Re: Switching Between Applications in Gnome 3
Le 18/06/2013 10:40, bugs a écrit : What can be improved is the key-combination for switching between the tabs. For a weird, unknown reason, we don't rely on Ctrl+Tab for switching between tabs in most applications. That will fit much more in the expectations of the users, than Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN or even worse Ctrl+Shift+PGUP/PGDN. Furthermore it will follow the convention of Alt+Tab and is also more keyboard-friendly. Hitting Ctrl+Tab is easier than searching Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN, especially since a lot of manufacturers started to move around PGUP/PGDN (most ot them seem to search a ideal place for it...). e.g. Ctrl+Tab/Ctrl+Shift+Tab could be used aside of Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN, which won't hurt people how are already aware of the current behaviour of GNOME. For me Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN is to browse in order the tabs. Alt+Tab has always carried more a recently used, or history semantic, so I don't think they're the same. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Switching Between Applications in Gnome 3
Le 19/06/2013 12:56, Luis Menina a écrit : Le 18/06/2013 10:40, bugs a écrit : What can be improved is the key-combination for switching between the tabs. For a weird, unknown reason, we don't rely on Ctrl+Tab for switching between tabs in most applications. That will fit much more in the expectations of the users, than Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN or even worse Ctrl+Shift+PGUP/PGDN. Furthermore it will follow the convention of Alt+Tab and is also more keyboard-friendly. Hitting Ctrl+Tab is easier than searching Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN, especially since a lot of manufacturers started to move around PGUP/PGDN (most ot them seem to search a ideal place for it...). e.g. Ctrl+Tab/Ctrl+Shift+Tab could be used aside of Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN, which won't hurt people how are already aware of the current behaviour of GNOME. For me Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN is to browse in order the tabs. Alt+Tab has always carried more a recently used, or history semantic, so I don't think they're the same. Just saw you're right, some applications are already implementing Ctrl+Tab that way, like Firefox and Thunderbird. Looks like I have an unusual expectation on the semantics bewind the Tab key. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
I think I found an error in libwnck the name_changed and icon_changed function pointers appear to take the wrong type
To the libwnck devs yeah in class-group.h _WnckClassGroupClass is defined as follows in 3.4.5 struct _WnckClassGroupClass { GObjectClass parent_class; void (* name_changed) (WnckApplication *app); void (* icon_changed) (WnckApplication *app); /* Padding for future expansion */ void (* pad1) (void); void (* pad2) (void); void (* pad3) (void); void (* pad4) (void); } shouldn't they take WnckClassGroup pointers not WnckApplication one's as it's the first arg so that should be the this or self pointer maybe this is already fixed up stream I can't tell as I cannot find anything earlier than 3.4.5 is there a githup or similar repository I could look at anyway thanks for what looks to be a great library. -- .~. In my life God comes first /V\ but Linux is pretty high after that :-D /( )\Francis (Grizzly) Smit ^^-^^http://www.smit.id.au/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: I think I found an error in libwnck the name_changed and icon_changed function pointers appear to take the wrong type
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 12:33 +1000, Francis (Grizzly) Smit wrote: To the libwnck devs Please file bug reports in https://bugzilla.gnome.org under the product libwnck. Thanks, andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list