[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2013-12-03 Thread Igor A Tarasov
I have dedicated spamassassin server in my network.
I want evolution to use SPAMC for learning spam.
Is it possible ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19061

Title:
  evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when
  there is a spamd process)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/19061/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2013-12-03 Thread Igor A Tarasov
Evolution need some additional options in Junk configuration tab to enable to 
choose 
spamassassin or spamc with remote server address.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19061

Title:
  evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when
  there is a spamd process)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/19061/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2006-04-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs = Daniel Holbach
   Status: Needs Info = Unconfirmed

-- 
evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is 
a spamd process)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19061

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2006-04-30 Thread Charles
With the latest evolution update it seems to work.

-- 
evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is 
a spamd process)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19061

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2006-04-30 Thread Simon Law
Charles claims that this works properly now.

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released

-- 
evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is 
a spamd process)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19061

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2006-04-24 Thread Sebastien Bacher
you need to select only one of those plugins to get it working correctly

-- 
evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is 
a spamd process)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19061

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2006-04-24 Thread Charles
I had done that already and still no dice.

-- 
evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is 
a spamd process)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19061

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2006-04-09 Thread Carthik Sharma
Is this bug still relevant with the latest Evolution packages in Dapper?

Thank you for reporting this issue.

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Sebastien Bacher = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
-- 
evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is 
a spamd process)
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/19061

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 19061] Re: evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is a spamd process)

2006-04-09 Thread Charles
No it is not.  That said, neither the bogofilter nor spamassassin plugins seem 
to work in the latest version of evolution in dapper.  The plugins have not 
worked in some time even with bogofilter and spamassassin installed.
-- 
evolution always using spamassasin binary rather than spamc (even when there is 
a spamd process)
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/19061

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs