Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released
On 01/11/2017 04:06 PM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > How would you write a correctness test for this? Or what specific set > of conditions would cause an error here? Not sure, its a runtime error you would see when a downstream would try to register an already registered GType. > Librsvg *only* uses the Cairo part from gtk-rs right now; it doesn't > use the GTK+ bindings. It also uses little bits from glib-rs, but just > for marshaling strings. It might work today, just something to consider. One example might be if the glib-rs marshaler decided to created a string boxed type for UTF-8 strings to avoid further deep copies. -- Christian ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 13:11 -0800, Christian Hergert wrote: > > Does a static link of gtk-rs in librsvg prevent others from using > gtk-rs > in consuming applications because any GType (glue code!) has been > registered which will conflict with an applications use of gtk-rs. How would you write a correctness test for this? Or what specific set of conditions would cause an error here? Librsvg *only* uses the Cairo part from gtk-rs right now; it doesn't use the GTK+ bindings. It also uses little bits from glib-rs, but just for marshaling strings. Federico ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 05:25 +0200, Adrian Perez de Castro wrote: > them, and unpack them in the proper location. Then "cargo build" > doesn't need > to fetch things itself. For more on this, there's interesting > comments here: > > https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/1330 > This is very interesting; thanks for the link. I haven't submitted librsvg 2.41 to the openSUSE Build Service yet, but this will certainly come in handy. Federico ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Bridge gimpnet to matrix.org
What you think about bridge our irc to matrix.org? It just will be another entry point for our IRC. Asking irc maintaners on #opers we could give it a try from our servers installing https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-irc (See instructions on README.md) If you ask for benefits, everyone seems to have its DIY configuration to have log on irc (I know it was disabled for specific reasons) and reuse same nick on different devices (mobile, web, tablet) I can resist to link my own choosed solution (https://www.irccloud.com) which allows me to be almost always avaliable and be aware of what is happening when offline. I think many others want similar service. Don't know the cost of hosting such huge irc server so if that's the problem is completely understandable. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
