Annual GNOME Bugzilla statistics for 2017

[Andre Klapper]

Hi everybody,

a quick look at some basic GNOME Bugzilla activity in 2017.

Overall statistics:
 2017   2016   2015
  Open reports at the end(*):   49788  49593  47205
  Opened in that year:  15016  16239  17481
  Closed in that year:  14761  13675  16417
(*): Excludes reports marked as enhancements

Note that numbers are not directly comparable to previous years as some
projects have moved their task tracking from Bugzilla to GitLab.

The following people closed more than 400 tickets in 2017:
  1285 André Klapper
   510 Florian Müllner
   505 Milan Crha
   499 Philip Withnall
   465 Bastien Nocera
   443 GNOME Infrastructure Team
   414 Georges Basile Stavracas Neto

The following people reported more than 100 tickets in 2017:
   344 Jeremy Bicha
   240 Bastien Nocera
   231 Mohammed Sadiq
   168 Debarshi Ray
   124 Matthias Clasen
   115 Florian Müllner
   112 Piotr Drąg
   105 Daniel Boles

The following people contributed more than 250 patches in 2017:
   612 Debarshi Ray
   404 Florian Müllner
   386 Bastien Nocera
   335 Adrien Plazas
   294 Philip Withnall
   290 Philip Chimento

The following people reviewed more than 450 patches in 2017:
   852 Sebastian Dröge (slomo)
   760 Bastien Nocera
   656 Debarshi Ray
   620 Philip Withnall
   606 Rui Matos
   493 Florian Müllner
   456 Adrien Plazas

Enjoy 2018!

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Gitlab hosting - Fwd: Transmitter - GUI for transmission-daemon and transmission-remote

[Emily Gonyer]

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Felipe Ferreira da Silva
 wrote:
>> Since Sébastien brought this up.
>>
>> Do we want to advertise hosting space if people are thinking of writing
>> GNOME applications as part of a greater desire to create a more solid
>> GNOME/GTK+ developer community?
>>
>> Advantages are that we would be more active in what our developers are
>> writing and see problems with development.  There would also be a path for
>> more maintainers in parts of the eco-system.  Also a place for new designers
>> to find tasks to do.
>>
>> The engagement/marketing team could start reaching out to developers to
>> host their GTK+/GNOME project there.  The only issue would be to understand
>> the costs of hosting as that could be problematic in the long term.  It
>> could be a great problem to have provided we have stable funding sources.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> sri
>
>
> Having a hosting space for potential GNOME apps certainly would attract a
> developer community, I believe.
>
> If hosting space is an issue, at least a single space where developers and
> designers could add a link and description to their project could energize
> these developers/designers to be more active on the GNOME community. Nothing
> like having your project receiving some attention ;)
>
> Felipe Ferreira da Silva
>
> ___
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Issues with hosting space seems like the only reason to not do so, but
if funds can be found to provide such, it seems like a great way to
build community and attract developers. Asking for space (or money to
provide it) may also be a great way to get funding, with easily
observable results. Perhaps Google, Red Hat or Canonical would be
interested in funding?

Emily


-- 
Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius,
power and magic in it. -  Goethe

Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't
matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr.Seuss

Every step is a first step if it's a step in the right direction. -
Sir Terry Pratchett
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Gitlab hosting - Fwd: Transmitter - GUI for transmission-daemon and transmission-remote

[Felipe Ferreira da Silva]

>
> Since Sébastien brought this up.
>
> Do we want to advertise hosting space if people are thinking of writing
> GNOME applications as part of a greater desire to create a more solid
> GNOME/GTK+ developer community?
>
> Advantages are that we would be more active in what our developers are
> writing and see problems with development.  There would also be a path for
> more maintainers in parts of the eco-system.  Also a place for new
> designers to find tasks to do.
>
> The engagement/marketing team could start reaching out to developers to
> host their GTK+/GNOME project there.  The only issue would be to understand
> the costs of hosting as that could be problematic in the long term.  It
> could be a great problem to have provided we have stable funding sources.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> sri
>

Having a hosting space for potential GNOME apps certainly would attract a
developer community, I believe.

If hosting space is an issue, at least a single space where developers and
designers could add a link and description to their project could energize
these developers/designers to be more active on the GNOME community.
Nothing like having your project receiving some attention ;)

Felipe Ferreira da Silva
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Transmitter - GUI for transmission-daemon and transmission-remote

[Felipe Ferreira da Silva]

> I think that new maintainers like Felipe need to ask for an account
> here:
> https://wiki.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner
>
> As long as the project meets the prerequisites:
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Prerequisites
>
> There are many projects hosted on gnome.org which are not officially
> part of GNOME. A bittorrent GTK+ client is definitely the kind of
> project that makes sense to host on gnome.org.
>
> But GNOME has two categories: core and apps. For example for the latest
> release:
>  core   -  https://download.gnome.org/core/3.27/3.27.3/NEWS
>  apps   -  https://download.gnome.org/apps/3.27/3.27.3/NEWS
>
> A bittorrent client could be part of apps, no? In that category there
> are games, an IRC client, developer tools, even a hex editor and
> gnome-multi-writer (some niche applications), so why not a bittorrent
> client? The boundary seems arbitrary.


That's good to know. I will send a request once the project meets all the
prerequisites.

Best regards,
Felipe Ferreira da Silva
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list