[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
Marking as fixed. Feel free to reopen if you still have the issue ** Changed in: gnome-vfs2 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Fix Released -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
Just for the info: I use 14 seconds to open a share with 500 folders inside. That is from i doubble click it, till the content is fully shown. (And it is only the first time, guess it is some cache somewhere). So I will say that browsing a share is usable, and this is over wireless. Ipw2200 card to a slow 600Mhz gateway/server -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
it is still rather slow, i don't how it was before the update though! sometimes the shares can't be displayed the first time you try. i have to hit reload almost everytime im browsing the shares of a remote windows computer. besides that it's working better than in breezy :) -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
gnome-vfs2 (2.14.0-0ubuntu2) dapper; urgency=low works for me. -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
This upload has the patch pointed by upstream, could people who noticed smb speed issues comment if that makes it better after restarting their session? gnome-vfs2 (2.14.0-0ubuntu2) dapper; urgency=low . * debian/patches/15_smb_cache_lookup_fix.patch: - fix the smb cache lookup, patch from upstream list (Ubuntu: #34203) * debian/patches/16_ftp_ls_parse_fix.patch: - use atoll instead of atol so the value are not truncated (Ubuntu: #39794) -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
Those are some good news, indeed :) So, has the patch already been applied? I don't want to push anyone, just trying to close some bugs ;-) clast -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
I just noticed this bug after googling for slow network in Dapper. I have the same problem. Local Network browsing is useable but slow, across the wireless network it is pretty close to unusable. If I can help in anyway Both machines are using Realtech chipset Belkin cards, but from whats been said this problem is not with the network, but with the GUI. Dan -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
** Attachment added: debdiff of the patched version http://librarian.launchpad.net/2124270/smb.patch -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
rubinstein, sorry I'm a bit late but I can confirm the behavior you have. frank -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
Could someone attach (a non-HTML-mangled version of) the patch linked above? -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
I can confirm that the problem here with excessive connections occurs here too and that the patch linked to above fixes the problem. -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
Yes, that's it. I checked with SWAT, and I have hundreds of smb processes, and I'm the only user. With Breezy, there are only a handful of open processes. Applying the patch from http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-vfs-list/2006-March/msg00048.html should fix this bug. Good news indeed. -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
Do any of you have access to that samba server and can check if it is suffering from a high load or millions of smbd processes or something? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-vfs-list/2006-March/msg00048.html could be related. ** Changed in: gnome-vfs2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Needs Info -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
I am also having the same problem. Yesterday my samba was working fine with 5.10 but as today i upgraded to dapper it is quite slow. -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy
Thanks Sebastien, appreciate what you do, we know you work like mad :-) Just for the record: Tried fedora core 5 and smb browsing via nautilus was quite snappy, so it must be (at least a little bit) Ubuntu-specific. Nevertheless, interesting news: I get very slow browsing when I use the following: Go to Places - Network Servers - Windows Network - netzwerk ... If I do the following: Places - Connect to Server... and connect via Service type Windows share everything is really fast again, even if I use Places - Network Servers - Windows Network afterwards. When I disconnect the share on my Deskop, browsing is slow again. Frank, maybe you can confirm this? -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
