[Bug 122602] Re: Duplicated entries in Places Menu
This happened with the new gnome-menus update in which they fixed some problems with spaces and updates from alacarte. One of the other things it does now, which I'm not sure if I like is that all cifs mounts used to show up as a place, but now they have been moved into a Removable Devices submenu in places. -- Duplicated entries in Places Menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 22930] Re: Newly-sensitive button ignores clicks until cursor re-enters it
While guiding a new Ubuntu user (coming from Windows) through the Install process, this was very annoying. Once he clicked the button, he thought it was working so he left it alone until he realized the button didn't actually get clicked. I told him it was a bug and that he needed to move the mouse outside the button and try clicking it again for every step of the install process. The first thing out of his mouth was, I don't have to do that with Windows. So as trivial as it may seem, this bug affects the usability of the user interface as a whole. Not to mention the fact that the stability of the system comes into question before it even gets installed. -- Newly-sensitive button ignores clicks until cursor re-enters it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191027] Re: Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument
I have this bug as well, however, switching to ALSA does not work for me. I get the test sound and all of the system sounds play, even when PulseAudio is selected. But the second I use Rhythmbox or Totem I get the error. -- Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191027] Re: Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument
CORRECTION: I actually got it to work with PulseAudio! Instead of switching to ALSA, I actually just did killall pulseaudio and the sound started to work! I'm not sure if that works for everyone though. -- Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
I still have this problem, but it appears to be a gvfs problem since it hangs when a SSH share is left open in Nautilus. Also, the Backtrace doesn't list anything when the window turns gray. ** Attachment added: Desktop Screenshot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14381234/Screenshot.png -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
Also, it should be noted, that in the screenshot, I should have 6 icons on the desktop, but all you see is the wallpaper. Whever Nautilus stops screwing up, the icons return. Until then, I can't do anything. I can't get to my home directory, or any directory for that matter because every Nautilus window hangs. ** Attachment added: gdb-nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14381344/gdb-nautilus.txt ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm on Hardy and I've noticed a problem recently where Nautilus forces me to do a force quit on it whenever one of its windows is open for a long time. I work in my home directory a lot, so when I leave my machine, I usually leave Nautilus open to my home directory. If that window is left open for a few hours, Nautilus (including the desktop and any other Nautilus windows open) freezes and the only way to clear the freeze is to continually click the close button on one of the windows until the option to Force Quit appears. When you force quit, the desktop icons disappear for a few seconds, and re-appear. + UPDATE: Appears to only affect gvfs mounts (Anything connected using + Places - Connect to Server). + Using Hardy with all the latest updates Nautilus version 2.22.2-0ubuntu4 ** Also affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
I hate to keep adding comments like this, but I'm working in Bluefish when Nautilus hangs. The funny thing is, the whole time Nautilus hangs, Bluefish is still able to edit files on the SSH share, as well as create and delete files. I'm actually having to use Bluefish for file management right now because Nautilus is so screwed up. -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
I only got the dbg package for nautilus...are there any other dbg packages I should install that could help with this? It's very difficult to do a backtrace on the problem because it only seems to happen with I'm not running the backtrace. And specifically, what should I be looking for in the backtrace so I know it got what's needed. -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
ma2412ma: Suppose gvfs is working, wouldn't it be a good idea to make this more obvious to the users and not hide it somewhere as a hidden folder? I have asked the same question in multiple places without answer. To further the question, why isn't gvfs-fuse installed by default? When a user mounts a share, they expect it to be accessible by ALL their applications, not just the core Gnome ones. I know that gvfs is a userspace filesystem, so why not mount it somewhere obvious in the user's home folder. Something like this maybe: /home/user/Volumes. How is a new user supposed to know to install gvfs-fuse, then look in a hidden folder by the name of .gvfs? -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
In Hardy Beta, you had to manually install it. I was not aware they had included it by default in the official release, but I am very glad they did. The only other real complaint (besides stability) that I have with it is the location of the shares. I really think they should be somewhere more visible, contained in a folder with a more meaningful name (e.g. ~/Volumes). Like everyone else, I am also experiencing this bug. However, I actually have all my important stuff mounted using the /etc/fstab file. People tell me it's archaic to mount SMB shares using fstab, but it's the only reliable way to mount shares. I know they are thinking about phasing out the fstab file, but they really need to get gvfs reliable and matured before they do. Thus far, aside from bugs like these, they have done surprisingly well with its integration. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
Try opening a file located on a gvfs mount using VLC or some other non- gnome application, and you'll see why. Even though the applications may use the Gnome file dialog, the dialog itself sometimes hides connected shares, depending on the application. VLC is one example of such an application. They only way to access media on a remote share is to connect to the share using the mount command. Another use case for visible, and easy to find mount points: What if I need to access an something on a remote share via a command line application? The only way to get to those shares from the terminal is to find the mount points. Also, I noticed something interesting...I don't even have a ~/.gvfs folder, even though I have gvfs-fuse installed and shares connected. ma2412ma: Though it would be nice to have a /Volumes at the root of the filesystem, gvfs-fuse is a userspace file system, meaning that once you log out, those shares are disconnected. There would also be permissions issues, which is why it's best to have it in the user's home directory. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
VLC is a widely used application and even though this may be their problem, don't count on them to fix it because they still haven't fixed a simple gui bug reported 5 years ago. But I'm not singling out VLC here, there are other applications I have come across that have the same behavior when it comes to gnomevfs/gvfs. The Gnome dialog simply won't let you select the shares. You have to manually navigate to their mount points. This in itself is frustrating enough, but having to right-click, show hidden files, and find .gvfs in my home folder (which I personally don't have for some reason) every single time you want to open a file with a non-gnome application is just plain stupid. Not to mention that I would have never found it if I didn't know how gvfs works. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
Ok, as mentioned, for NEW users or others who are not as computer literate, having to explain that their share is in a hidden using a seemly strange name is not user-friendly. It's supposed to be Linux for Human Beings. If I shared out my movies folder, and set it up on my girlfriend's laptop so that she could watch them with VLC, or mplayer, she would immediately ask me why she can't find any of the movies in VLC, but she can find them in the file browser (Nautilus). I have given plenty of reason as to why it should default to being easy to find, so now I ask why everyone is so against it? If it helps users, why is it such a bad thing? So to answer your question, sure, I could make a symlink.I COULDnot my girlfriend, not my grandmother, not my father, etc. And these are the people Ubuntu is targeted to. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
ma2414ma said it better than I probably could. I even have problems opening files in gedit for editing using gvfs via FTP. It tries to load them, then just stops and leaves you with a blank window. Another directory in the home directory may not be the best way to do it, but neither is a hidden folder in the home directory. I think ma2414ma's suggestion about having a symlink to .gvfs by default would work pretty well. It would certainly make it easier to find, as well as make it possible for someone like jmcantrell to remove the symlink in case you want to hide the directory. Also, it sounds like something that could be easily implemented by the devs. jmcantrell: I don't think it is obvious at all why it should be hidden. Out of curiosity, what is your reasoning for having the directory hidden? I'd like to get a different point of view on the subject. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
So as long as you have the option to quickly get rid of it, you'd be happy? Using a symlink by default would be a great help to new users, while taking less than two seconds to delete if you didn't want it, which would be jmcantrell's case. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
I agree that it should just work without ever needing to know how, but because of examples like those already given by myself and ma2414ma, not all applications are using gvfs (and some, like VLC don't play nice with it) yet, and it could be quite some time (or never) before they do. Providing a visible location for the mount points provides a workaround for the problems that currently exists. But even if those problems all got addressed, you'd still need the mount points in order to use the terminal with connected shares. Though it has already been mentioned that Linux is not OS X (and I too am glad it's not), Apple is all about the user experience and obviously they felt that having a /Volumes folder was sensible. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
ma2414ma: don't waste your time, they are totally unwilling to see reason no matter how many examples you give. They refuse to admit there is a problem. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 212789] Re: gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login
jmcantrell: There didn't seem to be a problem adding the folders Music, Pictures, Videos, etc to the user's home directory. I'm not fighting the directory structure. You'd know that if you read the whole thread. I'm done arguing with your close mindedness. Sebastien: Perhaps showing the implementation details isn't the best idea, I agree with you. However, until the problem with applications playing nicely with gvfs is fixed, there should be some kind of work around, even if only temporary. I would file another bug report, but opinions from users with legitimate ideas seem to get flamed quite quickly. I'll use jmcantrell's latest response as the example. -- gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 123492] Re: Most applications can't access Connect to Server mounts
Yes, and it doesn't work with VLC, as mentioned yesterday. Steps to reproduce: - Install VLC if not installed - Run VLC - Click File-Open File - Shares mounted with gvfs do not appear on the sidebar of the open file dialog. -- Most applications can't access Connect to Server mounts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191027] Re: Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument
Actually, two months is pretty speedy for them. There are bugs that are several years old they have yet to fix. -- Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191027] Re: Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument
Besides, I think they only release security fixes and other show stopper fixes until their next maintenance release (8.04.1). Since there is a workaround and audio really isn't a huge concern anyways (for servers), they don't see this as a show stopper. -- Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
After doing some system updates, the nautilus-dggsym package was removed. Trying to install the package gives me this error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: nautilus-dbgsym: Depends: nautilus (= 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu4) but 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu6 is to be installed E: Broken packages Of course this has to happen right when I found a way to reproduce this problem. Unfortunately, I only have a limited time window, so I don't know if I will be able to reproduce the problem after today. But it also seems to happen whenever I'm encoding video. Only this time, I can't even get into my home directory. -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 215700] [NEW] Connect To Server reports Timeout reached when connecting to an SSH host with a different RSA key
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs I recently reinstalled Ubuntu on my home machine. So when connecting to it from work through Places - Connect To Server - SSH, the gnome-panel freezes for about 10 seconds, then I get an error message saying Timeout reached. I know it's because the RSA key was changed when I reinstalled Ubuntu at home because connecting from the terminal using the ssh command tells me the key is different from the known key and answering yes allows me to connect. The workaround for this is to delete or rename the file ~/.ssh/known_hosts, but Gnome should give you a proper message stating the key difference, rather than giving a timeout message. ** Affects: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Connect To Server reports Timeout reached when connecting to an SSH host with a different RSA key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 215700] Re: Connect To Server reports Timeout reached when connecting to an SSH host with a different RSA key
I am using Hardy with all the latest updates. To reproduce: 1. Connect to an SSH server using Places - Connect to Server... and accepting the Host key if you are connecting to a new SSH server. 2. Disconnect from the server by unmounting. 3. On the server you just connected to and disconnected from, generate a new RSA key or reinstall the operating system. 4. Try connecting to the SSH server again. The connection should fail with a Timeout reached error after several seconds. 5. To fix, go to ~/.ssh and rename the file known_hosts. 6. Try connecting to the SSH server again, and this time it should ask if you want to accept the host's RSA key. -- Connect To Server reports Timeout reached when connecting to an SSH host with a different RSA key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 215700] Re: Connect To Server reports Timeout reached when connecting to an SSH host with a different RSA key
I am unable to troubleshoot since I no longer have the old known_hosts file. But, accessing directly seems to do the same thing as Connect to Server, so I imagine the results would be the same. It seemed almost like gvfs wasn't expecting this scenario and eventually timed out because it didn't know what to do when asked the question about confirming the connecting to a previously known host that has a different rsa key than was expected. If you know how to generate a new host key for an SSH server without reinstalling the OS, I will try to reproduce the problem with a virtual machine as the SSH server. -- Connect To Server reports Timeout reached when connecting to an SSH host with a different RSA key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] [NEW] Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm on Hardy and I've noticed a problem recently where Nautilus forces me to do a force quit on it whenever one of its windows is open for a long time. I work in my home directory a lot, so when I leave my machine, I usually leave Nautilus open to my home directory. If that window is left open for a few hours, Nautilus (including the desktop and any other Nautilus windows open) freezes and the only way to clear the freeze is to continually click the close button on one of the windows until the option to Force Quit appears. When you force quit, the desktop icons disappear for a few seconds, and re-appear. Using Hardy with all the latest updates Nautilus version 2.22.2-0ubuntu4 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
Just started gdb and attached it nautilus. Hopefully by the time I get home this afternoon, I'll have a backtrace. -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
There is a possibility that this has already been fixed by the latest updates. I have had my home folder open for over 12 hours and it hasn't crashed yet. Knowing my luck, the second I detach gdb, nautilus will crash :) Anyways, I'm going to leave this running overnight and if it hasn't crashed within the next 24 hours, I'll close this bug. -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
I've been trying to reproduce this problem for the last 48 hours and I cannot get it to crash. I'm thinking the latest gvfs update did the trick, so I will try to mark this bug as fixed. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191027] Re: Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument
It's funny you say that frago. All those bugs that make Hardy the buggiest release yet are all Gnome bugs. I switched to KDE about a month ago and haven't had a problem. No PulseAudio screwing up audio, no gvfs screwing up the networking connections, no crashing of Nautilus every 20 minutes. And I used to be a Gnome advocate and have used it for years. Now I'm telling everyone to stay away from it. The new KDE 4 is WAY more stable than Gnome (and faster, too). -- Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 191027] Re: Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument
I was not trolling and I'm surprised by your reaction, Sebastien. I was merely suggesting an alternative until Gnome gets fixed. And I have filed bugs for all the problems I'm having. Reading blogs on the subject, there are several people having problems with Nautilus crashing. Some of those people are suggesting it had something to do with the scheduler, while others think it's the new gvfs. -- Failed to connect stream: Invalid argument https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
No, only a binary. What is ddeb anyways? Is that something I would have put in? Because I don't remember doing it. -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 220808] Re: Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time
The wiki page says that development Hardy doesn't have hardy-updates. However, it seems to work, so I guess that notice in the wiki is a little outdated now. Anyways, as soon as I can recreate the circumstances for this bug I'll get a backtrace. -- Nautilus Hangs if Open For an Extended Period of Time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 147943] Re: [MASTER] broken initial stacking
Matt, I have a X850 Platinum Edition and I have the proprietary drivers installed, and compiz looks great...aside from these types of bugs, I've never had it crash. Matt Jones wrote: It is still broken. Even when I create a new user, roboot, and login as the new user. Please stop marking this as fixed! And thank you medigeek for nominating this for Gutsy. When I initially reported It, I thought it was in the list of Gutsy bugs. And, because I never mentioned it: I have an ATI X800XT Platinum Edition with no restricted drivers installed (because they don't have compiz extensions) on my desktop, and an NVidia Geforce Go 7700 with restricted drivers for my laptop. Both machines still give the same error with stacking windows. -- [MASTER] broken initial stacking (was: compiz hides quick loading windows at login) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 147943] Re: [MASTER] broken initial stacking
I know what you mean about video card being obscured. Not many people run a X850 either. As far as bug reports go, I usually look to see if someone else posted something about, and if not, creating a new bug report. Alot of times it ends up as a duplicate of another bug with a subject line that has nothing to do with the bug itself, similar to this bug. My bug report had the title of something like, Panels do not show on desktop after logging in, running Compiz. Then when it became a duplicate of this bug which could be nominated for worst subject line for a bug report. But what I'm trying to say, is yes, you should file a bug report (as long as it's not obviously a duplicate of another existing bug). My experience with my card was strange to say the least. A fresh install of Gusty + XGL had Compiz running. Then when I realized video played very choppy, I installed the restricted drivers, which would not run Compiz. So I uninstalled again. Rebooted, and reinstalled the restricted drivers, and everything magically started working. I didn't file a bug report because I figured I did something wrong. So maybe try that and see if ity helps. Let me know and good luck, Ross On 10/10/07, Matt Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ross Peoples wrote: Matt, I have a X850 Platinum Edition and I have the proprietary drivers installed, and compiz looks great...aside from these types of bugs, I've never had it crash. Matt Jones wrote: It is still broken. Even when I create a new user, roboot, and login as the new user. Please stop marking this as fixed! And thank you medigeek for nominating this for Gutsy. When I initially reported It, I thought it was in the list of Gutsy bugs. And, because I never mentioned it: I have an ATI X800XT Platinum Edition with no restricted drivers installed (because they don't have compiz extensions) on my desktop, and an NVidia Geforce Go 7700 with restricted drivers for my laptop. Both machines still give the same error with stacking windows. I didn't want to fill the thread with more posts, so I emailed this to you. That is interesting that it works for you. When I enable the restricted driver and reboot. it says that my card does not support composite extensions. I know it works, because I used to download the drivers and install them from the ATI site, years ago with older Ubuntu releases. Do you think I should file a bug report about it not working? I'm not quite up-to-speed on how all the bug report procedures work in launchpad. So I don't know if that is something they would care about. Just wondering since you have more experience with it. On a side note. I've often thought of just giving my video card to Ubuntu, so they can make sure it works. It is kind of an obscure card. -- [MASTER] broken initial stacking (was: compiz hides quick loading windows at login) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147943 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- [MASTER] broken initial stacking (was: compiz hides quick loading windows at login) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 255316] Re: Disable square brackets in minimized window titles
I actually like the brackets because when I have a bunch of windows open, it's nice to know which ones are minimized. If you wanna get rid of the square brackets, at least provide some visual cue that the window is minimized. And as always, giving the user an option to turn it off is better than forcing everyone to either live with it (if keeping) or live without (if removing). Options are a user's best friendassuming the options are organized properly. -- Disable square brackets in minimized window titles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 179413] Group Properties Window Doesn't Show Group Members
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-desktop-environment Going to System - Administration - Users and Groups, then clicking Manage Groups button will bring up a list groups on the system. Clicking any of those groups and clicking the Properties button shows the Group Properties window with a checkable list of Group Members. However, users that are members of the group are not checked, so there is no way to know if a user is currently a member of a group. Putting a check next to a user name, then clicking OK, and bringing up the properties window again shows the user is still unchecked. On a side note, the old way of adding users to groups was much better. In the Users and Groups window, there should be a tab for Users and a tab for Groups. It is, after all, named Users and Groups, so you should be able to edit groups without having to open up another window inside the User editor. The way it is now is very confusing. ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Group Properties Window Doesn't Show Group Members https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for meta-gnome2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 179413] Re: Group Properties Window Doesn't Show Group Members
Well, I'm running Hardy Alpha 2 in VirtualBox now and it is not fixed. However, this is a fresh install and I have not done the updates yet. When I get all the current updates for Hardy Alpha 2, I'll report back with the results. -- Group Properties Window Doesn't Show Group Members https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for meta-gnome2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
