[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
** Changed in: gnome-panel Importance: Unknown = Low -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
** Changed in: gnome-panel Status: Unknown = New -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
I forwarded it upstream ** Changed in: gnome-panel Importance: Undecided = Unknown Bugwatch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #565168 Status: New = Unknown -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
Forget my last comment... My clock is reading Sa, 06. Dez, 12:16 , so instead of a whitespace numbers lower than 10 have a leading zero. -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
Maybe the additional space is there, because of bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/159323 and it there instead of the missing leading zero? -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
could someone send it upstream at bugzilla.gnome.org? -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
Still an issue. In general, date and time strings are generated all over GNOME with simple gettext tokens. I don't see this going away until we add stuff to GLib. The band-aid solution for Clock Applet is to collapse multiple spaces into 1 space, as there is no strftime token that prints the day-of-month without padding. -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
any news about this? -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
may someone having this issue forward it upstream? i'm leaving this as incomplete until that, thanks. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
I think it's just that the stock date format string is designed for monospace terminals, and we're just borrowing that stuff for the clock. -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://launchpad.net/bugs/74670 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
I agree with Alex here - the extra space seems a little pointless. I can understand why its there if you use a monospace font for the clock - to stop the clock expanding / contracting when the date changes. Not many people do however. It stands out now its been pointed out, heh. -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://launchpad.net/bugs/74670 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
Thank you for your bug. Very minor detail, I'm not sure that's a bug, why one space would be nicer? ** Changed in: Ubuntu Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-panel Importance: Undecided = Low Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs ** Also affects: gnome-panel (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://launchpad.net/bugs/74670 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 74670] Re: GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates
Because it would be consistent with itself. In a monospace terminal, the width of a space is equal to the width of a digit, so dates line up in, e.g. ls. This isn't the case with variable-width fonts and it just looks silly to have inconsistent spacing between, e.g. Fri··9·Feb,·17:42 and Sat·10·Feb,·17:42. -- GNOME Clock has duplicate 0x20's on single-figure dates https://launchpad.net/bugs/74670 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
