[Bug 235945] Re: Rhythmbox gives priority to APEv2 tags and won't display changes to ID3v2 tags
Same problem here. Workarounded with 10111's script in #9, thanks! -- Rhythmbox gives priority to APEv2 tags and won't display changes to ID3v2 tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
@Daniele Napolitano: I don't understand, you say that SeaTools reads the same data as Palimpsest (S.M.A.R.T. params) and does the same tests. But if that's the case why doesn't SeaTools tell me my drive is failing too? The drive manufacturer's software isn't showing any problems on my drive, but palimpsest is. Are you saying the bug is in SeaTools? What would be another good tool to run to get a third opinion? -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
@p4man: I have a 120GB Maxtor (6Y120L0). Reallocated Sector Count Threshold = 63, Value = 191 sectors, so palimpsest gives me the Disk has many bad sectors warning each time I log in. So I ran the manufacturer's diagnostic tool SeaTools for Windows in Long DST mode which reads each sector, and no problems were found. The SeaTools SMART check also passes. So even when a reasonable number of reallocated sectors are found by palimpsest (191 sectors) it still seems to be giving false positives. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-SMART Data.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35016911/Screenshot-SMART%20Data.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Here is a screenshot of the SeaTools output ** Attachment added: SeaTools Output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35016985/LongDSTPass.JPG -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 128803] Re: [Gutsy] very slow gnome startup
I have switched to KDE from Gnome because Gnome was taking too long to start up, and this did fix the problem for me. So I think it is a problem related to Gnome. In either case Compiz didn't make a difference. -- [Gutsy] very slow gnome startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 151544] Re: [Gutsy] GNOME takes too much time to load during system boot
This would be my last comment. I have just remove Ubuntu 7.10 from my system. My fix for this has been to switch to KDE. It took a couple of days to get used to, but is probably worth trying out before switching distros. -- [Gutsy] GNOME takes too much time to load during system boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for meta-gnome2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
