Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?
Hey, 2009/4/24 Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org: Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 10:50 -0500, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? Didn't see a lot of replies, but I think it makes sense. Any other opinion? +1 --lucasr ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 10:50 -0500, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? Didn't see a lot of replies, but I think it makes sense. Any other opinion? I'm fine either way, but I would love to know ASAP so I can decide how to spend the rest of my weekend. Is there an official decision yet? Thanks, Sandy ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 10:50 -0500, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? Didn't see a lot of replies, but I think it makes sense. Any other opinion? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?
Evolution isn't yet ready to do anything. I heard there are similar modules. Settling with jhbuild w/git, and the entire clone, pro'lly gonna eat lot of time. If its possible, I second this. -Srini. On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:50 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote: With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Srinivasa Ragavan sraga...@novell.com wrote: Evolution isn't yet ready to do anything. I heard there are similar modules. Settling with jhbuild w/git, and the entire clone, pro'lly gonna eat lot of time. If its possible, I second this. -Srini. On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:50 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote: With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? Can we selectively roll back JHBuild modules that are failing because of broken Git repositories to point at SVN? Seems nicer than breaking jhbuild build? Any individual modules having problems could use a git-mirror (i havent downed the server, yet...) and then use git-format-patch and git-am to migrate when the module is fixed. Alternatively we could try and get SVN access turned back on for broken modules if fixing the problems is going to take any unreasonable length of time. John ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com wrote: With the outstanding git migration problems (and the resulting inability to jhbuild) perhaps we should postpone 2.27.1 by one week? Do we have a list of modules that still have trouble after the git migration ? ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Move back 2.27.1 one week?
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 15:20 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen: Do we have a list of modules that still have trouble after the git migration ? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-infrastructure/2009-April/msg00165.html krh gnomemm and seahorse are in place now krh but additionally there was a problem with beagle andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
