Re: Git: Do not use http to access Git!

2011-02-17 Thread Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Danielle Madeley
danielle.made...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
 On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 10:48 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:

 Some people have been using the cgit interface to checkout a lot of git
 modules. This cause a very high load on our server. Please use the git
 protocol instead. For now I've blocked git from accessing cgit as too
 many people have been using the http interface and it negatively impacts
 performance (very high loads over long periods).

 Is it possible these people are on ridiculous corporate networks that
 only permit HTTP traffic (via a proxy) and allow no other outgoing
 connections beyond their network?

 I have been on one of these before, http was the only way I could
 checkout sources (from Subversion at the time).

 If this is the case, git being awesome as it is, perhaps someone could
 set up a remote that offers http cloning that updates once a day or so.
 This would let people clone a repo, and still submit their work via
 format-patch etc.


I agree. That has happened to me as well.
I understand the performance issues, but not to have a http acces to
the clones, could be blocker issue for some people.

Greetings.

-- 
Juanje
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: bug-buddy integration

2009-03-11 Thread Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jonh Wendell jwend...@gnome.org wrote:
 Hi, folks.

Hi :-)

 We from Brazilian team are discussing about the best option to report
 bugs related with translations.

 An optimal solution is to have bug-buddy integrated into applications,
 in the menu Help-Report a bug or wish. This would call bug-buddy, the
 user would select the severity of the bug (translation, bug,
 suggestion), enter the bug itself and then would hit the 'send' button.
 Simple like that.

 Ubuntu does something similar, but the negative points are:
 - Ubuntu packagers have to patch lots of applications;
 - The bug reports go to launchpad, ubuntu only;
 - The launchpad interface is English-only, where bug-buddy is translated
 into the user language;

Well. actually it is not exactly like that.
Ubuntu has two menu entries for the help on each app to report things.
  * Report an error (apport)
 *  Translate the application

The error report is what you describe, but I think it's a bit better
than you said.
Apport[1] is a system which is able to send a very complete crash log
to a bug tracker system (not necessary the Ubuntu's one). This is
working with the one from Ubuntu, but also Fedora and OpenSuse. Can be
used agoinst email based interface and more.
It does generate very complete reports and send them as a
Multipart/MIME so the server side can receive each log as a different
attachment, which is very clear.
It's made in python and is easy to add hooks[2] for applications to
attach more logs or info to the report.

And the tool is translated into several languages:
http://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/apport/+pots/apport

Anyways, this is very focused in crash or issues report.

The other option takes you to the Ubuntu translation page for that
application. But I guess it's just good for the Ubuntu translators,
because it's not very easy for normal (non-English speaker) user to
find how to fill a translation bug.
We could redirect the user to a translation bug for the product of the
application in our Bugzilla. Something like:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/simple-bug-guide.cgi?sbg_type=l10nproduct=l10napplication=hamster-appletcomp=Spanish
[es]

If I'm launching it from hamster-applet with Spanish locales.

 Perhaps bug-buddy could be configurable to send reports to another place
 instead of only bugzilla.gnome.

I don't know how is now bug-buddy, but I remember that before was a
bit hard for a newbie of non very tech people. Maybe now it's is more
user friendly...

Anyway, this is an interesting thing and wold be nice to have such a feature :-)

Cheers

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport/DeveloperHowTo
-- 
Juanje
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: DVCS

2008-10-28 Thread Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Zeeshan Ali Khattak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi everyone!
  I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
 migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
 request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
 SVN. AFAIK both git and bazaar have very strong supporters in our
 community so the only way I see out of this is:

 1. Get someone (known and trusted) to volunteer to set-up and maintain
 the repository. I think Olav likes bazaar so he would volunteer for
 that?
 2. Assuming that we get volunteers for both the repository types, we
 simply vote amongst the top 50 contributers (i myself most probably
 don't count :))
[...]

Ummm... So, the discussion will be just about bazaar and git? What
happend with Mercurial?
I see the three of them on http://live.gnome.org/DistributedSCM

If there was some earlier discussion about it were you decide to leave
Mercurial out, just tell me, please.

BTW, I think as well (as Claudio say) that should be the current SVN
GNOME users (which fight against the SVN repo everyday) who might
decide.

Cheers

-- 
Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier

Emergya Consultoría / http://www.emergya.es
Avda. de la Innovación, 3 (Edif. Hércules), Mód 12-13
E41020 Sevilla
Tfno: +34 954 51 75 77 Fax: +34 954 51 64 73
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
 A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
 Apache packages configured to run at startup, so it is not just a
 matter of binary size.

 That's exactly the problem.

 As a data point, Fedora's httpd is disabled by default for exactly this
 sort of reason (having it installed doesn't mean we want it running by
 default).

 I doubt our server guys will get overly happy over the idea of
 disabling a typical server daemon just so you can integrate it with
 GNOME. I don't really think I want the server team to hate the GNOME
 team any more.

 Also there seem to be lighter alternatives:
 http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=658773

And what about Cherokee?

http://www.cherokee-project.com

It's small, modular, very light and easy to run as a user in specific
port (to avoid bother system web servers, for example)

http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/bundle_cherokee-worker.html

-- 
Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier

Emergya Consultoría / http://www.emergya.es
Avda. de la Innovación, 3 (Edif. Hércules), Mód 12-13
E41020 Sevilla
Tfno: +34 954 51 75 77 Fax: +34 954 51 64 73
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: GNOME 2.24 Showstopper Review

2008-09-01 Thread Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Og Maciel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Sebastian Pölsterl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In my opinion an additional blocker is that hamster applet requires
 Python 2.5 [1]. It might be just a change in configure.ac if they don't
 make use of any Python 2.5 specific features.
 Last time I checked, it did. :/

 Care to share the details in the bug report? As much as I'd want to
 fix it, I don't (and won't in the foreseeable future) have access to
 any pre-2.5 machine.

Toms fix it just a moment ago. There where a couple of Python 2.5
specific features, once they where changed it was just matter of
change the python version on the configure.ac.
So this bugs is not blocking any more :-)

-- 
Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier

Emergya Consultoría / http://www.emergya.es
Avda. de la Innovación, 3 (Edif. Hércules), Mód 12-13
E41020 Sevilla
Tfno: +34 954 51 75 77 Fax: +34 954 51 64 73
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list