Fwd: Official GNOME subreddit
Hello all, I know this is going out to everyone, so I'll keep this short and sweet. We recently gutted and cleaned the official GNOME subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/gnome/ I believe this page is probably the easiest and most transparent place for us to interact with the community, as it offers a low barrier to entry and less-officialness than either mailing lists, IRC, or GitLab. This subreddit is a good place to make announcements, bounce ideas, get trolled, have open discussions, the works. With that said, we have implemented special badges called "flairs" that we can assign to you if you so choose that will set you apart from the rest of the community. If you would like a flair added to your account 1) you need to be subscribed, and 2) you need to contact a moderator. Right now your choices are "GNOME Foundation", "GNOME Developer", "GNOME Contributor", or "GNOME Designer". We can make more if we need. I hope you guys take a moment to look at this subreddit and perhaps consider using it as part of your information dissemination strategy. The more of us that use it regularly, the better it is overall. Cheers and happy holidays, -Britt Yazel ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Annual Gitlab Statistics, anyone?
Hello everybody! I've seen Andre email talking about GitLab stats, and I was thinking about setting up a GrimoireLab instance [1] to check some basic GNOME community metrics, because it has added support for GitLab analytics recently, and I love both projects/communities (GNOME and GrimoireLab), so it's a perfect match to test its capabilities. My idea is to follow this recipe: https://gitlab.com/Bitergia/lab/analytics-demo If anyone is willing to help, basically the first step is to build a projects.json file to list all the projects and repositories to track. And a place to run the machinery would help. Otherwise, I would use some Bitergia resources to run it. What do you think? [1] https://chaoss.github.io/grimoirelab/ Best regards, --- Manrique ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: new GNOME Weather maintainers
On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 13:12 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > There has not yet been a GitLab migration, so bugs and unreviewed > patches are still on Bugzilla. First responsibility of new maintainers > is to review unreviewed patches. But there's no way to list them. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=patchreport.html=none_days=1=gnome-weather https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=patchreport.html=accepted-commit_now_days=1=gnome-weather https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=patchreport.html=accepted-commit_after_freeze_days=1=gnome-weather https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=patchreport.html=reviewed_days=1=gnome-weather > To get to the patch list, or just to view all the open bugs, you need to > visit > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html=gnome-weather > but that page is now blocked. There's no reason for it to be blocked, > because it does not allow entering bugs. Just prevents maintainers from > doing their job and reviewing patches. Who can fix this? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796811 Cheers, andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: new GNOME Weather maintainers
First problems I see: There has not yet been a GitLab migration, so bugs and unreviewed patches are still on Bugzilla. First responsibility of new maintainers is to review unreviewed patches. But there's no way to list them. To get to the patch list, or just to view all the open bugs, you need to visit https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html=gnome-weather but that page is now blocked. There's no reason for it to be blocked, because it does not allow entering bugs. Just prevents maintainers from doing their job and reviewing patches. Who can fix this? Michael P.S. I have https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777200 outstanding but I'm sure there are many, many more waiting in the patch list. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: projects-old.gnome.org being discontinued
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 22:42 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote: > Do you see any value in keeping those URLs around even if they're > historical and not relevant since several years? I occasionally get internet search engine results which point to projects-old.gnome.org. For clarification: If I try to visit any URL on projects-old, will my browser/search engine/I get a HTTP 301 redirect to some GNOME URL that will work? Or just a useless "Server not found"? (Anecdote: I still regularly run into/click on links to wiki.gnome.org just to end up on blank pages because some people thought it's a great idea to reorganize content by moving pages without leaving redirects.) andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
