Re: bumping clutter's external dependencies for 2.30
Jason D. Clinton wrote: After a little more testing, it seems fine to bump, so if the release team wants to bump, that would be fine with me. I am ok with it; especially as this will allow to run current gnome shell with the approved clutter. Frederic ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: bumping clutter's external dependencies for 2.30
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: I am ok with it; especially as this will allow to run current gnome shell with the approved clutter. As for libchamplain use of Clutter, libchamplain 0.4.5 (soon to be released) shouldn't have any issues with Clutter 1.2, but that remains to be tested. Pierre-Luc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: bumping clutter's external dependencies for 2.30
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Jason D. Clinton wrote: After a little more testing, it seems fine to bump, so if the release team wants to bump, that would be fine with me. I am ok with it; especially as this will allow to run current gnome shell with the approved clutter. thanks for the feedback. wiki updated. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gnome-keyring 2.29 breakages
Le mercredi 17 mars 2010 à 23:51 +0100, Sebastien Bacher a écrit : The gnome-keyring maintainer has announced that he would not have much time for GNOME in the next months but the current 2.29 version seems to be broken in several ways which seem to be show stoppers for 2.30. Hi, Just to follow on the issue, Stef has replied to my email this weekend, he also fixed most of the bugs listed, thanks to him -- Sebastien Bacher ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Freeze break request
Permission to add missing .js files to POTFILES.in? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613092 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Freeze break request
We are in hard code freeze. I included i18n only as an informative measure. On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Gabor Kelemen kelem...@gnome.hu wrote: Jason D. Clinton írta: Permission to add missing .js files to POTFILES.in? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613092 This does not count as a break, as these files are already there. Just go ahead and commit. Regards Gabor Kelemen ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
