already opened? i think its safe to assume its the same bug as im experiencing -- file transfers on USB disk are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 197762] Re: file transfers on USB disk are very slow
if you do as Leann Ogasawara suggested wich seems like a good idea please post a link of the new bug here so we will know and not open new ones ill start the jaunty bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/334914 -- file transfers on USB disk are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 333282] Re: [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets
its getting worse... now update-manager, apport-gtk, awn and others stoped working this may be related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/333866 -- [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 333282] [NEW] [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-gobject the last update of package python-gobject from version 2.15.4-1build1 to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets which now does not load on startup and the manager also does not load when trying to launch screenlets from terminal i get: desktop:~$ screenlets Segmentation fault (core dumped) ** Affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygobject in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 333282] Re: [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets
other pygtk softwares? if you will give me an example to other software i will check i dont know which software is a pyGTK one and which is not... thank you -- [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 333282] Re: [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets
those apps work fine except update-manager which crashed on me (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/333422) -- [jaunty] last update of python-gobject (2.15.4-1build1) to 2.16.1-0ubuntu1 broke screenlets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 197762] Re: file transfers on USB disk are very slow
i get the same problem in jaunty 9.04 alpha fully updated -- file transfers on USB disk are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 310234] Re: slow transfer to external usb 2.0 drive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197762 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 197762 file transfers on USB disk are very slow -- slow transfer to external usb 2.0 drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs (via bug 197762). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 301416] Re: Slow USB transfer rate in Ubuntu 8.10 64-bit
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197762 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 197762 file transfers on USB disk are very slow -- Slow USB transfer rate in Ubuntu 8.10 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301416 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs (via bug 197762). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 289134] Re: extremely slow copy to USB flash drive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197762 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 243841 abnormally slow writing to usb flash drive ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 197762 file transfers on USB disk are very slow -- extremely slow copy to USB flash drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs (via bug 197762). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 243841] Re: abnormally slow writing to usb flash drive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197762 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 197762 file transfers on USB disk are very slow -- abnormally slow writing to usb flash drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs (via bug 197762). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
i used to have that problem but since i formated the machine and installed the 8.10 beta it is gone never to come back so far -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 285736] Re: Ubuntu 8-10 totem starts when clicking on Places Home folder, documents, pictures etc
is this a dupe of Bug #274563 ? -- Ubuntu 8-10 totem starts when clicking on Places Home folder, documents, pictures etc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 284088] Re: 8.10 LCD screen dim and screen sleep
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 278112 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278112 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 278112 Screensaver doesn't start -- 8.10 LCD screen dim and screen sleep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu (via bug 278112). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 252486] Re: Evolution cannot check for spam
i have the same problem using imap account -- Evolution cannot check for spam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252486 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269134] [NEW] ati fglrx drivers fail to install [intrepid]
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs i have been trying to install the ati drivers from the amd ati site with no success im using ubuntu 8.10 fully updated HP 6715s amd turion x2 with 1 GB ram atached: installer log if any more info is needed do ask and ill try to provide ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ati fglrx drivers fail to install [intrepid] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269134] Re: ati fglrx drivers fail to install [intrepid]
** Attachment added: fglrx-install.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17542453/fglrx-install.log -- ati fglrx drivers fail to install [intrepid] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 251910] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_idle_funcs()
i also get this in amd 64 -- gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_idle_funcs() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I have same problems. When access to windows 2003 server with smb://win2003server I can't see shares, but if I try to acces my ubuntu it shows shares example, smb://localhost. Instead if I try to access some share with smb://win2003server/share it shows folders inside share correctly and I can access without errors. I want to know where this issue is originated and how to fix it i have the same problem it very anoying i have 3 ubuntu hardy machines that share that problem also i can not see the computer (MSserver 2003) when opening the workgroup it seems fine when browsing XP computers (computers on workgroup and shares) -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241578] Re: cant browse windows shares on local lan [hardy]
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 207072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 207072 nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. -- cant browse windows shares on local lan [hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 242436] Re: unable to open shared folders on windows network
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 207072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 207072 nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. -- unable to open shared folders on windows network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 243769] Re: Hebrew is cut in GNOME messeges
i can confirm that one ** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Hebrew is cut in GNOME messeges https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241578] Re: cant browse windows shares on local lan [hardy]
hi Sebastien by mistake i filed this one twice this one is the same: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/242436 as for the server i dont know much: MS server 2003 -- cant browse windows shares on local lan [hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 242436] Re: unable to open shared folders on windows network
iv'e downgraded the gvfs* from the proposed repo's back to normal ones now i can enter this share but i get a blank page (see atachment) if you need any more info just say ** Attachment added: Screenshot-Windows shares on netserver - File Browser.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15579036/Screenshot-Windows%20shares%20on%20netserver%20-%20File%20Browser.png -- unable to open shared folders on windows network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 242436] Re: unable to open shared folders on windows network
No it does not work same thing with the password [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gvfs-mount smb://netserver/ Password required for netserver User [kulight]: Domain [AFIKIM]: Password: Password required for netserver User [kulight]: Domain [AFIKIM]: Password: Password required for netserver User [kulight]: Domain [AFIKIM]: Password: Password required for netserver User [kulight]: -- unable to open shared folders on windows network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 242436] Re: unable to open shared folders on windows network
but this does work [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gvfs-mount smb://netserver/פעולה-מתח-פשע-אימה/ Password required for share פעולה-מתח-פשע-אימה on netserver User [kulight]: Domain [AFIKIM]: Password: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gvfs-mount smb://netserver/היסטוריה-טבע-מדע-טכנולוגיה/ Password required for share היסטוריה-טבע-מדע-טכנולוגיה on netserver User [kulight]: Domain [AFIKIM]: Password: -- unable to open shared folders on windows network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 242436] [NEW] unable to open shared folders on windows network
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus im unable to access or even see shared folders on a windows network it just keeps asking for password which is not required but when using the console it works [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L //xx.xxx.xxx.x Password: Domain=[x] OS=[Windows Server 2003 R2 3790 Service Pack 1] Server=[Windows Server 2003 R2 5.2] Sharename Type Comment - --- שונות Disk C$ Disk Default share דרמות ספורט Disk ישראליDisk מדע בדיוני - פנטסיה Disk סטנד-אפ Disk לכל המשפחה Disk פעולה-מתח-פשע-אימה Disk תוכנות לצפיה בסרטים Disk מוסיקהDisk דרמהDisk מיני-סדרות Disk IPC$IPC Remote IPC סדרות טלויזיה ישראליות Disk A-Z סדרות טלויזיה Disk ADMIN$ Disk Remote Admin D$ Disk Default share קומדיהDisk היסטוריה-טבע-מדע-טכנולוגיה Disk כל הקטגוריות Disk ישן-קלאסי Disk E$ Disk Default share מחזמר Disk מלחמה Disk נוסטלגיה קיבוצית Disk session request to xx.xxx.xxx.x failed (Called name not present) session request to 80 failed (Called name not present) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name) NetBIOS over TCP disabled -- no workgroup available ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jun 23 20:58:18 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.22.3-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- unable to open shared folders on windows network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 242436] Re: unable to open shared folders on windows network
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15543207/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15543209/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15543210/ProcStatus.txt -- unable to open shared folders on windows network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 205919] Re: Brasero and nautilus-cd-burner cannot burn 4GiB file to DVD
confirmed this one i have the same problem here is my error log: Checking session consistency (brasero_burn_check_session_consistency burn.c:1714) BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_output_type BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_action BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_action BraseroMd5sumFile deactivating BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_output_type BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_action BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_action BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_action BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_input_type BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_set_current_action BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_set_progress BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_action BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_input_type BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_add_track BraseroMd5sumFile called brasero_job_get_action BraseroMd5sumFile finished track successfully BraseroMd5sumFile stopping BraseroLocalTrack called brasero_job_get_action BraseroLocalTrack called brasero_job_get_action BraseroLocalTrack stopping BraseroLocalTrack called brasero_job_get_action BraseroLocalTrack called brasero_job_get_action BraseroLocalTrack called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroLocalTrack called brasero_job_get_input_type BraseroLocalTrack no foreign URIs BraseroLocalTrack stopping BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs getting varg BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_input_type BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_flags BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_speed BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_device BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_session_output_size BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_input_type BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_fd_in BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_current_track BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_input_type BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_tmp_dir BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_action BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_set_current_action BraseroGrowisofs got varg: growisofs -use-the-force-luke=notray -use-the-force-luke=dao -dvd-compat -speed=16 -use-the-force-luke=tty -Z /dev/scd0 -dry-run -r -J -iso-level 3 -udf -input-charset utf8 -graft-points -D -path-list /tmp/brasero_tmp_9HOO9T -exclude-list /tmp/brasero_tmp_1UMQ9T -print-size BraseroGrowisofs launching command BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_get_fd_out BraseroGrowisofs stdout: Executing 'genisoimage -r -J -iso-level 3 -udf -input-charset utf8 -graft-points -D -path-list /tmp/brasero_tmp_9HOO9T -exclude-list /tmp/brasero_tmp_1UMQ9T -print-size | builtin_dd of=/dev/scd0 obs=32k seek=0' BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_set_dangerous BraseroGrowisofs stderr: File /home/kulight/yotam/My Documents.part1.rar is larger than 4GiB-1. BraseroGrowisofs stderr: -allow-limited-size was not specified. There is no way do represent this file size. Aborting. BraseroGrowisofs stdout: HUP BraseroGrowisofs stderr: HUP BraseroGrowisofs process finished with status 5 BraseroGrowisofs called brasero_job_error BraseroGrowisofs finished with an error BraseroGrowisofs asked to stop because of an error error = 0 message = no message BraseroGrowisofs stopping BraseroGrowisofs got killed Session error : unknown (brasero_burn_record burn.c:2273) ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Brasero and nautilus-cd-burner cannot burn 4GiB file to DVD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 213863] Re: Broken package dependency
workaround worked for me too thank you -- Broken package dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to launchpad-integration in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
